Username or Email Address
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up

    VWVortex


    Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
    Results 36 to 43 of 43

    Thread: Real world gas mileage. 2.0 vs 1.8t?

    1. Senior Member FlashRedGLS1.8T's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 17th, 2001
      Location
      Ohio
      Posts
      20,802
      06-16-2005 10:18 AM #36
      I get 28-29mpg in mixed driving.
      If I do a lot of highway it will go up to about 33-34mpg.

    2. Member
      Join Date
      Mar 1st, 2004
      Posts
      999
      Vehicles
      2003 GTI 1.8T 5MT
      06-17-2005 12:35 PM #37
      I'm in a similiar boat. We're driving a '95 GL (auto) at the moment but i'm looking to step up to a MkIV Jetta GLS with a 5-speed. I thought my options were the 2.0L or TDI as fuel consumption is an issue for me - I want to better my fuel economy (currently getting ~400city/~650 highway) and reduce fuel costs. I figured the 1.8t or VR6 would be a sure fire way to increase my fuel consumption so they never made the list... especially with the 1.8t requiring premium (~$1/L these days). It's not the end of the world, but it does increase the cost of ownership. One of my mechanics also warned me about repair costs on the 1.8t should anything go wrong. So far, i've had absolutely no engine trouble with the 2.0L in my '95 and it's got 230000km's on it. He drove a TDI for a years and his wife is still driving a 2.0L.

      That said, i'm pleased to see that the numbers for the 1.8t are respectable and very close to the 2.0L when driven with a lighter foot.

      Personally, i've never understood why VW produced the 2.0L with such low output. Many competitors are able to produce 2.0L and 1.8L I4 engines with the same efficiency but 140hp or better. Odd...

      So, i'm taking another look at the 1.8t. Maybe I can make it work. The TDI (chiped) as gotten my attention lately tho...


    3. 06-17-2005 12:47 PM #38
      I have a Jetta 1.8t and if I drive it hard I can practically watch the gas gauge drop but if I'm doing all highway I've gotten 38 mpg a couple times.

      As far as mixed driving, if I'm careful not to puch it like i tend to do i can average 28-32.

      I'm guessing you could probably get slightly higher results with a 2.0 but if you like to drive go with the 1.8t ...you won't regret it


    4. 06-17-2005 02:59 PM #39
      Quote, originally posted by rsfnatik »

      Personally, i've never understood why VW produced the 2.0L with such low output. Many competitors are able to produce 2.0L and 1.8L I4 engines with the same efficiency but 140hp or better. Odd...

      on paper... until you go head to head with a stock 132hp civic and you realize, somehow, the 2.slow will pull on the civic.


    5. Member
      Join Date
      Dec 4th, 2001
      Posts
      2,845
      Vehicles
      88 BMW M3/2001 BMW 325/ 2003 BMW 330
      07-25-2005 06:50 PM #40
      Our 1.8t get 20 miles per gallon on light driving.

    6. 07-25-2005 09:11 PM #41
      Seriously, if you can afford to buy a new car, you should be able to afford gas. Diesel scream conservatism.

    7. 07-25-2005 09:14 PM #42
      17 mpg on a good day with my sc'd 2.0 ....oh well I don't care about gas mileage or performance anyway
      Brandon A.
      BAAK2BASICS TUNING LLC
      FACESPACE US CLICK HERE

    8. Member Phrost's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 8th, 2004
      Location
      Green Bay, WI
      Posts
      5,067
      Vehicles
      '11 Audi S4
      07-25-2005 09:22 PM #43
      I drive a 5speed 2.0... About 75% city and 25% highway. I don't drive nice, and I floor it a lot I get a little over 400 miles every tank, which puts me at an average of a little over 30mpg. The only mods I have are full exhaust, cai, and lots of maintenance

    Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •