VWVortex


+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 32 of 32

Thread: GT28rs - Dyno Results

  1. 07-25-2005 03:54 AM #1
    I completed my GT28rs turbo upgrade and after a week of tuning and swapping up to 55lb injectors on dyno day I got the following results:

    Mods include:

    gt28rs turbo and all the fittings
    BMC intake
    VR6 maf housing
    3" custom exhaust
    3" downpipe
    55lb injectors
    front mount intercooler
    4 bar fuel pressure regulator
    forge diverter valve
    revo big turbo software
    ... and more

    Pretty happy with the following results at approx 20 psi

    Note - the 440 injectors had the car running dangerously lean and I couldnt break 284 whp with them.


  2. Senior Member bluebora20v's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 14th, 2001
    Location
    Bay
    Posts
    31,459
    Vehicles
    2000/VW/MK4 Jetta
    07-25-2005 03:59 AM #2
    nice. breaking 300 whp is sweet

  3. Administrator BHB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 26th, 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    28,733
    Vehicles
    '11 Grand Cherokee
    07-25-2005 03:59 AM #3
    yeah no joke
    Current: 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee 5.7 Hemi 4x4, 2013 BMW 650GS Sertao, BMW 1150RT
    Gone: 2010 Audi S4; 2008 GTI; 2007 Audi A6; 2004 Audi allroad 2.7T; 2001 Audi A6 2.7T; 1999.5 Mk4 Jetta VR6; 1991 Jeep Cherokee 4.0 4x4

  4. 07-25-2005 05:43 AM #4
    now lemme see your car man!

  5. 07-25-2005 06:02 AM #5
    lol... the car is still somewhat of a sleeper. My intention was to make it fast first, then make it look sweet.

    It's only got 1 weeks worth of tuning done so I am hoping to see even better numbers over the next few months.

    350whp would be nice, but probably unrealistic... but ya never know!

    PS - Should give PG Performance a big hand for working their assess off getting this together and Shawn at Kinetic Motorsports for tuning this thing so well in a short time.


    Modified by kevin11 at 3:06 AM 7-25-2005


    Modified by kevin11 at 3:08 AM 7-25-2005


  6. 07-25-2005 07:22 AM #6
    remind me what your car looks like again?

  7. Senior Member CapeGLS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2nd, 2002
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    34,761
    Vehicles
    01 Golf GLS 1.8T, 02 Jetta WGN 2.0, 11 JSW 2.5SE (Wifes)
    07-25-2005 07:50 AM #7
    Not bad.... I am taking it you have the .86 trim!
    Can't wait to get mine on the rollers (but gotta work out all of the kinks)
    Chamber: My Wheels Rub on the Inside|Forgeline Wheels|WRDusa.com|
    FlickR

  8. 07-25-2005 08:20 AM #8
    Nice numbers, although I'm a little confused as to where it's all coming from. Maybe I'm showing my ignorance here, but if you have REVO stage 2 on a K03s and you're pushing 20psi, you don't get anywhere near that horsepower. I know its a bigger turbo and whatnot, but do the injectors and such give you that much extra hp at a similar level of boost?

  9. Member GTI_2.0T's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 14th, 2001
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    5,667
    Vehicles
    2008 GTI, 1977 Trans Am
    07-25-2005 08:26 AM #9
    Quote, originally posted by EPWolfy18T »
    I know its a bigger turbo and whatnot, but do the injectors and such give you that much extra hp at a similar level of boost?


    The same boost pressure does equal the same amount of air flow with a larger turbo. A GT28rs can move a much, much larger volume of air at a given pressure than a K03. The larger injectors are needed to provide enough fuel to match this larger volume.

    Jason DubR • Now 2.0T / 400 • Then 1.8T / 2.0
    ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

  10. 07-25-2005 08:40 AM #10
    first off there is no way you need that much injector unless the software is plain terrible.

    second whats with the killer lag? do you have a huge exhaust leak?


  11. 07-25-2005 09:27 AM #11
    Quote, originally posted by tim18t@teambagtag »
    first off there is no way you need that much injector unless the software is plain terrible.

    second whats with the killer lag? do you have a huge exhaust leak?

    seriously, 55# injectors and a 4bar is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much fuel.

  12. Banned V84LNCH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 29th, 2003
    Posts
    4,521
    07-25-2005 09:31 AM #12
    i don't think this is laggy at all. 175whp at 4500rpm. thats not to bad. i didn't catch the ar side, but assuming it's an .86 ar.

    i'm with tim though, 440's will get you there and way mor with a 28rs. your tune must be way off to run bigger injectors.


  13. 07-25-2005 09:38 AM #13
    i see 250 at 4500 so granted i have a smaller turbo but the spool shouldnt be that far off on his set up

  14. Banned V84LNCH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 29th, 2003
    Posts
    4,521
    07-25-2005 09:44 AM #14
    you're also not running the same crap sw he is. and your sw can make the best of 380's.

  15. Member VDUBRACER187's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 16th, 2004
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    11,111
    Vehicles
    11' WRX
    07-25-2005 09:57 AM #15
    nice #'s... you just need better software so the power is there through most of the rpm range

  16. 07-25-2005 02:53 PM #16
    Quote, originally posted by tim18t@teambagtag »
    first off there is no way you need that much injector unless the software is plain terrible.

    second whats with the killer lag? do you have a huge exhaust leak?

    I know the injector size is huge - maybe its the software. The car did near 20 pulls during the week when it was being dyno tuned, and couldnt get the lean spots out by tuning alone. The A/F looks nice now.

    The lag isnt that bad at all - it could improve a little, but I think its reasonable for this turbo.


  17. 07-25-2005 10:28 PM #17
    Quote, originally posted by JettaGL_1.8T »
    The same boost pressure does equal the same amount of air flow with a larger turbo. A GT28rs can move a much, much larger volume of air at a given pressure than a K03. The larger injectors are needed to provide enough fuel to match this larger volume.

    Ah, everything makes a lot more sense now - I wasn't thinking this morning before work.


  18. 07-25-2005 10:29 PM #18
    niceee

  19. 07-25-2005 11:02 PM #19
    no LSD or clutch??!?

  20. 07-25-2005 11:16 PM #20
    nice numbaz

  21. 07-25-2005 11:33 PM #21
    nice job... im with the guys about the software bein off you shouldnt need injectors that big but awsome job

  22. 07-26-2005 02:24 AM #22
    Stage 4 clutch - 12lb flywheel - no lsd

  23. Member Vwagen18t's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 13th, 2004
    Location
    Van down by the river
    Posts
    1,424
    Vehicles
    GTI, GLI, Touareg, Passat
    07-26-2005 02:33 AM #23
    cool

    i think once you get the fueling and tuning ironed out you can squeek out atleast another 10-15hp

    Volkswagen........

  24. 07-26-2005 03:05 AM #24
    Sweet

  25. 07-26-2005 03:12 AM #25
    now lemme see your car man!

    Here's a 2 month old picture - it now has a 2" drop and a front mount intercooler. Like I said, its pretty much a sleeper.


  26. 07-26-2005 03:25 AM #26
    oops... was answering a question thats already been answered for me...


    Modified by kevin11 at 12:35 AM 7-26-2005

  27. 07-26-2005 03:44 AM #27
    what kinda FMI do you have???

  28. 07-26-2005 04:03 AM #28

  29. Banned mtiede's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 23rd, 2005
    Posts
    836
    07-26-2005 04:03 AM #29




    That is soooo sweet. Good work!


  30. Banned mtiede's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 23rd, 2005
    Posts
    836
    07-26-2005 04:05 AM #30
    what kind of gas mileage are you gettin?

  31. 07-26-2005 04:10 AM #31
    Quote, originally posted by mtiede »
    what kind of gas mileage are you gettin?

    I'm really not sure about the gas mileage yet - I havent calculated it out. Plus, I am driving the car alot harder than normal to expose any weak spots since the turbo upgrade.

    After spending approx. $15k on mods in the last few months, my fuel economy is the least of my worries...


  32. Banned mtiede's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 23rd, 2005
    Posts
    836
    07-26-2005 04:13 AM #32
    Quote, originally posted by kevin11 »

    I'm really not sure about the gas mileage yet - I havent calculated it out. Plus, I am driving the car alot harder than normal to expose any weak spots since the turbo upgrade.

    After spending approx. $15k on mods in the last few months, my fuel economy is the least of my worries...


    Yeah I was just curious because I wanted to know how much of a difference the gas mileage is on a stock 1.8t vs. a big turbo 1.8t. That question has always burned in my head for comparison reasons.

    Did you post this in the 1.8t forum? I am sure that there are some more people that can lend their insight to anything.


    Modified by mtiede at 1:15 AM 7-26-2005


+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts