VWVortex


+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 105 of 448

Thread: DIY: COMPLETE, very detailed airbox/intake modification write-up.

  1. 10-12-2006 04:15 PM #71
    damn, car is clean, and quick , and heres a couple for ya
    PAGE 3 OWNED

  2. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 14th, 2005
    Location
    NJ ALL DAY.
    Posts
    2,734
    10-12-2006 04:15 PM #72
    Quote, originally posted by yo vanilla »
    the problem with CAI's is that if you have 10 different ones, 8 are junk, 1 gives a mild gain and the last one gives you a real, significant power increase. the problem is that there is alot more cheap, innefective parts on the market than there are quality ones. they are not overrated; the bad parts have alot more exposure than the good ones.

    p.s. i've got a turn2, the good one. makes real, actual, measurable power

    I hear Turn 2's are awesome and all, but in the end, a CAI is a CAI is a CAI. How can one put out different power than another? All CAIs for this car go down to where the canister sits with a filter at the end of it. See what I'm saying?

    I responded to your other post at the bottom of page 2 by the way.


  3. Member yo vanilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 12th, 2004
    Location
    Appleton, WI
    Posts
    7,535
    Vehicles
    07 Subaru WRX
    10-13-2006 10:55 AM #73
    Quote, originally posted by Breezy. »

    I hear Turn 2's are awesome and all, but in the end, a CAI is a CAI is a CAI. How can one put out different power than another? All CAIs for this car go down to where the canister sits with a filter at the end of it. See what I'm saying?

    I responded to your other post at the bottom of page 2 by the way.

    the difference is in the filter quality and the surface area. for an example, i remember a couple years ago a magazine did a dyno test of like 8 different cai's for the rsx-s. the best WHP number was 18 from aem, the second best was injen at like 12, and the rest were all around 6whp. same car, same dyno, same day.

    now the rsx is different from our cars in that the intake makes some crazy bends to work its way form the filter to the TB, so pipe comes more into play than on our cars where it is basically straight. besides that, its just like any other part, springs, chips, etc. some are designed better than others. but there always seems to be more of the cheap stuff than the good stuff.

    p.s. nice times

    No more Shake N Bake. From now on, it's El Diablo and The Magic Man

  4. Member austinweisVR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 20th, 2006
    Location
    717 PA
    Posts
    2,002
    Vehicles
    91 jetta
    10-13-2006 11:14 AM #74
    Quote, originally posted by SouthFl VW »
    Just did it 5 min ago....hands down alot more noticeable performance than any cone filter....and the sound is incredible...it makes your vr6 sound like a small block v8.


    Modified by SouthFl VW at 6:43 PM 9-25-2006

    then you havent heard a small block v8. cause they sound nothing alike. if my vr sounded like a small block id be worried about the timing.

    it does make it sound a hole lot better. and its much better than the cold air that i had on.
    my dad thinks it sounds like a vacum cleaner when he drives it, he does think its better than the cold air. noise is supposed to come from the back of the car not the front, so thats what it does better then the CAI.


  5. 10-13-2006 07:13 PM #75
    any gains on a 2.0? anybody actually know that it bumps up performance, or does everybody just "feel" it.

    also for the guy getting a weird idle, try to disconnect your battery, so to reset the ecu.


  6. Member piran21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 28th, 2004
    Location
    GTA
    Posts
    1,436
    Vehicles
    BRM, LS1
    10-14-2006 06:16 AM #76
    This made a noticeable difference for me. I have a VR6 and switched from a P-flo type intake back to a modified box w/Fram paper filter and none of the ducting these guys have done. The intake noise is reduced but still there. Throttle response is better and highway acceleration seems a lot better, but I'm not sure. Most likely getting it dynoed tomorrow.
    P

    GTADeal.ca
    your one stop for group deals of the day

  7. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 14th, 2005
    Location
    NJ ALL DAY.
    Posts
    2,734
    10-14-2006 10:53 AM #77
    Quote, originally posted by piran21 »
    This made a noticeable difference for me. I have a VR6 and switched from a P-flo type intake back to a modified box w/Fram paper filter and none of the ducting these guys have done. The intake noise is reduced but still there. Throttle response is better and highway acceleration seems a lot better, but I'm not sure. Most likely getting it dynoed tomorrow.

    If you can find a K&N to borrow for this dyno, that would be appreciated so we can see an even more realistic dyno difference over the p-flow. was your p-flo with a heatshield or no? if not, i don't have a question who's dyno'inig more, but even it were, i'm still confident.


  8. Member piran21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 28th, 2004
    Location
    GTA
    Posts
    1,436
    Vehicles
    BRM, LS1
    10-14-2006 11:20 AM #78
    No heatsheild. I had PCV tubing just bringing the filter to the fender as far away as possible from the motor. I think the air box will be better.
    P

    GTADeal.ca
    your one stop for group deals of the day

  9. Member yo vanilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 12th, 2004
    Location
    Appleton, WI
    Posts
    7,535
    Vehicles
    07 Subaru WRX
    10-14-2006 11:27 AM #79
    the air box is definitely better than an open element (inside the engine bay, especially with no shield).

    and of course i'm sure most people know this, but a short ram is different than an actual cold air intake.

    No more Shake N Bake. From now on, it's El Diablo and The Magic Man

  10. Member oempls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 8th, 2004
    Location
    Chula Vista, CA
    Posts
    16,448
    Vehicles
    CW MK6 GTI
    10-31-2006 07:19 PM #80
    definitely gonna have to do this!

  11. 11-04-2006 02:52 PM #81
    the air box is different on the vr than the 2l right? may someone post a pic of this "mod" done to the 2l airbox?
    __.__.__.__.__.__.__.

    .:R32 - sponsored by mommy.

  12. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 7th, 2004
    Location
    findlay, ohio
    Posts
    9,049
    Vehicles
    97 Ram 1500, 95 Jetta VR6
    11-04-2006 02:56 PM #82
    the airbox may be different, but its the same idea. improvise
    Keep Calm & Chive On

    FKA gti_r_done

  13. Member Fjr17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 29th, 2005
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    203
    Vehicles
    WRX
    12-23-2006 11:57 PM #83
    I have a question... What if instead of using a panel filter, I use a cone filter?... Does it even fit inside the airbox, and is the cone filter even better than the panel?

  14. Member azn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 20th, 2006
    Location
    East and West
    Posts
    6,500
    Vehicles
    08 NS Capital, 04+ Bianchi Pista, 06 Transition Dirtbag
    12-24-2006 12:18 AM #84
    Quote, originally posted by gti_r_done »
    the airbox may be different, but its the same idea. improvise

    how different? would someone who's had no experience (me) be able to figure it out using the DIY on pg 1?

    thanks

    Cupcake - Team My Little Pony

  15. Member UberDub15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 13th, 2006
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    2,487
    Vehicles
    98 Jetta VR6
    12-24-2006 12:20 AM #85
    nice

  16. Member Fjr17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 29th, 2005
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    203
    Vehicles
    WRX
    12-24-2006 02:28 PM #86
    Quote, originally posted by Fjr17 »
    I have a question... What if instead of using a panel filter, I use a cone filter?... Does it even fit inside the airbox, and is the cone filter even better than the panel?

    Anyone??

  17. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 14th, 2005
    Location
    NJ ALL DAY.
    Posts
    2,734
    12-24-2006 03:30 PM #87
    Quote, originally posted by Fjr17 »
    I have a question... What if instead of using a panel filter, I use a cone filter?... Does it even fit inside the airbox, and is the cone filter even better than the panel?

    i had already thought of this idea in the past just out of curiosity as well. it does not fit and even if it did, i'm sure the panel filter will provide better overall performance anyway. there is more surface area with a panel filter.


  18. Member Fjr17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 29th, 2005
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    203
    Vehicles
    WRX
    12-25-2006 01:27 AM #88
    Quote, originally posted by Breezy. »

    i had already thought of this idea in the past just out of curiosity as well. it does not fit and even if it did, i'm sure the panel filter will provide better overall performance anyway. there is more surface area with a panel filter.


    Thanks..It looks like I'll just be buying a panel filter and doing this mod..

  19. 12-29-2006 05:31 PM #89
    This is what I did with my air box.
    aluminum air box with round filter inside
    and 3" aluminum flex tube running from the air duct in the front bumper. before this setup, I had the snorkel on the stock box turned around with a tube connecting it with the bumper ducts.



  20. Senior Member Dan J Reed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 26th, 2004
    Location
    NJ - AKA - Earth's armpit.
    Posts
    26,502
    Vehicles
    Too many
    12-29-2006 05:33 PM #90
    Daym, is that a FLOMASTER?!


  21. 12-29-2006 05:40 PM #91
    Very inventive. I like.

  22. Member azn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 20th, 2006
    Location
    East and West
    Posts
    6,500
    Vehicles
    08 NS Capital, 04+ Bianchi Pista, 06 Transition Dirtbag
    12-29-2006 05:43 PM #92
    damn awesome!
    Cupcake - Team My Little Pony

  23. Member botkiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 19th, 2007
    Location
    albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    310
    Vehicles
    Yin: 97 Jetta gt 2.0: Yang: 1998 Golf VR6
    02-08-2007 11:58 PM #93
    what about doing this mod to a 97 jetta trek 2.0 ? seems like the airboxes are the same - and I wanna do some mods for sure.

  24. Member $cash only$'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 22nd, 2007
    Location
    longmont, CO
    Posts
    395
    Vehicles
    95 Jetta, 97 Jetta vr6
    02-09-2007 03:56 AM #94
    I just did this recently and can def feel a difference because before the air was just trying to squeeze through that small ass tube that was only like 1-2inches if that. With this mod now it gets whatever it can grab. As for sound at WOT i've made heads turn left and right and them honda guys would ask what kind of exhaust i have
    If it's got TiTs or Tires...its trouble!!!!

  25. Member LP_sk8er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 12th, 2005
    Location
    Rowland Heights, CA
    Posts
    1,908
    Vehicles
    98 GLX , 08 GTI
    02-10-2007 04:56 PM #95
    I just did the mod today exactly as in the pictures except I left the honeycomb in place. I went from a short ram intake with no heat shield to this and I love it. The sound is pretty much the same but the throttle response on the lower rpm's is much much better IMO. I am still using the stock paper filter cuz my K&N is being shipped, I hope it makes even a little more response with the K&N

    Thanks for the great post Breezy!


  26. Member VR6W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 4th, 2006
    Location
    NNJ
    Posts
    341
    Vehicles
    97 gti DE VR6(sold), now 02 1.8T GTI
    02-10-2007 05:05 PM #96
    kool

  27. Member Turbostuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 18th, 2006
    Location
    DallASS, TexASS
    Posts
    2,304
    Vehicles
    2003 Wolfsburg
    02-10-2007 05:20 PM #97
    Quote, originally posted by VR6W »
    kool

    Quote Originally Posted by DiverDan182 View Post
    How do you like your eggs in the morning? Scrambled or fertilized

  28. 02-10-2007 05:42 PM #98
    it's just an airbox hahaha.

  29. 02-10-2007 05:50 PM #99
    I switched from P_flo back to this and like it a lot better.. faster throttle response and acceleration IMO (butt dyno of course)

  30. Member oempls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 8th, 2004
    Location
    Chula Vista, CA
    Posts
    16,448
    Vehicles
    CW MK6 GTI
    02-10-2007 11:58 PM #100
    Quote, originally posted by botkiller »
    what about doing this mod to a 97 jetta trek 2.0 ? seems like the airboxes are the same - and I wanna do some mods for sure.

    The 2.0 and vr6 filter are the same so im guessing the boxes are relatively the same.


  31. 02-11-2007 04:54 AM #101
    will i notice a sound/performance difference without removing the middle muffler?

  32. 02-11-2007 12:15 PM #102
    you will def feel a difference

    the sound it produces is truely one of a kind

    my next mod is the suitcase delete. well see how that sucker will sound then


  33. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 14th, 2005
    Location
    NJ ALL DAY.
    Posts
    2,734
    02-11-2007 05:10 PM #103
    Quote, originally posted by d3v5o »
    will i notice a sound/performance difference without removing the middle muffler?

    without a doubt. that deep sound you are hearing in the videos is all motor (airbox/intake).

    Quote, originally posted by just-a-ginster »
    you will def feel a difference

    the sound it produces is truely one of a kind

    my next mod is the suitcase delete. well see how that sucker will sound then

    it will sound exactly the way my car does in those videos i posted on the original post.


  34. 02-11-2007 06:45 PM #104
    i just need to drop in a k&n

  35. 02-19-2007 04:19 AM #105
    Will this work with the stock, paper air filter? Does it make the nice sound without a k&n?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts