great thread i'll be making my own here soon
#71
Check out this thread for it.... http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=4330238
#73
Bump for some great custom fab work!
#74
I've only skimmed the posts in this thread, so please excuse any redundancy here.I'm thinking that in a hard corner, the inside rear wheel is airborn, and need not apply.
Focusing on the outside rear wheel, you'd have forces trying to bend the trailing arm inwards
(toe out), and forces trying to tip the top of the wheel outwards. (positive camber)
Toe out, would kinda be like four wheel steering, helping the car to make the corner. In my book, (and i'm thinking autocrossing, and road courses, NOT Rallye) this would be a good thing.
I suspect that the second case, twisting the trailing arm so the wheel gains positive camber, is the lesser of the two. Based solely on the moment arm (trying to sound smart here) of the first case being longer than the second case, and, in the first case, you're bending a T section (in MKI) where the arm meets the lateral beam which would be significantly easier than twisting a tube the diameter and wall thickness of the trailing arm.
Regardless, even if you gain positive camber on the outside rear wheel, perhaps lifting some of the inner tread patch off the pavement, would this not also serve to help the rear end around come around and to some degree eliminate the natural understeering tendancy?Thoughts?
Great thread, BTW
Modified by Rabbit6 at 9:41 PM 3-1-2010
3 speeds are better than no speeds. I LOVE 010 AUTO TRANSMISSIONS!!
If you need ANYTHING from China, let me know. I'm not talking about door handles. I'm talking containers of anything made there. I can cut out all the middlemen.
#75
no thoughts for you!
3 speeds are better than no speeds. I LOVE 010 AUTO TRANSMISSIONS!!
If you need ANYTHING from China, let me know. I'm not talking about door handles. I'm talking containers of anything made there. I can cut out all the middlemen.
#79
Keep us updated.....I was interested in doing this a while back and never got around to it....
#80
it is a shame looking at all of these that everyone is missing a very simple concept when trying to reproduce this...
and this was orignially a Bill Scott Racing piece used in the early 80's in SCCA... i simply changed the design to work with a later trailing arm where the beam was no longer located at the pivot.
#81
#83
#89
Well I got them on
But It hits the gas tankThinking about making new towers that are 2 inches taller.
How low are your cars? I'm not against raising it more if I have to
12.2@116mph-293whp305wtq 22psi stock aba-AC-DD My Jetta
Current Want list-sunroof delete,paint
Fifteen52 - Urotuning
#90
You should have put the rose joints in centre of beam in double shear.
But, other than that, looks good, apart from tank issue
Brian,