I had two f/1.8 and now I have a f/1.4, I enjoy it much too, faster quieter focusing and colors pop more, but the nifty fifty still is the most bang for the buck Canon lens !
Quote, originally posted by CapeGLS »
Nice shots, but you need to clean your camera/lense. You have dust showing up!
I wasn't sure if it was dust or the table
Quote, originally posted by aglio »
best photo related $100 i ever spent
oh completely! I've never had so much fun or such great results with $100 with any of my other gear. a close second is my multi-coated polarizer, like $110, but it only gets used once in a blue moon.
Quote, originally posted by JettaDude101 » ^^ is it just me or the first pic looks wayyy over saturated?
rest of them look awesome though.
if you're talking about my shot....it's not oversaturated...that's just his neons! the flash hitting him also brings out the color...
I'm not a huge fan of the focal length on an APS-C camera myself.. but the lens is good none-the-less..
with the 1.4x TC.. f/1.8
So what's the general thought? Is the 1.4 worth the money over the 1.8? Is it worth the price difference?
I ask because the 50mm is going to be my next lens. I absolutely love the pictures these lenses produce.
honestly the 1.4 is worth the money if u have it and are ready to blow it...
if not i have the 1.8 and LOVE IT.... altho even i say the focal lenth falls short untill about f2.2
these are all shot with the f1.8 on a canon xti...
Modified by 1cleangti at 1:08 AM 12-29-2007
I like my 50mm. I'm honestly tempted to pick up an 85mm prime to add to my bag as well - pretty much solely for portrait use. This was just screwing around with the 50, but I kind of like the shot anyway.
If crazy paid the bills.. I'd be freaking rich.
Quote, originally posted by Agtronic »
I would love to play my strat through that amp!
haha its a sweet little stack... fender's clean channels are a little bright tho, the distortion is nice, tho not to much crunch its great for classic rock dirty sounds like zeppelin and skynard and such..