VWVortex


+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 71 to 105 of 197

Thread: RS4 Fuel return valve

  1. Banner Advertiser JC@DouglasVW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 24th, 2009
    Location
    Summit, NJ
    Posts
    6,570
    Vehicles
    Billet 72'd 07 GTI, Billet 6265'd 08 R32, 2010 GMC Sierra
    03-29-2010 01:22 PM #71
    What is the current best price for the RS4 valve? If i can get a few people together i can do $74 plus shipping...not sure how that comes in the market though.
    Douglas VW
    Distributors for FFE Racing, GoAPR, CTSturbo, Integrated Engineering and HPA
    Innovative Motorsports + UM

  2. Member CoNGLoMeRaTeGTi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 4th, 2007
    Location
    11713
    Posts
    3,026
    Vehicles
    B & H series swapped Hondas, 383 swapped Chevys, EJ20 swapped Subies, a few STIs, an audi, a few VWs
    03-29-2010 01:57 PM #72
    I got mine for 100 shipped

    I knew I houldve let you get it for me through your Audi connect.

    Unfortunately, I was in a rush.

    I'm going to PM you for some other parts.

    .doTuning
    John@doTuning.com
    Quote Originally Posted by mrbikle View Post
    Stages are ****ing dumb. Just state turbo size and built or not

  3. Member LEWXCORE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 6th, 2007
    Location
    Miami/Ft.Laud
    Posts
    2,165
    Vehicles
    2011 golf TDI, 1991 e30 (m50 swap)
    03-29-2010 05:30 PM #73
    Quote, originally posted by staulkor »
    genuinevwaudiparts.com has the valve for $70.20 + shipping.

    it would be in the market somewhere between genuinevwaudiparts and worldimpex.


  4. Junior Member bokiNY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 26th, 2008
    Location
    Serbia/Bronx, NY
    Posts
    98
    Vehicles
    09 GLI APR K04
    03-29-2010 06:26 PM #74
    So the TSI cars don't need one? If so, great news! More money for other mods...

  5. Junior Member bokiNY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 26th, 2008
    Location
    Serbia/Bronx, NY
    Posts
    98
    Vehicles
    09 GLI APR K04
    03-29-2010 06:31 PM #75
    Thanks CoNGLo, I did find it on ecs site and worldimpex but I was more interested in Staulkor's post where he was able to get it for $70 from genuinevwaudiparts.com - I couldn't find it there. Anyways, if TSI cars don't need one, great, I'll stop looking!

  6. Member staulkor's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 21st, 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    1,245
    Vehicles
    2007 Fahrenheit GTI #776
    03-30-2010 02:36 AM #76
    Just go to genuinevwaudiparts.com, right in the middle on the left "Search by Part Number or Keyword". Paste in "079130757" and select Audi and search. It is right there, lol.

  7. Junior Member bokiNY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 26th, 2008
    Location
    Serbia/Bronx, NY
    Posts
    98
    Vehicles
    09 GLI APR K04
    03-30-2010 11:41 AM #77
    Thanks


    Modified by bokiNY at 11:44 AM 3-30-2010

  8. 03-31-2010 06:53 PM #78
    When you did remove the manifold, did you replace your injectors gasket kit as well?

  9. Member 2pt0tee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 28th, 2008
    Location
    somewhere in the trees
    Posts
    1,112
    Vehicles
    JATO powered gokart
    04-01-2010 03:35 AM #79
    Quote, originally posted by blackcruiser »
    When you did remove the manifold, did you replace your injectors gasket kit as well?

    In Rich's case... short answer no, long answer yes... LOL


    Modified by 2pt0tee at 3:37 AM 4-1-2010


  10. Member
    Join Date
    May 1st, 2009
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    194
    Vehicles
    06 BMP GTI
    04-01-2010 04:34 AM #80
    So I take it that there is no way of installing this without removing the manifold?

    I cringe at the thought of removing it again.


  11. 04-01-2010 04:57 AM #81
    Can easily be done without removing manifold but you will have to bend fuel rail slightly and undo clips holding it in place, just be carefull not to break anything and a second pair of hands will definetly help. I paid no more than £35-£40 pounds for the RS4 Valve from TPS volkswagen.

  12. 04-01-2010 07:40 PM #82
    have you installed rs4 valve in your car yet?

  13. 04-05-2010 01:34 PM #83
    Quote, originally posted by ilie.vw.tech »
    have you installed rs4 valve in your car yet?

    Who are you asking? I think conglomerate has been running the valve for a while now. I just installed mine over the weekend.

    For those interested, i honestly don't see how you could replace this valve either correctly or easily without removing the whole intake manifold assembly. It's a lot of work to r&r that manifold so believe me i would've loved to have found a way to swap the valve out without going through all that trouble. I just don't see a way; at least not without some special slim profile wrench or some other special tool which i don't own.

    I was a little disappointed to see how much buildup had re-accumulated on my valves since the last cleaning i gave them but i attribute that mostly to the fact that my driving has changed almost to 100% city stop & go driving now with usually not enough time for the engine to get up to temp during my daily commute. I might post some pics later if anyone's interested.

    As far as results...my 'before' logs show that my software is requesting 129.99 bar rail pressure but never meeting that, only getting as close as 127 in most cases and as high as 128.02 in one case. I've yet to do a set of 'after' logs because of all the rain so far. I will say the car feels much better now (even my wife noticed it) but that could be because of the valve cleaning more than anything else.


  14. Member CoNGLoMeRaTeGTi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 4th, 2007
    Location
    11713
    Posts
    3,026
    Vehicles
    B & H series swapped Hondas, 383 swapped Chevys, EJ20 swapped Subies, a few STIs, an audi, a few VWs
    04-05-2010 01:47 PM #84
    what he said. ^^^^

    Quote, originally posted by ilie.vw.tech »
    have you installed rs4 valve in your car yet?

    I too will have logs once I get the car running upto my standards.

    .doTuning
    John@doTuning.com
    Quote Originally Posted by mrbikle View Post
    Stages are ****ing dumb. Just state turbo size and built or not

  15. 04-05-2010 01:50 PM #85
    so its a direct fit from the rail no modification need? (from rs4 to gti fsi)

  16. Banner Advertiser chris@revotechnik's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 17th, 2007
    Location
    Summit Point, WV
    Posts
    9,318
    Vehicles
    X,80,X,X,98,00,X,06,12
    04-05-2010 01:54 PM #86
    Quote, originally posted by ndifadvokit »

    For those interested, i honestly don't see how you could replace this valve either correctly or easily without removing the whole intake manifold assembly.

    Remove the line going to the pump

    remove t30 torx holding line to of manifold and one on the bottom right.

    14mm crows foot to remove the line

    17mm crows foot to remove the valve itself.

    Install is reverse of removal

    Can be done in about 10 minutes this way.


  17. 04-05-2010 02:01 PM #87
    Quote, originally posted by ndifadvokit »

    As far as results...my 'before' logs show that my software is requesting 129.99 bar rail pressure but never meeting that, only getting as close as 127 in most cases and as high as 128.02 in one case. I've yet to do a set of 'after' logs because of all the rain so far. I will say the car feels much better now (even my wife noticed it) but that could be because of the valve cleaning more than anything else.

    im assuming your stage 2+...i believe a variance or 1-2 bar is acceptable for ur fuel rail pressure


  18. 04-05-2010 02:19 PM #88
    Quote, originally posted by 08 passat turbo »

    im assuming your stage 2+...i believe a variance or 1-2 bar is acceptable for ur fuel rail pressure

    no, i'm running a k04 with rs4 injectors. A few bars lower could very well still be acceptable. I wasn't having any problems with my car before but i decided to install this valve anyways to see if it would make a difference or not. So far, the car feels a lot better but i'll see what my logs have to say before i draw any conclusions.

    This valve is a direct fit on FSIs with no modifications needed.

    That's good info from Chris. Chris, you could've posted that a few days earlier but better late than never. All i know is it wasn't possible to do the install with any of my standard wrenches. Anyways, no regrets.


  19. Banner Advertiser chris@revotechnik's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 17th, 2007
    Location
    Summit Point, WV
    Posts
    9,318
    Vehicles
    X,80,X,X,98,00,X,06,12
    04-05-2010 02:34 PM #89
    Quote, originally posted by ndifadvokit »


    That's good info from Chris. Chris, you could've posted that a few days earlier but better late than never. All i know is it wasn't possible to do the install with any of my standard wrenches. Anyways, no regrets.

    No problem, I hadn't thought of it before to post it even though I have done them this way.

    No way I can think of to do it with normal wrenches but crows feet you can do it with the manifold on.


  20. 04-05-2010 02:44 PM #90
    so it is a direct fitment? no mods needed.

  21. 04-05-2010 02:55 PM #91
    Quote, originally posted by chris@revotechnik »

    No problem, I hadn't thought of it before to post it even though I have done them this way.

    No way I can think of to do it with normal wrenches but crows feet you can do it with the manifold on.

    Yes you can do it with normal wrenches and without removing the manifold

    Although i must admit i had no idea a "crow's foot" tool ever existed..LOL..


  22. Banner Advertiser chris@revotechnik's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 17th, 2007
    Location
    Summit Point, WV
    Posts
    9,318
    Vehicles
    X,80,X,X,98,00,X,06,12
    04-05-2010 03:14 PM #92
    Quote, originally posted by GolfRS »

    Yes you can do it with normal wrenches and without removing the manifold

    Although i must admit i had no idea a "crow's foot" tool ever existed..LOL..

    Yeah i guess there are ways to get some tools in there. It just see it taking a really really long time only having that short of an area to turn it in. Maybe from the bottom if you get the crankcase line out of the way and have a stubby.


  23. 04-05-2010 04:29 PM #93
    Quote, originally posted by ilie.vw.tech »
    so it is a direct fitment? no mods needed.

    Quote, originally posted by ndifadvokit »
    This valve is a direct fit on FSIs with no modifications needed.

    umm, yep.


  24. 04-05-2010 04:47 PM #94
    thanks

  25. 04-05-2010 07:40 PM #95
    does anybody have a picture of the two valves and compare it to each other

  26. 04-05-2010 07:58 PM #96
    Quote, originally posted by ilie.vw.tech »
    does anybody have a picture of the two valves and compare it to each other

    Nothing to compare.

    They are externally IDENTICAL...


  27. 04-10-2010 01:58 AM #97
    For those who have installed the rs4 valves, have you got a issue with petrol leakage before you retighten them? I had this issue initially and it's a bitch to get a modified wretch to tighten them without removing the manifold. But I guess it's all worth it after I drove it.

  28. Member CoNGLoMeRaTeGTi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 4th, 2007
    Location
    11713
    Posts
    3,026
    Vehicles
    B & H series swapped Hondas, 383 swapped Chevys, EJ20 swapped Subies, a few STIs, an audi, a few VWs
    04-10-2010 10:37 AM #98
    thats why i decided to remove my intake mani.

    .doTuning
    John@doTuning.com
    Quote Originally Posted by mrbikle View Post
    Stages are ****ing dumb. Just state turbo size and built or not

  29. 04-12-2010 02:33 PM #99
    ok, it's been a full week since i've installed the new valve. Here are some before and after logs for those interested. The car feels a lot smoother and there was definitely a noticeable improvement after the install. Rail pressure now easily goes beyond 127. I cleaned the intake valves at the same time so it's possible that that added to the improvement. However, really there wasn't enough buildup in my opinion to make a noticeable difference in performance yet so i largely think the RS4 valve made the biggest difference in this case. The sample rate's not that great w/o turbo mode but i think the difference is still clearly visible.



  30. 04-12-2010 03:58 PM #100
    Well looking at your logs, and also considering you are not using an aftermarket HPFP, i'd have to say there is ZERO difference as far as logs/numbers go.

    I'd say what you are feeling is more of a placebo effect rather than actual gains from the valve...

    Hell...it's cheap though right ?Why not install it anyways...

    Yeah...


  31. Member
    Join Date
    May 1st, 2009
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    194
    Vehicles
    06 BMP GTI
    04-12-2010 04:06 PM #101
    ^ Zero differences in his logs? I'm seeing a 5 bar gain in his fuel pressure, that's pretty substantial IMO

  32. Member LEWXCORE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 6th, 2007
    Location
    Miami/Ft.Laud
    Posts
    2,165
    Vehicles
    2011 golf TDI, 1991 e30 (m50 swap)
    04-12-2010 04:11 PM #102
    Quote, originally posted by GolfRS »
    Well looking at your logs, and also considering you are not using an aftermarket HPFP, i'd have to say there is ZERO difference as far as logs/numbers go.

    I'd say what you are feeling is more of a placebo effect rather than actual gains from the valve...

    Hell...it's cheap though right ?Why not install it anyways...

    Yeah...

    LOL this is awesome logic.. i'm about to order one up too, but i want someone to show me that it's bringing a .5bar gain in low pressure fueling with logs.

    Quote, originally posted by CupraK1 »
    There is also a by-product of fitting the RS4 valve and this is that it alters the pressure in the in-tank low pressure pump. The OEM low pressure fuel pump before the valve was fitted started off at 4.5bar pressure, but gradually dropped to around 3.4bar pressure at higher revs when WOT. After the RS4 valve was fitted the in-tank pressure stabilised at between 4.1-3.9 bar across the entire run whilst WOT. This too could point to where you would get a drop in power around 5krpm as the in-tank low pressure fuel pump drops below 3.5bar around those revs, which is outside normal parameters and MAY cause fuel cuts or the ECU to back off the power.

    I must stress that all this is from readings taken from live logging on my car, but the diagnosis is subjective although compelling in the logic.




  33. 04-12-2010 04:23 PM #103
    Quote, originally posted by GolfRS »
    Well looking at your logs, and also considering you are not using an aftermarket HPFP, i'd have to say there is ZERO difference as far as logs/numbers go.

    I'd say what you are feeling is more of a placebo effect rather than actual gains from the valve...

    Hell...it's cheap though right ?Why not install it anyways...

    Yeah...

    lol. Where are people getting my list of mods from?? I'm running an upgraded HPFP as well as RS4 injectors and a K04. If it's too hard for you to believe the RS4 valve caused any improvement i'm willing to aknowledge the gains could also be from cleaning the valves or possibly from fixing some unknown issue beforehand but i have a lot of logs from beforehand showing no pre-existing issues at all. So i'm going to stick with what i said before that this valve made a noticeable improvement. No placebo effect involved. I call things how they are.


  34. 04-12-2010 04:32 PM #104
    Quote, originally posted by LEWXCORE »

    LOL this is awesome logic.. i'm about to order one up too, but i want someone to show me that it's bringing a .5bar gain in low pressure fueling with logs.

    There was no noteable difference in my low pressure fueling from before installing the valve to after installing it. It never dipped below 4bar.


  35. 04-12-2010 05:27 PM #105
    Quote, originally posted by ndifadvokit »

    lol. Where are people getting my list of mods from?? I'm running an upgraded HPFP as well as RS4 injectors and a K04. If it's too hard for you to believe the RS4 valve caused any improvement i'm willing to aknowledge the gains could also be from cleaning the valves or possibly from fixing some unknown issue beforehand but i have a lot of logs from beforehand showing no pre-existing issues at all. So i'm going to stick with what i said before that this valve made a noticeable improvement. No placebo effect involved. I call things how they are.

    Are you serious ??

    That's like even more stupid than installing a valve you don't know how or what it does...

    So yeah, you are using an aftermarket HPFP running 90 bar of rail pressure in the high torque/fuel demand area, AND also using RS4 injectors....oh i forgot...that's with a....Garrett.....oh sorry a K04 ?? LOL

    Oh i'm pretty sure you saw a HUUUGE difference with the RS4 valve...NOOOOT....

    Definitely placebo effect.


+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts