VWVortex


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 35 of 336

Thread: f1.4 Thread

  1. 04-30-2010 09:54 AM #1
    I just got my 50mm f1.4 yesterday. Lets see your f1.4 shots.


  2. Member Throttle_Inc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 25th, 2008
    Location
    Columbus, OH, USA
    Posts
    494
    Vehicles
    '05 GLI
    04-30-2010 10:06 AM #2
    Very nice shot. I absolutely love my 50mm f/1.4. It has single-handedly converted me to loving primes over all others. It almost becomes a sickness too, because I (not sure if others do) always feel the need to shoot at f/1.4 as much as I can.

    Some of my favorites:





    Flickr

    2005 Jetta GLI [K&N intake / BB 2.5" DP / APR 93 chip / 034 DV]

  3. 04-30-2010 10:37 AM #3
    I saw those shots on your photostream, I love them. I totally understand your obsession for 1.4. I traded my 50mm f1.8 for this new one just because f1.8 wasnt enough for me!

  4. Member Throttle_Inc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 25th, 2008
    Location
    Columbus, OH, USA
    Posts
    494
    Vehicles
    '05 GLI
    04-30-2010 11:02 AM #4
    Quote, originally posted by VrstewartW »
    I saw those shots on your photostream, I love them. I totally understand your obsession for 1.4. I traded my 50mm f1.8 for this new one just because f1.8 wasnt enough for me!

    Thanks! It's funny how f/1.8 -> f/1.4 makes such a huge difference, huh? After a shoot this past weekend and being given a 24-70L to play with, I was pretty set on it... but now am back to "prime vision" thinking that a 135mm f/2L is my next lens. I have a mental block where anything above f/3.5 seems slooooow.

    Flickr

    2005 Jetta GLI [K&N intake / BB 2.5" DP / APR 93 chip / 034 DV]

  5. Member ZoomBy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2nd, 2005
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    8,156
    Vehicles
    2013 MKVI GLI - Manual / 1998 MKIII Jetta GLX VR6 - Manual
    04-30-2010 11:50 AM #5
    does a 1.4 lens allow you to still take pics at 1.8 or is it a fixed lens?

  6. 04-30-2010 12:03 PM #6
    Yup, adjustable just like any other lens. Except mine only goes up to f16.

  7. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 16th, 2001
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    921
    Vehicles
    2010 GTI
    04-30-2010 12:24 PM #7
    total newb question...what's the difference between 1.4 and 1.8...

    I understand that question is so basic I don't really expect you to answer it but if you could point me to a very good beginner's link...

    MKVI GTI 4-Dr | CW | H&R Sport | DSG | VMR | Nav | Xenon | Sunroof Totaled

    The search begins...


  8. 04-30-2010 12:30 PM #9
    1.4 is faster, which means it will let in more light than the 1.8. It will also give a shallower depth of field that will throw anything out of focus if your at 1.4. Fast lenses with an f-stop like will cost more but its well worth it.

    Edit: ^ beat me to it, thanks!


  9. 04-30-2010 12:32 PM #10

    and.. close enough..


  10. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 16th, 2001
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    921
    Vehicles
    2010 GTI
    04-30-2010 12:47 PM #11
    Thanks guys! Research time!
    MKVI GTI 4-Dr | CW | H&R Sport | DSG | VMR | Nav | Xenon | Sunroof Totaled

    The search begins...

  11. Member iadubber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 31st, 2005
    Location
    Dubuque, IA
    Posts
    2,914
    Vehicles
    1998 VW Passat Wagon
    04-30-2010 12:49 PM #12
    This is an amazing lens and is light years beyond the 1.8 II in build alone. I just got my 1.4 this past week so I don't have any good shots with it yet.

  12. 04-30-2010 12:50 PM #13
    I love my 1.4 it is an amazing lens adn very quick to focus.

  13. 04-30-2010 01:28 PM #14
    Quote, originally posted by iadubber »
    This is an amazing lens and is light years beyond the 1.8 II in build alone. I just got my 1.4 this past week so I don't have any good shots with it yet.

    the usm breaks under it's own load, other than that..
    i agree..



  14. Member Throttle_Inc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 25th, 2008
    Location
    Columbus, OH, USA
    Posts
    494
    Vehicles
    '05 GLI
    04-30-2010 02:08 PM #15
    The build quality is definitely something to talk about - much meatier and solid feeling than the f/1.8. Now the f/1.2, I can't speak to... sadly.

    Quote, originally posted by no786 »

    the usm breaks under it's own load, other than that..
    i agree..


    ORLY? That's disturbing. Is there a history of that happening with others too? I had yet to hear about this issue until now.


    Modified by Throttle_Inc at 11:11 AM 4-30-2010


    Modified by Throttle_Inc at 11:11 AM 4-30-2010

    Flickr

    2005 Jetta GLI [K&N intake / BB 2.5" DP / APR 93 chip / 034 DV]

  15. Member Ld7w_VR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 21st, 2006
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    4,749
    Vehicles
    2003 Gti, 2001 Wolfsburg
    04-30-2010 03:36 PM #16
    so far.
    The Elite 24v VR6 Club: Member #268 "Like 6 cylinder of 15 degree sex"

    (_fishbowl society_)


  16. 04-30-2010 04:22 PM #17
    Quote, originally posted by Throttle_Inc »
    The build quality is definitely something to talk about - much meatier and solid feeling than the f/1.8. Now the f/1.2, I can't speak to... sadly.

    ORLY? That's disturbing. Is there a history of that happening with others too? I had yet to hear about this issue until now.


    Modified by Throttle_Inc at 11:11 AM 4-30-2010


    Modified by Throttle_Inc at 11:11 AM 4-30-2010

    The 1.2 is money. That's all that can really be said.

    Canon 7d: Tokina 10-17mm fisheye; Sigma 24-70 f2.8; Canon 85mm f1.8; Canon 430ex.

  17. Member Calinada's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 29th, 2005
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    1,453
    Vehicles
    '07 Touareg
    04-30-2010 04:44 PM #18
    Nikon 35mm f/1.4 AIS


  18. Member mr lee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 31st, 2005
    Location
    misery
    Posts
    14,628
    Vehicles
    Don't you know I sold them all...
    04-30-2010 05:29 PM #19
    Quote, originally posted by Dedpool »
    ...what's the difference between 1.4 and 1.8...

    about $500

    Quote Originally Posted by Amsterdam087 View Post
    its not your car...

  19. Member Throttle_Inc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 25th, 2008
    Location
    Columbus, OH, USA
    Posts
    494
    Vehicles
    '05 GLI
    04-30-2010 05:34 PM #20
    Quote, originally posted by mr lee »

    about $500

    More like $250-275.

    Flickr

    2005 Jetta GLI [K&N intake / BB 2.5" DP / APR 93 chip / 034 DV]

  20. Member mr lee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 31st, 2005
    Location
    misery
    Posts
    14,628
    Vehicles
    Don't you know I sold them all...
    04-30-2010 05:37 PM #21
    Quote, originally posted by Throttle_Inc »

    More like $250-275.

    really?! the last 1.4 I looked at was around $600, whereas the 1.8 I picked up was $120~

    Quote Originally Posted by Amsterdam087 View Post
    its not your car...

  21. Member DubRadio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 14th, 2003
    Location
    Abingdon, MD
    Posts
    2,769
    Vehicles
    07 Rabbit 2dr UG
    04-30-2010 06:54 PM #22
    for canon... not quite

    1.8 = 100$
    1.4 = 350-375$

    Nikon
    1.8 = 125$
    1.4 = 440$

    Like digging virtual holes in the ground? Come play in the Official Vortex Minecraft Server.
    XBL : northVdubbed
    Steam : Dubradio


  22. 04-30-2010 08:06 PM #24
    :'[ lens prices are one of the huge reasons nikon pisses me off haha

  23. Member alextakesphotos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 6th, 2006
    Location
    5280
    Posts
    4,238
    Vehicles
    13 Jetta TDI | 13 Tiguan SE
    04-30-2010 08:35 PM #25
    i just picked up a 1.8 so its gonna take me a little bit time to convince my gf to buy me a 1.4 lol. i did tried both and it is amazing how much more better and faster the 1.4 is

  24. Member Throttle_Inc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 25th, 2008
    Location
    Columbus, OH, USA
    Posts
    494
    Vehicles
    '05 GLI
    04-30-2010 09:16 PM #26
    Quote, originally posted by mr lee »

    really?! the last 1.4 I looked at was around $600, whereas the 1.8 I picked up was $120~

    Definitely! I bought mine for $400, and now I'm seeing them for $360-375, depending on where you look and new/used choices. I couldn't help myself at that "small" price bump.

    Flickr

    2005 Jetta GLI [K&N intake / BB 2.5" DP / APR 93 chip / 034 DV]

  25. 04-30-2010 11:57 PM #27
    Pentax F1.2


  26. Member Raek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1st, 2003
    Posts
    5,311
    Vehicles
    2001 TT225 / 2002 BMW 330ci / 2000 XJ
    05-01-2010 01:02 AM #28


  27. 05-01-2010 01:13 AM #29
    F 1.2 FTW


  28. 05-01-2010 11:53 AM #30
    Quote, originally posted by wake0n »
    F 1.2 FTW

    So jealous!


  29. Member iadubber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 31st, 2005
    Location
    Dubuque, IA
    Posts
    2,914
    Vehicles
    1998 VW Passat Wagon
    05-01-2010 12:03 PM #31
    way to post 1.2 in a 1.4 thread.

  30. 05-01-2010 12:12 PM #32
    Quote, originally posted by iadubber »
    way to post 1.2 in a 1.4 thread.
    Sorry I had to haha 1.2, 1.4, 1.8. All pretty much the same, minus the ludicrous price tag on the 1.2's.

  31. 05-01-2010 06:36 PM #33
    this thread makes me want to buy the 50 1.4 even more than i already want it, but i'm going to wait and see how much the "new 50 1.2" that's apparently supposed to come out will cost.

  32. Member impact's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 6th, 2002
    Posts
    5,196
    Vehicles
    2006 Škoda Octavia
    05-03-2010 02:33 PM #34



+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts