Username or Email Address
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up

    VWVortex


    Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
    Results 51 to 75 of 203

    Thread: Most Off-Road Capable Stock Vehicle

    1. Member unimogken's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 19th, 2005
      Location
      South of Jazzydub, WA
      Posts
      5,386
      Vehicles
      6 Tap Kegerator
      03-24-2011 01:56 PM #51
      Based on my real world offroading I have another vote for the G-Wagon.

      There's a reason that many countries use the G-Wagon as a military vehicle.
      I really wish everyone would update their location in their profile!

      Someone buy my car already!!

      Always looking for free firewood to feed my hungry wood stove!

    2. Moderator robbyb413's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 12th, 2002
      Location
      Longmeadow, MA / Boston, MA
      Posts
      16,856
      Vehicles
      2010 Audi S4 Prestige, 1987 Grady White 206G Overnighter, 2010 Audi A4 P+ (Hers)
      03-24-2011 04:21 PM #52
      Quote Originally Posted by deucestudios View Post
      Take that to the soft sand of North Carolina, size is a non issue. Never wheeled, or even been to the PNW, but from what I've seen, it's at least similiar to the north east, as far as tight trails go. South west? Full size truck all day, for 9 out of 10 trails.
      The OP qualified his statement with "able to run the trails in Moab". Long way between that and what you're talking about. Hence the reason the Full size rig and Disco are just right out. You have to play within his rules.
      Last edited by robbyb413; 03-24-2011 at 04:28 PM.
      VAG COM services available, send a PM | Join the VWVortex Folding@Home team... save the world | Current Rides: 2010 S4 Prestige, 1987 Grady White 206G Overnighter | Old Rides: 1999 TJ 4.0 Sport, 2001.5 A4 1.8TQMS GTRS, 1997 TJ 4.0 Sport, 1990 Corrado g60 StageIV | Lounging in a field with 726 sweater cows

    3. Moderator robbyb413's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 12th, 2002
      Location
      Longmeadow, MA / Boston, MA
      Posts
      16,856
      Vehicles
      2010 Audi S4 Prestige, 1987 Grady White 206G Overnighter, 2010 Audi A4 P+ (Hers)
      03-24-2011 04:24 PM #53
      Quote Originally Posted by dbreid View Post
      The 5 years thing kills it a bit, but the D90 Rover is the actual answer to this question. But they weren't sold in the US in the last 5 years.
      So then it's NOT the actual answer to the OP's question at all. D90 rovers are nice, but If I were choosing between one of those at what they cost, and a wrangler rubicon at what they cost I'm going Wrangler all day every day even if the 5yr restriction is removed from the equation.

      Stock for stock over the same obstacles I've never seen a STOCK d90 do anything spectacular that a STOCK Rubicon can't do as well, at least not around here in the northeast. Plus when you ride with rovers you spend a lot of time sitting around. They really do break. A Lot. And they are less fuel efficient than the Rubi.

      There's just no benefit to paying the premium, other than the fact that d90s are darn sweet rides.
      Last edited by robbyb413; 03-24-2011 at 04:29 PM.
      VAG COM services available, send a PM | Join the VWVortex Folding@Home team... save the world | Current Rides: 2010 S4 Prestige, 1987 Grady White 206G Overnighter | Old Rides: 1999 TJ 4.0 Sport, 2001.5 A4 1.8TQMS GTRS, 1997 TJ 4.0 Sport, 1990 Corrado g60 StageIV | Lounging in a field with 726 sweater cows

    4. Member CreeperSleeper's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 29th, 2003
      Location
      Tualatin, OR
      Posts
      7,848
      Vehicles
      '00 LX470, '84 Toy "crawler"
      03-24-2011 05:35 PM #54
      Quote Originally Posted by robbyb413 View Post
      The OP qualified his statement with "able to run the trails in Moab". Long way between that and what you're talking about. Hence the reason the Full size rig and Disco are just right out. You have to play within his rules.
      Other than BFE, most of Moab is easier to wheel in a full size. The width and length tends to be a benifit (within reason) IMO...

      One the the OP didn't say was that it had to be a US vehicle. I choose a 70 series Land Cruiser! They are available brand new right now with a turbo diesel, manual trans, solid (and locked) axles, coil suspension front and rear, etc. That gives you all the benifits of the Rubicon but with stronger axles, frame, engine, trans... Hell, it's a better, stronger rig. It is also availible in different wheelbase lengths (even a pickup) and you don't have to drive a J**p!

      This one is an '07 but the new ones look the same:


      Oh (almost forgot) these come with winches as an available option as well.
      Last edited by CreeperSleeper; 03-24-2011 at 05:41 PM.

    5. Senior Member Sporin's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 17th, 1999
      Location
      Windsor, VT USA
      Posts
      25,224
      Vehicles
      '10 Prius & '05 4Runner
      03-24-2011 07:05 PM #55
      70-series is my do-all dream rig.

    6. Member CreeperSleeper's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 29th, 2003
      Location
      Tualatin, OR
      Posts
      7,848
      Vehicles
      '00 LX470, '84 Toy "crawler"
      03-24-2011 07:52 PM #56
      Quote Originally Posted by Sporin View Post
      70-series is my do-all dream rig.
      I will import an older Austrailian one once I get a few things paid off. I want to find a clean 1FZ version just for parts availability.

    7. 03-25-2011 12:25 AM #57
      Quote Originally Posted by CreeperSleeper View Post

      This looks cool and I like the options available.

    8. Moderator robbyb413's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 12th, 2002
      Location
      Longmeadow, MA / Boston, MA
      Posts
      16,856
      Vehicles
      2010 Audi S4 Prestige, 1987 Grady White 206G Overnighter, 2010 Audi A4 P+ (Hers)
      03-25-2011 08:56 AM #58
      Quote Originally Posted by CreeperSleeper View Post
      One the the OP didn't say was that it had to be a US vehicle.
      He said street legal, and he lives in the US. The implication there would be that it needs to be an EPA certified vehicle. Can you bring that series 70 into the US?

      The Land Rover Defender is older than 5 years as a US model, but they still make it in other markets. If the series 70 gets a seat at the table then so does the Defender. And if you put them head to head it's defender all the way! Then you don't have to drive "T****a".

      I'm still sticking to the Wrangler Rubicon, IMO there's never a benefit to a full size rig on the trails. They have their place, but it's in wide open spaces with long easy inclines that make having the big long wheelbase a nice thing. All the rest of the time they're just bigger, burn more gas, and break more stuff because they have too much overhang to get up to an obstacle or off of one, and they're too long in the belly to get over things when they're on top. If you need a little more wheelbase get the off-road minivan Rubicon Unlimited.
      VAG COM services available, send a PM | Join the VWVortex Folding@Home team... save the world | Current Rides: 2010 S4 Prestige, 1987 Grady White 206G Overnighter | Old Rides: 1999 TJ 4.0 Sport, 2001.5 A4 1.8TQMS GTRS, 1997 TJ 4.0 Sport, 1990 Corrado g60 StageIV | Lounging in a field with 726 sweater cows

    9. Member
      Join Date
      Sep 16th, 2000
      Location
      Transitioning
      Posts
      12,446
      Vehicles
      1994 Land Cruiser
      03-25-2011 02:21 PM #59
      Quote Originally Posted by robbyb413 View Post
      The Land Rover Defender is older than 5 years as a US model, but they still make it in other markets. If the series 70 gets a seat at the table then so does the Defender. And if you put them head to head it's defender all the way! Then you don't have to drive "T****a".
      The market says otherwise. Both are priced roughly the same in South Africa and Namibia and the LC outsells the Defender by more then 2 to 1 (as station wagons). If we throw in the dual cab pick-up versions and pick-ups it is probably more like 3 to 1.

      I'll put it more succinctly, head to head a 76 makes a D90 look like a retarded purpose made only by North Americans who want to buy into some fantasy about what Defenders are, and believe their something to their supposed pedigree.

    10. Moderator robbyb413's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 12th, 2002
      Location
      Longmeadow, MA / Boston, MA
      Posts
      16,856
      Vehicles
      2010 Audi S4 Prestige, 1987 Grady White 206G Overnighter, 2010 Audi A4 P+ (Hers)
      03-28-2011 09:19 AM #60
      Sales figures in South Africa have nothing to do with the most capable stock off-road vehicle for Moab. People buy Toyota off-road vhicles because they're cheap and have easy access to repair parts, not because they're built like tanks or capable out of the box. The guy who just finished driving around the world in a Land Cruiser talked about that alot. he wanted a Rover. He weighed in a bunch of factors and decided that he had to go with a Toyota because toyota has a larger presence in the undeveloped countries he was traveling through. He thought he could cut downtime because he could find mechanics familiar with the brand and could also find parts easily. IMO after following the whole process he ended up losing out on a lot of days because every time he looked at his truck wrong it broke. Looking at his repair list it seemed like silly stuff that broke and he should have just gone with the Rover and enjoyed it.

      And IIRC he's French. Not North American.
      Last edited by robbyb413; 03-28-2011 at 09:21 AM.
      VAG COM services available, send a PM | Join the VWVortex Folding@Home team... save the world | Current Rides: 2010 S4 Prestige, 1987 Grady White 206G Overnighter | Old Rides: 1999 TJ 4.0 Sport, 2001.5 A4 1.8TQMS GTRS, 1997 TJ 4.0 Sport, 1990 Corrado g60 StageIV | Lounging in a field with 726 sweater cows

    11. Senior Member Sporin's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 17th, 1999
      Location
      Windsor, VT USA
      Posts
      25,224
      Vehicles
      '10 Prius & '05 4Runner
      03-28-2011 09:41 AM #61
      Every vehicle is a trade off. Taking a Rover certainly was no guarantee that he wouldn't break things also. While I'm sure the Land Cruiser round the world guy might like to imagine that a Rover wouldn't have broken anything, that's simply just not realistic.

      Much of it comes down to personal preference and having owned both a Rover and Toyota's I can say that BOTH will happily break parts big and small when used for long periods in rough conditions. The idea that one or the other will magically not break is simply a fairy tale.

      Some historical perspective.... most of Africa was under the British Crown for a century, thus the initial toe-hold by Rover in those parts of the world. They weren't driving a Series land Rover in "The Gods Must Be Crazy" because it was the "better" choice, they were driving it because it was the "only" choice.

      Toyota has since built a giant dealer and parts network there (as well as other places obviously) and in many respects take over the "#1 Choice" role in the desert.

      While marketers and competing marquee-fans will argue them to death, on a mechanical level, they both come with their pluses and minuses.

    12. Geriatric Member Turbio!'s Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 21st, 2005
      Location
      San Antonio, TX
      Posts
      41,551
      Vehicles
      '13 Subaru Outback
      03-28-2011 11:07 AM #62
      Quote Originally Posted by dbreid View Post
      The 5 years thing kills it a bit, but the D90 Rover is the actual answer to this question.
      I tend to disagree. They're capable, but the D90 is, to be frank, just not a very good rig. I've heard horror stories about the axles, the V8 is an outdated horrorshow, and they don't really have any mechanical advantage over a Rubicon.
      IPRO Meat-Director and High Minister of Terror-Grilling

      Quote Originally Posted by Marshmallow Man View Post
      The Terror Grill: Part restaurant, part amusement attraction, part gladiator arena, all profit.
      ARE YOU NOT SATIATED?!?!?!

    13. Member MCTB's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 29th, 2005
      Location
      The Northern of Virginia
      Posts
      10,513
      Vehicles
      '12 Focus SE, '15 Outback Limited
      03-28-2011 12:00 PM #63
      Quote Originally Posted by dbreid View Post
      The 5 years thing kills it a bit, but the D90 Rover is the actual answer to this question. I adore Wrangler Rubicons, and agree that if you cannot get a D90, then it is the clear answer. However, a stock D90 is a purpose built truck for exactly this. V8, solid axles, roll cage, the works. They even have sealed electronics and are serviceable with a flathead screwdriver.

      But they weren't sold in the US in the last 5 years.
      As a Rover guy, the D90 is not the actual answer. If you want a truly simple vehicle, you want a diesel power, BJ40. The D90 wasnt sold in the US in large numbers and you are right, its hasnt been done in years. The D90 is also NOT as easily serviceable as you might think. To remove panels, you will need a full set of metric and standard since its a mix. The electrical systems are no more simple that a Toyota of that era, and by that era I mean the late 1980's. The Defender hasnt changed much since its inception in 1984. The one thing that Rover has going against it is that it is built entirely of car parts. The Land Rover is a parts pin truck. Motors, transmissions, etc... are all taken from road going cars. The build quality is crap and dont even think about ergonomics. They have the look but not much else.

      In the terms of the last 5 years, I would go with an XTerra Offroad package or a JK Rubicon. A Power Wagon is a joke as they are just too damn big.

      I went back in time to find my most capable, perfect rig. It has a rear locker and a winch up front. The rear locker added the capability and the winch is just there for extraction and will probably never get used. Its all in how you look at it. I dont mind using the winch. Some people will build a truck that is so insane as to avoid using the winch. I will go as far as I can without taxing my drivetrain and then use the winch for the rest of that section. I see no shame in that. Others do. Its wheeling mentality really. I try to save my mechanical bits whereas some just go out to break things. That being said, I agree that in definition, a winch adds to capability. It allows you to go through obstacles and complete them. At the same time, does it actually add to the capability since you are no longer relying upon your actual vehicle but on an aftermarket piece of equipment? Thats your call to make.

      Me, I run all terrain tires. Not great in the mud but will get me far enough. When forward momentum has stopped, I hand throttle to about 1600 rpm, hook up the winch line to a tree and go from there. Its all in your mentality. To some, I just failed. To others, I took the smart, less abusive way out. That way out might have saved my u joints some unneeded wear and tear and get me further down the line than the guy with dual lockers, ripping it up, bouncing off the limiter and beating the piss out of his truck yet going nowhere. There is fun to be had with both options, thats for sure.


      Modern, straight out of the box vehicle: JK Rubicon, it pains to say. In an ideal world, you would look at all options, past a present and you would more than likely come up with a Toyota. I was a Land Rover owner and am still a Land Rover guy. I love them for some reason but after going Cruiser, I dont really see myself going back. Well, with one exception. When the 60 rots away, the motor, trans, axles, etc... might find their way into a Series III 109. Just a thought though.
      Looking for a car event on the East Coast? Check here

      I have an idea, we will try it my way first...and then we will finish.

      MCFC

    14. Senior Member Sporin's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 17th, 1999
      Location
      Windsor, VT USA
      Posts
      25,224
      Vehicles
      '10 Prius & '05 4Runner
      03-28-2011 01:50 PM #64
      morecarsthanbrains, Well said.

      Nothing worse then being on a trail ride with a guy who refuses to pull cable when he's clearly just spinning tires and digging holes.... sadly the "skinny pedal" crowd more often breaks something then not.

      One other thing to point out, is that when the D90 hit US shores, it WAS a bit better then the Wrangler since it was coil sprung, sat taller from the factory, etc. The Wranglers of that era where still leaf sprung and didn't have the heavier-duty axles, the lower transfer case, and lockers that the modern Rubicons have.

      The TJ's closed the gap (move to coils), with the Rubicon clearly outpacing the old D90's thanks to modern everything and a ton of offroad specific goodies previously not available from the factory in the US.

    15. Member
      Join Date
      May 27th, 2008
      Location
      Malvern, PA
      Posts
      6,218
      Vehicles
      5.3L Wrangler
      03-28-2011 02:12 PM #65
      Quote Originally Posted by robbyb413 View Post
      and could also find parts easily.
      This is the main reason I take a Cherokee into the woods and beat it, when there's other "better" options out there. If it says "wrangler" or "Jeep" on it, or in the name, it's costing a pretty penny. Wranglers and (the good) Rovers, are in similiar condition in junkyards picked clean, with 10 complete cherokees sitting next to them.
      Capable from the factory comes 1 time, and will take you into the woods, but even with the best equipment, it's never guaranteed to bring you out. Then you're replacing broken parts. For me, to pay to play on something like a JK, or a LR/RR, or hell a G-wagen, well it just isn't in the cards. Now, if I lived in Germany, and could go to a u-pull-it, and they had G500's in various stages of decay, I would rock one in a heartbeat. No question about it. Chero-what?
      I'm not saying that Cherokee would satisfy the answer to this thread at all, just a mini-tangent on how parts availability is a real good point to bring up.

      Also this:

      Quote Originally Posted by Sporin View Post
      morecarsthanbrains, Well said.
      5.3L Wrangler work in progress
      Quote Originally Posted by Juniper Monkeys View Post
      "Less Forethought, More Welding"

    16. Member CreeperSleeper's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 29th, 2003
      Location
      Tualatin, OR
      Posts
      7,848
      Vehicles
      '00 LX470, '84 Toy "crawler"
      03-28-2011 05:09 PM #66
      FYI, you can import in 70-series Land Cruisers... There is one that is daily driven in Tualatin, OR I see every once in a while and a handful of TLCA members in the states have them.

    17. Member rcr_x's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 21st, 1999
      Location
      PDX
      Posts
      1,257
      Vehicles
      1996 Discovery 5spd, 1995 Z/28 'vert, 1988 5KTQ rally car, 1955 Pontiac Hearse, ~90 other cars
      03-28-2011 10:07 PM #67
      Quote Originally Posted by deucestudios View Post
      This is the main reason I take a Cherokee into the woods and beat it, when there's other "better" options out there. If it says "wrangler" or "Jeep" on it, or in the name, it's costing a pretty penny. Wranglers and (the good) Rovers, are in similiar condition in junkyards picked clean, with 10 complete cherokees sitting next to them.
      Capable from the factory comes 1 time, and will take you into the woods, but even with the best equipment, it's never guaranteed to bring you out. Then you're replacing broken parts. For me, to pay to play on something like a JK, or a LR/RR, or hell a G-wagen, well it just isn't in the cards. Now, if I lived in Germany, and could go to a u-pull-it, and they had G500's in various stages of decay, I would rock one in a heartbeat. No question about it. Chero-what?
      I'm not saying that Cherokee would satisfy the answer to this thread at all, just a mini-tangent on how parts availability is a real good point to bring up.

      Also this:
      This is the truth. They built Cherokees continuously from 1982 to 2001? or something. several million were built. Lots of cheap parts around. I have a 1996 Discovery and for some reason there are tons of cheap used ones around Portland here. I'm tempted to pick up some extra axles just in case!

    18. Member
      Join Date
      Feb 1st, 2011
      Location
      Fort Collins
      Posts
      199
      Vehicles
      2003 VW Jetta, 1979 Jeep CJ7
      03-28-2011 10:16 PM #68
      The smart wheeler is the one in the cherokee that wheels it to the breaking point and then limps back to have it fixed the next day. I do agree with that, but it really all depends on what kind of trail you are running. If you were to hop through a small rock garden or up a decent incline, the xj will perform great with a good set of tires. But as soon as it becomes a little more technical, the tj is hands over heels better...

    19. Moderator robbyb413's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 12th, 2002
      Location
      Longmeadow, MA / Boston, MA
      Posts
      16,856
      Vehicles
      2010 Audi S4 Prestige, 1987 Grady White 206G Overnighter, 2010 Audi A4 P+ (Hers)
      03-29-2011 08:53 AM #69
      Quote Originally Posted by deucestudios View Post
      This is the main reason I take a Cherokee into the woods and beat it, when there's other "better" options out there. If it says "wrangler" or "Jeep" on it, or in the name, it's costing a pretty penny. Wranglers and (the good) Rovers, are in similiar condition in junkyards picked clean, with 10 complete cherokees sitting next to them.
      That's a very interesting thought process you have, considering that so many Jeep Wrangler, Cherokee, and GC parts in the running gear department, the stuff you're going to break while wheeling, is interchangeable or can be adapted to work and all cost about the same from the vendors anyway.

      Really though, an XJ has no bearing on this since the OP set forth the 5 year rule and they're not going to meet anyone's criteria of being the "most capable" in stock form with only a tire change. If you were to put 30" mud tires on there you'd be running at it's max it will fit without lift, and those won't have the ability to let your axles play about without rubbing. That's a disadvantage out of the box that you can't get around.

      Mod for Mod the XJ costs more than TJs and JKs as well because you just have more work and dump more cash into mods to do to keep up with the TJ or the JK. It takes twice as much lift to clear the same tires with the XJ, and that creates extra cost and extra labor at each stage of your build. They're not the smart move for wheeling at all, really.
      Last edited by robbyb413; 03-29-2011 at 09:12 AM.
      VAG COM services available, send a PM | Join the VWVortex Folding@Home team... save the world | Current Rides: 2010 S4 Prestige, 1987 Grady White 206G Overnighter | Old Rides: 1999 TJ 4.0 Sport, 2001.5 A4 1.8TQMS GTRS, 1997 TJ 4.0 Sport, 1990 Corrado g60 StageIV | Lounging in a field with 726 sweater cows

    20. Member
      Join Date
      Oct 7th, 2006
      Location
      Western Mass
      Posts
      1,571
      Vehicles
      Fiesta ST, Jeep 4.0, BMW e12
      03-29-2011 11:28 AM #70
      Quote Originally Posted by robbyb413 View Post
      Mod for Mod the XJ costs more than TJs and JKs as well because you just have more work and dump more cash into mods to do to keep up with the TJ or the JK. It takes twice as much lift to clear the same tires with the XJ, and that creates extra cost and extra labor at each stage of your build. They're not the smart move for wheeling at all, really.
      If one is considering each 4x4 vehicle soley by the amount of money and work to make it more capable, than no, an XJ would not be a good choice. But an XJ has wayy more interior space for gear and luggage than a TJ, and I think that's the reason why most go with an XJ.

    21. 03-29-2011 12:10 PM #71
      I'm glad for the discussion that is going on here and I have learned a lot so far, being an off-road newbie. Definitely a good mature discussion regarding the overall driving approach to driving off-road.

      The XJ discussion, while being quite informative and ultimately is one approach when building a dedicated/dual-purpose rig, is outside the bounds of what one can get in the past five years. It definitely has given me some insight on what to do/build for a more trail capable rig in the future, because it is a somewhat similar approach to building my previous track/auto-x '91 civic si.

      Carry on

    22. Member
      Join Date
      Sep 16th, 2000
      Location
      Transitioning
      Posts
      12,446
      Vehicles
      1994 Land Cruiser
      03-29-2011 01:25 PM #72
      Quote Originally Posted by CreeperSleeper View Post
      FYI, you can import in 70-series Land Cruisers... There is one that is daily driven in Tualatin, OR I see every once in a while and a handful of TLCA members in the states have them.

      Are you sure they aren't old Prados instead of newer 76s. I can't see why new LCs wouldn't be restricted like cars of similar vintage.

    23. Member CreeperSleeper's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 29th, 2003
      Location
      Tualatin, OR
      Posts
      7,848
      Vehicles
      '00 LX470, '84 Toy "crawler"
      03-29-2011 01:27 PM #73
      Quote Originally Posted by CBJ View Post
      Are you sure they aren't old Prados instead of newer 76s. I can't see why new LCs wouldn't be restricted like cars of similar vintage.
      Yes, I'm sure. All cars are restricted but there are ways around it. You probably couldn't license a new 70-series but I know I could get a late 80's one here with OR plates and title!

    24. Senior Member Sporin's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 17th, 1999
      Location
      Windsor, VT USA
      Posts
      25,224
      Vehicles
      '10 Prius & '05 4Runner
      03-29-2011 01:44 PM #74
      There's definitely a few in the states, gray-market trucks. Some states are easier then others to get (and keep) them registered legally in.

      1985 is the year anything we want can be imported, you're starting to see some of the legal, 25-year old BJ70's hit the market now.

      Of course, in Canada, it's only 15 years so there are a lot more choices up in the land of poutine and bagged milk.

    25. Member
      Join Date
      May 27th, 2008
      Location
      Malvern, PA
      Posts
      6,218
      Vehicles
      5.3L Wrangler
      03-29-2011 03:56 PM #75
      Quote Originally Posted by robbyb413 View Post
      That's a very interesting thought process you have, considering that so many Jeep Wrangler, Cherokee, and GC parts in the running gear department, the stuff you're going to break while wheeling, is interchangeable or can be adapted to work and all cost about the same from the vendors anyway.

      Really though, an XJ has no bearing on this since the OP set forth the 5 year rule and they're not going to meet anyone's criteria of being the "most capable" in stock form with only a tire change. If you were to put 30" mud tires on there you'd be running at it's max it will fit without lift, and those won't have the ability to let your axles play about without rubbing. That's a disadvantage out of the box that you can't get around.

      Mod for Mod the XJ costs more than TJs and JKs as well because you just have more work and dump more cash into mods to do to keep up with the TJ or the JK. It takes twice as much lift to clear the same tires with the XJ, and that creates extra cost and extra labor at each stage of your build. They're not the smart move for wheeling at all, really.
      Since we know have the blessing of the OP to continue this, and the Yota/Rover guys are looking the other way, on their own separate tangent...

      It was never my intention to propose Cherokee as a contender in this thread. I was just reinforcing the point you were making about parts availability. If you're gonna play, you're gonna break stuff. If you want to play cheap, weekends you're not trail riding, you're junkyard diggin.

      On the wrangler/cherokee debate. Stock for stock? There is no debate that the wrangler is better than the station wagon. I wouldn't even go there.

      Cost? You brought up cost?
      Sure... it could be done similiarly, if you ignore purchase price completely.
      4.0L, AX-15 trans, np231 with 100k
      Cherokee? $1000-$2000
      Wrangler? $4000-$8000

      A lot of the parts interchange, a lot more than you'd think don't.
      Axle shafts do, but the carrier is different, and gear sets are different. Some TJ guys upgrade to the high pinion 30 from the XJ, which is slightly better than the low pinion 30 in the TJ.
      Driveshafts, totally different.
      Rear axles, totally different. If you're gonna change coil buckets to leaves, or vice versa, you're not using something out of an XJ, unless you find an 87 with a D44, and even then, you'd get more for it with leaf perches than you would with coil buckets.
      Most GC's are 5 on 5, and have D44A. I'd take the knuckles and lower control arms, but that's about it. Axle width ain't the same. ZJ Grands (93-98) had a lot more parts that can be used, they were a lot more XJ back then, but they're getting sparse in the yards I go to.
      Springs? different widths & rates. Sure they can be swapped, but a 3" front spring kit for a TJ does not equal 3" on the front of a Cherokee.
      Putting an XJ 4.0L in a Wrangler? Think again, unless you don't really need an alternator.

      5.3L Wrangler work in progress
      Quote Originally Posted by Juniper Monkeys View Post
      "Less Forethought, More Welding"

    Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •