Bradsvw,
I'm sure that you know more about how much fuel the engine is utilizing than do VW's engineers. Yup...I'm sure that they programmed the transmission to shift in such a way as to make the least efficient use of fuel possible, to hurt their car's mileage and its marketability. That makes total sense. It would be totally illogical to think that the powertrain was designed to function exactly how it functions, making full use of the relative abundance of low-end torque that the turbocharged 4 cylinder makes. It would also be illogical to think that a driver such as yourself could be competent enough to manage how the car drives by doing something like adjusting how much pressure you're putting on the throttle pedal.
Et tu, vw_nc_dude? Really? You don't think it "shifts correctly"? I'm amazed--I've never been on a forum with this many automotive engineers on it before. Nor have I ever been on a forum with so many people who bought $30-40k without having a clue how they drove. Seriously. Did you all sleep through the test drive?
My engine doesn't groan at low RPMs. It shifts completely properly. If I want to hold a gear longer and accelerate faster, I can apply more throttle. If I'm driving normally, I can take advantage of the great fuel economy. It drives how it is supposed to drive. And if we lived in a perfect world where owners could know everything within any given PCM upgrade from the manufacturer, and pick and choose what changes they wanted, your suggestion would make total sense. But we don't live in that world.
So instead, because you're an incompetent test driver, I'm supposed to accept changes to my car, because it drives the way it's supposed to drive? I'm supposed to fend off PCM updates because the car drives like it drove on the test drive? And you're normal for wanting the car to drive totally differently than it drove on the test drive and totally differently from how it was designed to function? Who's the

one?