VWVortex


Links back to The Car Lounge (opens in same window)
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 35 of 43

Thread: New Jeep Liberty Debuts @ NAIAS in 2013 with 3.2 Pentastar V6

  1. Member
    Join Date
    May 15th, 2007
    Location
    Wilmington, DE
    Posts
    10,580
    Vehicles
    2012 Jeep Wrangler
    03-15-2012 08:56 PM #1


    more pix of mule here:
    http://blogs.insideline.com/straight...nge-a-bit.html

    The Liberty (hopefully renamed Cherokee) will be debuting in 2013 at NAIAS in Detroit.
    According to LeftLane News, the Liberty will be getting a smaller displacement version of the 3.6 liter Pentastar V6 and a 9-Speed automatic transmission.

    From LLN:

    http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-lib...n-january.html

    By Mark Kleis
    Thursday, Mar 15th, 2012 @ 3:01 am

    Chrysler currently has just one Pentastar V6 in its lineup for the U.S., a 3.6-liter unit, but that may change when the Detroit Auto Show kicks off in January next year.

    Two sources within the United Auto Workers union have confirmed to Automotive News that 3.2-liter Pentastar V6 will make its world debut in the successor for the Jeep Liberty that is set to be unveiled at the 2013 Detroit Auto Show in January.

    The Liberty successor will not only gain a new 3.2-liter V6, but also a nine-speed automatic transmission from ZF, the same supplier that created the eight-speed automatic found in multiple Chrysler products. Although no horsepower or fuel economy figures were given, it is likely that Jeep is going to make a very serious effort to capture the best-in-class fuel economy title with this new vehicle – something not usually associated with the rugged off-road-minded Jeep brand.

    Some hints at this coming engine have been leaked directly from the lips of none other than Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne, who said at the Geneva Motor Show, “If we had known the eight-speed [transmission] was coming, we would have made the [3.6-liter] Pentastar a 3.2-liter [V6].”

  2. Member TigerinColorado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 16th, 2007
    Location
    Hilton parking lot.
    Posts
    13,235
    Vehicles
    Hertz Gold + Rewards
    03-15-2012 09:07 PM #2
    9 speed Auto!
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyle C
    The world runs on marketing, and in the case of winter tires Subaru has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that any round, rubber-ish object that holds a bit of air and passes as a tire will get you through the snow just fine, but only if it is attached to a vehicle with AWD/4WD.

  3. Member milbournosphere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 23rd, 2011
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    191
    Vehicles
    1996 Golf GLS, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4WD
    03-15-2012 09:11 PM #3
    9 speed auto? Sounds like the Libby is about to have an identity crisis. Seeing the fiat body over the underpinnings doesn't exactly help either...

  4. Member Live-Wire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 9th, 2005
    Location
    Guelph Ontario
    Posts
    10,275
    Vehicles
    2008 BMW 335i
    03-15-2012 09:15 PM #4
    Fix the - worse then a Toyota from the mid 90's to mid 00's exhaust kink/hang - and I'll look at it again... All I see is hanging exhaust pipe in that picture... that's absolutely not acceptable in 2012, especially in an off road vehicle!!! (which should have as flat an underbody as possible, to at least give the illusion that nothing will get damaged if you take it thru some rocks, ruts, and mud).

  5. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 19th, 2009
    Posts
    890
    Vehicles
    2006 TDI Jetta, 2010 Tiguan, 2001 Astro van
    03-15-2012 09:27 PM #5
    One word. Ugly.
    People are funny; They want the Front of the bus,
    the Middle of the road,
    And Back of the church.

  6. Member Bakounine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 15th, 2002
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    1,310
    Vehicles
    '11 GTI; '06 Outback 3.0R; '89 Sierra K2500
    03-15-2012 09:29 PM #6
    Quote Originally Posted by whitejeep1989 View Post
    The Liberty (hopefully renamed Cherokee)
    FWD-based crossover? Hopefully it will NOT be called Cherokee.

  7. Senior Member urogolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 10th, 2000
    Location
    Somerset, MA
    Posts
    24,388
    Vehicles
    03 Cooper S, 11 Camry, 11 RAV4
    03-15-2012 09:29 PM #7
    ummm rebodied test mule!?
    ................................................www. CHECKCOLLISION .com

  8. Geriatric Member BRealistic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 16th, 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    59,295
    Vehicles
    88 F150, 04 RX8
    03-15-2012 10:32 PM #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Bigtree View Post
    One word. Ugly.
    One word. Illiterate.
    |˙˙ʇǝuɹǝʇuı ǝɥʇ uo ʇxǝʇ uʍop ǝpısdn ɯopuɐɹ pɐǝɹ noʎ :ǝɯıʇ ǝǝɹɟ ɥɔnɯ ooʇ ʎɐʍ ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ןןǝʇ oʇ ʍoɥ˙˙˙|http://hotlinktest.com/

  9. Member Air and water do mix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 5th, 2004
    Location
    Southern Indiana
    Posts
    18,452
    Vehicles
    '66 Beetle, '69 VW Fastback and an '08 Fit
    03-15-2012 10:52 PM #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Live-Wire View Post
    Fix the - worse then a Toyota from the mid 90's to mid 00's exhaust kink/hang - and I'll look at it again... All I see is hanging exhaust pipe in that picture... that's absolutely not acceptable in 2012, especially in an off road vehicle!!! (which should have as flat an underbody as possible, to at least give the illusion that nothing will get damaged if you take it thru some rocks, ruts, and mud).
    It's a test mule. It's probably safe to say that since it won't even be shown for nearly a year that it's simply undergoing testing and not exactly it's final shakedown before production begins.
    Quote Originally Posted by Boyz in da Park
    Proletariat, Bourgeoise - Everybody smellin' my potpourri...

  10. Member
    Join Date
    May 15th, 2007
    Location
    Wilmington, DE
    Posts
    10,580
    Vehicles
    2012 Jeep Wrangler
    03-15-2012 11:19 PM #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Bakounine View Post
    FWD-based crossover? Hopefully it will NOT be called Cherokee.

    I don't dispute the fact that the Cherokee has definitely found it's place as an off-road legend, but the ones that are off-roaded are most likely used vehicles on their second or third owners. While new, most Cherokees served duty as the suburban family station wagon. Since that role in modern times is now expected to be played by a FWD-based, unibody CUV, why shouldn't a future Cherokee deliver what the marketplace expects? Land Rover is doing just fine with 2 FWD based CUVs, so why wouldn't Jeep? As long as Jeep offers the Grand Cherokee and Wrangler as true off-roaders, the rest of the line-up does not need to be so hardcore.

  11. Member Jordan 191's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 6th, 2000
    Location
    St. Paul, MN
    Posts
    4,569
    Vehicles
    2007 Mazdaspeed3
    03-15-2012 11:23 PM #11
    Jeep mules with a plunging Alfa grille. Nothing to see here, move along, this is normal.

  12. Member S4cabriofox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 5th, 2008
    Location
    Chicago / New Orleans
    Posts
    2,759
    Vehicles
    '12 Mini Clubman S
    03-16-2012 12:48 AM #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Jordan 191 View Post
    Jeep mules with a plunging Alfa grille. Nothing to see here, move along, this is normal.
    The whole body is from a Giulietta...

  13. Geriatric Member BRealistic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 16th, 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    59,295
    Vehicles
    88 F150, 04 RX8
    03-16-2012 12:57 AM #13
    Quote Originally Posted by S4cabriofox View Post
    The whole body is from a Giulietta...
    You would think the entire concept of a test MULE was just invented yesterday.

    It usually just the basic drivetrain and suspension popped in another heavily modified vehicle for testing.
    |˙˙ʇǝuɹǝʇuı ǝɥʇ uo ʇxǝʇ uʍop ǝpısdn ɯopuɐɹ pɐǝɹ noʎ :ǝɯıʇ ǝǝɹɟ ɥɔnɯ ooʇ ʎɐʍ ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ןןǝʇ oʇ ʍoɥ˙˙˙|http://hotlinktest.com/

  14. Member kraut_pauer79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 27th, 2004
    Location
    the dirty inland empire, CA
    Posts
    4,323
    Vehicles
    1966 VW Type 1 Sedan, 1904cc
    03-16-2012 01:08 AM #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Bigtree View Post
    One word. Ugly.
    Two Words: Test Mule
    Quote Originally Posted by Turbiodiesel! View Post
    Hear that sound? Like distant applause? That's the entire Car Lounge, fapping like crazed zoo-apes.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swallow Doretti View Post
    You bitches fight more than a bunch of high school girls at the clearance rack of the local Forever 21.

  15. Member watsontb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 7th, 2009
    Location
    Edmonchuk, Canucklstan
    Posts
    542
    Vehicles
    94 Civic
    03-16-2012 01:10 AM #15
    Quote Originally Posted by kraut_pauer79 View Post
    Two Words: Test Mule
    Three Words : I love pancakes

  16. Member brandonwillyumz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 5th, 2011
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    412
    Vehicles
    2008 Jetta 2.5, 1996 Jeep Cherokee XJ 4.0 5 speed (245k miles and going strong)
    03-16-2012 05:45 AM #16
    I really hope this doesn't become the Cherokee. The worst decision Jeep ever made was to cease use and production of the 4.0 straight-6. I mean, that engine is starting virtually perfect, aside from MPG.
    IBEW Local 24

  17. Member
    Join Date
    May 15th, 2007
    Location
    Wilmington, DE
    Posts
    10,580
    Vehicles
    2012 Jeep Wrangler
    03-16-2012 07:42 AM #17
    Quote Originally Posted by brandonwillyumz View Post
    I really hope this doesn't become the Cherokee. The worst decision Jeep ever made was to cease use and production of the 4.0 straight-6. I mean, that engine is starting virtually perfect, aside from MPG.
    Test drive anything with the Pentastar V6, and see if your opinion of the old 4.0 still stands. There is a lot of love here for the 4.0, but it was not a modern engine by any means, in terms of NVH, fuel economy, and power delivery. Only about 180 HP out of 4 liters of displacement and about 17 MPG HWY. I owned two Jeeps with this engine and I honestly can say I'm glad Jeep moved on from that nostalgic lump.

  18. Member 200HP4dr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 21st, 2001
    Location
    NE. OH
    Posts
    7,485
    03-16-2012 07:43 AM #18
    Quote Originally Posted by brandonwillyumz View Post
    I really hope this doesn't become the Cherokee. The worst decision Jeep ever made was to cease use and production of the 4.0 straight-6. I mean, that engine is starting virtually perfect, aside from MPG.
    Really? That 4.0 wasn't as great as everyone around here says it was. I mean, it worked for the time, but how long can you excuse an engine that blows head gaskets, cracks manifolds and has a relatively inefficient head design?

    Chris
    | 2012 Nissan Leaf | 1995 Jeep Wrangler |
    | 2007 Toyota Prius | 1999 Plymouth Voyager |

  19. Member
    Join Date
    May 15th, 2007
    Location
    Wilmington, DE
    Posts
    10,580
    Vehicles
    2012 Jeep Wrangler
    03-16-2012 07:51 AM #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Air and water do mix View Post
    It's a test mule. It's probably safe to say that since it won't even be shown for nearly a year that it's simply undergoing testing and not exactly it's final shakedown before production begins.
    I do think that there are a few positive things to be gathered from the mule.

    1. Wicked ground clearance. They must be serious about this having off road capability.
    2. Stretched Giulietta body indicates size/wheelbase of final vehicle. The final body will obviously be different.

  20. Geriatric Member Turbio!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 21st, 2005
    Location
    Alamogordo, NM
    Posts
    37,789
    Vehicles
    '13 Subaru Outback
    03-16-2012 07:51 AM #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Bigtree View Post
    One word. Ugly.
    One more word: mule.
    The Cooking Animal is my side project: a blog for horngry food geeks. Check it out!

  21. Geriatric Member Turbio!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 21st, 2005
    Location
    Alamogordo, NM
    Posts
    37,789
    Vehicles
    '13 Subaru Outback
    03-16-2012 07:52 AM #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Live-Wire View Post
    Fix the - worse then a Toyota from the mid 90's to mid 00's exhaust kink/hang - and I'll look at it again... All I see is hanging exhaust pipe in that picture... that's absolutely not acceptable in 2012, especially in an off road vehicle!!! (which should have as flat an underbody as possible, to at least give the illusion that nothing will get damaged if you take it thru some rocks, ruts, and mud).
    Dude, it's still a year out. Patience.
    The Cooking Animal is my side project: a blog for horngry food geeks. Check it out!

  22. Member clutchrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 10th, 2010
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    3,740
    Vehicles
    2012 GLI
    03-16-2012 08:08 AM #22
    People can't be dense to think this design from Alfa is the actual car

    First it was established that it was the "mule" so they are simply testing the engine, tranny and other components. Second Jeep would NEVER let the Liberty/Cherokee go soft in looks. I would as noted above expect something similar to a JGC with more straight edges.

    I'm still waiting to see what they do with it design wise to determine if I get this or the GC for the wife.

  23. Member Mosbius Designs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2nd, 2006
    Posts
    12,182
    Vehicles
    2012 Honda HRX217, 2 Golfs, and a 944.
    03-16-2012 08:10 AM #23
    Quote Originally Posted by clutchrider View Post
    People can't be dense to think this design from Alfa is the actual car
    This is TCL, it really shouldn't surprise you that much.
    I love all cars, I just happen to own a few pieces of german crap at the moment.

  24. Member
    Join Date
    May 15th, 2007
    Location
    Wilmington, DE
    Posts
    10,580
    Vehicles
    2012 Jeep Wrangler
    03-16-2012 08:28 AM #24
    Quote Originally Posted by clutchrider View Post
    People can't be dense to think this design from Alfa is the actual car

    First it was established that it was the "mule" so they are simply testing the engine, tranny and other components. Second Jeep would NEVER let the Liberty/Cherokee go soft in looks. I would as noted above expect something similar to a JGC with more straight edges.

    I'm still waiting to see what they do with it design wise to determine if I get this or the GC for the wife.
    I don't disagree with most of what you said here, but Jeep's design history under Cerebus and Daimler was not stellar (see the original Compass CUV and countless crappy interiors). Even the 1st gen Liberty was soft and googlie-eyed, compared to the Cherokee it replaced, and that Liberty was designed while Chrysler was still independent. Now, I don't think this new Chrysler/Fiat would ever make the same design mistakes as past stewards of the Jeep brand.

  25. Geriatric Member Turbio!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 21st, 2005
    Location
    Alamogordo, NM
    Posts
    37,789
    Vehicles
    '13 Subaru Outback
    03-16-2012 09:21 AM #25
    Quote Originally Posted by whitejeep1989 View Post
    I don't disagree with most of what you said here, but Jeep's design history under Cerebus and Daimler was not stellar (see the original Compass CUV and countless crappy interiors). Even the 1st gen Liberty was soft and googlie-eyed, compared to the Cherokee it replaced, and that Liberty was designed while Chrysler was still independent. Now, I don't think this new Chrysler/Fiat would ever make the same design mistakes as past stewards of the Jeep brand.
    Rumor has it that it looks a bit like the Trailhawk concept and the Grand Cherokee, with a bit of the Renegade concept mixed in.
    The Cooking Animal is my side project: a blog for horngry food geeks. Check it out!

  26. Member clutchrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 10th, 2010
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    3,740
    Vehicles
    2012 GLI
    03-16-2012 09:22 AM #26
    Quote Originally Posted by whitejeep1989 View Post
    I don't disagree with most of what you said here, but Jeep's design history under Cerebus and Daimler was not stellar (see the original Compass CUV and countless crappy interiors). Even the 1st gen Liberty was soft and googlie-eyed, compared to the Cherokee it replaced, and that Liberty was designed while Chrysler was still independent. Now, I don't think this new Chrysler/Fiat would ever make the same design mistakes as past stewards of the Jeep brand.
    I agree that the last Liberty (read not current) was a bit more googlie-eyed to keep with their trend of circular headlamps (a la Wrangler). However I may be in a minority when I say that I really actually like the current look of the Liberty. It reminds me more of the Cherokee and dare I say less feminine/goofy in style. I would think minor exterior upgrades (headlamps, taillamps, panel sculpting in some areas) and an upgraded interior with the PV6 would do wonders for this car.

  27. Member Air and water do mix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 5th, 2004
    Location
    Southern Indiana
    Posts
    18,452
    Vehicles
    '66 Beetle, '69 VW Fastback and an '08 Fit
    03-16-2012 09:54 AM #27
    Quote Originally Posted by whitejeep1989 View Post
    I do think that there are a few positive things to be gathered from the mule.

    1. Wicked ground clearance. They must be serious about this having off road capability.
    2. Stretched Giulietta body indicates size/wheelbase of final vehicle. The final body will obviously be different.
    Oh, I wasn't meaning to imply that information couldn't be gleaned from the spy photos of the mule, only that it was nowhere near production ready.

    Certainly details such as exhaust hangers aren't worked out!
    Quote Originally Posted by Boyz in da Park
    Proletariat, Bourgeoise - Everybody smellin' my potpourri...

  28. Member blue70beetle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 23rd, 2004
    Location
    Lafayette, IN
    Posts
    5,694
    Vehicles
    '00 XJ, '08 N* SRX4 (hers), '70 Beetle (rusty and parked)
    03-16-2012 10:07 AM #28
    Quote Originally Posted by 200HP4dr View Post
    Really? That 4.0 wasn't as great as everyone around here says it was. I mean, it worked for the time, but how long can you excuse an engine that blows head gaskets, cracks manifolds and has a relatively inefficient head design?

    Chris
    I thought the manifold cracking issue was fixed by the late '80s-early '90s. My old '86 had one.

    Also, didn't realize there was a significant problem with head gaskets.

    I'll give you that it's an inefficient head design. The high-output 4.0 makes far less power than many smaller engines, but it's old. Very old. Our current analytical tools for things like combustion events are much different than 20 years ago, when the newest 4.0 would have been designed, and engine management technology has also changed significantly in that time.

  29. Member Boxer2100's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 25th, 2004
    Location
    Helena, MT / Columbus, OH
    Posts
    4,657
    Vehicles
    2006 Subaru Impreza 2.5i
    03-16-2012 10:10 AM #29
    Quote Originally Posted by brandonwillyumz View Post
    I really hope this doesn't become the Cherokee. The worst decision Jeep ever made was to cease use and production of the 4.0 straight-6. I mean, that engine is starting virtually perfect, aside from MPG.
    Aside from being the last of the once-common low revving pushrod inline 6s in the US, what made the 4.0 special?

    Durable and torquey, I get, but virtually perfect?

  30. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 7th, 2006
    Location
    Western Mass
    Posts
    994
    Vehicles
    Jeep 4.0, BMW e12
    03-16-2012 10:14 AM #30
    Quote Originally Posted by 200HP4dr View Post
    Really? That 4.0 wasn't as great as everyone around here says it was. I mean, it worked for the time, but how long can you excuse an engine that blows head gaskets, cracks manifolds and has a relatively inefficient head design?

    Chris
    I think most people like it for its robustness and the fact that is is simple and easy to work on. Blown head gastkets isn't really a widespread problem. Can't argue with the cracked manifolds and inefficient heads though. Like any other engine, it has its share of problems.

  31. 08-22-2012 06:54 AM #31

  32. Member horsty69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 21st, 2003
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,145
    Vehicles
    2013 TSX, 2011 MINI, 2011 Zuma 125
    08-22-2012 07:40 AM #32
    If it looks anything like that or is a cuv it should not be named the Cherokee...I am excited to see it though..I think with Fiats help this could be a step up in quality.

  33. Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 10th, 2012
    Posts
    50
    Vehicles
    G8 GT
    08-22-2012 08:09 AM #33
    Jeep Rogue.

  34. Member MK5golf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 30th, 2012
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    696
    Vehicles
    2009 vw rabbit
    08-22-2012 08:50 AM #34
    Quote Originally Posted by kobra kai View Post
    Jeep Rogue.
    srsly
    Quote Originally Posted by BRealistic View Post
    They quit making manual work trucks because even Hispanics don't know how to drive Manuel anymore.

  35. Senior Member Hostile's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 29th, 2002
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    27,063
    Vehicles
    a subaru and a vw
    08-22-2012 09:07 AM #35
    Quote Originally Posted by kobra kai View Post
    Jeep Rogue.
    Quote Originally Posted by MK5golf View Post
    srsly

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts