Exactly. Don't think so? Do this test.
From cold, start your engine and just let it idle. See how long it takes to get up to working temperature. Then the next day, start your engine and drive and note how long it takes to get up to working temperature.
Mine takes about 10 minutes at idle, or about 1.5 minutes in 45 MPH driving. No contest - an engine under load uses more fuel and thus makes more heat.
Yes, it is generating some heat - but not near as much as when under load. And yes, with no fan at slow or now speed you have no heat extraction - except a minimal amount from radiation - so yes, you need a fan for that reason. OEM's and most interested in cost and quiet operation, not efficiency. A slower shrouded fan at slow speed sounds better than a faster non-shrouded one.
Again, that depends how much of the area the fans actually cover. Typically if that is more than about 60% and the high-speed fans are well sealed to the radiator face, you don't need a shroud from my experience. And when moving forcing all air to go up against the shroud and through the fan is definitely less efficient that it just flowing straight though in the non-fan areas. Adding ducting to force air though the radiator is the key for cooling while moving. When air meets the radiator, if it can go around it instead of through it - it will. Path of least resistance.
Seriously though - if cooling is that iffy without a shroud and those two new high-speed fans, what is needed is a better (or possibly just new) radiator. He could also consider using Evans coolant instead of water/glycol and gain another 100 degrees of buffer before boiling coolant. That especially helps in the heat of summer where the temperature delta from the air coming off the road is much closer to the boiling point of water/glycol than other times of the year.
Here is what I am running - a single high-speed fan on an all-aluminum afco scirocco radiator with Evans. No problems any time of the year, or on the track.
