A few comments:
- The Evo X MR or SE Touring is a stupid car. The GSR is the only Evo for this generation.
- Nevertheless he totally nailed the Evo. He gets it, the good and the bad. Nothing else to say.
- The lack of ESC defeat on the R is just ****ing stupid. We as R fans and owners shouldn't be making weak sauce excuses for it. Its just a big honking ridiculous problem.
Thankfully, I won't be tracking the R as its just too expensive for me to risk on the track. That was actually true for me about the Evo X as well. I'll go buy a high mile VIII with a bunch of mods and put that on the track instead and enjoy the R with ESC enabled, with its wonderful demeanor on public roads.
I can appreciate your POV, but here's the real question. If the ESP was fully disabled, is the R faster around the track? Or is it just that in this car, driving rally style, throwing the car into the corner and powering through simply is off the table as a option? I've yet to see anyone on these pages talk about ponying up the 10Gs for some Ohlins and heading to the Maine woods. So while it might be a valid criticism that some of the fun has been capped, its not at all clear to me, particularly given the admittedly flawed C&D track testing results, that the car's lap times are in any real sense compromised on track given the inability to defeat ESP.
I'd agree with you that its a shame we won't get the opportunity to explore the car fully unless someday we find a way to defeat ESP. But in my case, the car likely will never see a track. I have a dedicated car for that purpose, and frankly no fresh from the factory road with or without ESP will ever be comparable in the slightest to it. And so, the first half of your review is spot on and all that really matters to me. Personally, while I fully understand the desire to acquire a single road car capable serious track work, in the end I've yet to meet a car that has reasonably managed the compromises and been good enough at either.
It would be nice to make our own decisions on ESP enablement, but I think we all know that for better or worse those days are rapidly drawing to a close here in the US. I suspect that in the very near future those who decide that nannie disabling is a make or break decision will have to be satisfied with buying used.
Again, terrific review. After watching I'd simply suggest you buy the R and use the extra 8Gs for a beat up spec Miata.
Currently: 2017 TTS (on order), 2015 GLA45 AMG, 2011 F150 SCrew 5.0, 2000 911 C2 Brumos 'B59', 1970/73 911 RSR
Past VWs: 2012 Golf R CW 2DR, 2010 GTI, 1984 Sirocco Wolfsburg Edition, 1979 Dasher, 1971 Super Beetle, 1969 Beetle,
Past Audis: 2015 A3 TDI (buy back a'comin), 2006 A6 2.7T, 2000 A3, 199? 90, 198? 4000 CS
Ok, I finally watched the video, the only faults, I see in his review is he compares price on out the door and not MSRP, or the fact that I picked up my same spec'd EVO for 37k in Nov of 09 the week they released the touring in the US and that Mitsubishi doesn't make microwaves or if they do they don't sell them in the US. Is the interior on the R nicer looking and of better quality than the EVO, he'll yes, but with the leather interior in the EVO it's definitely nicer looking than the cloth, and the car is a joy to drive on such a different level than any other car at its price, you quickly forget to complain and hands down Mitsubishi's navigation system is a lot better than the one that is available in the R. The mfi in the EVO is full color and tells you exactly which wheels are getting how much power. I agree that the manual in the R is more enjoyable to drive than the dual clutch sst in the EVO, but the EVO's transmission is technically better and can shift faster than any man ever could, it is truly one of the best dcts out there at any price, but IMO any dct leaves you somewhat unattached to the vehicle and I think it is safe to say, that we all here what to be completely involved when driving a car.
I think the fact that I drive an R now and not an EVO says more about me than it does about either car.
Mechanical Engineer | Certified SolidWorks Expert | Reverse Engineering and Design Services Available
------- 4dr AWD 16V Turbo MK1 Rabbit Build -------
I never did track days to be the fastest car out there, or even to get the fastest possible time from my car – to that I could just hand the keys to a better driver. We’re not getting paid for lap times, we’re out there for fun and to learn to drive faster.
I did all my track days in a ’95 325i which had only traction control, not ESP – and I turned that off. Knowing you’re one mistake away from a concrete wall makes you more cautious, and probably a safer driver. It’s not like ESP can protect you from all mistakes.
So... just wondering if there is any silver lining to always-on ESP.
Only one I can think of is insurance rates. In theory, this "feature" should make the R much cheaper to insure than an all-other-things-being-pretty-much-equal alternative like the Evo or STI. Does it?
USAA has it down as a Golf R. I didn't even tell her that, I gave her the VIN, and she verified it was a Golf R.
Current: 2017 Golf R Oryx White, DSG- Current 2017 Camaro 2SS 2016 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8 Night Edition
Previous VWs: 2013 Jetta Hybrid | 2012 Golf R | 2012 Golf R Candy Sold(again) | 2006 Jetta GLI PKG#2 DSG | 2005 GTI 1.8T | 2005 Golf GLS Indigo Blue
By your rational APR wouldn't make performance software because of the risk of being sued by someone that wraps their chipped car around a tree.
Last edited by webcrawlr; 04-05-2012 at 11:33 AM.