VWVortex


Links back to The Car Lounge (opens in same window)

View Poll Results: Wagons on the Cheap (Sub $10K)

Voters
125. You may not vote on this poll
  • Audi A4

    33 26.40%
  • Saab 9-5

    14 11.20%
  • Subaru Outback

    42 33.60%
  • Vokswagon Passat

    24 19.20%
  • Volvo XC70

    12 9.60%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 35 of 75

Thread: Wagons on the cheap

  1. Member That1njguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 25th, 2009
    Location
    Central NJ
    Posts
    2,182
    04-12-2012 12:41 PM #1
    What say you mighty TLC? Which wagon would you choose on the cheap? The goal is a cheap wagon with 25+ mpg's.

    All of these choices are 03 or newer. Any ownership comments are welcome.

    Audi A4 Avant


    Saab 9-5


    Subaru Outback


    Volkswagon Passat

    Volvo XC70
    Last edited by That1njguy; 04-12-2012 at 12:59 PM.

  2. Member R-Dubya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 23rd, 2011
    Posts
    595
    Vehicles
    '86 Mustang GT
    04-12-2012 12:44 PM #2
    Wouldn't an Outback be considerably cheaper than the rest of the cars you posted up?
    Seems sort of out of place among the rest of the choices.

  3. Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 17th, 2003
    Posts
    22,902
    Vehicles
    LG Optimus G Pro (stock)
    04-12-2012 12:58 PM #3
    All the above are decent except VAG cars, simply don't trust older used VAG. One incident away from major fix bill.

  4. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 25th, 2012
    Location
    Shytcago, IL - hell hole of all hell holes
    Posts
    1,662
    Vehicles
    74 Subaru DL, 78 280Z,94 Sentra SER, 86 CRX Si, 86 Suzuki 700 Intruder (still own) 07 Fit (still own
    04-12-2012 01:03 PM #4
    Quote Originally Posted by R-Dubya View Post
    Wouldn't an Outback be considerably cheaper than the rest of the cars you posted up?
    Seems sort of out of place among the rest of the choices.
    Saab prices have a good chance to drop fast now. I still haven't heard of any possible buyers. To make things worse I read in Motor Trend how China is trying to cut down on the number of automobile companies now. Why I don't know. All I know is that could make it tougher for Saab to find a Chinese savior.

  5. Member VW1.8Tsunami's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 7th, 2007
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    9,123
    Vehicles
    2011 Ram 1500, 2003 Stratus SXT
    04-12-2012 01:04 PM #5
    protoge5?
    Previously Owned: 2010 Kia Forte, 2010 JK Wrangler, 2007 Passat, 2003 Jetta, 2002 Jetta, 1992 Sentra, 1998 Dakota, 1990 Ford Ranger

  6. Member CodeMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 12th, 2006
    Location
    Denverish
    Posts
    7,254
    Vehicles
    Scirocco 16v, A2 ABA, '03 Tyke Hauler GLS
    04-12-2012 01:04 PM #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Vision33r View Post
    All the above are decent except VAG cars, simply don't trust older used VAG. One incident away from major fix bill.


    Our Passat has been great. In 5 years of ownership I've replaced 3 CV boots and done a timing belt job. It hauls an 8' countertop, handles reasonably well with summer tires, and gets along just fine with the 170hp 1.8t.

    It does seem to hover just below 25mpg during city driving. On the highway, low 30s are typical.
    Quote Originally Posted by seadoo2006 View Post
    I think Scirocco owners are just a little dense in the head...
    I, uhh... well, ok.

  7. Member Heffernan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 17th, 2006
    Location
    Howard County, MD
    Posts
    4,268
    Vehicles
    A lifted Outback
    04-12-2012 01:15 PM #7
    Outback w/ Baja suspension swap.
    IAG Performace | AndrewTech Automotive
    Baltimore Ravens - Super Bowl XLVII Champions!

  8. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 14th, 1999
    Location
    Mullica Hill, NJ
    Posts
    1,015
    04-12-2012 01:16 PM #8
    Based on your list I'd choose the subie. Outside of your list I'd look at the BMW 325iT

  9. Member
    Join Date
    Sep 24th, 2011
    Location
    Chino Hills
    Posts
    320
    Vehicles
    1997 MKIII GTI 2.Slow
    04-12-2012 01:23 PM #9
    I would go Passat if you get a stick. The auto's they had at that point are expensive, and not known for longevity.

    Outback? Reliable yes, but almost as bad a mpg as a suv.

    SAAB interesting, and quite reliable from what I hear, but parts would scare me now.

  10. Member GolfTango's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 15th, 2001
    Location
    Not Fancy CT
    Posts
    5,906
    Vehicles
    09 Mazda5 GT, 09 Saturn Aura XE
    04-12-2012 01:25 PM #10
    What's the price point?
    My flickr
    Me

    The best way to give advice to your children is to find out what they want and then advise them to do it. - Harry S. Truman

  11. Forum Sponsor Brendan@bwalkauto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 28th, 2009
    Location
    Redwood City, CA
    Posts
    5,268
    Vehicles
    2001 540/6, LEAF SL.
    04-12-2012 01:29 PM #11
    Inside your list, I'd go with the Passat or the Subaru.

    Outside your list, you can probably find a 525iT or 530iT, and if you don't mind getting your hands dirty every now and again, they'll run 200k easily, and are a blast to drive.

  12. Member zaYG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 28th, 2009
    Location
    Derry NH
    Posts
    3,340
    Vehicles
    glorified Volkswagen for middle class white women
    04-12-2012 01:32 PM #12
    I'll be the ballsy one and take the Saab.
    flickr | Follow me on instagram: @ginger_reporter

  13. Member clutchrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 10th, 2010
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    3,740
    Vehicles
    2012 GLI
    04-12-2012 01:33 PM #13
    I picked the V70. My parents have a newer one and I love it. I didn't pick the Outback cause that's the wrong version. Needs more Legacy B Spec.


  14. Member jepva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 10th, 2011
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    1,211
    Vehicles
    '12 Regal GS 6MT, 4runner V8 w/ Quattro
    04-12-2012 01:33 PM #14
    Any reason you're limiting yourself to the XC70, instead of the V70?

    Based on you options, and the fact you're probably looking at older and higher mileage, your best choice is Volvo or a Legacy/Outback wagon.

    I trust Volvo's with even 200k miles on them, and they're a remarkable value at their used selling prices. There's plenty of well taken care of 100k+ mile examples under $5-6k, and can also be found in manual fairly easily. The T5's can get around 30 on the highway, and also offer decent performance. Subaru stuff won't get decent mpg's because of the AWD.

    Only old high mileage Passat I would trust the TDI. Problem with the Legacy or Outback wagons, even though they're cheap to fix and hold up decently, is the Subaru used prices are a joke. People with their 200k wagons think they are still worth $10k, which is why I recommend Volvos.
    Last edited by jepva; 04-12-2012 at 01:37 PM.

  15. Member bikerboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 23rd, 2005
    Location
    MA/NH
    Posts
    2,670
    Vehicles
    2004 Subaru Forester XT, 1973 MG Midget
    04-12-2012 01:35 PM #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Spatzle View Post
    I would go Passat if you get a stick. The auto's they had at that point are expensive, and not known for longevity.

    Outback? Reliable yes, but almost as bad a mpg as a suv.

    SAAB interesting, and quite reliable from what I hear, but parts would scare me now.
    I get 28 MPG on the highway with my 2000 Outback. Our 2002 H6 Outback gets 26. I'd hardly call that as bad as an SUV. The both do about 20-21 MPG in the city, which is pretty consistent with the rest of the cara in the poll.

    If it were my decision, it would come down to the Outback and 9-5.

  16. Moderator Oliver@triplezoom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 30th, 1999
    Location
    Fredericton NB Canada
    Posts
    43,584
    Vehicles
    2006 Mazda6 GT wagon, 2007 Mazda3 GT sedan
    04-12-2012 01:38 PM #16
    I'd say Mazda 6 but 25 mpg might be a stretch. I only ever got two tanks over 25 MPG.

  17. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 5th, 2004
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    5,788
    Vehicles
    V70R, CRV
    04-12-2012 02:19 PM #17
    I vote V70

  18. Member patrickvr6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 29th, 2001
    Location
    Atlanta GA
    Posts
    6,844
    Vehicles
    '87 930 '77 Bronco '01 325iT '08 Xterra
    04-12-2012 02:25 PM #18
    Do you need or want AWD? If not it opens up the options some, if you require it that is going to make it harder to get 25mpg in town.

  19. Member Omnilith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 15th, 2010
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    1,049
    Vehicles
    2002 SVT Focus, 2000 Focus ZX3, 1966 Cortina, 1987 Dodge Charger, 1998 Tacoma, 1983 Plymouth Scamp
    04-12-2012 02:26 PM #19
    03-04 Ford Focus ZTW with a 2.3L and a stick.

  20. Member That1njguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 25th, 2009
    Location
    Central NJ
    Posts
    2,182
    04-12-2012 02:31 PM #20
    The Mazda's. BMW's are worthy considerations, however there just aren't many in my area. I reason why the XC70 was chosen over the V70 is for the more powerful motor and all wheel drive. The 2.4 is a bit of a slug. I consider the V70R or Subaru B Spec, but you're not touching those under $10K. The 3 series is too small as a tendacy to do some people carrying. So that takes out Jetta and Focus wagon.
    Last edited by That1njguy; 04-12-2012 at 02:33 PM.

  21. Member
    Join Date
    Nov 3rd, 2008
    Location
    DC Metro Area
    Posts
    3,169
    Vehicles
    06 Mustang GT Vert 5MT, 08 TSX 5AT, 95 Volvo 850 GLT 4AT
    04-12-2012 02:33 PM #21
    I vote E39, which isn't on this list.

    Otherwise 9-5 wagon fasho, 2.3t Aero with a manual.
    http://sixsylinder.blogspot.com

    Quote Originally Posted by stacman View Post
    Top gear recommended it, so I bought it.

  22. Senior Member Aonarch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 4th, 2006
    Location
    SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES, AUSTRALIA, OCEANIA, AKA UPSIDE-DOWN LAND, WHERE THE SPIDERS WILL EAT YOUR F
    Posts
    24,592
    Vehicles
    B6 | E30 | MKVI | Versys 650 | VT750DC
    04-12-2012 02:34 PM #22
    Subie and that is coming from a VAG guy.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy Clarkson
    (On the Monaro) *licks hood Mmm. Love it. I love it! Someone in Australia had a picture of me and said, "Lets build that bloke a car!"
    ██████████████████
    Vote Yes To Create A 3rd Gen 2.0 TSI Section!

  23. Member digraph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 23rd, 1999
    Location
    Bay State
    Posts
    1,267
    Vehicles
    '12 Impreza, '10 Forester, '09 Matchbox Unimog
    04-12-2012 02:39 PM #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Aonarch View Post
    Subie and that is coming from a VAG guy.
    Passat, and that's coming from an ex-VW, new Subie guy!

    Provided
    a) it's a 5 MT FWD
    b) you can work on the car yourself.

    That Passat will go 250K, trounce the Outback in MPG, and you'll have access to cheap, new parts that are easy to find.
    Not an enthusiast.

  24. Member Tiny Voices's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 25th, 2011
    Location
    Ellicott City, MD
    Posts
    906
    Vehicles
    Just a mk4
    04-12-2012 02:48 PM #24
    Quote Originally Posted by That1njguy View Post
    The Mazda's. BMW's are worthy considerations, however there just aren't many in my area. I reason why the XC70 was chosen over the V70 is for the more powerful motor and all wheel drive. The 2.4 is a bit of a slug. I consider the V70R or Subaru B Spec, but you're not touching those under $10K. The 3 series is too small as a tendacy to do some people carrying. So that takes out Jetta and Focus wagon.
    Can you get the 2.4t in a Volvo wagon? My mom dailys a 2001 fwd s60 2.4t and with the t5r turbo SHE installed and a tune, the thing flies.
    It also has 260k on it and it never has given us a problem. I'm sure that if you could get the stock 2.4t in a wagon it would be more than quick enough for what you want. You might can probably get 25 mpg out of a stock one. Volvos are pretty cheap and go forever so I definitely choose the Volvo.

    Sent from my Inspire 4g using Tapatalk 2
    8v Society #372

  25. Member
    Join Date
    May 10th, 2006
    Location
    Vancouver/Melbourne
    Posts
    1,080
    Vehicles
    Tiguan Highline, Mazda 6 Hatch Diesel 6MT
    04-12-2012 02:58 PM #25
    Most of the euro models would be rattling/squeaking by now.

    I'd go for the Outback H6 VDC. The economy would be comparable to most of the choices you've listed. The 1.8T in a Passat/A4 wagon is dog slow, and anyone that claims they are reliable are beyond delusional/fanboys.

    The McIntosh system in this thing will make your ears bleed, offering very very good SQ.
    I'm not sure if the Volvo offers the Dynaudio or a Premium Dolby system on this generation.

  26. Member Rockmonky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 7th, 2003
    Location
    boulder co
    Posts
    2,023
    Vehicles
    1979 Rabbit 4-door
    04-12-2012 03:05 PM #26
    I'm a big fan of the Swedish ones =) i love driving the 9-5 wagon, and i really like that generation of Volvo.

    if you can find a passat wagon with v6 4motion, that would be my top choice, but not the best gas mileage..

    (did you exclude e39 bmw wagons because of mpg? my all-time favorite wagon)

  27. Member Live-Wire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 9th, 2005
    Location
    Guelph Ontario
    Posts
    10,275
    Vehicles
    2008 BMW 335i
    04-12-2012 04:12 PM #27
    V70... they were really designed to 'go the distance'. I've got good friends with a battle-tank of an 02' (first year of the P2, maybe 01'). V70 2.4T... almost 500k kms on it. No work done to the engine aside from a minor rebuild to the turbo at around 400-450k kms... the culprit was the blowoff valve was stuck open. While it was being fixed they reconditioned it for the sake of it burning oil slightly thru its seals (maybe 1/2 a liter every few tanks of gas... not bad, but not going to get better). Their transmission is original - benefited from the software updates since new to turn into a reliable unit - the first few years, there were some transmission issues on the V70 due to poor choices in how it was programmed. Suspension lasted till around 350k kms, then it was re-done completely (this is phenomenal for a luxury car in Canada... our roads are horrible on ball joints and bushings).

    They get roughly 25mpg, maybe a hair under when driven in town... but on the highway you'll hit your target. All of these cars will struggle with a continuous 25mpg tho. The Subaru and Audi especially, with AWD.

    I'd avoid the XC70 unless you want AWD. The added weight and complexity might not be worth it at the pumps, or your wallet in terms of repairs (the AWD system has one or two weak points, they don't usually show up on 2.4T's, but you might see the angle gear go on a T5).

    Another vote for Volvo!

    Quote Originally Posted by too_slow View Post
    Most of the euro models would be rattling/squeaking by now.

    I'd go for the Outback H6 VDC. The economy would be comparable to most of the choices you've listed. The 1.8T in a Passat/A4 wagon is dog slow, and anyone that claims they are reliable are beyond delusional/fanboys.

    The McIntosh system in this thing will make your ears bleed, offering very very good SQ.
    I'm not sure if the Volvo offers the Dynaudio or a Premium Dolby system on this generation.
    The Volvo did have a premium sound option... Dynaudio branding came a bit later. Volvo has always used high quality speakers and stereo systems as standard.

    The 1.8T isn't any slower then the 2.5i in an outback... takes the H6 to make it feel anything but completely gutless.

    As for squeaks/rattles... I think any older car might have them. Test and be sure. My A4 with 200k kms on it made no noises. My friends V70 only rattled after they got into an accident with it. When they finally got their suspension done, the door panel re-attached properly, and the one blown speaker replaced (mom, dad, and 3 kids learned to drive in it, and abused the living crap out of that car... what do you expect) the car was rattle-free. I've been in a few B5.5 Passats that are drum-tight too. The Subaru shown in the OP's picture is a pretty solid car, but the interior is dreary, the headlights seem from about 1985 in terms of output, fuel economy wasn't great for a 4-cylinder, and it had no more/less noises then any other higher quality older car I've driven (was a 2002 Outback sedan that I drove).
    Last edited by Live-Wire; 04-12-2012 at 04:18 PM.

  28. Member zaYG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 28th, 2009
    Location
    Derry NH
    Posts
    3,340
    Vehicles
    glorified Volkswagen for middle class white women
    04-12-2012 04:27 PM #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Wanganrunner View Post
    I vote E39, which isn't on this list.

    Otherwise 9-5 wagon fasho, 2.3t Aero with a manual.
    Unicorn.
    flickr | Follow me on instagram: @ginger_reporter

  29. Member stascom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 12th, 2009
    Location
    So. Oregon
    Posts
    4,973
    Vehicles
    a Nissan
    04-12-2012 04:36 PM #29
    Quote Originally Posted by Oliver@triplezoom View Post
    I'd say Mazda 6 but 25 mpg might be a stretch. I only ever got two tanks over 25 MPG.
    This.


    Quote Originally Posted by Omnilith View Post
    03-04 Ford Focus ZTW with a 2.3L and a stick.
    And this.

  30. 04-12-2012 06:22 PM #30
    Why no hemi Magnum? You guys have somehting against man-wagons? Nothing personal, but these all seem kind of sissy town.

    Carry on.

  31. Member R3Drew's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 4th, 2010
    Location
    Man Jose, CA
    Posts
    767
    Vehicles
    Personal: 2008 Silverado 1500 VMax Work: 2012 Camry L Sold: 2008 R32
    04-12-2012 06:31 PM #31
    Quote Originally Posted by That1njguy View Post
    What say you mighty TLC?


    I don't think they'd have much to say about wagons, however I'm almost positive they'd advise against the pursuit of falling water.

  32. Member patrickvr6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 29th, 2001
    Location
    Atlanta GA
    Posts
    6,844
    Vehicles
    '87 930 '77 Bronco '01 325iT '08 Xterra
    04-12-2012 06:54 PM #32
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Zero View Post
    Why no hemi Magnum? You guys have somehting against man-wagons? Nothing personal, but these all seem kind of sissy town.

    Carry on.
    When I bought my wagon I ruled them out because they aren't available with a manual an they are boats. I just don't need a car that big.

  33. Senior Member A.Wilder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 1st, 2003
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    20,714
    Vehicles
    99 V70
    04-12-2012 06:55 PM #33
    Quote Originally Posted by Vision33r View Post
    All the above are decent except VAG cars, simply don't trust older used VAG. One incident away from major fix bill.
    This is my feeling too. Volvos have been extremely cheap to own and operate in my experience, VW's not so much.
    Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one's lifetime.
    Mark Twain

  34. Member Volvo_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 19th, 2009
    Posts
    3,086
    Vehicles
    2006 Volvo XC90 2.5T, current demo: 2010 Volvo XC60 T6
    04-12-2012 07:00 PM #34
    V70, not XC.
    What I do for a living? This is a small part of it www.lehmanvolvo.blogspot.com ...and now, so is this: www.infinitiofmechanicsburg.blogspot.com

  35. 04-12-2012 07:04 PM #35
    Quote Originally Posted by patrickvr6 View Post
    When I bought my wagon I ruled them out because they aren't available with a manual an they are boats. I just don't need a car that big.
    All wagons are boats. The magnum is just a bit bigger.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts