VWVortex


Links back to The Car Lounge (opens in same window)
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 28 of 28

Thread: Mazdaspeed 3 vs Honda Odyssey... wait what?

  1. Member
    Join Date
    Nov 5th, 2008
    Location
    Morristown/Bayonne, NJ
    Posts
    147
    Vehicles
    08 GTI
    04-26-2012 09:15 AM #1
    came across this on yahoo! autos, arguably the be-all, end-all in automotive journalism

    Reality check: Let’s talk about space and size. For around the same price and fuel economy and comparable power as the Mazdaspeed3, you can get the 2012 Honda Odyssey which seats seven passengers (two more than the Mazda), has nearly double the passenger volume (172.5 cubic feet versus 94.6 cubic feet) plus another 25 or so inches in length (202.9 versus 177.6).

    On a serious note, who ever wrote this.... I.... nevermind I'm speechless

    http://autos.yahoo.com/news/5-small-...ge.html?page=4

  2. Member VeeDubDriver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 1st, 2001
    Location
    Boynton Beach, FL
    Posts
    9,256
    Vehicles
    '12 Golf R Rising Blue / '11 Infiniti G25
    04-26-2012 09:19 AM #2
    Quote Originally Posted by jfolt View Post
    came across this on yahoo! autos, arguably the be-all, end-all in automotive journalism

    Reality check: Let’s talk about space and size. For around the same price and fuel economy and comparable power as the Mazdaspeed3, you can get the 2012 Honda Odyssey which seats seven passengers (two more than the Mazda), has nearly double the passenger volume (172.5 cubic feet versus 94.6 cubic feet) plus another 25 or so inches in length (202.9 versus 177.6).

    On a serious note, who ever wrote this.... I.... nevermind I'm speechless

    http://autos.yahoo.com/news/5-small-...ge.html?page=4
    Since it was an article on small vehicles with poor fuel economy, I think the point they are trying to make is that the brick of an Odyssey has similar power and mileage, but is a much larger vehicle. I always thought the MS3 should get better mileage, but it may be an issue of it performing (mileage-wise) better in real life than on the EPA test cycle.

  3. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 15th, 2010
    Location
    Chesterfield, Indiana
    Posts
    759
    Vehicles
    2009 Caliber SRT4, 1989 Mazda B2200, 2010 RAV4
    04-26-2012 09:21 AM #3
    LOL, retarded:

    Reality check: The much smaller Subaru Impreza Wagon WRX STI gets the same fuel economy as the brawny Ford F-150 truck, which carries a 3.7-liter V-6 engine that can generate 302 horsepower and 278-lb-ft of torque and weighs (curb weight) 1300 more pounds than the Subaru Impreza Wagon (4,685 pounds versus 3,384 pounds).

    Reality check: The 2012 Porsche 911 Carrera (with 7-speed PDK automatic transmission) gets better economy than the Ralliart trim of the Mitsubishi Lancer.


    Well, that settles it then! I'll just be getting a 911 instead of a Rallart Lancer and an F150 instead of a WRX.

    I see what they are trying to do, but I really don't think anybody interested in buying a WRX is going to not buy it because it gets below average gas mileage. If you were talking about something like a Hyundai Accent getting bad mileage, then yeah, OK.
    Last edited by Roboturner913; 04-26-2012 at 09:23 AM.

  4. Member Mike!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 17th, 2002
    Location
    Ontario & Ohio
    Posts
    10,016
    Vehicles
    2010 Mazda6 GT-I4
    04-26-2012 09:22 AM #4
    Wow... and an STI gets the fuel economy of a "much bigger" F-150... as if size is a benefit in all situations.

    The MS3 and STI may not haul 5 kids or 3 yards of soil, but the Ody and F-series aren't touching them on a backroad either. But, apparently, it's all about size per dollar.

  5. 04-26-2012 09:27 AM #5
    People buying those cars know what they are getting with gas mileage, if I was after fuel economy, I would get a fuel efficient car.

  6. Member audiphile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 17th, 2001
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    11,075
    Vehicles
    mkI coupe, mkV GTI, ford escapé avec man pedal
    04-26-2012 09:29 AM #6
    So if I want better fuel economy and don't care about performance I shouldn't purchase the performance model?? Thanks, got it.

    Embarrassing "article". No way it would have made it to physical print if we still did that kind of thing. It bothers me how the Internet has watered down journalism, and automotive websites seems to be the worst offenders. At least this one seems to have been run through spell check.
    dasjettakartell - immortalized on the wall, forgotten on the floor

    #HOTTESTCHICKINTHAGAME

  7. Member VeeDubDriver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 1st, 2001
    Location
    Boynton Beach, FL
    Posts
    9,256
    Vehicles
    '12 Golf R Rising Blue / '11 Infiniti G25
    04-26-2012 09:34 AM #7
    It is curious that an S4 gets the same mileage as a MS3: http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find....31584&id=31180

  8. Senior Member FlashRedGLS1.8T's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 17th, 2001
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    21,513
    04-26-2012 09:37 AM #8
    Quote Originally Posted by VeeDubDriver View Post
    It is curious that an S4 gets the same mileage as a MS3: http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find....31584&id=31180
    Given the posts in this thread, it is not curious.

  9. 04-26-2012 09:40 AM #9
    as an auto enthusiast, i would take a honda odyssey over a MS3 in a cocaine heartbeat.

    i am an odyssey fanboy.

    carry on.

  10. Member audiphile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 17th, 2001
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    11,075
    Vehicles
    mkI coupe, mkV GTI, ford escapé avec man pedal
    04-26-2012 09:43 AM #10


    I think I found somebody dumber than the author.
    dasjettakartell - immortalized on the wall, forgotten on the floor

    #HOTTESTCHICKINTHAGAME

  11. Member VW1.8Tsunami's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 7th, 2007
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    9,123
    Vehicles
    2011 Ram 1500, 2003 Stratus SXT
    04-26-2012 09:48 AM #11
    Quote Originally Posted by audiphile View Post


    I think I found somebody dumber than the author.
    LOOL, wow
    Previously Owned: 2010 Kia Forte, 2010 JK Wrangler, 2007 Passat, 2003 Jetta, 2002 Jetta, 1992 Sentra, 1998 Dakota, 1990 Ford Ranger

  12. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 15th, 2010
    Location
    Chesterfield, Indiana
    Posts
    759
    Vehicles
    2009 Caliber SRT4, 1989 Mazda B2200, 2010 RAV4
    04-26-2012 10:15 AM #12
    Quote Originally Posted by audiphile View Post


    I think I found somebody dumber than the author.
    She probably lives in my neighborhood.

    I live in a former GM town and we can't drive either of our cars (Mazda, Nissan and a Toyota) without some local yokel putting their 2 cents in about it. A couple times a week somebody leaves a note under the windshield wiper saying something like "every foreign car you buy is an American job lost" or something equally stupid.

  13. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 11th, 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    848
    Vehicles
    2013 VW Tiguan, 2007 VW GTI, 1992 Nissan 300ZXTT
    04-26-2012 10:28 AM #13
    Quote Originally Posted by audiphile View Post


    I think I found somebody dumber than the author.
    posts like this are pretty much the norm on any yahoo affiliated site.

  14. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 11th, 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    848
    Vehicles
    2013 VW Tiguan, 2007 VW GTI, 1992 Nissan 300ZXTT
    04-26-2012 10:33 AM #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Roboturner913 View Post
    LOL, retarded:

    Reality check: The much smaller Subaru Impreza Wagon WRX STI gets the same fuel economy as the brawny Ford F-150 truck, which carries a 3.7-liter V-6 engine that can generate 302 horsepower and 278-lb-ft of torque and weighs (curb weight) 1300 more pounds than the Subaru Impreza Wagon (4,685 pounds versus 3,384 pounds).

    Reality check: The 2012 Porsche 911 Carrera (with 7-speed PDK automatic transmission) gets better economy than the Ralliart trim of the Mitsubishi Lancer.


    Well, that settles it then! I'll just be getting a 911 instead of a Rallart Lancer and an F150 instead of a WRX.

    I see what they are trying to do, but I really don't think anybody interested in buying a WRX is going to not buy it because it gets below average gas mileage. If you were talking about something like a Hyundai Accent getting bad mileage, then yeah, OK.

    i agree that their premise is misinformed. for example, not everyone who purchases a car values size as one of their top priorities. but they do have a point in regards to fuel economy. there really is no reason that the wrx/sti/evo continue to get the abysmal fuel economy that they do, especially when cars and trucks that weigh significantly more and have similar power outputs manage to get just as, if not better, fuel economy. but i imagine it is something that subaru/mitsu will address with their coming redesigns.

  15. Member Mike!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 17th, 2002
    Location
    Ontario & Ohio
    Posts
    10,016
    Vehicles
    2010 Mazda6 GT-I4
    04-26-2012 10:40 AM #15
    Quote Originally Posted by scsuh View Post
    i agree that their premise is misinformed. for example, not everyone who purchases a car values size as one of their top priorities. but they do have a point in regards to fuel economy. there really is no reason that the wrx/sti/evo continue to get the abysmal fuel economy that they do, especially when cars and trucks that weigh significantly more and have similar power outputs manage to get just as, if not better, fuel economy. but i imagine it is something that subaru/mitsu will address with their coming redesigns.
    Gearing and tuning for performance over economy is likely the cause of that... there's more to it than weight and peak power. Like you say, however, a shift towards reducing CO2 emissions is happening, and you're more likely to see bumps in fuel economy with only minor increases in power for upcoming generation changes.

  16. Member SpecialFX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 19th, 2006
    Location
    Tell City, IN
    Posts
    3,638
    Vehicles
    06 Stage 2 GTI, 82 Stage 3 G60 Rabbit, 85 F-250
    04-26-2012 10:41 AM #16
    Well damn! I guess I need to cross off the sti from the vehicles I want to buy to save money on fuel!
    Team Reaper of the BABE 2012 road rally proudly supports Susan G. Komen for the cure in memory of my Mother, who lost her fight with breast cancer in 2003
    Please go to our team donation page to make a donation to help end breast cancer forever!

  17. Member Slipstream's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 8th, 2002
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    9,680
    Vehicles
    5.0L, 10 cylinders
    04-26-2012 10:57 AM #17
    Quote Originally Posted by audiphile View Post


    I think I found somebody dumber than the author.


    This is why I stopped reading news story comment sections for a long time (and probably need to continue not reading them)... I lose a little more faith in humanity every time I do.
    07 rabbit | 08 jetta | seventwosix | flickr

  18. Member GTI 20v's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 12th, 2000
    Location
    Right over there
    Posts
    16,025
    Vehicles
    2005 S2000; 2011 Mini Countryman S All4; 2010 Jetta Sportwagen TDI; 1966 Pontiac GTO
    04-26-2012 11:01 AM #18
    Quote Originally Posted by audiphile View Post


    I think I found somebody dumber than the author.
    I'll bet my left nut that more than 50% of the contents of this woman's house were made in China and purchased at Wal Mart.
    Quote Originally Posted by DUBLUV401 View Post
    I am not here for grammer lesson's

  19. 04-26-2012 11:12 AM #19
    The MS3 is very capable of getting decent gas mileage so long as you stay out of boost.

    The WRX/STI and Evo needs to be tuned to lean out the fuel mixture at partial throttle to get that gas mileage up. But in order to do that, they need factory catalytic converters that can keep the emissions (which are heightened from leaning out the mixture) down to a normal amount.

    There isn't much to the Evo's and STI's aside from their power plants. All other aspects were cut to keep cost down. Using better catalytic converters and tuning for fuel economy is one of those areas I would assume Subaru and Mitsubishi said "**** it. People will buy them anyway."

  20. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 4th, 2006
    Posts
    957
    04-26-2012 11:13 AM #20
    We like performance cars, but also appreciate getting close to 30 mpg while cruising on the highway with the S4 & Carrera.

  21. Member adrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 14th, 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    10,562
    Vehicles
    Yaris x2
    04-26-2012 11:24 AM #21
    Not as bad as this:
    Improving the signal-to-noise ratio

  22. Member 01tj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 8th, 2005
    Location
    WV
    Posts
    4,216
    Vehicles
    02 330i, 09 Flex, 01 Wrangler
    04-26-2012 11:37 AM #22
    Quote Originally Posted by Roboturner913 View Post
    She probably lives in my neighborhood.

    I live in a former GM town and we can't drive either of our cars (Mazda, Nissan and a Toyota) without some local yokel putting their 2 cents in about it. A couple times a week somebody leaves a note under the windshield wiper saying something like "every foreign car you buy is an American job lost" or something equally stupid.
    I don't live in a GM town but I hear the same stuff around here. "GM makes the best vehicles and everything else is un-American". I thought it was just a red-neck thing

    Quote Originally Posted by scsuh View Post
    i agree that their premise is misinformed. for example, not everyone who purchases a car values size as one of their top priorities. but they do have a point in regards to fuel economy. there really is no reason that the wrx/sti/evo continue to get the abysmal fuel economy that they do, especially when cars and trucks that weigh significantly more and have similar power outputs manage to get just as, if not better, fuel economy. but i imagine it is something that subaru/mitsu will address with their coming redesigns.
    Compare the 0-60 and track times of the vehicles and you'll see why the smaller vehicles are getting the same mileage. MOST people buy large vehicles like a van or a full size truck out of necessity so it helps to save a bit at the pump. MOST people buy the smaller vehicles listed because they enjoy driving and will sacrifice a little mpg's for performance

  23. Member InfinitiG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 7th, 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    4,910
    Vehicles
    RSX Type-S
    04-26-2012 11:55 AM #23
    Whoever wrote that article needs to be kneed in the face.
    PSN: Silviatzero
    "I've got an idea for sweat shops: air conditioning! Problem solved."
    RSX-S

  24. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 15th, 2010
    Location
    Chesterfield, Indiana
    Posts
    759
    Vehicles
    2009 Caliber SRT4, 1989 Mazda B2200, 2010 RAV4
    04-26-2012 11:58 AM #24
    Quote Originally Posted by 01tj View Post
    I thought it was just a red-neck thing
    Well, northern Indiana is not exactly a bastion of sophistication and forward thinking.

  25. Member 01tj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 8th, 2005
    Location
    WV
    Posts
    4,216
    Vehicles
    02 330i, 09 Flex, 01 Wrangler
    04-26-2012 03:27 PM #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Roboturner913 View Post
    Well, northern Indiana is not exactly a bastion of sophistication and forward thinking.
    LOL, didn't look up your geo. It doesn't matter how bad it is there, we will still always get that label.

  26. Senior Member feels_road's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 27th, 2005
    Location
    East Bay Area
    Posts
    20,420
    Vehicles
    2010 MkVI MT TDI Golf, 2000 B5 4M Passat Wagon
    04-27-2012 07:12 AM #26
    Also interesting that (besides the power/fun factor) they didn't bother to mention that all but the (known to have abysmally poor mileage) MazdaSpeed3 are AWD.

  27. Member Yo Teach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 24th, 2010
    Location
    Waterville, OH
    Posts
    2,522
    04-27-2012 08:47 AM #27
    The esteemed author must have gotten his/her (no idea if the name Shadee is male or female) automotive opinions from the Lounge, where the answer to every automotive purchase advice thread is "Buy an E30 3-Series/Cherokee/Miata!"
    2007 Mazda 3 s Grand Touring

  28. Senior Member feels_road's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 27th, 2005
    Location
    East Bay Area
    Posts
    20,420
    Vehicles
    2010 MkVI MT TDI Golf, 2000 B5 4M Passat Wagon
    04-27-2012 08:52 AM #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Yo Teach View Post
    (no idea if the name Shadee is male or female)
    In my experience, Sade is female, and Chadi is male. YMMV.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts