VWVortex


+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Kw v2 VS Bilsten Pss9

  1. Member .:RThirtyTwo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 25th, 2010
    Location
    MTL
    Posts
    282
    Vehicles
    Two Thousand and Four .:R Thirty Two
    05-03-2012 01:25 AM #1
    Can anyone tell me the major differences between the two.. how they are adjusted ? ride quality ? quality of the suspesion themselves ? how low could they go ? the spring rates ? and which one is better and why ? any info would be great thanks

    i didnt compare the v3's to the pss9s because the bilsten are only two way adjustable like the v2s.
    Turbochargers are for people who cant build engines. – Keith Duckworth

  2. Member rajuncajun37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 25th, 2008
    Location
    New Orleans
    Posts
    6,079
    Vehicles
    2011 FORD .:Raptor
    05-03-2012 03:31 AM #2
    I got PSS9's, did a ton of homework first.

    KW is more money and a little more trouble to adjust.
    Bilstein is respected and the PSS9's are simple to adjust. One day I'm at the drag strip, the next is a daily commute and maybe one day a track event. I can adjust the car so easy without even lifting her off the ground. Fully adjusted in minutes, maybe seconds.

    Seems like every time I post up about bilstein the KW bandwagon starts smashing my a$$ on these forums. Already installed the PSS9's on my car, people. Gonna back them up on the internet. Besides, I never see the Bilstein guys giving me prop's. Cause the Bilstein guys are out driving. Guess the KW guys love the internet.

    Either way you can't go wrong. KW and Bilstein are both GREAT. KW is more money and more trouble but they probably handle better. KW is probably better than Bilstein but Bilstein gives me what I need. Full adjust ability at a good price and easy to use.

    OK, KW fans.....bring it
    *R32 1518*, biggest head ever to fit in a GOLF!
    Congrats, turd burglar.

  3. Member .:RThirtyTwo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 25th, 2010
    Location
    MTL
    Posts
    282
    Vehicles
    Two Thousand and Four .:R Thirty Two
    05-04-2012 09:48 PM #3
    Can you post me a pic of your car ? i heard the pss9s dont go low.. at all. with the kw's i find they go to my preferred height.
    Turbochargers are for people who cant build engines. – Keith Duckworth

  4. Banned ThatVdub's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 28th, 2010
    Location
    Jax, FL
    Posts
    6,940
    Vehicles
    Golf R
    05-04-2012 10:10 PM #4
    I owned 2 sets of V3's and would NOT buy the V2's, since I rather have bump adjustment, than rebound.

    PSS9's hands down better than V2's, imo...

    Obtw, iirc, pss9's can go lower than V2's, iirc...

  5. Member
    Join Date
    Nov 28th, 2011
    Location
    westchester
    Posts
    189
    Vehicles
    03 gti 1.8t (totaled) Jazz 20th (sold) 04 DBP R32
    05-04-2012 10:33 PM #5
    im in between the 2 coilovers at the moment as well and i was leaning towards the pss9's

  6. Member rajuncajun37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 25th, 2008
    Location
    New Orleans
    Posts
    6,079
    Vehicles
    2011 FORD .:Raptor
    05-04-2012 10:46 PM #6
    I'll post pics soon, maybe tomorrow
    *R32 1518*, biggest head ever to fit in a GOLF!
    Congrats, turd burglar.

  7. Member EIPtuningR32's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 3rd, 2008
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    Posts
    1,563
    Vehicles
    2004 VW .:R32, 1982 Porsche 928S Euro, 1923 Ford T-Bucket, 1962 VW Myers Manx (sold), 2000 Trans Am
    05-05-2012 12:08 AM #7
    I would personally go with the PSS9's... because its the nicest of one brand against the mid-range of another. Plus I saw a video of Steve Meade putting KW V3's on his lexus with 20" wheels on it. Ever since then i said "Meh" to KW.

    ^^^This has no legitimacy to it in the decision making between the two products in question.... my girlfriend is asleep and i am bored.

    When i go coilovers, i would either go Koni or the H&R ones. The PSS9's were popular a LONG time ago... i would feel like i was buying an old piece of technology for some reason.

    ***Edit*** just read some reviews on the Koni's and i dont think i will be getting those.
    Last edited by EIPtuningR32; 05-05-2012 at 12:30 AM.

  8. Member JCWolf1.8T's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 12th, 2004
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    3,497
    Vehicles
    MKIV R32, 2010 Tiguan Wolfsburg Edition, 2009 Jetta Wolfsburg Edition
    05-05-2012 07:05 AM #8
    Been running PSS9s for years and very happy with them.

  9. Member Mu.:Rkk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 16th, 2011
    Location
    WestCoast BayArea
    Posts
    163
    Vehicles
    03 Jti 24v,B7 S4,04 .:R32,05 ZX-10R, K6 GSX-R 750
    05-05-2012 11:21 PM #9
    Hate my pss9's

  10. Member EIPtuningR32's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 3rd, 2008
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    Posts
    1,563
    Vehicles
    2004 VW .:R32, 1982 Porsche 928S Euro, 1923 Ford T-Bucket, 1962 VW Myers Manx (sold), 2000 Trans Am
    05-06-2012 02:25 AM #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Mu.:Rkk View Post
    Hate my pss9's

  11. Member .:RThirtyTwo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 25th, 2010
    Location
    MTL
    Posts
    282
    Vehicles
    Two Thousand and Four .:R Thirty Two
    05-06-2012 11:00 PM #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Mu.:Rkk View Post
    Hate my pss9's
    how come ? do they still have that problem with the rear springs collapsing ? anyone know the spring rates on the pss9s ?
    Turbochargers are for people who cant build engines. – Keith Duckworth

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts