Vanilla vs French Vanilla. Either way, they will both be "adequate"
#1
need a new DD...like the looks exterior and interior of the 2011 better....but i heard the 2012 drives and handles better....anyone have any experiences?
![]()
#2
Vanilla vs French Vanilla. Either way, they will both be "adequate"
"Of course that's just my opinion; I could be wrong."
Originally Posted by The Igneous Faction
Originally Posted by WhistlerYOW
#3
#5
You're not going to be driving it anywhere where you will notice a significant difference between the two. I'd go with the one that appeals more to you in looks/comfort.like the looks exterior and interior of the 2011 better....but i heard the 2012 drives and handles better
135 R
├┼┼┘
246
Her miniskirt wrote a check for sex that the Vagina Bank had no intention of cashing.
#6
|˙˙ʇǝuɹǝʇuı ǝɥʇ uo ʇxǝʇ uʍop ǝpısdn ɯopuɐɹ pɐǝɹ noʎ :ǝɯıʇ ǝǝɹɟ ɥɔnɯ ooʇ ʎɐʍ ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ןןǝʇ oʇ ʍoɥ˙˙˙|http://hotlinktest.com/
#7
#8
#9
#10
To be a Rok, and not to roll
#11
Does the 2012 have a built in Playstation controller on the steering wheel![]()
#12
Have you been in both these cars, because the 2011 interior is probably the worst, cheapest interior ever in a Camry.
However, if you like it more you'll save yourself some cash buy buying a slightly used 2011 model.
#13
I own an 11 LE love it for its intended purpose...
that being said, given the choice I'd go with th 12
I work for a yota dealer and have had a bunch of seat timein both.
the 12 feels better all around, from switches to the feel of the materials to a slightly better ride and fuel economy.. Price on the 12 should be the same or lower given the options![]()
................................................www. CHECKCOLLISION .com
#14
As much as I love Toyota trucks, SUVs and Crossovers I just can't seem to feel any enthusiasm for their cars. Well the FR-S being the exception. The Camry while fast, roomy and utterly reliable just leaves me ... bored. Then again I'm not a massive fan of any other mainstream mid-size offering either so perhaps it's the entire genre I hate.
■■■■■■■■■■■■
#15
#16
Sorry to hear that. The 2012 is too busy inside and out. Don't like the dash treatment, or the sharp edges on the exterior.
I've always like the 2011 generation of the Camry. Love the simplicity of it. Just about perfect for it's intended purpose. Comfy, soft riding, good on gas, and IMO, conservatively good looking. Unique even. Just a solid car all around, and maybe underrated.
And the interior may be plain, but it's far from "cheap".
![]()
#17
#18
I prefer the interior of the 12, but the exterior of the 11. I'd do a 4-cyl SE model if it HAD to be a camry.
Otherwise, it'd be a 4cyl SEL fusion, or a diesel Jetta.
#19
i'll take optima. new camry's interior is very depressing in person.
or wait for the new fusion.
#20
"Of course that's just my opinion; I could be wrong."
Originally Posted by The Igneous Faction
Originally Posted by WhistlerYOW
#21
I owned one or about a week. Long story, I was selling it for a family member.
It felt REALLY cheap to me. At any rate, I just didn't understand why people specifically seek out a Camry when there are a million other choices in the midsize field, all of which offer something over the Camry's stunning lack of character. There was once a day when the Camry was a cut above in quality, but it just no longer is. That day ended in 1996.
I've been daily driving a Miata for the past 7 years so I really have trouble understanding the idea that any car for any purpose justifies being, not just boring, but boring for no reason. You can get a Fusion, Altima, or Optima and it does every single "daily driver" thing just as good or better, AND it looks nice and drives nice.
Splinter - Team Post-Killing Ninja
I don't practice llanteria
#22
██████████████████Originally Posted by Jeremy Clarkson
ECSTUNING | GO APR
#23
#24
the 2011 feels sterile. Not that there is anything wrong with it, but the 12 is much much nicer. The 2011 also feels somewhat cheap, having rode in a few I was not too happy.
#26
I just don't think the average Camry owner cares. I've always been under the impression that a Camry owner buys one, puts 150K+ trouble free miles on the odo, comes back to the dealer looking for a new one, says "I like what you've done with it", and repeats the process.
#27
You can't buy a midsize car that doesn't hit all those bullet points anymore. This isn't 1986, we're not comparing the Camry to a Pontiac Goolie. You could put all the midsize cars on sale in the US on a dartboard, hit a random one, and get a car that's safe, roomy, and reliable.
It's one thing if one of my car-clueless relatives said they were buying one, because they probably don't know there are other choices. But this is TCL, users here are supposed to know better.
Splinter - Team Post-Killing Ninja
I don't practice llanteria
#30
#31
And Toyota wasn't even the best back then... Honda was.
Not that the '98-'02 Accord was a real looker or driver's car, but it was still one notch above the dismal '97-'01 Camry.
Splinter - Team Post-Killing Ninja
I don't practice llanteria
#34
#35
Wow, when will toyota STOP fitting their cars with light beige fabric!!??
![]()
They've done studies you know. 60% of the time... it works every time.