VWVortex


Links back to The Car Lounge (opens in same window)
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 35 of 91

Thread: How much HP/TQ do you REALLY need in a DD?

  1. Member sicklyscott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 24th, 2002
    Location
    Metuchen, NJ
    Posts
    3,054
    Vehicles
    2004 M3, 2001 2.5 RS, 1978 MGB, 2011 S60 T6
    05-09-2012 09:46 AM #1
    I'm sure lots of you are like me, you want the most power possible in your daily driver. Face it, we're all addicted to that wonderful feeling of being thrown back in our seats and knowing that our cars are the fastest in the work parking lot. The problem is however that generally with high HP comes low MPGs. My question to TCL is would you be ok to give up 50% of your power for a 50% increase in fuel economy?

    Here's my personal situation. We have 4 cars in my household, my wife drives a '12 S60 T6 and I have a '01 2.5RS, '04 M3 and a '78 MGB. All these cars get below 30 mpg on the highway (M3 and S60 are tied at 27) and around town we barely reach 22 in any car. This is really starting to bother me. I've been looking at cars that are in hatch form, come in manual and can achieve 30+ mixed driving. This is quite a small population and I wouldn't call any car that qualifies as "fast". I'm thinking of maybe buying a Focus 5-door or even a Golf TDI but I'm not sure if I can live with those power levels.

    So what say you TCL? Would you trade your keys in on a quick car for a slower car with better MPG? If you have done this, do you regret it? How did you cope with the "lack" of power?
    ///M3 - The dream is on!

  2. Member teklord69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 28th, 2006
    Location
    Socal
    Posts
    800
    Vehicles
    BMW E39
    05-09-2012 09:48 AM #2
    As long as over 151 torque you are ok.

  3. Member Ben.Reilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 20th, 2008
    Location
    RI
    Posts
    3,832
    Vehicles
    2009 Wrong Wheel Drive Crapalier
    05-09-2012 09:54 AM #3
    Quote Originally Posted by sicklyscott View Post

    So what say you TCL? Would you trade your keys in on a quick car for a slower car with better MPG?
    No. I am a car guy.
    F1
    RED BULL Racing Formula One
    Final Gear

    "Here's a couple things America got right; cars and freedom"

  4. Member InfinitiG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 7th, 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    4,908
    Vehicles
    RSX Type-S
    05-09-2012 09:54 AM #4
    Quote Originally Posted by teklord69 View Post
    As long as over 151 torque you are ok.
    Dang how am I not dead?

    I've been thinking about this recently, I really like the 200 hp/142 lb/ft in my car, driving around town is a pleasure and freeway cruising is excellent. In a light car you really don't need much more.
    PSN: Silviatzero
    "I've got an idea for sweat shops: air conditioning! Problem solved."
    RSX-S

  5. Senior Member Lwize's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 4th, 2000
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    22,061
    Vehicles
    09 Rabbit S 5MT
    05-09-2012 09:55 AM #5
    As long as your car has no trouble keeping up with traffic, you're good.
    Anything more than that is flaunting it.

    CBS cares.
    There are no old Porsches - just new owners.

  6. 05-09-2012 09:55 AM #6
    200 per ton of both.

  7. Member Shomegrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 26th, 2002
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    15,482
    Vehicles
    Current: Audi S4, BMW M5, Audi A3 quattro, Dodge Dakota 4x4
    05-09-2012 09:56 AM #7
    If you're getting 22/27 out of the M3, I'd be more concerned that you're simply not enjoying the vehicle.

    Why does it bother you? I assume it's not for financial reasons as we're not talking about much money here...

  8. Member SebTheDJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 24th, 2003
    Posts
    2,429
    Vehicles
    2006 Saab 9-3 Aero
    05-09-2012 09:58 AM #8
    about treefiddy

  9. Member Boogety Boogety's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 22nd, 2003
    Location
    Dallas!
    Posts
    2,426
    Vehicles
    '06 NBC
    05-09-2012 10:11 AM #9
    Do you want to commute to work in your DD? Then get the cheapest-to-own-and-run, best possible mileage car.

    Do you want to do your boy racer bit and impress everyone with how cool your car is and how much power you have in rush hour traffic? Then get something with lots of HP/TQ (even though 99.99% of the fellow commuters don't give a rat's ass).

    People with self-esteem issues drive something to show off as a DD. Others, the more-intelligent ones, see it as a way to get to work cheaply, save money they can use in their life and for their true FUN vehicle, and don't think twice about it.

    And spare me the "I want to make my commute time count" crap. It's a commute, not an autocross...

  10. Member teklord69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 28th, 2006
    Location
    Socal
    Posts
    800
    Vehicles
    BMW E39
    05-09-2012 10:18 AM #10
    Instead of getting rid of your car in trade for better MPG, have you ever considered the Tornado air? We used to have this on my wife's Jeep GC and we noticed considerable increase in MPG (up to 5mpg difference). Gimmick? I don't think so..read the various reviews on this product. They really don't cost that much and really..what do you have to lose? Installs in minutes and you will notice a difference in power and mpg. I now have this on my BMW, Jeep Commander, and the Ford Explorer Sport Trac.




  11. Member SVTDanny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 7th, 2005
    Location
    Winchester, VA
    Posts
    15,648
    Vehicles
    2010 GT500
    05-09-2012 10:22 AM #11
    My trip meter reads 50 miles, and my gas gauge is sitting on 1/2. However, it's not a DD so I don't really care, and the fun is well worth the hit at the gas pump. I did average 22-23 on the highway with the cruise control set, though, so it's not unbearable if you stay out of it.

  12. 05-09-2012 10:25 AM #12
    I have a whopping 130 hp with 135 torks in a 3000# car with a power sapping automatic transmission, and I live above 5000'.... and I haven't died in traffic yet. My car still gets crap fuel economy around town and I would kill for something that did better than 20-22 city.

  13. Member seadoo2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 4th, 2008
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    4,798
    Vehicles
    04 Audi S4 Avant 6MT
    05-09-2012 10:27 AM #13
    My 2003 Civic EX 5-speed with the D17A2 SOHC VTEC had 127hp/114lbft. Was peppy enough in
    traffic and got 40+mpg at 75mph on the highway and over 40,000 miles, I NEVER AVERAGED A
    TANK LESS THAN 30MPG
    . I think, in that car, with that transmission, it was perfect. Plus, you
    could throw it around some corners and it handled pretty nicely actually.

    Unfortunately, I live in snow country, and that car SUCKED in the snow.


  14. Member TurboWraith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 4th, 2004
    Location
    Morton, IL
    Posts
    10,056
    Vehicles
    3 Hatch, VFR800 (Vtec, Yo!)
    05-09-2012 10:30 AM #14
    Perfectly happy with the Mazda's 150hp. Would more be more fun? Yeah. But I only drive it to and from work. And even then, I avoid it as much as possible. Bike is far more entertaining than any car I will ever be able to own.

  15. Member SoCalDubber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 21st, 2004
    Location
    Southern Cali
    Posts
    17,284
    Vehicles
    '12 Fiat 500 Sport, '11 Jetta SEL
    05-09-2012 10:31 AM #15
    What I consider to be the perfect DD/commuter. 101hp @ 98lb-ft (plus an intake and Magnaflow)

    Chasin Design | SoCalStanceShop | Pure Euro
    ---------- Let Me Sell You A VW ----------


    Wuste European Car Festival The West Coast's LARGEST European Car Show!

  16. 05-09-2012 10:32 AM #16
    Quote Originally Posted by SoCalDubber View Post
    What I consider to be the perfect DD/commuter.

    Elbows too pointy.

  17. Member vasillalov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 4th, 2003
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    7,846
    Vehicles
    2008 BMW 335i
    05-09-2012 10:37 AM #17
    Depends on the weight of the car!

    Ultimately, you need enough hp and torque so that you don't get passed by soccer moms in minivans.

  18. Member threebeerbuzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 12th, 2006
    Location
    Bellingham, WA
    Posts
    589
    Vehicles
    84' GTI, 84' Jetta, 99' A4 Avant 1.8t
    05-09-2012 10:52 AM #18
    Quote Originally Posted by vasillalov View Post
    Depends on the weight of the car!

    Ultimately, you need enough hp and torque so that you don't get passed by soccer moms in minivans.
    Minivans are pretty fast these days...

  19. Member Bakounine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 15th, 2002
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    1,310
    Vehicles
    '11 GTI; '06 Outback 3.0R; '89 Sierra K2500
    05-09-2012 10:55 AM #19
    I guess it's more about hp/ton and ft/lbs/ton + powerband and preference considerations than actual power figures.

    My first cars were mk2 VW's with the good old 1.8 8v engine. Far from the most powerful, but decent low-end torque combined with low weight made these cars enjoyable.

    I later had a Mazda 3 2.0. While it did have enough power, I did not like the experience because of the powerband. It needed some revs to get going. While this was not an issue on back roads or the highway, from stop light to stop light 9it was my DD), it felt miserable. That's why I like small turbos like I have on the GTI. The engine may not be the most powerful, but it is plenty flexible and smooth.

  20. Member BetterByDesign's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 7th, 2004
    Location
    morgan hill, ca
    Posts
    6,224
    05-09-2012 10:56 AM #20
    I am now looking to get something with maximum comfort and mpg for a daily.

    I dont get the M-F guys tearing out of a parking lot with 250-300 hp straight into line of minivans and mediocrity.

    Whats the point?

  21. Member zaYG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 28th, 2009
    Location
    Derry NH
    Posts
    3,340
    Vehicles
    glorified Volkswagen for middle class white women
    05-09-2012 10:57 AM #21
    My Saab has 250 hp or so. I enjoy it, but I would DEFINITELY get rid of it for a smaller, more fun car with a lot less power. More mpg is just a plus.

    Miata here I come
    flickr | Follow me on instagram: @ginger_reporter

  22. 05-09-2012 10:57 AM #22
    Quote Originally Posted by seadoo2006 View Post
    My 2003 Civic EX 5-speed with the D17A2 SOHC VTEC had 127hp/114lbft. Was peppy enough in
    traffic and got 40+mpg at 75mph on the highway and over 40,000 miles, I NEVER AVERAGED A
    TANK LESS THAN 30MPG
    . I think, in that car, with that transmission, it was perfect. Plus, you
    could throw it around some corners and it handled pretty nicely actually.

    Unfortunately, I live in snow country, and that car SUCKED in the snow.

    it sucked in rain too. But I had it worse than you, I had a D17a1, but it was a good daily driver though needed better seats

  23. Member vasillalov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 4th, 2003
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    7,846
    Vehicles
    2008 BMW 335i
    05-09-2012 10:58 AM #23
    Quote Originally Posted by threebeerbuzz View Post
    Minivans are pretty fast these days...
    I know. My point still stands though, no?

  24. Member romanl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2nd, 2010
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    2,026
    Vehicles
    '10 GOLF TDI
    05-09-2012 10:59 AM #24
    Quote Originally Posted by sicklyscott View Post
    I've been looking at cars that are in hatch form, come in manual and can achieve 30+ mixed driving. This is quite a small population and I wouldn't call any car that qualifies as "fast". I'm thinking of maybe buying a Focus 5-door or even a Golf TDI but I'm not sure if I can live with those power levels.

    So what say you TCL? Would you trade your keys in on a quick car for a slower car with better MPG? If you have done this, do you regret it? How did you cope with the "lack" of power?
    i love my '10 TDI GOLF manual, plenty of power to get in trouble.
    the only problem is i couldn't get 30+ in it unless i really try to burn rubber at ever corner or sat in traffic for few hours over few mile drive
    true story, i would have to try really hard to get down to 30

  25. Member BetterByDesign's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 7th, 2004
    Location
    morgan hill, ca
    Posts
    6,224
    05-09-2012 10:59 AM #25
    Quote Originally Posted by vasillalov View Post
    Depends on the weight of the car!

    Ultimately, you need enough hp and torque so that you don't get passed by soccer moms in minivans.
    Those minivans are powered by anger, not HP.

  26. Member Voodoo.T's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 4th, 2002
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    11,026
    Vehicles
    2009 R56 S, 1987 E30
    05-09-2012 11:00 AM #26
    Quote Originally Posted by SoCalDubber View Post
    What I consider to be the perfect DD/commuter. 101hp @ 98lb-ft (plus an intake and Magnaflow)

    Having now had one as a rental, albeit in a much more pleasing shade of brown than... that, I can agree that this was adequate to keep me from getting killed by idiots in big trucks trying to kill me while I was in Houston. And it was also an autotragic. Probably would've been more entertaining with a proper transmission.

    HP/TQ isn't everything, especially in a lighter car. The Fiat moves just fine with ~100hp. I have 215hp/230tq or thereabouts in my 9-3, and that's more than enough for a daily.
    2009 MINI Cooper S
    1988 BMW 325i topless

  27. Member davidraeside's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 8th, 2004
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,445
    05-09-2012 11:02 AM #27
    Quote Originally Posted by teklord69 View Post
    As long as over 151 torque you are ok.
    Current: 2006 Acura CSX
    Gone: 2004 Jeep Liberty Renegade (375,000 kms), 2007 VW GTI (BMP), 2001 VW Jetta Wolfsburg Edition, 1994 Ford Ranger (calipso green), 1987 Jeep YJ

  28. Member NoLongerLow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 8th, 2003
    Location
    Towson, MD
    Posts
    2,358
    Vehicles
    2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara, 2001 Miata, 2004 Yamaha XT225
    05-09-2012 11:02 AM #28
    I daily drove my '93 Miata w/ no issues. They have what? 110hp on a good day? I never felt "unsafe" while merging on to the highway. Cruised around at 70mpg usually got around 30mpgs.
    I <3 driving.

  29. 05-09-2012 11:02 AM #29
    Quote Originally Posted by Ben.Reilly View Post
    No. I am a car guy.
    I'm a car guy and I did just that.

    All depends on your priorities.

    I had an 06 WRX that, when driven easily, was averaging 20mpg on my commute and had me filling up every 2.5 days. At between $40-45 a tank, that got old fast. It was fun to drive, but it was costing me about $500 a month or more on gas.

    Sold it after 6 weeks and got an 09 Civic with an auto. Yes its boring, yes its slow, but it handles highway trips fine (where almost all my commute is anyways) and the gas savings alone makes it worth it for a dd where I'm not utilizing the WRXs power or handling capabilities.

  30. Member vasillalov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 4th, 2003
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    7,846
    Vehicles
    2008 BMW 335i
    05-09-2012 11:06 AM #30
    Quote Originally Posted by BetterByDesign View Post
    Those minivans are powered by anger, not HP.
    Hahhaa! Nicely done!

  31. Member Denniswhat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 11th, 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    1,284
    Vehicles
    98 ek coupe
    05-09-2012 11:12 AM #31
    As long as I can get traction in third with street tires

  32. Member sicklyscott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 24th, 2002
    Location
    Metuchen, NJ
    Posts
    3,054
    Vehicles
    2004 M3, 2001 2.5 RS, 1978 MGB, 2011 S60 T6
    05-09-2012 03:36 PM #32
    Quote Originally Posted by Shomegrown View Post
    If you're getting 22/27 out of the M3, I'd be more concerned that you're simply not enjoying the vehicle.

    Why does it bother you? I assume it's not for financial reasons as we're not talking about much money here...
    The next year or so might bring a new family member to...err...our family. I can't put a childseat in the back of the M and I can't justify spending gobs of money on new(er) cars with bad fuel economy (the thought of a e90 M3 crossed my mind). I'd also like to keep this car for a while and as time passes the more expensive gas will get.

    Trust me, many times the M is in the mid-teens when it comes to mpg.
    ///M3 - The dream is on!

  33. Member Dr. Woo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 28th, 2003
    Location
    Hampton, VA
    Posts
    4,006
    Vehicles
    '03 S2K '12 Focus
    05-09-2012 03:42 PM #33
    I went from 355/385 to 160/146 on my DD.

    18 mpg combined to 33 mpg combined. Plenty of grunt for my commute.
    ├┼┤2003 S2000 | ├┼┘2012 Focus SE Sport | 2009 Pontiac G8 (2011-2011) | 2008 VW R32 (2007-2011) | 2006 VW GTI (2006-2007) | 2001 Audi A4 (2002-2006)
    SAVETHERING

  34. Member Omnilith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 15th, 2010
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    1,049
    Vehicles
    2002 SVT Focus, 2000 Focus ZX3, 1966 Cortina, 1987 Dodge Charger, 1998 Tacoma, 1983 Plymouth Scamp
    05-09-2012 04:17 PM #34
    About 25-23 lbs/hp and 21-19 lbs/tq is about right.

  35. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 17th, 2007
    Posts
    1,269
    Vehicles
    2012 GTI
    05-09-2012 04:25 PM #35
    My last several cars have been between 200-250hp. My current GTI is around 220 and it's plenty for DD duties. It's the first new car I've had and I really like having the creature comforts. Having NAV and bluetooth makes it a nice place to be slogging back and forth to work. The fact that it only uses 3/4 of a tank every two weeks is nice.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts