Username or Email Address
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up

    VWVortex


    The Car Lounge
    Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
    Results 36 to 70 of 112

    Thread: What's the View Here on Catless Downpipes/Cat Deletes?

    1. Member jepva's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 10th, 2011
      Location
      Richmond, VA
      Posts
      1,749
      Vehicles
      '14 Lexus GX460, '14 GLI Autobahn
      05-11-2012 06:40 PM #36
      TO those who think HFCs or test pipes do not add to performance, you are misinformed. It does depend on the car and how restrictive the stock cats were, but most late model cars always experience a gain in exhaust flow, and these performance improvements are heavily documented.

      Also, it is not just for FI cars. On the G37, HFCs are dyno proven as one of the single most gaining modifications with about 20whp improvements over stock. There are two of them, so that's one of the reasons.

      Contrary to popular belief, most also see improvements in MPGs.

      That being said, of course it will let more CO2 out of the car. However, the % of people doing this is so small, I doubt there is any significant scientific detriment on a large scale, especially not enough to offset the yearly decrease in nationwide emissions with the advent of more efficient and less polluting cars taking to the roads each day. I'm not saying it's OK, just that it's not this horrid thing a lot of people may make it out to be.

      What you all should be worried about is CHINA. Talk about pollution.

    2. Moderator rs4-380's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 12th, 2000
      Location
      Maine
      Posts
      23,001
      Vehicles
      VWs & Audis
      05-11-2012 06:42 PM #37
      I have no cat on my rabbit. I *may* drive it several hundred miles a year. Berate me if you may, my header setup somewhat precludes it.
      Dave

    3. Banned SVTDanny's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 7th, 2005
      Location
      Winchester, VA
      Posts
      16,876
      05-11-2012 06:45 PM #38
      More power, faster spool, popping, gurgling, and turbo jet noises through the exhaust..... what's not to love?

      I might be alone on this one, but I love the smell of a catless exhaust, especially after decel through the gears.

      My wife's Sonic will see 10x the miles that the Mustang will in a year, so... eh.

    4. Member Toaster29's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 19th, 2000
      Location
      Birmingham, Al
      Posts
      4,654
      Vehicles
      997TT, F80 M3
      05-11-2012 06:50 PM #39
      I have a catless setup on the GT-R. Sue me. The benefits far outweigh the negatives and the car doesn't get driven that much anyway.

      I have a HFC on the Acura, which sees 15k+ miles a year. The headers came with a test pipe, and I had an aftermarket HFC welded in. Toned the noise down some and the car is happy with no CELs or anything.
      '07 997.1 TT 6MT: Arctic Silver / Sea Blue. AWE exhaust, Cobb Stage 2, GT2RS Intercoolers, H&R, BBS CH-R in widebody fitment.
      '15 F80 M3 6MT: Alpine White / Sakhir: Exec pkg, LEDs, carbon roof, Harman Kardon, black 19s, etc
      Past: 300 hp B5 A4, 500 hp Evo 8, 2 450 hp E92 335s, 520hp C6 Z06, and a 750 hp CBA GT-R

    5. Member weakshht's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 21st, 2010
      Location
      Calgary
      Posts
      654
      Vehicles
      Silver Arrow VR
      05-11-2012 06:56 PM #40
      I have a catless DP on my GTI.

      But i live in Alberta, ****ing up the environment is what we do..
      Quote Originally Posted by rankadoodle
      Who wants to ride some 20 year old honda that works all of the time no matter what. Thats boring as hell.
      Quote Originally Posted by vwjettaman97 View Post
      Were do you get 4x100 crome deepdish rims??
      THE SILVER SLED
      █ ♣ █

    6. Member jamerican1's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 8th, 2005
      Location
      VA
      Posts
      3,640
      Vehicles
      2008 A4 S-Line Titanium QTM, 2000 A4 QTM, 1993 Audi 90S (sold), 1992 Toyota Corolla
      05-11-2012 06:57 PM #41
      Inb4GermaniuM... Lol
      Unf*ckwithable

    7. 05-11-2012 06:58 PM #42
      This owner has yet to do a cat delete.


    8. Member S0RRY's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 12th, 2011
      Location
      Massachusetts
      Posts
      1,379
      Vehicles
      2008 9-3 2.0t
      05-11-2012 07:02 PM #43
      Quote Originally Posted by jepva View Post
      What you all should be worried about is CHINA. Talk about pollution.
      welp, since china's polluting, we might as well just give up! Love reading some people's justifications for doing selfish things.

    9. Member vasillalov's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 4th, 2003
      Location
      Chicago, IL
      Posts
      8,146
      Vehicles
      2008 BMW 335i
      05-11-2012 07:23 PM #44
      Quote Originally Posted by jepva View Post
      That being said, of course it will let more CO2 out of the car. :
      Actually, the CO2 emissions remain the same. It is the emissions of particulate matter, un-burnt hydrocarbons. nitrogen oxide and sulphur that does not get suppressed by removing the catalytic converters.

    10. Member cockerpunk's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 17th, 2010
      Location
      Twin Cities MN
      Posts
      4,081
      Vehicles
      Mr2, 951, NA6
      05-11-2012 07:28 PM #45
      Quote Originally Posted by S0RRY View Post
      welp, since china's polluting, we might as well just give up! Love reading some people's justifications for doing selfish things.
      you know, i understand the science behind climate change, i understand the effects of man made carbon gasses on the radiation absorption of the atmosphere, i do. i vote democrat, i even freaking recycle.

      but really, there are battles to fight, and there are battles that arnt worth fighting. and you know, im not going to feel guilty for by passing the cat on my classic car. sorry.

      its just not an issue. really.
      Quote Originally Posted by kwik!gti
      Cockerpunk: 1
      TCL Hive mind troll brigade: 0

    11. Member patrickvr6's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 29th, 2001
      Location
      Atlanta GA
      Posts
      8,591
      Vehicles
      '87 930 '77 Bronco '01 325iTSC '08 Xterra
      05-11-2012 07:40 PM #46
      Quote Originally Posted by xtravbx View Post
      Yeah... catalytic convertors usually don't "go wrong."


      Cats fail all the time and they are a big reason why a good number of late model cars are scrapped or traded in for something new.

      I just spent $1400 and 12 hours of my time replacing the cats on my 325i because I have to pass emissions with it. If I didn't get tested I would bought straight headers and not worried about it.

      Quote Originally Posted by S0RRY View Post
      welp, since china's polluting, we might as well just give up! Love reading some people's justifications for doing selfish things.

      Read this and then get all sanctimonious about someone choosing not to run cats.

      http://www.gizmag.com/shipping-pollution/11526/
      Last edited by patrickvr6; 05-11-2012 at 07:43 PM.

    12. Member S0RRY's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 12th, 2011
      Location
      Massachusetts
      Posts
      1,379
      Vehicles
      2008 9-3 2.0t
      05-11-2012 08:31 PM #47
      Quote Originally Posted by cockerpunk View Post
      you know, i understand the science behind climate change, i understand the effects of man made carbon gasses on the radiation absorption of the atmosphere, i do. i vote democrat, i even freaking recycle.

      but really, there are battles to fight, and there are battles that arnt worth fighting. and you know, im not going to feel guilty for by passing the cat on my classic car. sorry.

      its just not an issue. really.
      I was more mocking his justification than the act itself. I personally don't care if you run cats or not, but nothing annoys me more than logical fallacies.

    13. Member eunos94's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 17th, 2002
      Location
      Northeast Ohio
      Posts
      6,997
      Vehicles
      Yellow 1970 Beetle & Yellow Rush 2012 Beetle 2.5L Tiptronic
      05-11-2012 11:16 PM #48
      Pre-cats can be very restrictive and only provide benafits for 30 seconds of every day... so I'll cave and say you aren't a total douche for removing those but removing the main cats is still a douche move. I went with 3" high flow cats on a 1.8 liter forced induction engine. Massive over kill but they flow fantastically well and my turbo spools up PLENTY fast thank you very much. All while still being kind to the planet we live on.
      ■■■■■■■■■■■■

    14. Member ncbrock's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 28th, 2010
      Location
      Raleigh, NC
      Posts
      2,317
      Vehicles
      e30, 330i SpecE46, M Coupe, FFR Cobra
      05-11-2012 11:26 PM #49
      Quote Originally Posted by Adam144 View Post
      Screw the environment. Do it for the fire!

      im with this guy, it was a a given to remove the cat with webers or else it would have gotten ruined anyways

    15. 05-11-2012 11:45 PM #50
      if you have a reason to remove it.... IE....diesel, carbs, or FI that is running rich for performance reasons, then yes, if just because you want to add 3 hp. n0o0o0o0o! cats on most modern cars almost have a immeasurable effect on power and will usually get you in huge trouble if caught with out them.

      in the last few years I have owned 3 cars with out them, a carbed rx7 that shoots 3 foot flames (tried one killed it in 3 days), a tuned tdi , running rich enough to kill it so I pulled it before it could, and a car that didint come with one stock. other then that the have or had cats. my miata's cat is worn out, and I plan on upgrading the cat, but the CAR WILL HAVE ONE.
      I'm a certified vw/mazda dealer tech and I run a modification shop on the side.
      02 beetle tdi,00 jetta 2x4, 92 miata,,30 pontiac.

    16. Member Ungarisch's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 15th, 2002
      Location
      Hollywood, CA
      Posts
      2,374
      Vehicles
      2001 MB W210 Wagon, 1996 4Runner Manual Bro'd-Out
      05-11-2012 11:54 PM #51
      I purchased a high flow cats / down pipe for my WRX and it made the car smell like a 70s era soviet car, made me wonder why I bothered with the cat. A grandma took it out before it had its first SMOG inspection (required on the 4th year from new in CA), so I don't know if it would have even passed, just saying, high flow might just mean it ain't doing shizz besides making you feel like a responsible person.

    17. Member
      Join Date
      Jun 14th, 2007
      Posts
      12,733
      Vehicles
      E36, R32
      05-11-2012 11:57 PM #52
      if it's a true race car, then by all means go catless. but even then, i believe Grand Am series cars have cats - ST and GS, i believe.

      but, a universal Magnaflow High-Flow cat cost me $94 shipped and another $20 to have installed at some local exhaust shop. i didn't have to worry about CEL's, spacing out O2's, or anything else. it free'd up some power and increased flow, and wasn't all that bad for the environment. i also live in indiana, and even though we don't have emissions testing, it's just something that makes sense.

      plus, i like breathing fresh air. don't want a cat? then don't complain about smog or bad air quality.
      welcome to the layer cake

    18. Member
      Join Date
      Oct 2nd, 2003
      Location
      Washington, D.C.
      Posts
      1,125
      Vehicles
      2002 WRX 2.5L/6 Speed/Rotated GT30R
      05-12-2012 12:00 AM #53
      "Took the restrictor plate off to give the Red Dragon a little more juice. But it's not exactly street legal, so keep it on the down low."

      I bought my car catless, but just a cat would get blown out if I did put one on. It backfires like crazy, and smells like donkey farts. On the other hand, it only gets driven about 6-8,000 miles per year so I don't feel so bad. My car failed emissions the first time, but it wasn't due to being catless. It failed because I was throwing a CEL for some unrelated sensor.
      Last edited by Nateblizzy; 05-12-2012 at 12:02 AM.

    19. Member Internal Combustion's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 17th, 2007
      Location
      Columbus, OH
      Posts
      4,897
      Vehicles
      JB4 335xi, Prius
      05-12-2012 12:23 AM #54
      pre-cat cats- doubt they do much at all besides during warm up. these are restrictive and I would remove them from any performance minded car

      cat deletes- I removed the Cat on my 98 Jeep grand cherokee 5.9 after running a 3" carsound. I picked up about 7 rwhp, from 297 to 304 rwhp. I didn't really like the stink though. I wouldn't do it again on a DD.
      Quote Originally Posted by Internal Combustion View Post
      I do believe I've won TCL.
      I quote myself.

      335- 12.2@115

    20. Member 302W's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 24th, 2004
      Location
      NoVA
      Posts
      3,348
      05-12-2012 12:37 AM #55
      On an older, more aggressive car I don't run em. On a daily that is stock or mild I prefer to have cats though.
      Quote Originally Posted by Dave Zero View Post
      1988 is not an 80's car, it's an early 90s car but whatever.

    21. Member Horror Business's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 1st, 2005
      Posts
      1,747
      Vehicles
      '91 BMW e30 318is, '03 Subaru Impreza 2.5TS
      05-12-2012 12:39 AM #56
      When I had my MKIV I ran a 3 inch catless downpipe on an entirely stock 1.8t except for 007 forge DV and a short ram intake for a short time..

      Boost increased about 2psi, I felt a loss of low end torque but more power on the highway. Although I never tried it with a cat, word was back then from most people who have done dynos that the stock cat was allready free flowing and made no difference except for very high horsepower cars.

    22. 05-12-2012 12:39 AM #57
      start a poll next time farg
      precats in the 1zz motors like getting sucked into to the cylinders
      Last edited by DrFrisker; 05-12-2012 at 12:42 AM.
      Quote Originally Posted by slikaznricer View Post
      Dude, its the internet. Everyone trolls everyone. if you get butthurt, go buy some preparation H or troll back.

    23. Member Run L1ke H3LL's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 18th, 2009
      Location
      Long Island, NY
      Posts
      4,319
      Vehicles
      2002 1.8T GTI
      05-12-2012 02:11 AM #58
      It was cheaper not to buy an aftermarket exhaust without one. Do I feel bad sometimes? Sure. Do I lose sleep? No.

      Why? Because I would bet a whole lot that half the righteous folk in this dumbass thread don't give a hoot about the environment. I bet you smoke, litter and don't even recycle. So unless you're effin Captain Planet then piss off.
      OTC

    24. 05-12-2012 05:03 AM #59
      If you're going to play the environmental debate on this, don't think of in terms climate change. Think about it in terms of local air quality, where catalyzed automobile emissions have made real improvements in people's health and quality of life over the last decades, even yours. The image of 1970s-era Los Angeles, or present-day Beijing should give you an idea how modern emissions systems and standards improve air quality.

      So think about it when you're doing a cost/benefit analysis of whether or not you should remove the cats from your car.

    25. Member jepva's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 10th, 2011
      Location
      Richmond, VA
      Posts
      1,749
      Vehicles
      '14 Lexus GX460, '14 GLI Autobahn
      05-12-2012 11:11 AM #60
      Quote Originally Posted by S0RRY View Post
      I was more mocking his justification than the act itself. I personally don't care if you run cats or not, but nothing annoys me more than logical fallacies.
      I never said it was an excuse (maybe you should read), but if you want to bark up the pollution tree, I'm just saying, going after the few car guys who use HFCs or test pipes is probably a big waste of your time.

    26. Member S0RRY's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 12th, 2011
      Location
      Massachusetts
      Posts
      1,379
      Vehicles
      2008 9-3 2.0t
      05-12-2012 11:19 AM #61
      Quote Originally Posted by jepva View Post
      I never said it was an excuse (maybe you should read), but if you want to bark up the pollution tree, I'm just saying, going after the few car guys who use HFCs or test pipes is probably a big waste of your time.
      lol, you just used the same fallacy again. If everyone thought like you no one would ever do anything because someone was always doing more, or faster, or worse, or better, or whatever. It's a weak mindset.

    27. Member jepva's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 10th, 2011
      Location
      Richmond, VA
      Posts
      1,749
      Vehicles
      '14 Lexus GX460, '14 GLI Autobahn
      05-12-2012 11:20 AM #62
      Quote Originally Posted by S0RRY View Post
      lol, you just used the same fallacy again. If everyone thought like you no one would ever do anything because someone was always doing more, or faster, or worse, or better, or whatever. It's a weak mindset.
      You just don't get it. Take your logical fallacy crap back to Phil 101. You're probably one of those people that doesn't buy gas on X day to get prices to go down.
      Last edited by jepva; 05-12-2012 at 11:22 AM.

    28. Member
      Join Date
      Jun 2nd, 2002
      Location
      Saint Louis and Toledo
      Posts
      4,506
      Vehicles
      '11 Rav4 V6, '13 TL SH-AWD
      05-12-2012 11:22 AM #63
      I deleted my second cat. If I were to do a downpipe, which I am not, I would spend the extra change on one that was catted.

    29. Get Off My Lawn!!! vwlarry's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 16th, 1999
      Location
      Seaford DE
      Posts
      29,530
      Blog Entries
      1
      Vehicles
      '05 Camry XLE
      05-12-2012 11:29 AM #64
      I never imagined that such practices still existed! Years ago, in the seventies, when cats were still new and totally unreliable, we VW guys just bought what we called a "test pipe" that bolted into the gap where the catalytic converter used to be. End of problem. It's not so simple now, with all the engine management/feedback/electronics involved that were not there back then.

      Jeez, they still MAKE the things! I had no idea!

      Do you enjoy old cars and long-winded stories about them? If your answer is "yes", then you might enjoy my blogpage. Try it here: http://vwlarry.blogspot.com . Leave a comment, too; I love feedback! Thanx for reading.

      “To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.” - Aristotle

    30. Senior Member AZGolf's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 6th, 2000
      Location
      Phoenix area
      Posts
      22,566
      05-12-2012 11:33 AM #65
      Quote Originally Posted by Chris_V View Post
      Really, with the advent of reasonably priced, high performance, high flow cats, there's no reason not to run them
      This mirrors my thoughts.

    31. 05-12-2012 12:28 PM #66
      I still have the cat on my project car, but it is hollow.
      I was driving a few years ago and it all broke apart on its own, clogged the exhaust pipe at the first 90* bend, So I cut the pipe at the bend and let all the pieces blow out the back, then welded up some new pipe and called it a day.
      Easy fix for a car that is not driven on the street.

    32. Member SnowGTI2003's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 7th, 2004
      Location
      St. George, Ontario
      Posts
      7,563
      Vehicles
      Sedan and Van in white
      05-12-2012 01:42 PM #67
      I run a high flow cat on my STi. The downpipe was about $200 more than a catless one so it was a tough call. I'm not a huge fan of the catless stink so I went with a catted downpipe.



    33. Member l88m22vette's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 1st, 2006
      Location
      Chicagoland, IL
      Posts
      13,298
      Vehicles
      2003 TTq coupe, 2001 Forester L
      05-12-2012 03:14 PM #68
      My bolt-on DP has one, and once I get the engine built I will still run one (3" race cat), IL has emissions checks every year, and while I have my ECU coded out for that stuff I don't want to chance stinking up the emissions test center and raise suspicion. My TT is and will be a daily, and I'm sure the minimal power gain won't be outweighed by worrying about the smell and chances of getting into trouble.

      That said, uncatalyzed exhaust smells awesome, and the popping/gurgling/chances of flamethrowing is certainly appealing. I suppose I could pick up a cat delete section for summer fun (though a loud blue coupe shooting flames won't be cop-friendly fo sho )
      Audi TT mk1 FAQ zero Porsche wheels given

      Quote Originally Posted by silverspeedbuggy View Post
      TCL 1991 edition - Can't afford a CRX, what would TCL do: Hyundai Scoupe vs. Toyota Paseo vs. Geo Storm

    34. Member BassNotes's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 15th, 2005
      Location
      Costa Mesa, Calif., USA
      Posts
      3,180
      Vehicles
      2002 VW GTI 1.8t
      05-12-2012 03:50 PM #69
      Delete the cat. It's a big atmosphere, tree huggers.

      Dump your used motor oil in the storm drain. It's a big ocean (or river or lake). Lift up the grate and drop the filter in, too. Pretend it's Ed Begley Jr.'s face you're dropping it on.

      Leave your used coolant out for the neighborhood kitties.
      Bob Lee
      2002 GTI 1.8t 244,000+ miles
      VCDS 14.10.0 with KEY-USB interface

    35. Member
      Join Date
      Aug 4th, 2002
      Location
      Ohio
      Posts
      8,967
      Vehicles
      2.7 S4
      05-12-2012 04:32 PM #70
      Increased MPG's > whatever comes out the back from not running a cat.

    Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •