because its still cheaper to shift using cables or rods, than electric motors and actuators.
#1
Why haven't they been replaced with buttons or some other electronics? Seems like a rather simple thing to do to get a lot of prime real estate back.
Sorta like this on the Prius
http://kyoei-usa.com/blog/2011/06/ogs-prius-ips-switch/
Change this:
to this:
![]()
they're steppin' on my rhythm and they're stealin' all my lines
#2
because its still cheaper to shift using cables or rods, than electric motors and actuators.
#3
Because people driving automatics want to rest their hand on the gear selector like it is a manual shifter even though it isn't.
I like to use the + and - thing on the shifters in rental cars like I'm a racecar driver.
#4
Some people still like to manually shift an auto using the shift level instead of paddle shifters.
||||||
I have to stop this idiot from deminishing my credibility every time he posts because my usernsme is in his sig.
#5
#6
Other methods have been tried...
![]()
![]()
![]()
I love cars, but the problem is they are like schroedinger's hobby. They're always in a quantum superstate of being both awesome and a huge waste of time and money... until observation momentarily forces them into one state or another.
#7
Yeah that doesn't save any space and is expensive...
██████████████████Originally Posted by Jeremy Clarkson
Vote Yes To Create A 3rd Gen 2.0 TSI Section!
#8
No space has been saved. Nothing additional has been added because of the saved space you seem to think is there. Look, it's the same buttons in the same place.
Buttons might be a space saver, but not in the example you used.
The reason I see for keeping the shifter is tradition. It costs a little extra, makes it more difficult to slide across the center console, and obscures some buttons, but I don't see that as a big deal. If there's a manual stick shift option, then going to a different center console that takes advantage of saved space for the AT buttons might end up costing more.
#9
Thoughts expressed are those of the poster and not those of some long dead guy who I choose to speak for me.
#10
You should bring this up to "The Head Foundation". It would help road going donations greatly.
![]()
#11
"sports cars will get you through times without women better than women will get you through times without sports cars."
#12
Meh, gives me something to do in my Aero. I use the paddle shifters sometimes too.
![]()
#13
The biggest reason is that people still expect it to be there. I'm not so sure it will still be there in about 10 or 15 years but for now, most people who are of driving age, learned to drive with a conventional shifter.
#14
The Lincoln makes me laugh, because they eliminate the shifter but then waste all that space they could have used for storage or... something, on that big overstyled flying buttress armrest thing.
Eliminating the shifter makes the most sense for vehicles which have no sporting pretensions. My Odyssey has a shifter that's been minimized as much as possible while maintaining an old style shift linkage. If they could have replaced it with pushbuttons I wouldn't miss a thing. The shifter occupies a little corner of the dash next to the steering wheel rather than jutting out of the middle like a faux-manual; it opens up a lot of space for storage bins.
Splinter - Team Post-Killing Ninja
I don't practice llanteria
#15
The shifter in the E65 BMW's are nice... simple to use and out of the way:
![]()
#16
Or put it back on the column. In my van, it has a giant lever mounted on the column. I think the gear shifter adds a certain level of machismo. The illusion of control, if you will.
I personally would love to see automatic shifters go away.
Chris
| 2012 Nissan Leaf | 1995 Jeep Wrangler |
| 2007 Toyota Prius | 1999 Plymouth Voyager |
#17
The current Mercedes E-class (and some M-B SUVs) have a Prius-like shifter located on the steering column. It does free up some space for larger center console storage.
The key is we're seeing this on the ever increasing number of models with no manual available. With manual or auto cars, it makes sense to stick the auto lever where the stick shift would be.
#18
#19
It's easier to grab on to a stick than to fiddle with buttons. Just like it's easier to push real buttons than touch screen buttons.
#20
#21
#22
#23
I also think it's a waste of space. I think column shifters should make a wide-spread comeback
Then you get paddle-shifters if you want to be cool.
#24
#25
#28
OTC
#29
the primary reason is because when you design a car with an optional manual transmission, you have to build the dash and center counsel one way, and making two designs, one for each transmission is expensive and annoying.
note all the "sexy" automatic selectors are in cars that don't even have the option of a manual ....
#30
I agree with OP. Going with buttons should give interior designers lots of options. Why even have the middle console ? What about different seat configurations ? Why is the dashboard so large anyway?
Its time car interior design evolve
![]()
#31
Isn't the new Ram using a rotary dial on the dashboard? IDK how big it is though and why they are using it instead of the column shifter.
#32
#33
Here's a thread from a few months ago on this same topic.
http://forums.vwvortex.com/showthrea...matic-cars-Why
#34
While I agree that there's no need to keep it where it is if there's no manual available, the dash is large because it's structural, it has a lot of padding in it and there has to be room for wiring and HVAC. Show cars as pictured don't need working HVAC, as they can't be driven. As electrics come online, packaging of powertrains will likely free up some of that space for HVAC systems and wiring, giving designers a way to make cars look like that, though.![]()
Originally Posted by Boyz in da Park
#35
the chrysler minivan location isn't really that bad...
then there is some of the aston martins
![]()
2008 Passat wagon, 2.0T 6MT with mods
Other Rides:
- 2013 Cannondale CAADX-6
- 2010 Specialized Secteur Elite
- 2009 Specialized Rockhopper Comp 29-er