VWVortex.com - Is the Scion FR-S a sports car or a "sporty car"?
Username or Email Address
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up

    VWVortex


    The Car Lounge

    View Poll Results: Is the Scion FR-S a true sports car or just a "sporty car"?

    Voters
    65. You may not vote on this poll
    • Sports Car

      29 44.62%
    • Sporty Car

      36 55.38%
    Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
    Results 1 to 25 of 30

    Thread: Is the Scion FR-S a sports car or a "sporty car"?

    1. Member RWD_only's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 1st, 2010
      Location
      Peoples Republic of Eugene, OR
      Posts
      402
      Vehicles
      94 Miata
      05-15-2012 02:43 AM #1
      You are the Ted Haggard of the FR-S/BRZ
      Quote Originally Posted by Subwoofers View Post
      It's soul, man. You paid for that.

    2. Senior Member J-Tim's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 26th, 2000
      Location
      Kangaroo-infested Austria
      Posts
      34,715
      Vehicles
      German/American/Italian
      05-15-2012 02:44 AM #2
      Has roof and seats more than 2 - not a sports car
      🍵 🚴 🍲 💤
      And now for something completley different...A Scotsman on a horse.

    3. Member DerSpiegel's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 20th, 2008
      Posts
      2,625
      Vehicles
      2014 VW Jetta TDI 6MT
      05-15-2012 02:53 AM #3
      Quote Originally Posted by RWD_only View Post
      You are the Ted Haggard of the FR-S/BRZ
      OMG

    4. Banned patrikman's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 10th, 2008
      Location
      44.5 North, 88 West
      Posts
      32,220
      Vehicles
      EJ251, EJ255, EZ30D(R)
      05-15-2012 03:02 AM #4
      Quote Originally Posted by teklord69 View Post
      Is the Scion FR-S a sports car or a "sporty car"?

    5. Member
      Join Date
      Feb 4th, 2011
      Location
      Pee Dee Ecks
      Posts
      933
      05-15-2012 03:21 AM #5
      Quote Originally Posted by teklord69 View Post
      Is the Scion FR-S a sports car or a "sporty car"?
      It's more of a sports car than your glorified German slushbox fleet-special. Does that answer your question?
      Last edited by kimilein; 05-15-2012 at 03:27 AM.

    6. Member RogueTDI's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 12th, 2002
      Location
      USA
      Posts
      14,849
      Vehicles
      2010 Golf TDI 4DR MT6 SB 1989 AW11 MR2 4AGE 150whp 2250lbs
      05-15-2012 03:39 AM #6
      Id just like someone to identify any recognized authority on the matter. This poll is about as official as anything.

    7. Member eunos94's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 17th, 2002
      Location
      Northeast Ohio
      Posts
      7,088
      Vehicles
      Yellow 1970 Beetle & Yellow Rush 2012 Beetle 2.5L Tiptronic
      05-15-2012 03:49 AM #7
      Quote Originally Posted by teklord69 View Post
      had to google "ted haggard".. not cool bro.
      The truth doesn't have to be cool, polite or nice to still be "The Truth" in fact The truth often hurts.... just sayin'
      ■■■■■■■■■■■■

    8. Member Autobahn's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 26th, 2000
      Location
      SoCal
      Posts
      1,404
      Vehicles
      '93 Prelude VTEC, '00 GTI 1.8T, '91 Miata, '13 Golf R
      05-15-2012 05:19 AM #8
      The fact that this discussion comes up so often just kills me. Unless you prescribe to the antiquated dictionary definition of a "sports car," (meaning rwd, 2 seats, open-top) the FR-S is more of a pure sports car than just about anything rolling off an assembly line today. The Civic Si is a sporty car... the FR-S/BRZ is a sports car, straight-line numbers be damned.

    9. Member kmead's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 11th, 2001
      Location
      Left coast of Michigan-GR
      Posts
      3,073
      Vehicles
      '04 Sienna '00 Golf '92 Miata '84 Bertone X1/9 '70 Fiat 124 Sport Coupe '69 Fiat 850 Sport Coup
      05-15-2012 07:12 AM #9
      To be clear, it is a Sports Coupe.

      A sports car has two seats and should have a soft top or removable targa top.
      FIAT is back

    10. Member WAR_GTI's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 10th, 2006
      Location
      Eugene, OR
      Posts
      1,699
      05-15-2012 07:30 AM #10
      Is it by traditional definition a sports car...no...
      Is it an exceedingly fun, sporty, drivers car...you bet!

      BMW could learn a thing or two from Toyota/Subaru on how to build a real "drivers car", and not just use the term as a marketing gimmick

    11. Member
      Join Date
      Dec 2nd, 2011
      Location
      Burlington, NC
      Posts
      5,021
      Vehicles
      '16 S5 / '12 Atom / '16 Jetta S 1.4T
      05-15-2012 08:10 AM #11
      A car doesn't need a soft top to be a sports car... that's a roadster or any other many terms. The FR-S is more of a sports car than any other car on production right now. It's light, agile and produced solely as a car with sporting potential and not for any other reason.
      2016 Audi S5 | Daytona Gray | 6MT | Black Optics Plus | Sport Differential | Technology Package | Black Alcantara | Carbon Atlas

    12. Member
      Join Date
      Mar 25th, 2009
      Location
      NOVA
      Posts
      3,546
      Vehicles
      2012 CC R line, 61 Merc. 220b
      05-15-2012 08:14 AM #12
      where is the "your mom is a sports car" option?

    13. Member
      Join Date
      May 10th, 2010
      Location
      North Jersey
      Posts
      14,622
      Vehicles
      2016 Tiguan SE 4Motion
      05-15-2012 08:14 AM #13
      Quote Originally Posted by kmead View Post
      To be clear, it is a Sports Coupe.

      A sports car has two seats and should have a soft top or removable targa top.
      I should make a new thread titled: "Is the Porsche 911 a sports car" based on this thread's definition.

      the 2 rear seats in the FR-S/BRZ is only there for insurance purposes only... being a 2+2 means a lower insurance rate than a straight forward 2 seater.

      .
      .
      .
      .
      pics of "real" sports cars then...


      Quote Originally Posted by Jezza
      Power and Speed solves many things

    14. Member
      Join Date
      Mar 25th, 2009
      Location
      NOVA
      Posts
      3,546
      Vehicles
      2012 CC R line, 61 Merc. 220b
      05-15-2012 08:21 AM #14
      actually the 2 rear seats are there so that you have room for your spare set of rims, when you go to the track. they were designed to fit a pair of 17's quite nicely in there, very easy.

    15. Member Mike!'s Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 17th, 2002
      Location
      Ontario & Ohio
      Posts
      16,221
      Vehicles
      2015 Fusion Wagon Allroad Turbo
      05-15-2012 08:24 AM #15
      Quote Originally Posted by BsickPassat View Post
      the 2 rear seats in the FR-S/BRZ is only there for insurance purposes only... being a 2+2 means a lower insurance rate than a straight forward 2 seater.
      Bull. This car is the successor to sporty but practical cars that Toyota built in the mid eighties that came with a rear seat. It's meant to have a measure of practicality, hence the rear seat, hence the sizeable trunk. I really don't think they care what insurance companies might or might not charge their customers.

      After all, sports cars like the Miata, Boxster, or Corvette are often cheap to insure due to the grey-hair demographic that makes up a significant group of owners.

    16. Member Egz's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 30th, 2002
      Location
      Virginia
      Posts
      17,277
      Vehicles
      2006 Ford Fusion 2.3 Turbo, 2016 Ford Fusion Hybrid
      05-15-2012 08:26 AM #16
      The classic "sports car" definition has been butchered for years, so I don't have any problem calling it a sports car.

    17. Senior Member FlashRedGLS1.8T's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 17th, 2001
      Location
      Ohio
      Posts
      22,418
      05-15-2012 08:29 AM #17
      Sporty car, but I'm not sure why that matters.

    18. Member
      Join Date
      May 10th, 2010
      Location
      North Jersey
      Posts
      14,622
      Vehicles
      2016 Tiguan SE 4Motion
      05-15-2012 08:38 AM #18
      Quote Originally Posted by Mike! View Post
      Bull. This car is the successor to sporty but practical cars that Toyota built in the mid eighties that came with a rear seat. It's meant to have a measure of practicality, hence the rear seat, hence the sizeable trunk. I really don't think they care what insurance companies might or might not charge their customers.

      After all, sports cars like the Miata, Boxster, or Corvette are often cheap to insure due to the grey-hair demographic that makes up a significant group of owners.
      Have you tried squeezing yourself into the backseat of the FR-S or BRZ?

      yes, the FR-S is supposed to be a spritual successor to the AE85/86, and to a lesser extent, the AE82 (since the old FX-3 was a FWD chassis)... but you can actually squeeze people into the backseat, so in addition to its sporting pretentions, it was still a practical car to use as family car.

      Toyota/Subaru designed the FR-S/BRZ from the ground up as a balanced sports car. If it was a true successor to the mid-80's practical sport cars... it would have been based on the current Corolla E140, or if that was too big, then the Yaris XP130 chassis.
      Quote Originally Posted by Jezza
      Power and Speed solves many things

    19. Member cockerpunk's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 17th, 2010
      Location
      Twin Cities MN
      Posts
      5,085
      Vehicles
      Mr2, 951, NA6
      05-15-2012 09:14 AM #19


      teklord FRS trolling + sports car definition trolling = epic failure
      Quote Originally Posted by VigorousZX View Post
      In their unquenchable thirst for world domination, the aristocrats tax peoples time so as to keep its cattle viewed populations forever in servitude. They have gone as far as brainwashing and banning the western world that marrying your first cousin is forbidden and results in retardation... and thus have disturbed human evolutionary densities because broken families are easier to control and will better fall into debt slavery.

    20. 05-15-2012 09:23 AM #20
      Where's the RWD econobox option?! Oh wait, this ins't an AE86, its another RX-8...
      Quote Originally Posted by Subwoofers View Post
      You must be a professional troll in real life.
      Quote Originally Posted by Crob View Post
      I'm more amused by the scientific formulas people bring up to justify why a BRZ lost to a Megane. Like really? All that college education you paid for and a BRZ is that important to you to go into some asinine explanation about how it's still a good track car?

    21. Member G_RockNYTN's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 5th, 2006
      Location
      Indianapolis
      Posts
      620
      Vehicles
      2015 BMW M3
      05-15-2012 09:23 AM #21
      I saw both FR-S and teklord in the thread title yet I clicked anyway. Shame on me.

    22. Geriatric Member ByronLLN's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 29th, 2004
      Location
      Annapolis, MD
      Posts
      39,391
      Vehicles
      '16 FiST, '15 5.0, '13 Focus, '97 Wrangler, '90 Miata
      05-15-2012 09:25 AM #22
      It's a sports coupe/sporty coupe/2+2/whateverthe****youwannacallit.

      Lock it up.

    23. Member compy222's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 7th, 2005
      Location
      Pothole, Midwest
      Posts
      15,864
      Vehicles
      Honda Fanboy Collection
      05-15-2012 09:31 AM #23
      any car built with the primary intent of driving enjoyment should be considered a sports car.

      this doesn't mean that all sports cars are good or even fast...however, it does mean the FRS, the RX-8, Nissan Z's, Mustang, Camaro and Porsche 911 are sports car. when their manufacturer built them, the main goal was making them fast/fun.
      Quote Originally Posted by capsaicin View Post
      AP1 S2000? I can not in good conscience talk you out of that. May your slip angle be great and your bed not be the couch!

    24. Geriatric Member ByronLLN's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 29th, 2004
      Location
      Annapolis, MD
      Posts
      39,391
      Vehicles
      '16 FiST, '15 5.0, '13 Focus, '97 Wrangler, '90 Miata
      05-15-2012 09:33 AM #24
      Quote Originally Posted by compy222 View Post
      any car built with the primary intent of driving enjoyment should be considered a sports car.
      Jeep Wrangler. Go.

    25. Member
      Join Date
      Oct 31st, 2006
      Location
      CT
      Posts
      1,197
      Vehicles
      2011 Audi S4 Premium Plus
      05-15-2012 09:33 AM #25
      This THREAD.....


    For advertising information click HERE

    Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  
    « Back