VWVortex.com - Chevy Sonic 1.4L Turbo - Impressions?
Username or Email Address
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up

    VWVortex


    The Car Lounge
    Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
    Results 51 to 75 of 86

    Thread: Chevy Sonic 1.4L Turbo - Impressions?

    1. Member
      Join Date
      Dec 25th, 2007
      Location
      New Castle, PA
      Posts
      568
      05-17-2012 12:30 PM #51
      For you guys complaining about the drums...the car stops fine, the brakes feel great. Don't drums last longer anyways? The backseat is pretty tight and there's not much storage space, there is a ton of headroom though. The gauges are nice and clear, I prefer digital speedometers but then again I'm younger. I think cars in this class are usually pretty boring and I'm glad Chevy threw in some different stuff. And the 6th gear is really high but I'm glad it's there so I can cruise at a lower rpm. I don't mind shifting down to 5th or even 4th if I have to pass a car or there is a hill. Ideally you could stay in 5th gear on the highway if you wanted.

    2. Member aufmitterspeil's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 24th, 2008
      Posts
      123
      Vehicles
      A hatchback of blah
      05-17-2012 12:41 PM #52
      Quote Originally Posted by Voodoo.T View Post
      VW doesn't make anything in this price range. The only thing they make I'd drive would be a GTI or Golf TDI, both of which break mid-20's on price. And at that price, I'd rather have a Camaro. That's just me.
      2.5 hater
      Auf mit dem spiel

    3. Senior Member
      Join Date
      Jun 10th, 2000
      Location
      Motown
      Posts
      21,072
      Vehicles
      1957 Testa Rossa
      05-17-2012 01:03 PM #53
      Quote Originally Posted by Voodoo.T View Post
      Technically it is the second generation Aveo, not a completely new car.
      What makes you say that?

    4. Member
      Join Date
      Dec 25th, 2007
      Location
      New Castle, PA
      Posts
      568
      05-17-2012 06:01 PM #54
      Quote Originally Posted by uncleho View Post
      What makes you say that?
      It is still technically called the Aveo in other markets...

    5. Member
      Join Date
      Jul 1st, 2011
      Location
      The Volt Bar
      Posts
      1,656
      Vehicles
      2016 Chevrolet Volt, 2016 Cadillac CTS
      05-17-2012 06:11 PM #55
      Quote Originally Posted by Ubryaj View Post
      It is still technically called the Aveo in other markets...
      So enlighten us, just what does this Aveo/Somic share with the old model

    6. Member
      Join Date
      Mar 7th, 2010
      Location
      Phoenix, AZ
      Posts
      853
      Vehicles
      14 Touareg, 05 R53, 81 W123, 05 Tourneo Connect
      05-17-2012 06:19 PM #56
      I run into this CAr magazine review on the 1.2L version. Very positive i must say:

      http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/Drives/...12-CAR-review/

      Chevrolet Aveo 1.2 (2012) CAR review
      By Anthony ffrench-Constant

      First Drives

      09 May 2012 10:00


      Bit of a surprise, Chevrolet's new Aveo supermini; pretty good looking inside and out, and, on an all-new platform, a rather tidy performer to boot.

      I must confess to having quickly given up the frantic, five-speed stick stirrings necessary to wring the neck of the 1.2-litre petrol engined version, and settled for amiable bumbling instead.

      Not that the Aveo won’t handle; it’s actually remarkably tidy through the twisty stuff, just rather hard work trying to elicit enough power to tax the gently adept chassis.

      What's the Chevrolet Aveo like to bumble around in?
      Thanks to a comfy seat and a surprisingly refined, supple ride, it does the bumbling thing rather well. My only criticism might be aimed at the slightly unseemly levels of road noise that creep aboard, marring otherwise encouragingly smooth progress.

      The 1.3-litre diesel version is much ballsier, displaying admirable vim, but I suspect the front struts have been surreptitiously beefed to cater for an increase in engine weight, so the ride quality isn’t quite up there with that of the petrol.

      And inside the Chevy Aveo supermini?
      I’ve read much about the unremittingly harsh nature of the cabin finishes, but at least Chevrolet hasn’t wasted money on expensive, soft-touch trim in areas you’ll never fondle.

      Almost everything I came into contact with on a regular basis gave no cause for complaint, and if it helps keep the price of the car down in an era when both the price (and size for that matter) of superminis is getting somewhat out of hand, then that’s fine by me.

      Besides, if Chevrolet were to up their game in the interior trim stakes, I’d rather, in the Aveo’s case, it was in the interests of noise suppression.

    7. Member
      Join Date
      Dec 25th, 2007
      Location
      New Castle, PA
      Posts
      568
      05-17-2012 07:32 PM #57
      Quote Originally Posted by Minority5 View Post
      So enlighten us, just what does this Aveo/Somic share with the old model
      Probably nothing. Totally new model.

    8. Banned
      Join Date
      Mar 6th, 2003
      Location
      Toronto
      Posts
      3,798
      05-17-2012 07:54 PM #58
      CHEVY = CARBAGE
      FORD = CARBAGE
      CHRYSLER = CARBAGE


    9. Member hardcore4life's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 8th, 2010
      Location
      Mentor ,Ohio
      Posts
      3,675
      Vehicles
      2013 focus ST ST3
      05-17-2012 07:58 PM #59
      Quote Originally Posted by Rob. View Post
      FORD = CARBAGE



    10. Member lojasmo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 23rd, 2002
      Location
      SE MN
      Posts
      4,450
      Vehicles
      2006 Vue, 2012 Chevy Cruze LT2, 2004 Allroad
      05-17-2012 08:15 PM #60
      Quote Originally Posted by Rob. View Post
      CHEVY = CARBAGE
      FORD = CARBAGE
      CHRYSLER = CARBAGE


    11. Member Ben.Reilly's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 20th, 2008
      Location
      RI
      Posts
      3,847
      Vehicles
      2015 Jeep Wrangler
      05-17-2012 08:48 PM #61
      Quote Originally Posted by Rob. View Post
      CHEVY = CARBAGE
      FORD = CARBAGE
      CHRYSLER = CARBAGE

      You forgot Honda!
      F1
      RED BULL Racing Formula One
      Final Gear

      "Here's a couple things America got right; cars and freedom"

    12. Member curvedinfinity's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 11th, 2004
      Location
      Highway to the danger zone
      Posts
      8,911
      Vehicles
      F14 Tomcat
      05-17-2012 09:07 PM #62


      I don't understand

    13. Senior Member
      Join Date
      Jun 10th, 2000
      Location
      Motown
      Posts
      21,072
      Vehicles
      1957 Testa Rossa
      05-18-2012 06:44 AM #63
      Quote Originally Posted by Ubryaj View Post
      It is still technically called the Aveo in other markets...
      Name. Sure. But I think he was inferring that the Sonic was some mild, mechanical refresh of the older Daewoo... and it is not.

    14. Member Burnin8r's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 7th, 2003
      Location
      NY NJ PA
      Posts
      2,934
      Vehicles
      2014 FIAT 500 Abarth
      05-18-2012 08:10 AM #64
      Quote Originally Posted by uncleho View Post
      Name. Sure. But I think he was inferring that the Sonic was some mild, mechanical refresh of the older Daewoo... and it is not.
      exactly. that would be the Chevy Spark, not the Sonic =)

    15. Member
      Join Date
      May 19th, 2010
      Location
      Atlanta
      Posts
      686
      05-18-2012 09:11 AM #65
      Quote Originally Posted by adrew View Post
      My 2003 Civic Si (2800 lbs) had 160 horsepower and 132 lb-ft (all the way across the whole rev range) and everyone here said it was a slow, fat pig. So I am always a bit surprised when people say that the Sonic should be spunky.

      /slight sarcasm
      I think a big difference here is the sonic can easily get 170hp and decent torque just through a flash. With some other changes, the car can probably be made pretty quick.

    16. Member compy222's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 7th, 2005
      Location
      Pothole, MI
      Posts
      15,621
      Vehicles
      2007 Acura MDX, 2003 Honda S2000, 2004 Acura TSX
      05-18-2012 09:56 AM #66
      Quote Originally Posted by Minority5 View Post
      So enlighten us, just what does this Aveo/Somic share with the old model
      virtually nothing was retained. the body panels are totally different, the interior, materials. the only thing that remains remotely close is the way the car is set-up as a FWD econobox...its a surprisingly good little car to drive. torquey, forgiving, and fun.
      Quote Originally Posted by capsaicin View Post
      AP1 S2000? I can not in good conscience talk you out of that. May your slip angle be great and your bed not be the couch!

    17. Member caj1's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 16th, 1999
      Location
      Washington, DC
      Posts
      8,139
      Vehicles
      2016 Audi TTS; 2016 VW GTI w/PP
      05-18-2012 10:24 AM #67
      Quote Originally Posted by Non_Affiliated View Post

      Love the armchair quarter back critics.
      New here? That's TCL in a nutshell. 95% of those providing their perspective (positive or negative) probably haven't even seen the car in person, let alone driven it.

    18. 05-18-2012 11:44 AM #68
      Quote Originally Posted by adrew View Post
      My 2003 Civic Si (2800 lbs) had 160 horsepower and 132 lb-ft (all the way across the whole rev range) and everyone here said it was a slow, fat pig. So I am always a bit surprised when people say that the Sonic should be spunky.

      /slight sarcasm
      That power was available at stratospheric RPMs. Not so with the 1.4T, more power at lower RPMs gets a from me.
      Quote Originally Posted by pops View Post
      I'm naming my next child NightTrain EX.
      Quote Originally Posted by WhistlerYOW View Post
      You're a pretty cool dude.

    19. Member adrew's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 14th, 2003
      Location
      Texas
      Posts
      14,785
      Vehicles
      '12 Yaris, '14 Mirage, 2.7 liters total
      05-18-2012 11:53 AM #69
      Quote Originally Posted by NightTrain EX View Post
      That power was available at stratospheric RPMs. Not so with the 1.4T, more power at lower RPMs gets a from me.
      Not really, it had the VTEC-Lite™ K20A3 which redlined at 6800 (but pulled smoothly into the 7100 fuel cut). Unlike peaky earlier Hondas it is very flexible and pulls smoothly from 1500 RPM. The torque curve is flat from 2000-7000 RPM. Dyno plots: http://www.vtec.net/forums/one-messa...sage_id=174863
      Improving the signal-to-noise ratio

    20. Member firstorbit84's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 25th, 2006
      Location
      CO
      Posts
      4,191
      Vehicles
      '14 Jetta 1.8T, '16 Tiguan, '99 911
      05-18-2012 04:02 PM #70
      Quote Originally Posted by adrew View Post
      Not really, it had the VTEC-Lite™ K20A3 which redlined at 6800 (but pulled smoothly into the 7100 fuel cut). Unlike peaky earlier Hondas it is very flexible and pulls smoothly from 1500 RPM. The torque curve is flat from 2000-7000 RPM. Dyno plots: http://www.vtec.net/forums/one-messa...sage_id=174863
      Those torque numbers are pathetic
      If your car feels like it's on rails, then you're going too slow.

    21. Member adrew's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 14th, 2003
      Location
      Texas
      Posts
      14,785
      Vehicles
      '12 Yaris, '14 Mirage, 2.7 liters total
      05-18-2012 04:05 PM #71
      Quote Originally Posted by firstorbit84 View Post
      Those torque numbers are pathetic
      Just as pathetic as a stock 1.4T:
      Improving the signal-to-noise ratio

    22. Member Non_Affiliated's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 12th, 2002
      Location
      Hola Bitchola WA.
      Posts
      13,348
      Vehicles
      '91 MKIII Scirrocco, '78 SuperCab F-150 Quattro with 460 Cu. In. Of Eco terror.
      05-21-2012 07:41 PM #72
      Quote Originally Posted by caj1 View Post
      New here? That's TCL in a nutshell. 95% of those providing their perspective (positive or negative) probably haven't even seen the car in person, let alone driven it.

      Only by 3 years.
      We're the middle children of history, man. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our Great War's a spiritual war... our Great Depression is our lives. We've all been raised on television to believe that one day we'd all be millionaires, and movie gods, and rock stars. But we won't. And we're slowly learning that fact. And we're very, very pissed off.

    23. Member
      Join Date
      Feb 4th, 2011
      Location
      Pee Dee Ecks
      Posts
      933
      05-27-2012 09:13 PM #73
      I test drove a Sonic today, it was the 1.8, they didn't have any 1.4t Sonics in stock. That engine is a rough POS. Above 4000rpm, all you can hear is the engine screaming bloody murder, and not in a good way. All the other small cars I've looked at have decent sound at high RPM. Fiesta, Mini Cooper, Honda Fit, Fiat 500. The Sonic was just terrible.

      If the 1.4t is not significantly more refined than the 1.8, there is no way in hell am I considering one. Also, clueless dealers much, Chevy? "Oh the 1.4 is going to cost about 2 grand more than the 1.8." It's $700, you nimrod.

    24. Member jspirate's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 15th, 2011
      Location
      Virginia
      Posts
      2,340
      Vehicles
      2011 CC 6MT
      05-27-2012 09:36 PM #74
      Did not read one post this thread.

      This engine is 10 years late.

    25. Geriatric Member BRealistic's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 16th, 2005
      Location
      East-10EC
      Posts
      69,385
      Vehicles
      88 F150, 04 RX8, 96 T&C LXi
      05-27-2012 09:49 PM #75
      Quote Originally Posted by kimilein View Post
      I test drove a Sonic today, it was the 1.8, they didn't have any 1.4t Sonics in stock. That engine is a rough POS. Above 4000rpm, all you can hear is the engine screaming bloody murder, and not in a good way. All the other small cars I've looked at have decent sound at high RPM. Fiesta, Mini Cooper, Honda Fit, Fiat 500. The Sonic was just terrible.

      If the 1.4t is not significantly more refined than the 1.8, there is no way in hell am I considering one. Also, clueless dealers much, Chevy? "Oh the 1.4 is going to cost about 2 grand more than the 1.8." It's $700, you nimrod.
      Maybe he meant you had to step up to a higher trim model to get it?
      It's not available on the LS sedan, you have to go LT and then add the option.
      And I am surprised the 1.8 is so bad.
      This is the engine from the Cruze and Astra, right?
      “Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one's lifetime.”

    For advertising information click HERE

    Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •