Username or Email Address
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up

    VWVortex


    The Car Lounge
    Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
    Results 1 to 25 of 52

    Thread: *Unofficial* Pricing added to 2013 Ford Fusion configurator; Fusion S starts at $22,495

    1. Senior Member Mazda 3s's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 12th, 2003
      Location
      Garner, NC
      Posts
      21,510
      Vehicles
      2013 VW Jetta Sportwagen TDI, 2013 Hyundai Elantra Limited
      05-22-2012 06:50 PM #1


      We've noticed that 2013 Ford Fusion configurator has been updated with dollar values for each of its four models, however, we're not so sure the pricing is that black-and-white. Ford has also updated the disclaimer at the bottom of the page, to read, "Prices and features are for survey purposes only and are subject to change and features may become unavailable at the time of vehicle introduction." In other words, don't get too fixated on the numbers, as they're not locked down yet. And by playing with the configurator, you're likely serving as a FoMoCo lab rat – after all, this is the company that never met a focus group it didn't like.

      It's worth noting that Ford has not issued an official press release on pricing yet. But for now, it seems like the base Fusion S will start at $22,495, though we're not sure whether that includes destination or not. Stepping up to the SE at $24,490 will upgrade the steel wheels to alloys, add heated, lighted mirrors with turn signal indicators, and get you body color rocker panels. Inside, the SE has a power driver's seat and a better stereo, and backseat passengers get an armrest and their own HVAC ducts. The SE also allows you to order other stuff, including navigation and start/stop, or opt for a different engine than the base-spec 2.5-liter four-cylinder with automatic transmission.

      The 1.6-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder is available with a manual or automatic on the SE for $25,290, while the start/stop-equipped version (automatic only) is $25,585. The 2.0-liter EcoBoost with automatic is $26,745 when ordered in SE trim. Ford lists a number of different packages and options, but they seem to be offered on a sliding scale, such that the packages are more expensive on the lower-priced models. For instance, the Luxury Package with leather and heated seats, among other equipment, is $1,505 on the 1.6-liter EcoBoost but only $1,050 on the 2.0-liter EcoBoost.

      On the SE Hybrid, which starts at $27,995 and is equipped with a non-EcoBoost 2.0-liter four-cylinder and a CVT, the same Luxury Package is listed at $2,000. Apparently if you're saving all that money on gas, you can afford to pay double the guy with the most powerful engine.

      At the top of the Fusion price list, of course, rests the Titanium, which offers a lot of the optional stuff standard for $30,995. It's also the only way to get all-wheel drive, which will set you back $32,995. Note that the Titanium is exclusively powered by the 2.0-liter EcoBoost and is not available with a manual, so you won't be configuring your Fusion as a dual-use weekend rally car.

      But then again, Ford will likely change this all tomorrow.


      http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/22/p...-configurator/
      "Of course that's just my opinion; I could be wrong."

      Quote Originally Posted by The Igneous Faction
      Have you ever popped the hood on a powerstroke E350?
      Quote Originally Posted by WhistlerYOW
      No, I got good grades in school

    2. Geriatric Member Turbio!'s Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 21st, 2005
      Location
      San Antonio, TX
      Posts
      41,551
      Vehicles
      '13 Subaru Outback
      05-22-2012 06:57 PM #2
      ~33k for a loaded 2.0 Ecoboost with AWD is great; I'd take that over just about anything in the premium realm. The base price is okay, but it's about $1000 over the Accord and $2500 over the Sonata and Optima. This is clearly a slightly premium entrant in the class, not as much of a jump as the Regal or ILX but not for bargain shoppers - much as the Focus and Escape are. I've seen it in person - it looks like a $40k car, not a $22k one.

      They'll probably rejigger it a few times, but that's decent pricing.
      Last edited by Turbio!; 05-22-2012 at 07:01 PM.
      IPRO Meat-Director and High Minister of Terror-Grilling

      Quote Originally Posted by Marshmallow Man View Post
      The Terror Grill: Part restaurant, part amusement attraction, part gladiator arena, all profit.
      ARE YOU NOT SATIATED?!?!?!

    3. Member choochoo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 12th, 2008
      Location
      OC, CA
      Posts
      6,838
      Vehicles
      nothing to see here
      05-22-2012 07:04 PM #3
      wow, I hope this car drives as good as it looks. It's got to be the best looking family car out there.

    4. Senior Member Mazda 3s's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 12th, 2003
      Location
      Garner, NC
      Posts
      21,510
      Vehicles
      2013 VW Jetta Sportwagen TDI, 2013 Hyundai Elantra Limited
      05-22-2012 07:07 PM #4
      Quote Originally Posted by choochoo View Post
      wow, I hope this car drives as good as it looks. It's got to be the best looking family car out there.
      Agreed! I love the "budget Aston" looks of it. If this had been around when I was car shopping, I would have bought this instead of the Sonata 2.0t.

      The only thing I don't like is MyFord Touch. I like having actual controls and am not a fan of all this touch-sensitive crap.
      "Of course that's just my opinion; I could be wrong."

      Quote Originally Posted by The Igneous Faction
      Have you ever popped the hood on a powerstroke E350?
      Quote Originally Posted by WhistlerYOW
      No, I got good grades in school

    5. Member Robski92's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 26th, 2011
      Location
      Burlington, ON
      Posts
      3,546
      Vehicles
      2003 Golf TDI
      05-22-2012 07:20 PM #5
      Quote Originally Posted by Mazda 3s View Post
      Agreed! I love the "budget Aston" looks of it. If this had been around when I was car shopping, I would have bought this instead of the Sonata 2.0t.

      The only thing I don't like is MyFord Touch. I like having actual controls and am not a fan of all this touch-sensitive crap.
      My Ford touch will probably be offered in SES and Titanium trim only.

    6. Geriatric Member Turbio!'s Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 21st, 2005
      Location
      San Antonio, TX
      Posts
      41,551
      Vehicles
      '13 Subaru Outback
      05-22-2012 07:22 PM #6
      Quote Originally Posted by Mazda 3s View Post
      Agreed! I love the "budget Aston" looks of it. If this had been around when I was car shopping, I would have bought this instead of the Sonata 2.0t.

      The only thing I don't like is MyFord Touch. I like having actual controls and am not a fan of all this touch-sensitive crap.
      Most controls are redundant with my ford touch. HVAC, basic stereo, and so forth all have buttons. The lower-trim models do without it entirely.
      IPRO Meat-Director and High Minister of Terror-Grilling

      Quote Originally Posted by Marshmallow Man View Post
      The Terror Grill: Part restaurant, part amusement attraction, part gladiator arena, all profit.
      ARE YOU NOT SATIATED?!?!?!

    7. Senior Member Mazda 3s's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 12th, 2003
      Location
      Garner, NC
      Posts
      21,510
      Vehicles
      2013 VW Jetta Sportwagen TDI, 2013 Hyundai Elantra Limited
      05-22-2012 07:37 PM #7
      Quote Originally Posted by Turbio! View Post
      Most controls are redundant with my ford touch. HVAC, basic stereo, and so forth all have buttons. The lower-trim models do without it entirely.
      Looking at this picture, those look like touch sensitive touch points, not actual buttons or knobs (with the exception of volume). Those things are really hit or miss.


      Last edited by Mazda 3s; 05-22-2012 at 07:40 PM.
      "Of course that's just my opinion; I could be wrong."

      Quote Originally Posted by The Igneous Faction
      Have you ever popped the hood on a powerstroke E350?
      Quote Originally Posted by WhistlerYOW
      No, I got good grades in school

    8. Senior Member VarianceVQ's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 26th, 2005
      Location
      Fancy, Connecticut
      Posts
      20,463
      Vehicles
      2010 Toyota Prius V, 1996 Nissan Pathfinder LE 4x4
      05-22-2012 07:38 PM #8
      You know something, I still very much like this exterior (and V6 availability).



      Wish I could combine this with the new interior.
      Everybody's dying, bitch; let's get you some fruit.

    9. Senior Member Mazda 3s's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 12th, 2003
      Location
      Garner, NC
      Posts
      21,510
      Vehicles
      2013 VW Jetta Sportwagen TDI, 2013 Hyundai Elantra Limited
      05-22-2012 09:06 PM #9
      Quote Originally Posted by VarianceVQ View Post
      You know something, I still very much like this exterior (and V6 availability).



      Wish I could combine this with the new interior.
      This model looks uber dated now IMHO.
      "Of course that's just my opinion; I could be wrong."

      Quote Originally Posted by The Igneous Faction
      Have you ever popped the hood on a powerstroke E350?
      Quote Originally Posted by WhistlerYOW
      No, I got good grades in school

    10. Member wonderboy!'s Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 12th, 2006
      Location
      Hamilton Ontario
      Posts
      3,175
      Vehicles
      gc8 impreza
      05-22-2012 09:14 PM #10
      Quote Originally Posted by Mazda 3s View Post
      This model looks uber dated now IMHO.
      and the new one will look just as dated in a few years as well

    11. Member
      Join Date
      Mar 7th, 2010
      Location
      Phoenix, AZ
      Posts
      767
      Vehicles
      13 GTI, 05 R53, 81 W123, 05 Tourneo Connect
      05-22-2012 09:15 PM #11
      This goes straight to the top of the class. It looks great, with great tech. I wish they didn't have a S model ( wheel covers and such), so the range looks better. I guess its a must for the fleet sales

    12. Member Brimjolt's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 16th, 2008
      Location
      Burlington, ON
      Posts
      6,695
      Vehicles
      '13 Jetta
      05-22-2012 09:15 PM #12
      stick?
      Quote Originally Posted by Zhine
      Power sliding is not worth it, I realized I was addicted and have taken up a much healthier safer hobby called high school girls

    13. Banned WhistlerYOW's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 14th, 2004
      Posts
      10,165
      05-22-2012 09:18 PM #13
      Quote Originally Posted by Mazda 3s View Post
      This model looks uber dated now IMHO.
      Ya, kind of like using the term 'uber'.
      Last edited by WhistlerYOW; 05-22-2012 at 09:20 PM.

    14. Member adrew's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 14th, 2003
      Location
      Texas
      Posts
      13,551
      Vehicles
      '12 Yaris, '14 Mirage, 2.7 liters total
      05-22-2012 09:22 PM #14
      Quote Originally Posted by Brimjolt View Post
      stick?
      Yes, but with the 1.6T (only).
      Improving the signal-to-noise ratio

    15. Member patrickvr6's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 29th, 2001
      Location
      Atlanta GA
      Posts
      9,280
      Vehicles
      '77 Bronco '85 Toyota 4x4 '87 930 '01 325i '08 Xterra
      05-22-2012 09:24 PM #15
      Quote Originally Posted by Brimjolt View Post
      stick?
      Looks like it is only available with the 1.6 Ecoboost on the SE model.

    16. Member xo_vw's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 30th, 2009
      Location
      Southern California
      Posts
      1,591
      Vehicles
      2009 Jetta SE
      05-22-2012 09:25 PM #16
      Quote Originally Posted by Mazda 3s View Post
      This model looks uber dated now IMHO.
      I agree. I see these and they look really dated. Especially the rear end.

    17. Member 2.0T_Convert's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 23rd, 2009
      Location
      NYC
      Posts
      14,124
      05-22-2012 09:41 PM #17
      I must be one the few who doesn't like it inside and out.

      I'll be interested to see how many people choose the 1.6 ecoboost over the base 2.5 engine.
      Sent from my tablet while sipping weak drinks over fancy brunch with a view

    18. Moderator silverspeedbuggy's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 8th, 2001
      Location
      Cleveland Heights OH
      Posts
      5,051
      Vehicles
      2006 GLI, 1987 Scirocco 16V, 1989 Jetta GL
      05-22-2012 09:52 PM #18
      Quote Originally Posted by patrickvr6 View Post
      Looks like it (manual trans) is only available with the 1.6 Ecoboost on the SE model.
      Dear Ford,
      You need a VW GLI competitor. Please add a manual trans to the 2.0T for the 2014 model year with a sport suspension and body kit: Fusion Sport.

      Thanks,
      Silverspeedbuggy

    19. 05-22-2012 09:54 PM #19
      Quote Originally Posted by Turbio! View Post
      ~33k for a loaded 2.0 Ecoboost with AWD is great; I'd take that over just about anything in the premium realm. The base price is okay, but it's about $1000 over the Accord and $2500 over the Sonata and Optima. This is clearly a slightly premium entrant in the class, not as much of a jump as the Regal or ILX but not for bargain shoppers - much as the Focus and Escape are. I've seen it in person - it looks like a $40k car, not a $22k one.

      They'll probably rejigger it a few times, but that's decent pricing.

      I think it looks more like a $59k car


    20. Member Buzzkill's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 9th, 2003
      Location
      Knoxville, TN
      Posts
      856
      Vehicles
      2014 Ford Focus SE Hatchback
      05-22-2012 10:57 PM #20
      Quote Originally Posted by silverspeedbuggy View Post
      Dear Ford,
      You need a VW GLI competitor. Please add a manual trans to the 2.0T for the 2014 model year with a sport suspension and body kit: Fusion Sport.

      Thanks,
      Silverspeedbuggy
      I would think the focus st would be the gli competitor, I know its not a sedan, and will probably be a more sporty car, but would still be a closer match than the fusion.
      Quote Originally Posted by jrsmitchell in regards to the Mirage View Post
      It's like the 80s are back and they're in that engine bay.

    21. Geriatric Member BRealistic's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 16th, 2005
      Location
      Tennessee
      Posts
      66,830
      Vehicles
      88 F150, 04 RX8, 96 T&C LXi
      05-22-2012 11:31 PM #21
      Quote Originally Posted by Mazda 3s View Post
      This model looks uber dated now IMHO.
      And I don't mind.... because I like that design more now than when it first came out.
      At least it has some character and defines a moment in the design timeline.
      "Timeless" tends to be a crutch for generic derivative design.
      “Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one's lifetime.”

    22. 05-23-2012 12:43 AM #22
      well i fiddled with the configurator and a Fusion Titanium AWD with every bell and whistle including fancy paint and wheels (but still no panoramic moonroof, HIDs or ventilated seats) comes out to just under $39,000. very close to my original $40k prediction for a fully loaded Fusion. it was also unclear if the final price included destination.
      Last edited by akuma; 05-23-2012 at 01:11 AM.

    23. Senior Member Lwize's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 4th, 2000
      Location
      Los Angeles
      Posts
      24,287
      Vehicles
      09 Rabbit
      05-23-2012 01:08 AM #23
      I'm having trouble wrapping my head around a 1.6T Fusion stick at $26K.
      Actually, I'm having trouble wrapping my head around a 1.6T Fusion at any price.
      When did the US become part of the EU?
      :gift:

    24. Member
      Join Date
      Jul 1st, 2011
      Location
      The Volt Bar
      Posts
      1,330
      Vehicles
      2015 Corvette Stingray, 2015 Cadillac Escalade
      05-23-2012 01:29 PM #24
      After seeing this thing on Woodward Monday night, I must say I was a bit underwhelmed from a styling perspective. The nose (thanks in part to crash regs, I'll admit) photographs really well, but is less effective in person IMO. And it gets downright bland when you look at the side or rear.

      This class is going to be interesting to watch. A $39K loaded family sedan vs. a $40K, lightly optioned car in the 3 series realm (A4, ATS, C Class) will be an sales trend to watch as OEM's finally align the portfolios globally. But a great time to be a car buyer.

    25. 05-23-2012 02:07 PM #25
      Quote Originally Posted by Minority5 View Post
      After seeing this thing on Woodward Monday night, I must say I was a bit underwhelmed from a styling perspective. The nose (thanks in part to crash regs, I'll admit) photographs really well, but is less effective in person IMO. And it gets downright bland when you look at the side or rear.

      This class is going to be interesting to watch. A $39K loaded family sedan vs. a $40K, lightly optioned car in the 3 series realm (A4, ATS, C Class) will be an sales trend to watch as OEM's finally align the portfolios globally. But a great time to be a car buyer.
      39K for a family sedan does not speak "great time to be a car buyer" to me. Maybe it's just me though.

    Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •