VWVortex


+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Good Bye Firefox 12!

  1. Member kerridwen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 3rd, 2001
    Location
    Mexico City, Mexico
    Posts
    3,880
    Vehicles
    Yamaha XT660R & XT660X
    05-23-2012 04:42 PM #1
    Firefox 12 would hang on exit, the windows would close, but the process would remain in the Taks Manager and the memory wouldn't be freed until I manually killed it.

    Firefox "support" had just basic things to do, like disabling plugins and extensions, wich didn't help at all. Not even a reinstall helped.

    Between that, and the fact that after a couple hours of using it, it would be hoggin 1.5GB of RAM was enough. I'm now using IE, and while crappy, it doesn't quite get to the same level of crappiness as they managed in the latest versions of Firefox.

  2. 05-23-2012 04:48 PM #2
    Weird. FF12 works just fine for me. So does IE9 for that matter, but I'm more used to the FF interface so that's my browser of preference. I still use IE9 from time to time since it works so much better for certain (work) websites. I have 11 tabs open across 2 instances of FF and I'm at about 350MB of RAM. I don't really have any plugins running aside from AdBlock Plus or whatever it's called.

  3. Senior Member Hostile's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 29th, 2002
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    27,159
    Vehicles
    a subaru and a vw
    05-23-2012 05:03 PM #3
    I gave up on Firefox a year or two ago, it's a complete memory hog and just runs like ass compared to Chrome.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swallow Doretti View Post
    I'm going to go out on a limb here and say I've sucked on more ballsacks than you have.

  4. Member kerridwen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 3rd, 2001
    Location
    Mexico City, Mexico
    Posts
    3,880
    Vehicles
    Yamaha XT660R & XT660X
    05-23-2012 05:13 PM #4
    Quote Originally Posted by SpiffyGTI View Post
    Weird. FF12 works just fine for me. So does IE9 for that matter, but I'm more used to the FF interface so that's my browser of preference. I still use IE9 from time to time since it works so much better for certain (work) websites. I have 11 tabs open across 2 instances of FF and I'm at about 350MB of RAM. I don't really have any plugins running aside from AdBlock Plus or whatever it's called.
    AdBock Plus is an extension. I had two extensions installed:

    - Ad Block Plus
    - Skype Click to Call

    Then I had some plugins:

    - Java
    - Quicktime
    - Webex
    - Adobe Flash
    - Silverlight

    Pretty much what you'd expect in any computer, save for the Webex plugin. I removed all of them, disabled all of them, reinstalled and made sure they were updated, it didn't help at all.

    What really pissed me off, and made me swear off Firefox is that on their "support" section, they blame everything but their bloatware. They tell you to disable plugins, extensions and antivirus...

    Guess what? I tried all of that, didn't help, it's their crappy software that is causing problems.

  5. Member kerridwen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 3rd, 2001
    Location
    Mexico City, Mexico
    Posts
    3,880
    Vehicles
    Yamaha XT660R & XT660X
    05-23-2012 05:24 PM #5
    The only thing I was really missing about FF12 was the ad blocker...

    But I already found one for IE9!


    Not going back. The guys at Mozilla have to get their act together, going from Firefox 4 to Firefox 11 in a year? Releasing Firefox 12 just two months after that? What the heck do they think they are doing?

  6. Moderator rich!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 18th, 1999
    Location
    SoFLA
    Posts
    9,221
    Vehicles
    '12 Touareg, '12 CC
    05-23-2012 05:30 PM #6
    at least go chrome over IE - chrome has adblockplus as well

    as for memory - you have to set the hard limits in the about:config.
    .: FireVortex the Browser Extension for VWVortex :: Download now for Firefox & Google Chrome :: Powered by etivite

    .: Features: Full Ignore a Member :: Thread Previews :: Kill Threads :: Products Search :: Quick Menu (favorite forums, subscribe topics, recently viewed) :: Custom Emoticons :: Quick Reply :: Full Screen Mode :: MyPage :: Kill Quoted Images :: Kill Quotes in Sigs :: more...

  7. Geriatric Member ATL_Av8r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 17th, 2002
    Location
    Gapiana
    Posts
    37,955
    05-23-2012 09:39 PM #7
    create a new profile
    MemeGate 2012 - First Responder, post #2

    Quote Originally Posted by .skully.
    Mike, quote me in your signature

  8. Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 17th, 2003
    Posts
    22,928
    Vehicles
    LG Optimus G Pro (stock)
    05-24-2012 01:26 AM #8
    Chrome solved this memory problem by launching a separate process to run each plugin so that each plugin would independently address memory rather than stack. 32bit apps approaching the 2GB memory limit would cause a ton of pagefaults which results in hangs and choking the system.
    Chrome's solution does not solve the problem completely as some plugins can also leak memory over time and requires closing the tab.

    I wish Firefox would put the 64bit version out which will solve the memory addressing problem.

  9. Senior Member Hostile's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 29th, 2002
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    27,159
    Vehicles
    a subaru and a vw
    05-24-2012 06:58 AM #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Vision33r View Post
    Chrome solved this memory problem by launching a separate process to run each plugin so that each plugin would independently address memory rather than stack. 32bit apps approaching the 2GB memory limit would cause a ton of pagefaults which results in hangs and choking the system.
    Chrome's solution does not solve the problem completely as some plugins can also leak memory over time and requires closing the tab.

    I wish Firefox would put the 64bit version out which will solve the memory addressing problem.
    Yea, because giving an application known to be full of memory leaks more memory to use is the obvious solution...
    Quote Originally Posted by Swallow Doretti View Post
    I'm going to go out on a limb here and say I've sucked on more ballsacks than you have.

  10. Geriatric Member ATL_Av8r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 17th, 2002
    Location
    Gapiana
    Posts
    37,955
    05-24-2012 08:42 AM #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Hostile View Post
    Yea, because giving an application known to be full of memory leaks more memory to use is the obvious solution...
    Hey hey hey....don't knock Microsoft's business model
    MemeGate 2012 - First Responder, post #2

    Quote Originally Posted by .skully.
    Mike, quote me in your signature

  11. Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 17th, 2003
    Posts
    22,928
    Vehicles
    LG Optimus G Pro (stock)
    05-24-2012 01:18 PM #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Hostile View Post
    Yea, because giving an application known to be full of memory leaks more memory to use is the obvious solution...
    Chrome isn't immune to the problem, they only mitigated the issue thus so far.

  12. Member PhReE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 16th, 2004
    Location
    Taylorsville, UT
    Posts
    9,022
    Vehicles
    2004 Turbo VR6
    05-24-2012 01:23 PM #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Vision33r View Post
    Chrome solved this memory problem by launching a separate process to run each plugin so that each plugin would independently address memory rather than stack. 32bit apps approaching the 2GB memory limit would cause a ton of pagefaults which results in hangs and choking the system.
    Chrome's solution does not solve the problem completely as some plugins can also leak memory over time and requires closing the tab.

    I wish Firefox would put the 64bit version out which will solve the memory addressing problem.
    Chrome uses a lot of memory too. There IS a 64-bit version of firefox. Thats a link to the nightly beta. Good luck with plugins though...
    -James
    04 GTI Silverstone 24vT :: GT35r - TT 264/260 - Unitronic 630cc - Bosch 044 - Area51 SRI - Full 3" TB :: More in progress
    >> http://zingledot.myminicity.com/ | http://sourceforge.net/projects/imagizer2 <<

  13. Senior Member Aonarch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 4th, 2006
    Location
    SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES, AUSTRALIA, OCEANIA, AKA UPSIDE-DOWN LAND
    Posts
    25,555
    Vehicles
    B6 Variant 3.6L VR6 4Motion | E30 325e | MKVI Golf 2.5L | Versys 650
    05-24-2012 03:45 PM #13
    Pale Moon x64

    Try that out. It is a 64 bit version of Firefox per say.

    My adblocker and adobe works with it.
    ██████████████████
    President @ ARD

  14. 05-24-2012 10:33 PM #14
    I was running Firefox for 3-4 years, recent versions sucked .... now with Chrome since last fall. IE 9-10 is not bad either.
    2007 E90 AW 323i Step | Lowered 1.25"/1" | BMW Performance Exhaust | PBX | Debadged | Scangauge II | Style 162 18" & 161 17" wheels & rear 15mm spacers

  15. Member zhenya00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 7th, 2003
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    5,648
    05-25-2012 04:46 AM #15
    Quote Originally Posted by ATL_Av8r View Post
    create a new profile
    x2

    If you didn't do this, all else was for naught - even reinstalling.

  16. 05-28-2012 11:41 AM #16
    I gave up on Firefox and use Chrome only now.

  17. Geriatric Member BRealistic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 16th, 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    59,934
    Vehicles
    88 F150, 04 RX8
    05-28-2012 02:09 PM #17
    Firefox was good... but Chrome is better.

    The biggest irritation to Firefox was the extremely long time it took to initially open.
    |˙˙ʇǝuɹǝʇuı ǝɥʇ uo ʇxǝʇ uʍop ǝpısdn ɯopuɐɹ pɐǝɹ noʎ :ǝɯıʇ ǝǝɹɟ ɥɔnɯ ooʇ ʎɐʍ ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ןןǝʇ oʇ ʍoɥ˙˙˙|http://hotlinktest.com/


+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts