At the very least they (VW) could have used the Detroit's or Karthoum's on the R-Line.![]()
#2
At the very least they (VW) could have used the Detroit's or Karthoum's on the R-Line.![]()
#4
AWD CC would be the tits >.<
#5
#6
#8
R line is just a trim package, same in Europe. R line mk6 in Europe is just aggressive body styling.
When you have the: .:R, that's supposed to mean serious business. Lol
#10
#11
I hate the refreshed front end on the CC, but this helps it a little bit. If only VW kept the old front with the revised rear.
#12
200HP? Rough. So R line is just an interior/exterior trim package now?
#15
#16
#17
Yep...there seems to be a lot of misunderstanding among some of the other posters in this thread.
VW R-Line trim bears the same relation to actual R vehicles (like the Golf R) as Audi S-Line trim does to actual S vehicles (like the S4). Basically just an appearance package. Many, many manufacturers do something similar with a "sport" package that gets you all the trimmings of a sports model, just without the associated performance bump.
Last edited by retro_rocket; 05-27-2012 at 12:47 PM.
#18
Wish they'd do the opposite - performance upgrade availability on stripper interior.
#19
Hmm...this car could potentially bring me back to Volkswagen.
#21
Is that a chrome strip down the sides?
#23
there have been AWD and R-line versions of the CC since it came out, just not together. vw.com is your friend.
#24
Why no 3.6?
#26
seems like it's really about paying for the 'R' badge in the end.
#27
ok people you are getting confused this is not a CC R its an R-line which means its just add ons
usually just a body kit and some interior bits
#28
#29
...and the CC is expensive already as it is, tack on too much cool stuff and the final price would give customers that much more incentive to look at an Audi.
I like the CC a lot, but I can't believe a 2.0T CC with no leather and a stupid glass roof that only tilts up = $35,355
An A4 with Quattro, a manual gearbox no matter what trim you want, a more powerful 2.0T, real leather, comfier seats, a real power moonroof, xenons/LED's and an Audi badge = $34,875
#30
#31
I totally agree. I'm not sure what exactly VW is trying to do with the CC.. Sucker some idiot into leasing one, to which Audi doesn't even come to that customers mind I guess. I liked like look of the previous CC, I could never justify it, as you said I can have higher quality interior, AWD, more power, imo better appearance out of an Audi A4 for the same money!
#33
I will get one of these,, hopefully we see an early fall release.
#34
As a former CC owner I absolutely despise the new styling and I absolutely hate those wheels.
██████████████████
President @ ARD
#35
Ignorance is... bliss?
Ditto. This is common.
I'm kinda wondering that too, but I think the 2.0T is supposed to be the zippy quick engine and the 3.6 is supposed to be the calmer, powerful luxury engine. Though it would make sense.
A2Resource
.......