I dont know at all. I took one for my current job and failed. But they hired me because they liked me. However the test has been fairly consistent in that our best performing new hires had the best test results.
In my opinion, these tests are made so employers can hire people based on numbers and not objective points. Nobody can accuse you of not considering woman applicants if all you do is background searches, drug screen and hire the top scoring applicant. God forbid you hire someone based on how they act or their character.
BTW, if you left your past LEO positions in good standing and you applied with a small town agency, Im guessing you got passed over for a Councilman's kid or something.





I just hate those stupid tests 