Username or Email Address
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up

    VWVortex


    The Car Lounge
    Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
    Results 1 to 25 of 97

    Thread: First Drive: 2013 Hyundai Veloster Turbo

    1. Member omoderncultureo's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 1st, 2011
      Location
      Austin, TX
      Posts
      2,640
      06-27-2012 12:41 AM #1


      Quote Originally Posted by Auto Guide
      If there is a single complaint to be made about the Hyundai Veloster, it’s that it simply doesn’t have enough power. The solution, it seems, would be to strap a turbocharger to the small 4-cylinder and increase engine output by roughly 50 percent. With Hyundai having done just that in the all-new 2013 Veloster Turbo, it’s now apparent that that’s not all it needs.
      Full Article

      Quote Originally Posted by IL
      Yet another tight uphill hairpin looms as we storm up our favorite mountain road in a 2013 Hyundai Veloster Turbo with a full head of steam. Upon arrival we breathe off the throttle, turn in toward the apex and roll back on the gas without ever once thinking of dropping a gear in search of the grunt necessary to continue our uphill charge.

      The same corner in last year's normally aspirated machine would have demanded that downshift, and after complying we'd still have cursed the grade and gravity for conspiring to hold the Veloster's well-sorted chassis by the tail as we attempted to claw back our lost momentum.

      That was last year. The 2013 Hyundai Veloster Turbo has a ready answer in the form of 63 additional horses and 72 extra pound-feet of torque. The funky and unique three-door Hyundai hatchback known for having more chassis than motor now has equal shares of each.
      Full Article

      Quote Originally Posted by C&D
      Restraint is a noble thing, and Hyundai sets an excellent example with the 2013 Veloster Turbo. The 201-hp version of this half-coupe, half-sedan, half-hatchback is everything it could be without becoming things it shouldn’t be, including expensive.

      As we’ve previously reported, the Veloster is an odd little bulldog cadged together from platform pieces of the Accent and Elantra. The two-plus-one asymmetrical side doors are as novel as they are practical, but much about the Veloster’s blueprint is engineering code for “economy car.” There are struts in front and a twist-beam axle in back.
      Full Article

      Last edited by omoderncultureo; 06-27-2012 at 12:55 AM.

    2. Member Golgo-13's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 20th, 2003
      Posts
      4,981
      06-27-2012 12:56 AM #2
      Meet the new Honda.

      Welcome.

    3. Member someguy123's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 30th, 2005
      Posts
      16,006
      Vehicles
      Lexus Hybrid, '15 Panda Smart
      06-27-2012 01:01 AM #3
      Still waiting for the humpers here that was going to buy one.

    4. Member
      Join Date
      Apr 20th, 2012
      Location
      Portland
      Posts
      737
      Vehicles
      1991 Jetta GLI 16v
      06-27-2012 01:11 AM #4
      looks pretty nice

    5. 06-27-2012 01:22 AM #5
      Even the non-turbo has gotten solid reviews (tho there have been reviews which have been overly harsh and overly superlative), but while the VT gets a much needed bump in power, it seems that the VT is something that, while appealing to the general public, doesn't quite "hit it" when it comes to enthusiasts looking for a "hot hatch."

      The Kia Koup SX seems to be the more exciting drive (than the Veloster or the Elantra coupe), even if it needs some fine-tuning (a new Koup will be due out sometime after the new Forte is launched next year, so Kia may very well take the next step w/ the Koup).

      I guess Hyundai could inject a bit more excitement if they do an R-Spec trim, but we'll see.

      Still can't stand that center stack.
      Why you wouldn’t (buy an Optima SX):

      Because you have your eyes on the Frigidaire Limited Edition Camry that you saw last weekend at the neighborhood Autoplex
      .
      - LeftLaneNews

    6. Member genjy's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 7th, 2005
      Location
      Glendora, CA
      Posts
      4,226
      Vehicles
      Volvo C30 T5 6sp manual / Mazda5 5sp manual
      06-27-2012 02:49 AM #6
      VW GTI: 200 HP
      Veloster Turbo: 201 HP


    7. Member JtotheG's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 7th, 2009
      Location
      Huntington Beach, CA
      Posts
      899
      Vehicles
      The Wombat Benz Wagon & a crappy '00 Civic Si
      06-27-2012 11:02 AM #7
      Quote Originally Posted by genjy View Post
      VW GTI: 200 HP
      Veloster Turbo: 201 HP

      There's a weight difference though as well.
      Hooniverse.com


      Quote Originally Posted by B3passatBMX View Post
      Lol the car redlines at 'gravel'

    8. Member clutchrider's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 10th, 2010
      Location
      Connecticut
      Posts
      4,844
      Vehicles
      2012 GLI
      06-27-2012 11:18 AM #8
      Quote Originally Posted by Golgo-13 View Post
      Meet the new Honda.

      Welcome.
      This. Hyundai built a CRX, Honda built a two door hybrid.


      Quote Originally Posted by genjy View Post
      VW GTI: 200 HP
      Veloster Turbo: 201 HP
      I personally wouldn't cross shop the two if I was in the market. I consider the Veloster to be in a lower class (not lower as in beneath or less than) than the GTI. It's smaller and almost for a sub-compact than compact.

      Still looks like a fun little car.

    9. Member mikegilbert's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 29th, 2006
      Location
      Los Angeles
      Posts
      15,709
      Vehicles
      8 Rings / TDI / LWB
      06-27-2012 11:22 AM #9
      Hyundai's new grilles look horrible in real life.
      PM Travy℠ |flickr | mikegilbertphotography.com | Everything you need to know | » | Scratch-It™ | Vimeo
      Quote Originally Posted by emmettlodge View Post
      Great, a Chevy Lumina thread. Now I'm going to have an erection lasting more than four hours.
      #FREEPATRICKMAN

    10. Member
      Join Date
      Nov 3rd, 2008
      Location
      DC Metro Area
      Posts
      3,169
      Vehicles
      06 Mustang GT Vert 5MT, 08 TSX 5AT, 95 Volvo 850 GLT 4AT
      06-27-2012 11:24 AM #10
      I'm seriously considering a normal Veloster, I don't think I'd go for the turbo.

      I drove one yesterday and was pleasantly surprised.

      I'm not a fan of the center stack either, but the interior quality in general is very good and the tech package for ~$17.5k is outstanding. It's a little slow, but at 40mpg as a commuter with that much visual impact, it's pretty compelling.

      My only worry is it looks sort of toy-like, and I need to drive people around for work and generally look professional, and while I love it, I don't want people thinking it's goofy. Normally (i.e. personally) I'd never care, but professionally I care a little.
      http://sixsylinder.blogspot.com

      Quote Originally Posted by stacman View Post
      Top gear recommended it, so I bought it.

    11. Member JDBVR6's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 28th, 2006
      Location
      Houston, Tx
      Posts
      2,146
      Vehicles
      2006 Audi A3 2.0T DSG
      06-27-2012 11:26 AM #11
      Ugly, said car is very ugly!

      Hyundai's have great engine choices. It's too bad that they but them in such horribly styled cars. Based on styling alone I would opt to purchase from their sister company Kia if I wanted a durable daily driver.

    12. Member Lexi's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 18th, 2000
      Location
      On a track near you
      Posts
      7,346
      Vehicles
      Forester - Z06
      06-27-2012 11:29 AM #12





      Its quirky and the more I see it the more I love it. Honda move over, this is doing it right for the right price. Who wants a hybrid CRX anyways ?

    13. Member clutchrider's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 10th, 2010
      Location
      Connecticut
      Posts
      4,844
      Vehicles
      2012 GLI
      06-27-2012 11:34 AM #13
      I've seen a few Veloster's around and they do stand out and get noticed. The front doesn't bother me too much and looks a lot better in person. Especially if you get the right color.

    14. Member
      Join Date
      Mar 20th, 2001
      Posts
      15,733
      Vehicles
      2007 VW GTI 6MT; 2007 Porsche Cayman 5MT; 2009 VW Passat Highline Wagon 6MT
      06-27-2012 11:36 AM #14
      If only they would fix the ugly, it would be a compelling package.
      Quote Originally Posted by 20aeman View Post
      No, the real enthusiast vehicle would be the RX8. It combines V12 Lamborghini gas mileage with Hyundai Genesis 4cyl. performance.

    15. Member Egz's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 30th, 2002
      Location
      Virginia
      Posts
      16,809
      Vehicles
      2003 Ford Focus 2.3, 2006 Ford Fusion 2.3 Turbo, 2014 Fiesta SE 1.0T
      06-27-2012 12:11 PM #15
      Quote Originally Posted by Double-V View Post
      If only they would fix the ugly, it would be a compelling package.
      This.

    16. Member
      Join Date
      Aug 25th, 2011
      Location
      London, UK
      Posts
      576
      Vehicles
      22b STI, F10 M5
      06-27-2012 12:16 PM #16
      Quote Originally Posted by JDBVR6 View Post
      Ugly, said car is very ugly!

      Hyundai's have great engine choices. It's too bad that they but them in such horribly styled cars. Based on styling alone I would opt to purchase from their sister company Kia if I wanted a durable daily driver.
      QFT.

      The Veloster is one of the is one of the ugliest cars on the road.

    17. Member Bibs's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 17th, 2001
      Location
      SW Ontario
      Posts
      1,510
      Vehicles
      06 Miata, 07 Magnum, 06 Mazda 3
      06-27-2012 12:16 PM #17
      People bag on Mazda with the grin, but love this thing? I don't care for either, styling wise, but the VT is a disaster....it's a random mash of swoops and curves that looks like it's designed by kids.
      It will look dated pretty quickly.
      From what I read, it is a great car....I just need my cars to look good.
      2006 MX-5
      2007 Magnum
      2006 Mazda 3

    18. Member
      Join Date
      Feb 6th, 2007
      Location
      CT
      Posts
      116
      Vehicles
      2002/VW/Golf 2.0
      06-27-2012 12:23 PM #18
      The original Veloster to me looks ok in pictures but pretty bad in person.
      It's too high off the ground. The third door stands out like a sore thumb. The rear-end looks like a pregnant woman. For a small hatch, it's definately not small. The rear visibility..

      I just can't convince myself to like the exterior styling.
      $22.5k for the turbo is almost FR-S terrirtory.
      Last edited by jumbo11; 06-27-2012 at 12:25 PM.

    19. Member MoPho's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 12th, 2007
      Location
      NorCal/SoCal
      Posts
      1,841
      Vehicles
      Caterham 7 Superlight R
      06-27-2012 12:26 PM #19
      Quote Originally Posted by Bibs View Post
      People bag on Mazda with the grin, but love this thing? I don't care for either, styling wise, but the VT is a disaster....it's a random mash of swoops and curves that looks like it's designed by kids.
      It will look dated pretty quickly.
      From what I read, it is a great car....I just need my cars to look good.

      Looks are subjective, plenty of people like the looks of the Veloster and they are selling quite well ( and I see them all over the place where I live), so no one really cares if you or anyone else like the looks or not. I am sure many people think the cars that you "need to look good" in order to own are ugly, for example I find that Magnum of yours to be hideous and the front of the MX5 ain't great either

      And the whole it will "look dated" thing is a bunch of crap. Just like any design, whether it be architecture, fashion, graphics, photography, etc., car design follows trends that go in and out of style and car companies don't want cars to stand the test of time, they want you to buy a new one
      Last edited by MoPho; 06-27-2012 at 12:35 PM.

    20. Member 2.0T_Convert's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 23rd, 2009
      Location
      NYC
      Posts
      13,959
      06-27-2012 12:27 PM #20
      The new CRX?

      From Autoguide:

      An impressive machine based on all the available statistics, the Veloster Turbo is undeniably fun but fails to deliver that wow factor.

      In nearly all categories, Hyundai’s value approach has allowed it to rise to the top, but not here. After all, this is a segment where value is far from being a main priority and where ‘fun-to-drive’ comes standard.

      Regardless, Hyundai will sell lots of Veloster Turbos by nature of the fact that it delivers the goods on paper while in reality isn’t too hard-edged and won’t scare off the average consumer. A hot hatch for all, enthusiasts need not apply.
      I see C&D and IL follow the typical form by not offering any real negatives. I'll wait for the full tests and matches against other cars. Sounds like this car sells more on overall value than trying to steal the crown for performance.
      Sent from my tablet while sipping weak drinks over fancy brunch with a view

    21. Member MoPho's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 12th, 2007
      Location
      NorCal/SoCal
      Posts
      1,841
      Vehicles
      Caterham 7 Superlight R
      06-27-2012 12:28 PM #21
      Quote Originally Posted by 2.0T_Convert View Post
      The new CRX?

      From Autoguide:



      I see C&D and IL follow the typical form by not offering any real negatives. I'll wait for the full tests and matches against other cars. Sounds like this car sells more on overall value than trying to steal the crown for performance.

      It's not intended to steal the crown for performance

    22. Undersecretary of Understeer JalopnikMatt's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 12th, 2008
      Posts
      488
      06-27-2012 12:29 PM #22

    23. Member JtotheG's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 7th, 2009
      Location
      Huntington Beach, CA
      Posts
      899
      Vehicles
      The Wombat Benz Wagon & a crappy '00 Civic Si
      06-27-2012 12:36 PM #23
      The Hooniverse review:

      http://hooniverse.com/2012/06/26/fir...eloster-turbo/

      Complete with confusing intro paragraph!

      Hooniverse.com


      Quote Originally Posted by B3passatBMX View Post
      Lol the car redlines at 'gravel'

    24. Member 2.0T_Convert's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 23rd, 2009
      Location
      NYC
      Posts
      13,959
      06-27-2012 12:38 PM #24
      Quote Originally Posted by MoPho View Post
      It's not intended to steal the crown for performance
      John Krafcik from Hyundai states they benchmarked cars like the CRX and GTI.

      If that is the case why then turn around and trade things like LSD and a better rear suspension for a lower price tag.
      Sent from my tablet while sipping weak drinks over fancy brunch with a view

    25. Member JtotheG's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 7th, 2009
      Location
      Huntington Beach, CA
      Posts
      899
      Vehicles
      The Wombat Benz Wagon & a crappy '00 Civic Si
      06-27-2012 12:39 PM #25
      Quote Originally Posted by 2.0T_Convert View Post
      John Krafcik from Hyundai states they benchmarked cars like the CRX and GTI.

      If that is the case why then turn around and trade things like LSD and a better rear suspension for a lower price tag.
      The rear suspension is fine for the car. It was composed in the canyon roads, and it felt good on the auto-x course.
      Hooniverse.com


      Quote Originally Posted by B3passatBMX View Post
      Lol the car redlines at 'gravel'

    Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •