Username or Email Address
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up

    VWVortex


    The Car Lounge
    Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
    Results 1 to 25 of 96

    Thread: What year is the BEST Toyota Camry?

    1. Geriatric Member Chapel's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 23rd, 1999
      Location
      New England
      Posts
      53,063
      Vehicles
      '97 BMW 328i | '10 Mazda5
      07-01-2012 09:40 PM #1
      let's say based on features, performance and durability... what SINGLE year is the best year and why?

    2. 07-01-2012 09:42 PM #2
      1994

    3. Geriatric Member BRealistic's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 16th, 2005
      Location
      Tennessee
      Posts
      66,901
      Vehicles
      88 F150, 04 RX8, 96 T&C LXi
      07-01-2012 09:43 PM #3
      2015
      “Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one's lifetime.”

    4. Geriatric Member Chapel's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 23rd, 1999
      Location
      New England
      Posts
      53,063
      Vehicles
      '97 BMW 328i | '10 Mazda5
      07-01-2012 09:44 PM #4
      Quote Originally Posted by 1995Camry View Post
      1994
      any particular reason?

    5. Member 2.0T_Convert's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 23rd, 2009
      Location
      NYC
      Posts
      14,163
      07-01-2012 09:45 PM #5
      The latest model simply because I want cool features and don't want a dated box that will have people assuming I work at Burger King.
      Sent from my tablet while sipping weak drinks over fancy brunch with a view

    6. 07-01-2012 09:50 PM #6
      1992-1994, they are the same. The 1992-1996 (3rd gen) you will hear are the best from anyone that has owned multiple generations of camrys. The 95-96 is called the gen 3.5 and it received a minor facelift, but at the same time the interior was cheapened slighly, and it had no more features than the year before.

      The 1994 got the all aluminum 3.0 V6 too. It was one of the most quiet, refined and smooth engines out at the time, also one of the most reliable. The 4 cylinder is just as reliable but not as smooth and refined, but it is easier to work on.

      The Gen 2's are probably just as good as the gen 3's as far as build quality and reliablity. But are almost all rust buckets though and the gen 3 is much more modern and comfortable. The v6 was not as good either.

      Gen 4 camrys had the sludge problem, not a problem at all actually if the oil has been changed, but on a 10 plus year old car you cant be sure. They really have just been downhill from there as far as quality until the most recent generation.
      Last edited by 1995Camry; 07-01-2012 at 09:55 PM.

    7. Geriatric Member BRealistic's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 16th, 2005
      Location
      Tennessee
      Posts
      66,901
      Vehicles
      88 F150, 04 RX8, 96 T&C LXi
      07-01-2012 09:51 PM #7
      Quote Originally Posted by Chapel View Post
      any particular reason?
      The 1992 was the first year for the model generation. Hmm. But the 1994 model got a passenger side airbag and a more potent V6.

      Many think that generation of Camry was the last Camry made to be the best it could be without cost cutting (old Toyota durability with modern design). In 5 speed V6 SE form it was actually a driver's car.
      “Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one's lifetime.”

    8. Member compy222's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 7th, 2005
      Location
      Pothole, MI
      Posts
      15,126
      Vehicles
      2007 Acura MDX, 2003 Honda S2000, 2007 Honda Fit Sport
      07-01-2012 09:54 PM #8
      Actually some useful info in this thread...I was expecting this to turn into a "what type of hemorrhagic fever do you want?" thread. I too have heard then gen 3 4cyl are the most bombproof.
      Quote Originally Posted by capsaicin View Post
      AP1 S2000? I can not in good conscience talk you out of that. May your slip angle be great and your bed not be the couch!

    9. Member two.twoliter's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 4th, 2004
      Posts
      1,727
      Vehicles
      1991 Volvo 745 n/a
      07-01-2012 09:56 PM #9
      Quote Originally Posted by BRealistic View Post
      The 1992 was the first year for the model generation. Hmm. But the 1994 model got a passenger side airbag and a more potent V6.

      Many think that generation of Camry was the last Camry made to be the best it could be without cost cutting (old Toyota durability with modern design). In 5 speed V6 SE form it was actually a driver's car.
      Didn't the V6 engines have a tendency to blow headgaskets?

      Despite the supposed cost-cutting, I would take a brand new Camry Hybrid over all the others.

      If you live in an area that doesn't use road salt, a solid argument could be made for the original '83 Camry, of which there are plenty still rolling around.
      Sold: 86 240 DL 4MT+OD, 00 Protege ES, 87 325e, 93 S-10, 91 CRX Si, 99 Neon ACR, 90 Accord Coupe.

    10. 07-01-2012 09:59 PM #10
      Quote Originally Posted by BRealistic View Post
      The 1992 was the first year for the model generation. Hmm. But the 1994 model got a passenger side airbag and a more potent V6.

      Many think that generation of Camry was the last Camry made to be the best it could be without cost cutting (old Toyota durability with modern design). In 5 speed V6 SE form it was actually a driver's car.
      Outside of the Lexus LS400, toyota spent more money developing the 1992 camry than any other car it has ever made. It was also the first car they designed using CAD.

    11. 07-01-2012 10:02 PM #11
      Quote Originally Posted by two.twoliter View Post
      Didn't the V6 engines have a tendency to blow headgaskets?

      Despite the supposed cost-cutting, I would take a brand new Camry Hybrid over all the others.

      If you live in an area that doesn't use road salt, a solid argument could be made for the original '83 Camry, of which there are plenty still rolling around.
      The earlier 88-93 v6's with the iron block and aluminum head did. But in 1994 it got a new all aluminum motor which has no issues really.

    12. Geriatric Member BRealistic's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 16th, 2005
      Location
      Tennessee
      Posts
      66,901
      Vehicles
      88 F150, 04 RX8, 96 T&C LXi
      07-01-2012 10:11 PM #12
      Quote Originally Posted by two.twoliter View Post
      Didn't the V6 engines have a tendency to blow headgaskets?

      Despite the supposed cost-cutting, I would take a brand new Camry Hybrid over all the others.

      If you live in an area that doesn't use road salt, a solid argument could be made for the original '83 Camry, of which there are plenty still rolling around.
      In term of just durability/reliability for a four banger auto sedan, the later EFI 2nd gen Camry takes my vote.

      “Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one's lifetime.”

    13. 07-01-2012 10:12 PM #13
      The tan ones

    14. Geriatric Member BRealistic's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 16th, 2005
      Location
      Tennessee
      Posts
      66,901
      Vehicles
      88 F150, 04 RX8, 96 T&C LXi
      07-01-2012 10:15 PM #14
      Quote Originally Posted by 1995Camry View Post
      Outside of the Lexus LS400, toyota spent more money developing the 1992 camry than any other car it has ever made. It was also the first car they designed using CAD.
      And I believe that.
      The 2nd gen Camry was a success and Toyota's reliable image was solid by the late 80s.
      But they needed to compete with the big dogs (us domestic sedans- namely the extremely popular, good looking and driving Taurus), and in order to do that they really needed a sedan that competed at the midsize sedan level without compromise (power, room, ride, features, looks, refinement).

      ^

      And it is good to know for 94 the V6 head gasket issue was addressed.
      (you guys act like replacing a head gasket is some impossible repair)
      I keep an eye out for 5 speed manual V6 camries of this gen.
      Fuel economy is so-so, but for beater money you can have a really good car.
      The 5 speed V6 626 was more enthusiast tuned... but I bet the Camry will hold up much better.
      Last edited by BRealistic; 07-01-2012 at 10:26 PM.
      “Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one's lifetime.”

    15. 07-01-2012 10:24 PM #15
      2013 is newest and bestest

    16. Member RacingManiac's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 18th, 2011
      Location
      SE Mi and Toronto
      Posts
      6,148
      Vehicles
      2010 DB GTI DSG 2 Door
      07-01-2012 10:32 PM #16
      The 98 I had was pretty bullet proof...I am also extremely impressed with its rust resistance. As a Canadian car, with basically 0 care from me(I took over from my parents from 2005 on, sold last year to a coworker who still drives it), with lots of scrapes and scratches that exposed metal. The rusts were just confined to those area with damage....The car was basically just a put gas in it and go, and change oil every 10k km. Brakes were serviced at some point, some control-arm bushing were replaced....and the car gets 30MPG no matter how fast (or slow) you drive...

    17. 07-01-2012 10:39 PM #17
      The one that kept all it's letters on.
      Quote Originally Posted by Rutledge View Post
      Did you know that it's not pronounced Em Kay ? ALL OF THE CAR LOUNGE WILL BE HAPPY TO LET YOU KNOW THAT. SERIOUSLY. IT STANDS FOR MARK. DID YOU KNOW THAT? BEFORE THAT A1,A2, A3, ETC WAS USED. LIVE UP TO TCL STANDARDS BEFORE YOU GET ON MY ASS. THAT'S DISGUSTING.
      Example of TCL's standards

    18. Member nm+'s Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 6th, 2006
      Location
      Land of Bro-Dozer Ya Yas
      Posts
      19,721
      Vehicles
      2005 Legacy GT Wagon 5MT w/overnight diffs from Japan; 2013 Mazda 2 5MT
      07-01-2012 10:43 PM #18
      Quote Originally Posted by 1995Camry View Post

      The Gen 2's are probably just as good as the gen 3's as far as build quality and reliablity. But are almost all rust buckets though and the gen 3 is much more modern and comfortable.
      .
      Worth highlighting. The Gen 3 had extremely good rustproofing.
      Quote Originally Posted by Ducky TSX
      The Car Lounge likes to compare apples to llamas

    19. 07-01-2012 10:45 PM #19
      Quote Originally Posted by Chapel View Post
      let's say based on features, performance and durability... what SINGLE year is the best year and why?
      Well, my wife is a big time Camry fan. She bought a '91 Camry right out of college, then I bought her a '96 Avalon and I replaced that with a '99 Camry and then I replaced that Camry with an '08 Accord.

      I put A LOT of seat time in these cars. For durability, I would say the '99 was the most durable followed closely by the '96 Avalon (which I believe was just a stretched '92-96 Camry.) Neither one of those cars ever had anything break, ever, over several years and miles of ownership. In fact, I don't think I ever changed so much as a light bulb in ether of those cars. Not a belt, not a battery, nothing. We put 100k on the '96 Avalon and just over 100k on the '99 Camry.

      However, having said all that, I think by a long shot my favorite of them all was the '91 Camry she had. She put 100k miles on it and was ready to get rid of it. I loved that car so much that I traded in my beloved (but terribly unreliable) '93 Ford Probe GT (stick) for her automatic, 4 cylinder, stripped down, base model Camry. . . not an LE, not a DX, a base model - cloth interior, roll up windows, no cruise control, nada. It did have AC, rear window defroster and an oem cassette deck. I held on to it and drove it for years and put an additional 125k miles on it. When I donated it to charity it had 225k miles, a lot of rust but it still ran like it did new.

      It was just such a nicely balanced car though. I loved the shape, the size, pretty much everything. I put in batteries, did brakes every 80 or 90k miles. A set of tires would last two terms of a president, cheap, cheap, cheap to own and operate. Oh and speaking of tires, plain old all season tires would get you through the worst Indiana snowstorms. Outstanding snow car.

      Super easy to work on. One time the starter went out. I walked into Autozone, bought a replacement, asked the guy behind the counter if he knew where it was. He had no clue. So I asked "can you at least tell me is it on top of the motor or under it somewhere?" He said "oh it says here it's on top." So I held up the starter up and just looked around the engine bay for something that looked like it - found it - replaced it maybe 20 minutes.

      I loved the cloth interior too in that car. It was like a really rugged tweed fabric. It cleaned up easily and wore really well. Overall, I think the best Camry ever or at least my favorite Toyota of the bunch we've owned. . . and I say that because they stopped being fun after that one.


      Kind of looked like this one - notice it didn't have hub cabs even! :

      Last edited by sullie; 07-11-2014 at 12:52 PM.

    20. Banned patrikman's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 10th, 2008
      Location
      44.5 North, 88 West
      Posts
      32,232
      Vehicles
      EJ251, EJ255, EZ30D(R)
      07-02-2012 12:15 AM #20
      Best is not best without a Camry dent.

    21. Geriatric Member Aonarch's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 4th, 2006
      Location
      Atlanta, GA
      Posts
      37,383
      07-02-2012 12:20 AM #21
      Quote Originally Posted by patrikman View Post
      Best is not best without a Camry dent.
      Love them Camry dents.

      To me Camrys just scream Frigidaire. I could never own one. They are wonderful point A to point B appliances though.
      Butler Tires & Wheels
      HRE | Savini | Lexani | Forgiato | BBS | Rotiform | RBP | Niche | TSW | Lorinser | Fuel | Black Rhino | Dub| Foose | US Mags | American Force | Vossen | Rennen | Beyern | Brambus | OZ | Enkei | Cray | Conventry | Michelin | Pirelli | Toyo | Procomp | H&R | Corsa | Borla | Eibach | Hotchkis | Remus | Akrapovič

    22. 07-02-2012 12:21 AM #22
      All camrys are good camrys
      No Longer : -=Camry Driver=- -=Camry Driver=- -=Camry Driver=- -=Camry Driver=- -=Camry Driver=- -=Camry Driver=- -=Camry Driver=- -=Camry Driver=- -=Camry Driver=- -=Camry Driver=-

    23. Member eluwak's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 18th, 2002
      Location
      LF, odnalrO
      Posts
      2,381
      Vehicles
      '11 Prius, '14 Sienna, '98 C2500 454 Burp
      07-02-2012 12:28 AM #23
      I would say my Camry is OK at best... And that's only because it still runs. Outside of that it's crap. Everything is falling apart.
      <insert comment here>

    24. Member DrewSXR's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 26th, 2000
      Location
      Sint Maarten
      Posts
      3,874
      Vehicles
      Lexus
      07-02-2012 12:49 AM #24
      This one of course (3rd gen), IIRC it had triple door seals.

      There was big hub-bub when the 4th gen was introduced and it only had double door seals.


    25. Member nm+'s Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 6th, 2006
      Location
      Land of Bro-Dozer Ya Yas
      Posts
      19,721
      Vehicles
      2005 Legacy GT Wagon 5MT w/overnight diffs from Japan; 2013 Mazda 2 5MT
      07-02-2012 12:56 AM #25
      In 1992, the Camry was praise for. . .wait for it. . .handling.
      http://www.caranddriver.com/features...ry-v-6-page-11

      Seriously, it is hard to understate what a big deal this car was in 1992. It made the competition look like pieces of crap.
      Quote Originally Posted by Ducky TSX
      The Car Lounge likes to compare apples to llamas

    Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •