#1
Jeep Grand Cheroke fails
http://www.teknikensvarld.se/jeepmoosetest/
Well thats not good.
#2
#3
This just in. SUV's do not handle like cars.
#4
Read article. All other SUVs did fine, old Cherokee did fine, this new one flips at 40mph - 60km/hr - not even highway speeds. That's completely unacceptable.Think about it - you drive that fast in some res areas.
#5
The subject matter expert at Chrysler was slacking
![]()
Shenandoah hot lap 1:46.92: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmYq3mBbwPg
#6
#7
#8
Statement from Chrysler Group:
Chrysler Group engineers are investigating a Swedish magazine’s evaluation of the 2012 Grand Cherokee. During the evaluation, the publication was able to capture images of a Grand Cherokee on two wheels as it performed an extreme maneuver in an overloaded condition.
Advised of this event by the magazine, Chrysler Group engineers made numerous attempts to reproduce the wheel-lift in a properly loaded vehicle. Extensive testing produced no such result.
A subsequent evaluation was conducted by the magazine July 8 in Sweden and witnessed by Chrysler Group engineers. Three vehicles performed 11 runs on a course prepared by the magazine. None reproduced the original event.
The uncharacteristic result was obtained using a vehicle loaded beyond its weight specifications. The Grand Cherokee’s weight limitations are clearly stated on the vehicle and in the owner’s manual.
Also, the extreme maneuver performed by the magazine is not certified by any regulatory agency, nor is it used to establish any sanctioned safety ratings.
Chrysler Group takes seriously any safety concerns and engineers are examining the event to better understand the magazine’s claims.
A “Top Safety Pick” of the U.S. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the 2012 Grand Cherokee is an award-winning SUV that features Electronic Stability Control and Electronic Roll Mitigation as standard equipment. It meets or exceeds all government safety mandates and its outstanding performance has made it the most awarded SUV in history.
#11
Impressed the old dude kept it on 4 tires and avoided the camera gear in the end.![]()
#12
#13
The moose test is relevant in Scandanavia, but that's just about it. Any smaller animal, you're far better off hitting it than trying to avoid it. Beyond that, the scenario is specifically mimicking avoiding an animal in the roadway that you absolutely cannot hit. I don't think it's realistic or representative of any scenario besides the one it's explicitly named after. If you're cranking the wheel that hard to avoid another vehicle or a road hazard, you suck at defensive driving.
Also, this:
I, for one, am shocked that a vehicle loaded over GWVR displayed adverse reactions when subjected to a bizarrely extreme avoidance maneuver.A subsequent evaluation was conducted by the magazine July 8 in Sweden and witnessed by Chrysler Group engineers. Three vehicles performed 11 runs on a course prepared by the magazine. None reproduced the original event.
The uncharacteristic result was obtained using a vehicle loaded beyond its weight specifications. The Grand Cherokee’s weight limitations are clearly stated on the vehicle and in the owner’s manual.
In an experiment, you test on the basis of one changed variable. Not two. Teknikens Varld is testing vehicles irresponsibly.
Last edited by Turbio!; 07-09-2012 at 11:59 AM.
The Cooking Animal is my side project: a blog for horngry food geeks. Check it out!
#14
Doesn't the current Grand Cherokee share its chassis with the last generation Mercedes ML? Did they Moose-Test that? I didn't see any mention of it, I'd think they'd make a pretty big deal about it if they did.
#15
The Cooking Animal is my side project: a blog for horngry food geeks. Check it out!
#16
Originally Posted by Boyz in da Park
#17
#19
#20
The Cooking Animal is my side project: a blog for horngry food geeks. Check it out!
#21
The Cooking Animal is my side project: a blog for horngry food geeks. Check it out!
#22
http://www.speedsportlife.com press vehicle(s) this week: Scion FR-S 6MT, Miata Club PRHT
Twitter: @SSLByron, @SpeedSportLife
#23
I love cars, but the problem is they are like schroedinger's hobby. They're always in a quantum superstate of being both awesome and a huge waste of time and money... until observation momentarily forces them into one state or another.
#24
Don't ever been as far to has gone want to be more like 20" Rimz or bigger or you could swerve moose and dead until she tropper has sideburns finds you rolled over.
#25
Overloaded Jeep, didn't hit the brakes, I doubt many drivers will find themselves in the same situation.
Free "The GOD DAMN RANT Thread"!
#26
#27
Last edited by Turbio!; 07-09-2012 at 12:14 PM.
The Cooking Animal is my side project: a blog for horngry food geeks. Check it out!
#28
The Cooking Animal is my side project: a blog for horngry food geeks. Check it out!
#29
Those saying they doubt drivers will find themselves in the same situation, how do you know that for a fact? **** happens and that's what ESC is for: to keep the vehicle in control during as many avoidance maneuvers as possible. That test is well within the limits of ESC and at a fairly moderate speed and so a vehicle equipped with ESC shouldn't be that close to rolling in such a situation. And apparently the Grand Cherokee isn't when not overloaded past spec like these testers at the Swedish magazine did.
#30
Haha, what an article title. So one of their test driver's died during the test, right? Ugh.
#31
#34
http://www.speedsportlife.com press vehicle(s) this week: Scion FR-S 6MT, Miata Club PRHT
Twitter: @SSLByron, @SpeedSportLife
#35