VWVortex


Links back to The Car Lounge (opens in same window)
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 12 1 2 3 4 5 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 35 of 392

Thread: Jeep Grand Cherokee lethal in evasive maneuver test

  1. 07-09-2012 11:27 AM #1
    Jeep Grand Cheroke fails

    http://www.teknikensvarld.se/jeepmoosetest/

    Well thats not good.

  2. Member seadoo2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 4th, 2008
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    4,840
    Vehicles
    04 Audi S4 Avant 6MT
    07-09-2012 11:29 AM #2
    Quote Originally Posted by nilocs View Post
    Jeep Grand Cheroke fails

    http://www.teknikensvarld.se/jeepmoosetest/

    Well thats not good.
    Misleading title is misleading ... hell, the driver self-corrected ... yawn.

  3. Member B3passatBMX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 26th, 2004
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    9,897
    Vehicles
    93 525iT, 91 318iS
    07-09-2012 11:30 AM #3
    This just in. SUV's do not handle like cars.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rutledge View Post
    Well, then, I'm here to "ruin" the vortex for you. I'm sorry you hate fun.
    02 SVT Focus: Jackson Racing supercharged (SOLD )
    91 318is
    93 525iT

  4. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 5th, 2001
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    4,016
    Vehicles
    2013 FR-S, 2010 V6 Santa Fe
    07-09-2012 11:36 AM #4
    Read article. All other SUVs did fine, old Cherokee did fine, this new one flips at 40mph - 60km/hr - not even highway speeds. That's completely unacceptable. Think about it - you drive that fast in some res areas.

  5. Member curvedinfinity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 11th, 2004
    Location
    Highway to the danger zone
    Posts
    7,748
    Vehicles
    F14 Tomcat
    07-09-2012 11:37 AM #5
    The subject matter expert at Chrysler was slacking

    Personal website with contacts: http://curvedinfinity.com
    Shenandoah hot lap 1:46.92: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmYq3mBbwPg

  6. 07-09-2012 11:44 AM #6
    Quote Originally Posted by seadoo2006 View Post
    Misleading title is misleading ... hell, the driver self-corrected ... yawn.
    Professional Driver on a closed circuit.
    Not sure what your point is.

    In the real world...
    Soccer Mom going 60+ mph down the interstate swerves to avoid an obstacle or another car..
    the "anti rollover system" according to this test would not be effective.

  7. Member Shomegrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 26th, 2002
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    15,348
    Vehicles
    Current: Audi S4, B8 Audi Allroad quattro, Dodge Dakota 4x4
    07-09-2012 11:46 AM #7
    Quote Originally Posted by seadoo2006 View Post
    Misleading title is misleading ... hell, the driver self-corrected ... yawn.
    The number of drivers (outside of TCL) who would have stopped it from rolling in the real world is infinitesimally small.

  8. 07-09-2012 11:49 AM #8
    Statement from Chrysler Group:

    Chrysler Group engineers are investigating a Swedish magazine’s evaluation of the 2012 Grand Cherokee. During the evaluation, the publication was able to capture images of a Grand Cherokee on two wheels as it performed an extreme maneuver in an overloaded condition.

    Advised of this event by the magazine, Chrysler Group engineers made numerous attempts to reproduce the wheel-lift in a properly loaded vehicle. Extensive testing produced no such result.

    A subsequent evaluation was conducted by the magazine July 8 in Sweden and witnessed by Chrysler Group engineers. Three vehicles performed 11 runs on a course prepared by the magazine. None reproduced the original event.

    The uncharacteristic result was obtained using a vehicle loaded beyond its weight specifications. The Grand Cherokee’s weight limitations are clearly stated on the vehicle and in the owner’s manual.

    Also, the extreme maneuver performed by the magazine is not certified by any regulatory agency, nor is it used to establish any sanctioned safety ratings.

    Chrysler Group takes seriously any safety concerns and engineers are examining the event to better understand the magazine’s claims.

    A “Top Safety Pick” of the U.S. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the 2012 Grand Cherokee is an award-winning SUV that features Electronic Stability Control and Electronic Roll Mitigation as standard equipment. It meets or exceeds all government safety mandates and its outstanding performance has made it the most awarded SUV in history.

  9. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 27th, 2003
    Posts
    1,107
    Vehicles
    Toyota Sienna Crossover SUV,Nissan GT-R
    07-09-2012 11:49 AM #9
    They made a mistake exporting these death machines.

  10. Member zane!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 27th, 2005
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    3,230
    Vehicles
    Drivers, beaters, pedal bikes
    07-09-2012 11:49 AM #10
    Chrysler SUV drives like poop? Hardly newsworthy.

  11. Member wide_load's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 6th, 2005
    Location
    Guelph, Ontario
    Posts
    3,783
    Vehicles
    VRT, BT A4
    07-09-2012 11:49 AM #11
    Impressed the old dude kept it on 4 tires and avoided the camera gear in the end.

  12. Member patrickvr6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 29th, 2001
    Location
    Atlanta GA
    Posts
    7,006
    Vehicles
    '87 930 '77 Bronco '01 325iT '08 Xterra
    07-09-2012 11:52 AM #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Khyron View Post
    Read article. All other SUVs did fine, old Cherokee did fine, this new one flips at 40mph - 60km/hr - not even highway speeds. That's completely unacceptable. Think about it - you drive that fast in some res areas.
    Read article. It didn't flip.

    The test driver really jerked that thing around. Solution: Hit the moose.

  13. Geriatric Member Turbio!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 21st, 2005
    Location
    Alamogordo, NM
    Posts
    37,946
    Vehicles
    '13 Subaru Outback
    07-09-2012 11:53 AM #13
    Quote Originally Posted by nilocs View Post
    Professional Driver on a closed circuit.
    Not sure what your point is.

    In the real world...
    Soccer Mom going 60+ mph down the interstate swerves to avoid an obstacle or another car..
    the "anti rollover system" according to this test would not be effective.
    The moose test is relevant in Scandanavia, but that's just about it. Any smaller animal, you're far better off hitting it than trying to avoid it. Beyond that, the scenario is specifically mimicking avoiding an animal in the roadway that you absolutely cannot hit. I don't think it's realistic or representative of any scenario besides the one it's explicitly named after. If you're cranking the wheel that hard to avoid another vehicle or a road hazard, you suck at defensive driving.

    Also, this:

    A subsequent evaluation was conducted by the magazine July 8 in Sweden and witnessed by Chrysler Group engineers. Three vehicles performed 11 runs on a course prepared by the magazine. None reproduced the original event.

    The uncharacteristic result was obtained using a vehicle loaded beyond its weight specifications. The Grand Cherokee’s weight limitations are clearly stated on the vehicle and in the owner’s manual.
    I, for one, am shocked that a vehicle loaded over GWVR displayed adverse reactions when subjected to a bizarrely extreme avoidance maneuver.

    In an experiment, you test on the basis of one changed variable. Not two. Teknikens Varld is testing vehicles irresponsibly.
    Last edited by Turbio!; 07-09-2012 at 11:59 AM.
    The Cooking Animal is my side project: a blog for horngry food geeks. Check it out!

  14. Moderator MylesPH1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 6th, 2000
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    4,107
    Vehicles
    E24 and an E24
    07-09-2012 11:53 AM #14
    Doesn't the current Grand Cherokee share its chassis with the last generation Mercedes ML? Did they Moose-Test that? I didn't see any mention of it, I'd think they'd make a pretty big deal about it if they did.

  15. Geriatric Member Turbio!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 21st, 2005
    Location
    Alamogordo, NM
    Posts
    37,946
    Vehicles
    '13 Subaru Outback
    07-09-2012 11:56 AM #15
    Quote Originally Posted by driveareliablecar View Post
    They made a mistake exporting these death machines.
    You made a mistake posting. That's okay, though, we forgive you.
    The Cooking Animal is my side project: a blog for horngry food geeks. Check it out!

  16. Member Air and water do mix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 5th, 2004
    Location
    Southern Indiana
    Posts
    18,698
    Vehicles
    '66 Beetle, '69 VW Fastback and an '08 Fit
    07-09-2012 11:56 AM #16
    Quote Originally Posted by nilocs View Post
    Professional Driver on a closed circuit.
    Not sure what your point is.

    In the real world...
    Soccer Mom going 60+ mph down the interstate screams, lets go of the wheel and maybe hits the brakes. the "anti rollover system" according to this test would not be effective.
    Fixed.
    Quote Originally Posted by Boyz in da Park
    Proletariat, Bourgeoise - Everybody smellin' my potpourri...

  17. Senior Member Aonarch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 4th, 2006
    Location
    SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES, AUSTRALIA, OCEANIA, AKA UPSIDE-DOWN LAND
    Posts
    25,555
    Vehicles
    B6 Variant 3.6L VR6 4Motion | E30 325e | MKVI Golf 2.5L | Versys 650
    07-09-2012 11:59 AM #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Khyron View Post
    Read article. All other SUVs did fine, old Cherokee did fine, this new one flips at 40mph - 60km/hr - not even highway speeds. That's completely unacceptable. Think about it - you drive that fast in some res areas.
    Yup. That is the point of the test.

    Also if you watch the article the announcer pins most of it on the 20" wheels and tires.

  18. Member Air and water do mix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 5th, 2004
    Location
    Southern Indiana
    Posts
    18,698
    Vehicles
    '66 Beetle, '69 VW Fastback and an '08 Fit
    07-09-2012 12:00 PM #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Turbio! View Post
    I, for one, am shocked that a vehicle loaded over GWVR displayed adverse reactions when subjected to a bizarrely extreme avoidance maneuver.

    In an experiment, you test on the basis of one changed variable. Not two. Teknikens Varld is testing vehicles irresponsibly.
    Please. The next thing you'll tell me is that a news program will set up a truck to puncture it's gas tanks in a rigged crash test for sensationalistic reasons.

    Quote Originally Posted by Boyz in da Park
    Proletariat, Bourgeoise - Everybody smellin' my potpourri...

  19. Member Cousin Eddie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 17th, 2005
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    12,781
    Vehicles
    That there's an RV, Clark
    07-09-2012 12:01 PM #19
    Quote Originally Posted by zane! View Post
    Chrysler SUV drives like poop? Hardly newsworthy.
    Reading comprehension. Try it, two posts up from yours. Improperly (over)loaded vehicles handle unpredictably and outside of their engineered capabilites. More News at 11.

  20. Geriatric Member Turbio!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 21st, 2005
    Location
    Alamogordo, NM
    Posts
    37,946
    Vehicles
    '13 Subaru Outback
    07-09-2012 12:01 PM #20
    Quote Originally Posted by air and water do mix View Post
    please. The next thing you'll tell me is that a news program will set up a truck to puncture it's gas tanks in a rigged crash test for sensationalistic reasons.

    nawwww never happen
    The Cooking Animal is my side project: a blog for horngry food geeks. Check it out!

  21. Geriatric Member Turbio!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 21st, 2005
    Location
    Alamogordo, NM
    Posts
    37,946
    Vehicles
    '13 Subaru Outback
    07-09-2012 12:02 PM #21
    Quote Originally Posted by zane! View Post
    Chrysler SUV drives like poop? Hardly newsworthy.
    Oh, look, the car lounge is being the car lounge again.
    The Cooking Animal is my side project: a blog for horngry food geeks. Check it out!

  22. Senior Member SSLByron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 29th, 2004
    Location
    Annapolis, MD
    Posts
    34,943
    Vehicles
    '13 Focus, '08.5 MS3, '97 Wrangler, '94 and '90 Miatas
    07-09-2012 12:04 PM #22
    Quote Originally Posted by Aonarch View Post
    Yup. That is the point of the test.

    Also if you watch the article the announcer pins most of it on the 20" wheels and tires.
    Of course he does. Otherwise, you might notice that the car is being driven outside the manufacturer's recommended parameters.
    Quote Originally Posted by Turbio! View Post
    Turbio logic: the logic you need, not the logic you want.
    http://www.speedsportlife.com press vehicle(s) this week: None.
    Twitter: @SSLByron, @SpeedSportLife

  23. Member Chris_V's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 18th, 2009
    Location
    Pikesville, MD
    Posts
    11,653
    Vehicles
    2013 Chevy Volt, 2011 Mini Cooper, '94 GM3500 dually
    07-09-2012 12:06 PM #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Turbio! View Post
    The moose test is relevant in Scandanavia, but that's just about it. Any smaller animal, you're far better off hitting it than trying to avoid it. Beyond that, the scenario is specifically mimicking avoiding an animal in the roadway that you absolutely cannot hit. I don't think it's realistic or representative of any scenario besides the one it's explicitly named after. If you're cranking the wheel that hard to avoid another vehicle or a road hazard, you suck at defensive driving.

    Also, this:



    I, for one, am shocked that a vehicle loaded over GWVR displayed adverse reactions when subjected to a bizarrely extreme avoidance maneuver.

    In an experiment, you test on the basis of one changed variable. Not two. Teknikens Varld is testing vehicles irresponsibly.
    Shhh, Turbio. Don't introduce facts and logic into an argument against a Chrysler/Jeep vehicle. Or any vehicle, for that matter.
    I love cars, but the problem is they are like schroedinger's hobby. They're always in a quantum superstate of being both awesome and a huge waste of time and money... until observation momentarily forces them into one state or another.

  24. Member Cousin Eddie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 17th, 2005
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    12,781
    Vehicles
    That there's an RV, Clark
    07-09-2012 12:08 PM #24
    Don't ever been as far to has gone want to be more like 20" Rimz or bigger or you could swerve moose and dead until she tropper has sideburns finds you rolled over.

  25. Member TheDarkEnergist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 21st, 2009
    Location
    Crooklyn
    Posts
    8,300
    Vehicles
    E46 330ci and Bikes.
    07-09-2012 12:09 PM #25
    Overloaded Jeep, didn't hit the brakes, I doubt many drivers will find themselves in the same situation.
    Free "The GOD DAMN RANT Thread"!

  26. Member Galrot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 23rd, 2009
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Posts
    1,045
    07-09-2012 12:09 PM #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Turbio! View Post
    The moose test is relevant in Scandanavia,
    I would have thought it's very relevant in Canada, Finland and Russia too ...

  27. Geriatric Member Turbio!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 21st, 2005
    Location
    Alamogordo, NM
    Posts
    37,946
    Vehicles
    '13 Subaru Outback
    07-09-2012 12:11 PM #27
    Quote Originally Posted by Khyron View Post
    Read article. All other SUVs did fine, old Cherokee did fine, this new one flips at 40mph - 60km/hr - not even highway speeds. That's completely unacceptable. Think about it - you drive that fast in some res areas.
    Even TV weren't manipulating the results by overloading the Jeep, one wouldn't use the moose avoidance maneuver in a residential area for any reason. You'd do the classic "threshold brake and avoidance turn" maneuver that every good driving school drills into you.
    Last edited by Turbio!; 07-09-2012 at 12:14 PM.
    The Cooking Animal is my side project: a blog for horngry food geeks. Check it out!

  28. Geriatric Member Turbio!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 21st, 2005
    Location
    Alamogordo, NM
    Posts
    37,946
    Vehicles
    '13 Subaru Outback
    07-09-2012 12:12 PM #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Galrot View Post
    I would have thought it's very relevant in Canada, Finland and Russia too ...
    My statement wasn't necessarily exclusive, so let's not get too caught up in the semantics.
    The Cooking Animal is my side project: a blog for horngry food geeks. Check it out!

  29. 07-09-2012 12:16 PM #29
    Those saying they doubt drivers will find themselves in the same situation, how do you know that for a fact? **** happens and that's what ESC is for: to keep the vehicle in control during as many avoidance maneuvers as possible. That test is well within the limits of ESC and at a fairly moderate speed and so a vehicle equipped with ESC shouldn't be that close to rolling in such a situation. And apparently the Grand Cherokee isn't when not overloaded past spec like these testers at the Swedish magazine did.

  30. Member pat_ernzen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 23rd, 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,211
    Vehicles
    1967 AMC Rambler American
    07-09-2012 12:18 PM #30
    Haha, what an article title. So one of their test driver's died during the test, right? Ugh.

  31. Member mikegilbert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 29th, 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    14,857
    Vehicles
    8 Rings / TDI
    07-09-2012 12:22 PM #31
    Quote Originally Posted by Adam144 View Post
    Don't ever been as far to has gone want to be more like 20" Rimz or bigger or you could swerve moose and dead until she tropper has sideburns finds you rolled over.
    flickr | mikegilbertphotography.com | Everything you need to know | » | DrinkTanks | Scratch-It™
    Quote Originally Posted by A&F View Post
    Stacks are a legit preformance upgrade.

  32. Member MCTB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 29th, 2005
    Location
    NoVa
    Posts
    6,764
    Vehicles
    '12 Focus SE, '72 MGB GT, '58 MGA
    07-09-2012 12:23 PM #32
    Quote Originally Posted by Turbio! View Post
    I, for one, am shocked that a vehicle loaded over GWVR displayed adverse reactions when subjected to a bizarrely extreme avoidance maneuver.
    Are you being sarcastic or serious? How many people who drive a car actually know that there is a load recommendation? When youre heavily loaded, everything becomes a deadly situation.
    You think you hate it now. Wait til you drive it.

  33. 07-09-2012 12:27 PM #33
    Quote Originally Posted by Adam144 View Post
    Don't ever been as far to has gone want to be more like 20" Rimz or bigger or you could swerve moose and dead until she tropper has sideburns finds you rolled over.


  34. Senior Member SSLByron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 29th, 2004
    Location
    Annapolis, MD
    Posts
    34,943
    Vehicles
    '13 Focus, '08.5 MS3, '97 Wrangler, '94 and '90 Miatas
    07-09-2012 12:33 PM #34
    Quote Originally Posted by MCTB View Post
    Are you being sarcastic or serious? How many people who drive a car actually know that there is a load recommendation? When youre heavily loaded, everything becomes a deadly situation.
    Nope, only Chrysler products. I read it online and it was written by Europeans. Fact.
    Quote Originally Posted by Turbio! View Post
    Turbio logic: the logic you need, not the logic you want.
    http://www.speedsportlife.com press vehicle(s) this week: None.
    Twitter: @SSLByron, @SpeedSportLife

  35. Member zane!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 27th, 2005
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    3,230
    Vehicles
    Drivers, beaters, pedal bikes
    07-09-2012 12:35 PM #35
    Quote Originally Posted by Turbio! View Post
    Oh, look, the car lounge is being the car lounge again.
    Teh internets is srz business today.

    It was a joke.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 12 1 2 3 4 5 11 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts