VWVortex


Links back to The Car Lounge (opens in same window)
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: MT Head-2-Head Video - E30 M3 vs. 190E 2.3-16

  1. Member DrewSXR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 26th, 2000
    Location
    Sint Maarten
    Posts
    3,343
    Vehicles
    Lexus
    07-11-2012 10:48 PM #1
    MT Head-to-Head - E30 M3 vs. 190E 2.3-16

    http://wot.motortrend.com/bmw-e30-m3...ad-230807.html


  2. Member Eightysixturbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 18th, 2011
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,521
    Vehicles
    2005 MCS "Hyper Blue", 2006 330ci "Silver Grey"
    07-11-2012 10:49 PM #2
    These cars are both on my to-own list

    and I never knew that about senna
    pardon my 'merican

  3. Member Horror Business's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 1st, 2005
    Posts
    1,666
    Vehicles
    '91 BMW e30 318is
    07-12-2012 12:56 AM #3
    It's things like this that continually refuel my dreams. Some day...

  4. Member cockerpunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 17th, 2010
    Location
    Twin Cities MN
    Posts
    3,097
    Vehicles
    Mr2-S and 951
    07-12-2012 01:06 AM #4
    i can't help but wonder why the porsche 944, turbo and 944S are never in these comparisons. it has nearly the same racing pedigree, and is comparable or better in nearly every respect. is it because there was no "soft" and cheaper version? or because its a bit more then a sports coupe, more like a sports car? or because its not a homologation special?

    that being said, DAMN that M3 is sick!
    Quote Originally Posted by UnitedGTI. View Post
    makes dating really easy and cheap when they are under house arrest.
    Quote Originally Posted by UnitedGTI. View Post
    oh and house arrest girl is bat **** crazy.

  5. Member a2a4raddo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 14th, 2001
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    19,613
    Vehicles
    Porsche & Honda
    07-12-2012 01:39 AM #5
    Quote Originally Posted by cockerpunk View Post
    i can't help but wonder why the porsche 944, turbo and 944S are never in these comparisons. it has nearly the same racing pedigree, and is comparable or better in nearly every respect. is it because there was no "soft" and cheaper version? or because its a bit more then a sports coupe, more like a sports car? or because its not a homologation special?

    that being said, DAMN that M3 is sick!
    the 944 is a sports coupe. These cars are sedans. They are based on entry level lux sedans. The 944 was built from ground up as a sports car. You wont see many comparo's. They werent really raced against M3's and 190's when these cars were at their prime.

    Back on topic, when comparing the u.s. spec cars...its really no comparo(performance wise). The 190 made nearly 30HP less and weighed 400LBs more then an M3. On top of that, it cost 8K more new. the 190E 2.3-16 was slower then a 325is(which madethe same power and was significantly lighter), let alone and M3. Now, build quality, fit and finish,quality of materials, etc is a different story. E30's arnt on the same leve; as the MB's were. Not even close.

  6. Member malv1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 18th, 2007
    Location
    Rochester Hills
    Posts
    386
    Vehicles
    05 SRT-4 S3R, 95 Volvo T5-R
    07-12-2012 10:05 AM #6
    That was an awesome video. I had heard about Senna running the 190E 2.3 but didn't know it was really his starting point...

  7. Member 91gti20v's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 18th, 2001
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    3,938
    Vehicles
    '73 Camaro Z/28 & '05 LGT Wagon
    07-12-2012 10:49 AM #7
    Quote Originally Posted by malv1 View Post
    That was an awesome video. I had heard about Senna running the 190E 2.3 but didn't know it was really his starting point...
    It wasn't his starting point. He won the British Formula 3 championship in 1983. He was racing for Toleman in F1 in 1984.

  8. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 22nd, 2006
    Location
    Edgewood, MD
    Posts
    2,724
    Vehicles
    Euro Ford junk collection
    07-12-2012 11:17 AM #8
    Missing the Sierra Cosworth to smash them both.
    (That was these cars true competition)

  9. Member zhenya00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 7th, 2003
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    5,602
    07-12-2012 11:22 AM #9
    Nice video, and especially nice to see someone who can appreciate the 2.3-16 without being completely blinded by the presence of a Sport Evo.

    I totally agree about most of what he has to say about the Benz. The ride quality is insane. I can drive at speeds over the rough often dirt back roads we have around here at speeds that are intolerable in most modern cars. Sure does roll though. The build quality is also insane. 25 years old and mine is tighter than most new cars.

    Worth noting on the 2.3-16 is that most of the 20hp it lost in NA trim can be re-aquired with high-flow downpipes that lose the pre-cats, a hi-flow cat and exhaust. It truly wakes up the car. Mine is also lighter than expected at about 2900lbs on my local scales.

    Allow me to whore a bit:

    1987 Mercedes 190E 16v Cosworth
    1997 Volvo 855 T5
    2010 Volvo XC90

  10. Member Volvo_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 19th, 2009
    Posts
    3,102
    Vehicles
    2006 Volvo XC90 2.5T, current demo: 2010 Volvo XC60 T6
    07-12-2012 11:48 AM #10
    Old German cars = much much much cooler than new German cars.
    What I do for a living? This is a small part of it www.lehmanvolvo.blogspot.com ...and now, so is this: www.infinitiofmechanicsburg.blogspot.com

  11. 07-12-2012 12:02 PM #11
    Quote Originally Posted by zhenya00 View Post
    Allow me to whore a bit:

    Or, you know, you could whore a lot

    I would be perfectly content with either of these cars but I feel like (perhaps mistakenly so?) the lower end BMWs of that era are much more accessible and easier to get that M3 feel, power, etc without the M3 price. I also haven't looked into it much, but as I understand it the BMWs are still heavily supported at dealerships.

  12. Member chuckster1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 7th, 2001
    Location
    Central OH, USA
    Posts
    583
    Vehicles
    '09 Jetta Wolfsburg, 2.0T TSI, DSG, Salsa Red
    07-12-2012 12:39 PM #12
    I want a 190e Cosworth so bad. I found one locally last week. Everything worked electrically. Interior was awesome. Only 93K miles. Rear suspension was shot though, but the dealer wanted to send it to auction instead of letting me try to figure out how to get it fixed. Great "customer service." You know, that's how you treat customers in order to sell a new car down the road. That sort of thing. Oh well, soon I will have one. Just gotta be patient.

  13. Member chuckster1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 7th, 2001
    Location
    Central OH, USA
    Posts
    583
    Vehicles
    '09 Jetta Wolfsburg, 2.0T TSI, DSG, Salsa Red
    07-12-2012 12:39 PM #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Volvo_D View Post
    Old German cars = much much much cooler than new German cars.
    Money quote.

  14. Member zhenya00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 7th, 2003
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    5,602
    07-12-2012 01:29 PM #14
    Quote Originally Posted by chuckster1 View Post
    I want a 190e Cosworth so bad. I found one locally last week. Everything worked electrically. Interior was awesome. Only 93K miles. Rear suspension was shot though, but the dealer wanted to send it to auction instead of letting me try to figure out how to get it fixed. Great "customer service." You know, that's how you treat customers in order to sell a new car down the road. That sort of thing. Oh well, soon I will have one. Just gotta be patient.
    Bummer. It's worth finding a good one of these though if you are going to do it. Parts are insanely expensive and many difficult to find, so try to find one that has been taken care of. One of the big obstacles to owning a 2.3-16 is that there is just not that much information out there about them, nor many aftermarket parts available. Many things are one-offs produced for a short period by an enthusiast then NLA once they get rid of their car. The e30 is a lot easier to own in this regard.
    1987 Mercedes 190E 16v Cosworth
    1997 Volvo 855 T5
    2010 Volvo XC90

  15. Member choochoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 12th, 2008
    Location
    OC, CA
    Posts
    6,660
    Vehicles
    1989 GTI 16V, 2009 german suburban housewife standard issue, 2010 deluxe breedermobile
    07-12-2012 01:57 PM #15
    Quote Originally Posted by saron81 View Post
    Missing the Sierra Cosworth to smash them both.
    (That was these cars true competition)
    fifth gear did a review of the 190e 2.3-16v versus the Sierra Cosworth coupe. I would have like to see the sedan vs. sedan shootout

  16. Member chuckster1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 7th, 2001
    Location
    Central OH, USA
    Posts
    583
    Vehicles
    '09 Jetta Wolfsburg, 2.0T TSI, DSG, Salsa Red
    07-12-2012 02:45 PM #16
    Quote Originally Posted by zhenya00 View Post
    Bummer. It's worth finding a good one of these though if you are going to do it. Parts are insanely expensive and many difficult to find, so try to find one that has been taken care of. One of the big obstacles to owning a 2.3-16 is that there is just not that much information out there about them, nor many aftermarket parts available. Many things are one-offs produced for a short period by an enthusiast then NLA once they get rid of their car. The e30 is a lot easier to own in this regard.
    I'm with you on this. The 190e in question was pretty solid. A couple bubbles in the paint on the right side. Other than that the paint was great. I even drove it for a good solid 20 minutes flogging it pretty hard. 1st gear was a little tight, but the other gears were smooth. The dealership was only asking $3900. I guess they didn't realize what they had. I even saw these as replacements for the SLS:

    http://www.ground-control-store.com/...ory.php/CA=289

    Original wheels, so those would have to go for 17"s of some sort. EVO II wheels seem pricey but not hard to find:

    http://www.alloywheelsdirect.net/mer...o_ii_wheel_873

    So for about $6000 I could have had a great car with awesome suspension and period-correct wheels. A nice weekend car to play around with.

  17. Member choochoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 12th, 2008
    Location
    OC, CA
    Posts
    6,660
    Vehicles
    1989 GTI 16V, 2009 german suburban housewife standard issue, 2010 deluxe breedermobile
    07-12-2012 03:03 PM #17
    Quote Originally Posted by chuckster1 View Post
    Original wheels, so those would have to go for 17"s of some sort. EVO II wheels seem pricey but not hard to find:

    http://www.alloywheelsdirect.net/mer...o_ii_wheel_873
    or if you're on a tight budget, find some borbet type C, which look similar.


    Wow, you didnt' pick it up for $3900????? The clean ones on craigslist usually ask for around $6~8K.
    Last edited by choochoo; 07-12-2012 at 03:06 PM.

  18. Member zhenya00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 7th, 2003
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    5,602
    07-12-2012 03:07 PM #18
    Keep in mind that these motors are extremely sensitive to valve adjustments and clearance should be checked every 15k and adjusted as necessary. Since this largely goes ignored, MANY cossie's have valve issues, and many owners spend a huge amount of time effort and money chasing down other issues like poor hot start, stalling, bouncing idle, etc. that they are quick to blame on CIS but are actually signs of needing a head job.

    The Ground Control stuff is awesome, and one of the few newly available items for this car. You will, however, lose every bit of that wonderful ride quality. Some owners are reporting this setup as 'track only'. Jury is still out as there aren't that many people on them yet.
    1987 Mercedes 190E 16v Cosworth
    1997 Volvo 855 T5
    2010 Volvo XC90

  19. Member MAG58's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 14th, 2011
    Location
    Terre Haute, IN
    Posts
    704
    Vehicles
    1993 190E, 1971 240Z, 1963 Mini Estate, 1967 Mini Cooper S
    07-12-2012 03:58 PM #19
    Quote Originally Posted by zhenya00 View Post
    The Ground Control stuff is awesome, and one of the few newly available items for this car. You will, however, lose every bit of that wonderful ride quality. Some owners are reporting this setup as 'track only'. Jury is still out as there aren't that many people on them yet.
    I'm ordering a set for my M104 car. I wont say the ride is compliant as the factory sportline/16V ride quality. It is, however, loads better than those of us who were using 500E or R129 springs to get the spring rate up. Now that a larger rear swaybar is available via matsellah on the rev, I think I can have GC provide me with softer springs which can still give me a stiff, yet compliant ride.
    Bob

  20. Member IsraelGT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 25th, 2001
    Posts
    6,044
    Vehicles
    FX45, Sienna AWD ltd.
    07-12-2012 04:08 PM #20
    The 190E 2.5 Evo is the 190 that I have in my mind when talking about that era of M3, Sierra etc.




  21. Member chuckster1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 7th, 2001
    Location
    Central OH, USA
    Posts
    583
    Vehicles
    '09 Jetta Wolfsburg, 2.0T TSI, DSG, Salsa Red
    07-12-2012 04:39 PM #21
    Quote Originally Posted by choochoo View Post
    or if you're on a tight budget, find some borbet type C, which look similar.


    Wow, you didnt' pick it up for $3900????? The clean ones on craigslist usually ask for around $6~8K.
    Good info on the Borbets! Yeah, I tried to convince the wife that this would be a great example of a "Wheeler Dealer" car that we could at least turn an easy profit on if we decided not to keep it, once the SLS was sorted. My son-in-law was even excited to help me out. But in the end we decided it wasn't a good financial move for us right now. It was beyond tempting though. I think I could have walked away with it for $3K. Still upset I couldn't swing it.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts