That grille looks horrendous in the first pic while econd picture makes the front end look much more cohesive. Definitely like the pre-facelift noses better.
#1
#2
That grille looks horrendous in the first pic while econd picture makes the front end look much more cohesive. Definitely like the pre-facelift noses better.
#3
Last edited by Son; 08-08-2012 at 11:42 AM.
Previously known as Son of a B...5er!
#4
Dump the 4.2L V8 for the glorious turbo 5-cylinder found in the TT-RS, install manual transmission, and you have my attention. The V8 mated with a DSG tranny is getting rather boring and too common.
Now
Ford Flex AWD, Vulcan Nomad 1600
Prior Ownership:
VW Mk4 R32, Chevy Z71 Colorado 4x4, Audi A6 2.7T (RS6 replica wannabe), Audi 90Q, BMW X5 4.4i, VW 20AE GTI #0651, Aprilia RSV Mille, Suzuki V-Strom DL1000
#5
that face!![]()
What I do for a living? This is a small part of it www.lehmanvolvo.blogspot.com ...and now, so is this: www.infinitiofmechanicsburg.blogspot.com
#6
Can they make that grille any bigger?
Uber, nice idea w/the motor and tranny from the TT-RS!![]()
#7
#8
--Measure with mike, mark with chalk, cut with axe, pound to fit, paint to match
#9
#10
Now
Ford Flex AWD, Vulcan Nomad 1600
Prior Ownership:
VW Mk4 R32, Chevy Z71 Colorado 4x4, Audi A6 2.7T (RS6 replica wannabe), Audi 90Q, BMW X5 4.4i, VW 20AE GTI #0651, Aprilia RSV Mille, Suzuki V-Strom DL1000
#14
#15
I'm not impressed. The 4.2 V8 is a nice engine, but it's already long in the tooth and that GIANT cheese grater grill is just horrendous.
#16
The trick there is that the 2.5T won't fit longitudinally in the engine bay. It's actually longer than either the 4.2 V8 or the 5.2 V10 engines, and so while it will fit transversely in a TT, it won't fit longitudinally in an A5. Yes, they stuffed one into the quattro concept, but a LOT of changes had to be made that were just not production ready.
Also, there is something to Reil's argument about the character of the V8, I think. It's a wonderful engine that makes incredible noises, and I'm glad to see it in the RS5, personally.
-Tim
#17
#19
Saw my first one in the showroom a few weeks ago, black with ti package. Today I saw the first one in the wild, gray with ti package, at the local Whole Paycheck lot. I generally like it a lot, but think it's a tad bit overpriced.
I personally like the aluminum pack look on the red car as shown in the R and T pictures. If its options are anything like the TT-RS (and I think they are), you can have your choice of silver accent pieces that match the mirrors, or the blacked out look of the Ti package. I think it's all relative to the body color which looks best. I ordered my Sepang Blue car with the aluminum accents and think it looks great. The Ti might look better on a black or gray car.
Houston, TX
2012 Porsche Carrera 991
#20
#21
68 k base price, less than I thought. Nice.
Last edited by bbk; 08-08-2012 at 03:58 PM.
#22
#23
#24
Awesome looking car. Needs a plate to break up the huge front grill though
#25
I don't know if I could justify one of these knowing that the new S5 with the 3.0T is only a tune away from being faster and cheaper at the same time. Sort of like the whole 335is/M3 proposition I suppose.
Either way, it'd be a hard pill to swallow over a C63 AMG.
#26
I get that but the 5-cylinder is a symbol of Audi engineering and racing. It's what made Audi stand out from all the other manufacturers in the 80's. IMHO any "smaller" Audi RS vehicle should have the 5-pot engine harken back to the good old days.
I enjoy V8's like every other red blooded American male, but it just doesn't have the unique "soul" that the TT-RS seems to have.
Now
Ford Flex AWD, Vulcan Nomad 1600
Prior Ownership:
VW Mk4 R32, Chevy Z71 Colorado 4x4, Audi A6 2.7T (RS6 replica wannabe), Audi 90Q, BMW X5 4.4i, VW 20AE GTI #0651, Aprilia RSV Mille, Suzuki V-Strom DL1000
#27
#28
I hear you on the five cylinder heritage argument, loud and clear. I was rooting incredibly hard for them to build the quattro concept, even though I knew it would be stratospherically priced and very limited production.
However, arguing that the hi-rev 4.2 V8 lacks soul I would argue with. I've spent a fair amount of time driving various vehicles with that engine (and TT-RSes with the 2.5T) and they're both very special engines - just in different ways. Pinning the throttle in second gear in a 4.2 V8 car is an event, for sure. Pinning the throttle in 2nd gear in a TT-RS is also an event, but in a different way - 5 cylinder warble vs. V8 roar (and the 2.5T is not aided in the aural department by being turbocharged), the power delivery is a little different, etc.
And really, Audi has plenty of V8 racing heritage as well, though people forget that in light of the Gruppe B halo, I think.
Either way, you can't loose. People downplay the V8 because it's not the V10, or because it "should be" more powerful or whatever, but I freely admit that I think it's a fantastic engine and I jump at the chance to drive cars with one under the hood.
-Tim
#29
____________________
Byron
#30
IMHO, they should have made it with a 5.2 V10 and 450ish hp. Nothing wrong with the V8, but it could use more torque with all that weight.
#31
Yet that 3.0"T" would never sound as sexy as a naturally aspirated V8 revving up to 8500 RPM. The governments of the US and Europe are likely to make these amazing naturally aspirated powerplants a thing of the past so I will keep on enjoying them while they exist. There's nothing like the sound of a well-sorted naturally aspirated motor that can rev to the stratosphere while a turbocharged engines wheezes and farts up to fuel cut.
#32
2005 Lotus Elise - 6-speed
2011 BMW 128 'vert - 6-speed
2013 Subaru Crosstrek XV - 5-speed
#33
Current Ride - 2010 F-150 SVT Raptor 6.2L
Sold - 2009 Honda Ruckus
Sold - 2010 Camaro 2SS / RS M6 6.2L
#34
2007 E90 AW 323i Step | Lowered 1.25"/1" | BMW Performance Exhaust | PBX | Debadged | Scangauge II | Style 162 18" & 161 17" wheels & rear 15mm spacers
#35