09 SI vs 01 TT225, Take 2

[jedge1.8t]

why do you care?

This is my thread, this was my experience, I even have videos and and reviews i can show to back myself up

everyone here can just say well TT has 225 hp and civic has only 200 blah blah

Show me some hard facts on how a 225 TT beats a SI in everyway then i will shuttup

[Kacz07]

Trolllllllllllllll.

[taverncustoms]

lol i think this guy wants a si its pointless to argue. we was never lookin for help he just wants to troll.

the facts: Your broken ass car or you lost to a better driver in a slow car. cool thanks for sharing.

[tt_kcalb_nevar]

why do you care?

This is my thread, this was my experience, I even have videos and and reviews i can show to back myself up

everyone here can just say well TT has 225 hp and civic has only 200 blah blah

Show me some hard facts on how a 225 TT beats a SI in everyway then i will shuttup

Honestly jedge1.8t, most of the guys in this thread that you've been arguing with are the most experienced, knowledgeable and contributing members of this forum! Rather than arguing with them, Id suggest you take a moment and digest the credible info they're serving you rather than calling the car we all are passionate about a slouch or a hairdressers car or whatever the hell else you mentioned, its making you look like a troll!

[Marcus_Aurelius]

You can argue forever with everyone but the facts will remain the same. You say that you can find 30 magazine reviews that backs up your claim that the 225 TT is a performance slouch and not a sport car, but they'll also tell you to buy a Volt as it's the best thing since sliced bread. I particularly don't care for magazine reviews, unless it's Grassroots Motorsport... but since you asked for anything that proves that the 225 TT is a much better than an 09 SI in terms of performance, I'll give you something trustworthy

http://www.moutons.org/sccasolo/Lists/2011/stockc.html

The SCCA classing of cars in Solo Stock category is done in terms of their all around performance with no modification. The highest class is Super Stock - then A Stock - B Stock - C stock, and so on. The 225 TT is a D Stock car, based on its performance. The 09 SI is a G Stock car and inferior to the TT by several classes in SCCA's standard (based by on-track performance of racers across the country). I am sure you'll still find some way to discredit a true way of comparing true all around car performance coming from the most renown sport car racing sanctioning body in the country.

FYI, the fact that the TT share its platform with the Golf, uses Haldex as an AWD system, and a stock turbo that spools quick which graces you with rod-bending low-end torque, is not a bad combination. Quick spool and gobs of TQ is actually a good thing, Haldex is a much smarter and advanced system than the conventional Quattro for example, it's just de-tuned from the factory most likely to increase long term reliability. I am done beating a dead horse and won't continue to entertain such a pointless argument after this, I have nothing against you personally and just think that some of your assumptions were totally off.

[jedge1.8t]

ALL i posted in this thread was a SI is faster from a roll than a stock 225. done end of story

[Marcus_Aurelius]

ALL i posted in this thread was a SI is faster from a roll than a stock 225. done end of story

Really, you're that hopeless? How about this following statement that came from your keyboard and includes the words "beats the SI in everyway" ?

Show me some hard facts on how a 225 TT beats a SI in everyway then i will shuttup

[l88m22vette]

I wish I was a mod so I could lock this terrible thread

[ModsTTand]

Dear jedge1.8t ,

I just want to ask you this : how would you like us to reply and prove that we really like this car and don't like the fact that "2009"Honda Civic SI passed "1998-2005" Beloved Audi TT 225 Quattro !

If it did pass ur TT then please check the car over all performance 'cos something awfully wrong with ur dear car

From "stand-still" i have beaten 92 stock Mustangs.Stock 2004 VW R32 DSG(u know R32 were based on 3.2 Audi TT Quattro!) , 2007 Subaru impreza ...and Few more.

*All that racing was performed in a deserted Strip-Street with cops "troopers" to regulate this event.

We all concerned about your safety 'cos we care for ur well-being , i trust ur driving experience/reaction but i can't 100% predict other car Drivers on the main street I believe there's plenty of regulated tracks in ur State

Lasty : How could u allow this Honda to beat ur Audi VAG'ers ATTACK !

[PLAYED TT]

Really, you're that hopeless? How about this following statement that came from your keyboard and includes the words "beats the SI in everyway" ?

Just give up. It's not worth your effort to argue lol

[G'D60]

I wish I was a mod so I could lock this terrible thread

I wish I was a mod so I could ban this clown. Who goes on to a forum with a broken car, unflashed ECU and claims an SI walked all over them then expect the community to agree that his piss poor version of the TT is indicative of the entire TT population... If that were to happen to me I'd 1) NEVER talk about it 2) Find and fix EVERY boost leak I could find 3) TURN MY CHIP ON!!! (your down syndrome really shines through here) 4) BEG my SI friend to a rematch so I could sleep again at night.

[Chuckmeister87]

You can argue forever with everyone but the facts will remain the same. You say that you can find 30 magazine reviews that backs up your claim that the 225 TT is a performance slouch and not a sport car, but they'll also tell you to buy a Volt as it's the best thing since sliced bread. I particularly don't care for magazine reviews, unless it's Grassroots Motorsport... but since you asked for anything that proves that the 225 TT is a much better than an 09 SI in terms of performance, I'll give you something trustworthy

http://www.moutons.org/sccasolo/Lists/2011/stockc.html

The SCCA classing of cars in Solo Stock category is done in terms of their all around performance with no modification. The highest class is Super Stock - then A Stock - B Stock - C stock, and so on. The 225 TT is a D Stock car, based on its performance. The 09 SI is a G Stock car and inferior to the TT by several classes in SCCA's standard (based by on-track performance of racers across the country). I am sure you'll still find some way to discredit a true way of comparing true all around car performance coming from the most renown sport car racing sanctioning body in the country.

FYI, the fact that the TT share its platform with the Golf, uses Haldex as an AWD system, and a stock turbo that spools quick which graces you with rod-bending low-end torque, is not a bad combination. Quick spool and gobs of TQ is actually a good thing, Haldex is a much smarter and advanced system than the conventional Quattro for example, it's just de-tuned from the factory most likely to increase long term reliability. I am done beating a dead horse and won't continue to entertain such a pointless argument after this, I have nothing against you personally and just think that some of your assumptions were totally off.

I love this list. I'm going to have to rub in my friend's face how his NSX is B Stock and my chipped 180Q would qualify as D Stock since it's supposed to have the same power as the 225. He's such a bad driver...

[DeckManDubs]

I love this list. I'm going to have to rub in my friend's face how his NSX is B Stock and my chipped 180Q would qualify as D Stock since it's supposed to have the same power as the 225. He's such a bad driver...

Right gearing, right low-end torque powerband and awd will decimate. As I proved this past weekend running down a brand new C4s, stock and modified E92 M3's, E60 M5's with 500hp, put a hard beating on an Elise. The TT platform at the track is very potent as some of us have proven. My setup puts down 299.8awtq on the stock turbo The closest car in my group turned out to be a new V6 turbo 9-3 Sport Combi on r-compounds. As Max and others stated. Get your helmet, take it to the local road/auto-x and put your seat time in. Internet racing is pointless.

[FullyLoadedCarat]

Internet racing is pointless.

He isn't even good at that let alone actually piloting the car...

[Subverter]

With all due respect buddy, I don't agree with this. Driving above posted speed limits in a safe and mature manner is not the same as two knuckle heads going at it with total disrespect for others. Everyone, within the flow of traffic, goes above posted limits and even cops understand and don't mind it (obviously when it's reasonable).

Another thing is that racing like that proves nothing! There is really nothing telling where the start and finish are - somebody could easily be jumping the gun etc. When you get to actually race in sanctioned event, you get to understand that anything done outside of that type of setting is dangerous and pointless.

[darrenbyrnes]

My setup puts down 299.8 awtq on the stock turbo

Ballz!