VWVortex


+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Built Head

  1. Member pio.jimmy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 15th, 2011
    Location
    Nu Joisy
    Posts
    827
    Vehicles
    I.Hate.MK4.Kids.
    08-20-2012 09:33 PM #1
    So I'm starting to get bored with my car. I've tossed around the idea of air, FI, and just selling it in general. The other night I was thinking why not do something different and build the head and just clean the bay up a little. My plan is to get a used head, take it to a machine shop, P&P, 3 angle valve job (not sure if worth it), throw in new valves, new high strength springs and retainers, and either a 276 or 268 cam going with a custom tune as well. I was wondering if I leaving anything out. I was thinking if it would be worth it to even upgrade the injectors and fuel pump. Also can't really decide which cam I want, I'm more towards the 268 because I like my low end but I've talked to people who went from the 268 to the 276 and they said they don't regret it at all.
    instagram @jimmypio

  2. Member Einkaufswagen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 25th, 2009
    Location
    N Kingstown, RI
    Posts
    2,305
    Vehicles
    1999.5 Jetta VR6 GLS, 2000 Jetta VR6 GLX, 2001 Jetta VR6 GLX, 2001 Jetta VR6 GLX
    08-21-2012 01:26 PM #2
    I had 268 cams with a C2 tune, which was alright good power after like 4k -6.5 or so,

    But recently I snapped a cam and had to go back to stock, and man was I missing out on the low end haha.

    stock cams now that i have run both 268 and stock, are the better choice for a daily, the 268's in my case were only good for highway pulling and poor milage because you have to keep it up there in the RPM's

    My car also averaged about 21.2 MPG with the 268 setup which was meh at most. that was with regular driving some hard driving some relaxed driving.

    My car also has a 10lb flywheel and a SP short runner so that could also contribute to the lack of low end but still. From a straight comparison the 268's wernt as fun as the stock cams.

    Cars also got a 02m so I can realy take advantage of the low end power.

    If you are staying N/A I wouldent bother with any fuel mods little to no benefit.

    -Einkauf
    My OEM+ build thread with a twist: Einkaufswagen's Build

    Quote Originally Posted by jaysleeves View Post
    I'm just curious if I should wipe my ass with the left, or right hand? Any input would be appreciated and yes I searched.

  3. Member Stoddart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 26th, 2007
    Location
    Stillwater, MN
    Posts
    176
    Vehicles
    MKIV '00 VW GTI GLX VR6
    08-21-2012 03:49 PM #3
    There are allot of variables you're dealing with. 268 and 276 cams are only going to give you power and very high rpm's which will torment you piston rings. I would consider a mild cam, 263. work on your flow, and consider using a intercooler for a CIA. This way if you part from NA, you can through on a head spacer for FI.

    Ignition is another issue, the better the spark the less fuel you use.

    As for a LW flywheel, actually prefer stock. In its application the mass helps for better shifts and less stress on the cam and crank. You'll burn a clutch plate out faster, but it's better then knocking tdc and crashing.
    '92 Audi CQ: Sold
    '93 90 CS FWD V6 12v (commuter): Sold
    '00 VW GTI VR6: Sold

  4. Member Einkaufswagen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 25th, 2009
    Location
    N Kingstown, RI
    Posts
    2,305
    Vehicles
    1999.5 Jetta VR6 GLS, 2000 Jetta VR6 GLX, 2001 Jetta VR6 GLX, 2001 Jetta VR6 GLX
    08-21-2012 04:00 PM #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Stoddart View Post
    There are allot of variables you're dealing with. 268 and 276 cams are only going to give you power and very high rpm's which will torment you piston rings. I would consider a mild cam, 263. work on your flow, and consider using a intercooler for a CIA. This way if you part from NA, you can through on a head spacer for FI.

    Ignition is another issue, the better the spark the less fuel you use.

    As for a LW flywheel, actually prefer stock. In its application the mass helps for better shifts and less stress on the cam and crank. You'll burn a clutch plate out faster, but it's better then knocking tdc and crashing.
    I agree with all of this, the only reason I run a lightweight flywheel is my clutch was designed to be paired with it. I also enjoy the throttle response and the engine breaking is greatly improved. (I know people will debate the pros and cons of engine breaking all day but whatever )

    -Einkauf
    My OEM+ build thread with a twist: Einkaufswagen's Build

    Quote Originally Posted by jaysleeves View Post
    I'm just curious if I should wipe my ass with the left, or right hand? Any input would be appreciated and yes I searched.

  5. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 22nd, 2002
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    4,741
    08-21-2012 04:09 PM #5
    2010 MB GLK350 4matic
    2009 Gti 2.0t powered by APR (Sold! last VW purchase!)
    2001 Gti 1.8t powered by Dalhback (sold and will be missed :') )
    1988 Jetta Carat Vr6 powered by www.LugTronic.com (99.9% done!!! )
    1987 Scirocco 16v w/t3t4 57trim powered by SDS (sold but never forgotten)

  6. Member masterqaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 4th, 2007
    Location
    Oakville Ont
    Posts
    2,720
    Vehicles
    94 JTI Vrt 60-1 .58ar exh obd2 440 racefile 20psi/meth
    08-21-2012 06:06 PM #6
    Putting a intercooler on a NA car is like giving a lion lettuce.......
    Forced convection.... Now we grillin.
    Some times she goes, some times she doesn't.... Way of the road

    Rem 870 super mag in max 4 camo for sale. Pm me

  7. Member pio.jimmy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 15th, 2011
    Location
    Nu Joisy
    Posts
    827
    Vehicles
    I.Hate.MK4.Kids.
    08-21-2012 11:46 PM #7
    Thanks for all the input. So I think im going to end up going with a 262 cam becuase it's just my everyday car and I'm not trying to make anything special, just figured I would give it a little extra pep and see if it makes me like the car again other wise I'll move on to another car. I'm leaning towards Autotech 262 cams, heavy duty valves springs, new valves retainers and lifters and a mild port and polish with 3 angle valve job. If I seem to be missing anything let me know.
    instagram @jimmypio

  8. 08-22-2012 05:09 AM #8
    DRC 268's are around $320 give as much if not more power than Schrick 268's for much less and give quite a bit more power than 262's. No you lose no low end torque. If you want to take full advantage of your P&P head get DRC 268's and skip the autotech 262's b/c after a while you will be wanting more power. If you decide to go F/I later on just make sure you get the proper programming and properly sized fuel injectors.

  9. Member Einkaufswagen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 25th, 2009
    Location
    N Kingstown, RI
    Posts
    2,305
    Vehicles
    1999.5 Jetta VR6 GLS, 2000 Jetta VR6 GLX, 2001 Jetta VR6 GLX, 2001 Jetta VR6 GLX
    08-22-2012 09:31 AM #9
    I wouldent bother with the new retainers, just extra money and you 99.9% wont need them, lifters yes springs yes.

    If you do go FI though stock or 262 cams would be better, because you keep the low end torque, as well as adding the power from the turbo for the high end,Just a better rounded system.

    Not that haveing ALL the power at the high end is a bad thing lol, that is if you did like 268's and a turbo.
    My OEM+ build thread with a twist: Einkaufswagen's Build

    Quote Originally Posted by jaysleeves View Post
    I'm just curious if I should wipe my ass with the left, or right hand? Any input would be appreciated and yes I searched.

  10. Member pio.jimmy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 15th, 2011
    Location
    Nu Joisy
    Posts
    827
    Vehicles
    I.Hate.MK4.Kids.
    08-22-2012 10:29 PM #10
    Well I don't plan on going FI because turbo is too much and i find it absurd to put that much to just the front wheels lol (no offense to VRT guys). Supercharger would be the only thing I would do but still a 99% chance that won't happen. Does anyone have any kind of insight to the 260/264 cams? I was wondering how they perform against 268's.
    instagram @jimmypio

  11. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 22nd, 2002
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    4,741
    08-22-2012 10:32 PM #11
    If u get the 260/264 eventually you will take them out to install the 268s.

    Which brand are you planning on getting?
    2010 MB GLK350 4matic
    2009 Gti 2.0t powered by APR (Sold! last VW purchase!)
    2001 Gti 1.8t powered by Dalhback (sold and will be missed :') )
    1988 Jetta Carat Vr6 powered by www.LugTronic.com (99.9% done!!! )
    1987 Scirocco 16v w/t3t4 57trim powered by SDS (sold but never forgotten)

  12. Member pio.jimmy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 15th, 2011
    Location
    Nu Joisy
    Posts
    827
    Vehicles
    I.Hate.MK4.Kids.
    08-22-2012 10:44 PM #12
    If I were to go 260/264 I would go with techtonics, if I did 268 I would love to go with Shrick but that's a decent chunk of change. So I would probally have to go with DRC or Autotech, more likely DRC
    instagram @jimmypio

  13. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 22nd, 2002
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    4,741
    08-22-2012 10:59 PM #13
    Have you look into the cams the www.fourseasontuning.com sells?
    2010 MB GLK350 4matic
    2009 Gti 2.0t powered by APR (Sold! last VW purchase!)
    2001 Gti 1.8t powered by Dalhback (sold and will be missed :') )
    1988 Jetta Carat Vr6 powered by www.LugTronic.com (99.9% done!!! )
    1987 Scirocco 16v w/t3t4 57trim powered by SDS (sold but never forgotten)

  14. Member pio.jimmy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 15th, 2011
    Location
    Nu Joisy
    Posts
    827
    Vehicles
    I.Hate.MK4.Kids.
    08-22-2012 11:03 PM #14
    I was looking at MJM Autohaus, fourseason has an awful lot but I still can't decide what size cam I want yet
    instagram @jimmypio

  15. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 22nd, 2002
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    4,741
    08-22-2012 11:07 PM #15
    Check the catcam 267/266 or the drc 268 at fst
    2010 MB GLK350 4matic
    2009 Gti 2.0t powered by APR (Sold! last VW purchase!)
    2001 Gti 1.8t powered by Dalhback (sold and will be missed :') )
    1988 Jetta Carat Vr6 powered by www.LugTronic.com (99.9% done!!! )
    1987 Scirocco 16v w/t3t4 57trim powered by SDS (sold but never forgotten)

  16. 08-23-2012 04:56 PM #16
    DRC268's give equal and in other cars more hp than Schrick 268's. DRC268's today are the very best cam for the dollar anyone would want to use in the 12v VR6 Community. Not sure in the 24v VR6 Community but with John's experience in making cams for racing engines for the last at least 20yrs. I'd say it would be a safe bet his Cams for the 24v VR6 would make great hp for the price too.

  17. Member pio.jimmy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 15th, 2011
    Location
    Nu Joisy
    Posts
    827
    Vehicles
    I.Hate.MK4.Kids.
    08-24-2012 09:32 PM #17
    Yeah, I'm pretty much 95% on the DRC's gonna do new valves, springs, and lifters. Have any of you guys port and polished a head and done a valve job? Is it really worth it?
    instagram @jimmypio

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts