First thing that popped in my head.
![]()
#1
Technology can convert any car into a time travel device. What production car would you take that looks the most alien / futuristic?
Something simple?
Something unique?
Something different?
What would you take?
#2
First thing that popped in my head.
![]()
#4
I second the Aventador.
#5
#6
It would be cool to bring something radical -- but think about fuel availability. I would take something designed to run on crap/sulfury/leaded fuel, like what you might see in Russia or South America.
I definitely wouldn't take a modern computer-controlled diesel or anything super complicated with tight tolerances.
VW Gol or something like that?
Improving the signal-to-noise ratio
#7
I need futuristic looks and off road capabilities, so I'll choose the Vehicross:
![]()
#9
Thanks for Deloren.lol
Going back to '47 w low super cars![]()
"Your pants too tight,your wheels too bright"
#10
What grade of fuel was available then?
|˙˙ʇǝuɹǝʇuı ǝɥʇ uo ʇxǝʇ uʍop ǝpısdn ɯopuɐɹ pɐǝɹ noʎ :ǝɯıʇ ǝǝɹɟ ɥɔnɯ ooʇ ʎɐʍ ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ןןǝʇ oʇ ʍoɥ˙˙˙|http://hotlinktest.com/
#12
"Artificial Intelligence usually beats natural stupidity." <---- If we apply that logic to driverless cars, the future of commuting should be just fine.
#14
Plus it is German. The US would ****.
██████████████████Originally Posted by Jeremy Clarkson
Vote Yes To Create A 3rd Gen 2.0 TSI Section!
#17
This, and any modern French car.![]()
There are no old Porsches - just new owners.
#19
#22
Lets see. 1947. They didn't even have any freeways yet, a lot of roads were still dirt, not pavement, the fuel was leaded and low octane, diesel was difficult to find. Yeah, I'll take my chances in this :
![]()
#23
#25
what about this?
![]()
2011 VW Golf 2.5 5MT "Lola"
(_Fishbowl Society_)
YOLOUSYMLMTO- You only live once unless somehow you magically live more than once.
#26
Well, considering Cadillacs ruled the road in 1947, I'd go back in one of these to show then that over 6 decades later we've still got it (They don't need to know about the 80s and 90s.)
![]()
#27
Too new. It'd still grab a lot of attention because of that.
I'm more stealthy. Gimme a '47 Buick or some such, put 4 wheel disc brakes on it, beef the engine (still running on leaded fuel of the time) and give it modern, but high profile tires and some killer suspension. I've always loved sleepers.
Can I bring a car back with me, too?![]()
Originally Posted by Boyz in da Park
#28
#29
I'd be checking out roswell in a PONTIAC AZTEK!!!!!!
'86 Jaguar xj-s 5.3HE coupe, cobalt blue metallic/blue
'08 Hyundai Accent SE hatch, ice blue/gray
Bisixually disposed, lucas charged and coventry clothed
#30
Um, in '47 they were already driving stuff like this on both coasts:
As low or lower than modern supercars. These were the predecessors to '50s customs, becasue by 1950, only 3 years later, they were driving these:
![]()
Other than the fuel, supercars would work just fine.
OTOH, I'd still probably take something like a Range Rover. Luxury and offroad ability and adjustible suspension height. Would definitely still stand out and get attention.
I love cars, but the problem is they are like schroedinger's hobby. They're always in a quantum superstate of being both awesome and a huge waste of time and money... until observation momentarily forces them into one state or another.
#32
MemeGate 2012 - First Responder, post #2
Originally Posted by .skully.
#33
#34
Surely from 1947 to now they would stick soft touch material back into it...
In all seriousness, this. It can handle multiple terrain variants, and it looks futuristic as hell which was all the rave back then anyway..
![]()
Last edited by IridiumB6; 09-17-2012 at 10:01 AM.
#35