this is just embarassing

[ohsnappe2]

http://photorumors.com/2012/09/18/br...orless-camera/

[yel0wsn0]

I saw this earlier. The thing is brings shame to Hasselblad. It doesn't even look finished. It looks like someone slapped bondo onto a Nex and called it good. I can understand using another companies sensor and what-not to reduce costs. But explain how adding 10 tons of ugly onto an already ugly camera is worth 5,000 more?

It really reminds me of when Aston Martin took all those Scion iQ's (or whatever the Toyota version is) and said "Hey look at our car EPA! Now we're environmentally friendly! Also, where's my $35,000?"

[ohsnappe2]

xpans look awesome to me. but these not so much

[yel0wsn0]

That's because with the Xpan Hasselblad realized that Fuji had done a good enough job, the color just needed to not be that god awful champagne color that plagued cameras in the mid-late 90s.

[peoples_car]

This is ugh, how do you say? Ugly.

What's the point of that ridiculous grip when the most owners will be using that rear screen for 99% of their shots?

[WeenerBoy]

is it just me that's bored of the same old usual camera design?

...or is this the part where i put my flame suit on...

[Basscase]

is it just me that's bored of the same old usual camera design?

...or is this the part where i put my flame suit on...

I agree, I kinda like it.

[sonicGLI]

Wow, an APS-C sensor for $6,500 with a piece of wood slapped to the side. Good job.

Even if it looked like the coolest camera in the world, I'd take 2 5DIII's over this ridiculously priced thing, thank you.

[ohsnappe2]

m9 with a 35!

[WeenerBoy]

Wow, an APS-C sensor for $6,500 with a piece of wood slapped to the side. Good job.

Even if it looked like the coolest camera in the world, I'd take 2 5DIII's over this ridiculously priced thing, thank you.

i bet Bieber will buy one...