Username or Email Address
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up

    VWVortex


    The Car Lounge
    Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
    Results 71 to 105 of 108

    Thread: My First Drive of 2013 Cadillac ATS

    1. Member 2.0T_Convert's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 23rd, 2009
      Location
      We-Haw-Ken
      Posts
      12,890
      09-25-2012 11:42 PM #71
      Quote Originally Posted by NoXenons View Post
      I agree. Their selection pales in comparison to the German brands. Right now they have four model-lines that are class-competitive.. BMW has ten. Last year there was a nice concept that reminded me of a 60's Continental, but I guess they decided not to go through with it.
      Last I checked BMW was getting ass raped by Audi in every segment.

      XTS doesn't compete with anything BMW has.. even the current SRX is FWD based
      Dafuq does being FWD based true or not have to do with anything.
      Last edited by 2.0T_Convert; 09-25-2012 at 11:44 PM.

    2. 09-25-2012 11:43 PM #72
      Quote Originally Posted by NoXenons View Post
      XTS doesn't compete with anything BMW has.. even the current SRX is FWD based
      no one in the SRX category gives a flying you know what how it's architecture is established, as long as its AWD.

      and 7ish was there for a reason.

      it will hold over for the next 16 months
      Quote Originally Posted by Chris Stack View Post
      Makes me proud to be an American in some perverse way. **** your terrorist, I've a honey boo boo outside.

    3. 09-25-2012 11:44 PM #73
      Quote Originally Posted by 2.0T_Convert View Post
      Last I checked BMW was getting ass raped by Audi in every segment.
      man, let me discuss sales numbers with him once i beat him over the head with the 'nitty gritty' and then when he tries to discuss 'the big picture' i'll show him that too.

      i already shot his 'brand image' to pieces with 3 very sufficient very telling graphs.

      Quote Originally Posted by Chris Stack View Post
      Makes me proud to be an American in some perverse way. **** your terrorist, I've a honey boo boo outside.

    4. Member 2.0T_Convert's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 23rd, 2009
      Location
      We-Haw-Ken
      Posts
      12,890
      09-26-2012 12:11 AM #74
      Quote Originally Posted by NoXenons View Post
      You do realize the graph based on brand appeal proves my point?
      Proves that Cadillac sits right below Lexus and the Germans in brand appeal. In other words above all the quasi-luxury brands like Volvo, Acura, and Lincoln. And then all the regular brands like Hyundai, Honda, etc...

      So remind me again why Cadillac should be competing by being a budget luxury brand?

    5. 09-26-2012 12:13 AM #75
      Quote Originally Posted by NoXenons View Post
      You do realize the graph based on brand appeal proves my point?
      That 3.6% separates Cadillac and BMW?

      I knew you would use that, and never realize that 3.6% is the difference.

      The only brands not within 5% of Cadillac that is above it is Porsche and Jaguar, and they currently do not have dreams to overtake Porsche nor Jaguar.

      let's not mention the HUGE difference in the VDS and the larger difference in IQS
      Last edited by Nourdmrolnmt; 09-26-2012 at 12:15 AM.
      Quote Originally Posted by Chris Stack View Post
      Makes me proud to be an American in some perverse way. **** your terrorist, I've a honey boo boo outside.

    6. Member baljet's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 25th, 2012
      Posts
      1,623
      Vehicles
      2008 Civic LX
      09-26-2012 12:25 AM #76
      Quote Originally Posted by NoXenons View Post
      I agree. Their selection pales in comparison to the German brands. Right now they have four model-lines that are class-competitive.. BMW has ten. Last year there was a nice concept that reminded me of a 60's Continental, but I guess they decided not to go through with it.
      But when they get those products they have the brand strength to charge parity with BMW.

    7. 09-26-2012 07:42 AM #77
      Quote Originally Posted by NoXenons View Post
      BMW owners have usually tested all 3 and say they wanted a car that was involving and a real drivers car.
      Bowtie wearing, tattooed, Mustang driver

      Quote Originally Posted by Fritz27 View Post
      I was more annoyed with the implication of being a Browns fan.

    8. 09-26-2012 11:51 AM #78
      Quote Originally Posted by NoXenons View Post
      Audi Merc and Cadillac drivers in my opinion cannot really say this and must wish they too owned a BMW every time they see one.
      what a moron

    9. Member curvedinfinity's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 11th, 2004
      Location
      Highway to the danger zone
      Posts
      8,476
      Vehicles
      F14 Tomcat
      09-26-2012 12:28 PM #79
      That dude, what a high horse he has.


      We'll see how the ATS competes with the 3 series. I'm liking it. I'll be watching the ATS-V news like a hawk.
      Contributing editor at http://becarchic.com and http://speedsportlife.com
      Personal website with contacts: http://curvedinfinity.com
      Shenandoah hot lap 1:46.92: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmYq3mBbwPg

    10. Member gti5dr06's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 28th, 2006
      Posts
      1,696
      Vehicles
      2014 Cappuccino shawty, 2008 silver family thing
      09-26-2012 07:53 PM #80
      Quote Originally Posted by curvedinfinity View Post
      That dude, what a high horse he has.


      We'll see how the ATS competes with the 3 series. I'm liking it. I'll be watching the ATS-V news like a hawk.
      NoXenons = 2006330cickid?
      Quote Originally Posted by konigwheels View Post
      Wow, it amazes me that we have children in here that can't read a couple paragraphs. No wonder America's doing so well in education! Can't take the time to read, but sure can find the time to post. Self indulgence at it's finest.

      TL;DR should be banned and changed to ID;CR or I'm dumb, can't read.

    11. Member
      Join Date
      May 15th, 2007
      Location
      Wilmington, DE
      Posts
      12,865
      Vehicles
      2012 Jeep Wrangler
      09-27-2012 07:35 AM #81
      Quote Originally Posted by NoXenons View Post
      XTS doesn't compete with anything BMW has.. even the current SRX is FWD based
      If you are viewing "FWD-based" as a disqualifier for true luxury status, I guess you are dismissing most of Audi's line-up? Audi certainly is a luxury brand, IMO, yet most of their vehicles can be had in FWD only (FrontTrak). Even BMW and Mercedes have or will soon have FWD vehicles in their line-ups? Does this disqualify them as luxury brands? Porsche's upcoming Macan will be based on the Audi Q5, which means both will be FWD-based...just like the Caddy SRX. Land Rover, Lexus, Infiniti, Acura, and Volvo all also have very nice and capable vehicles that are FWD or FWD-based.

      As for the XTS, early sales are showing it to be very competitive with the 5-Series, and E-Class (in the USD market). If you consider how the average mid-size/large luxury sedan owner uses his or her vehicle, what makes you think that the XTS does not measure up well to the Germans? I see a lot of wealthy or socially climbing-types going out to dinner, commuting to work, and dropping the kids off at school in the this class of vehicle. Is the XTS somehow deficient in performing these mundane tasks in reasonable luxury and style? The XTS certainly is'nt going to be anyone's weekend trackday toy, but I doubt if the standard E-Class or 5-Series are spending a lot of time on a track.

    12. Member TangoRed's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 7th, 2005
      Location
      Cincinnati, OH
      Posts
      5,035
      Vehicles
      2010 BMW 528i
      09-27-2012 07:51 AM #82
      Quote Originally Posted by gti5dr06 View Post
      NoXenons = 2006330cickid?
      Throwback.

      But yes they have a similar demeanor.
      Quote Originally Posted by DamienR8 View Post
      in 2038 you will have the ability to think of a car, then your body will actually turn into a car, then you will die in an accident.

    13. Member
      Join Date
      Sep 16th, 2000
      Location
      Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
      Posts
      12,432
      Vehicles
      1994 Land Cruiser
      09-27-2012 07:52 AM #83
      Quote Originally Posted by NoXenons View Post
      Any of these cars would be great to own at the end of the day its just down to personal choice.

      Normally when I ask an Audi owner why they chose their car they point to the so called tacky Fairy Lights at the front of the car.

      When I ask an Mercedes owner they say the finance deal was so much cheaper.

      BMW owners have usually tested all 3 and say they wanted a car that was involving and a real drivers car.

      As an owner of many cars I feel I have the best brand of car you can get and when I see an Audi or Merc know I have the best car.

      Audi Merc and Cadillac drivers in my opinion cannot really say this and must wish they too owned a BMW every time they see one.
      Odd behaviour. I never ask anyone why they bought their car. Two reasons: It's their money and I don't care.

    14. Member curvedinfinity's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 11th, 2004
      Location
      Highway to the danger zone
      Posts
      8,476
      Vehicles
      F14 Tomcat
      10-03-2012 11:13 AM #84
      I was able to drive an ATS 2.5 yesterday -- wow! I really liked the 2.5. It did not seem like a hold-over model. The motor spins up quickly, and seems unstressed. It actually suits the ATS well because the car feels so light and agile. It's not fast, but its plenty for highway and traffic. It reminded me a lot of an E46 330i. The automatic was very good, and the manual mode was quick and precise. I'm not picky about interiors, so I had nothing to complain about. The seats were good and the touch interface didn't bother me. The car was very well put together.

      After driving the 2.5, it might just be the car I'd pick out of the ATS lineup. It seemed like a great package for a commute -- good MPG, quick, agile, and very high quality. The 2.0T would be considerably quicker, but I didn't feel like I was missing any power in the 2.5. -- This coming after just having stepped out of my CTS-V.

      Overall very impressed. This is a GREAT sport sedan.

      edit: Just to toss out some comparisons, the ATS seemed lighter and more agile than the 135i as I remember it, which was then more agile feeling than the E90 335i. Compared to an A4 2.0T as I remember it, the 2.5 is not as fast in a straight line (duh), but everything feels more precise and responsive, including the throttle.

      The ATS' cabin reminded me a lot of my Cruze's in dimensions. It's narrow and tall. The back seats are just big enough for adults, also similar to the Cruze's in dimensions.
      Last edited by curvedinfinity; 10-03-2012 at 11:25 AM.
      Contributing editor at http://becarchic.com and http://speedsportlife.com
      Personal website with contacts: http://curvedinfinity.com
      Shenandoah hot lap 1:46.92: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmYq3mBbwPg

    15. Member
      Join Date
      May 10th, 2006
      Location
      Vancouver/Melbourne
      Posts
      1,241
      Vehicles
      2011 Tiguan Highline, 2012 Mazda CX5 2.0i, 2008 Audi S3 3Dr Manual
      10-03-2012 12:20 PM #85
      This might be an odd question, but has anyone cross-shopped this car with the IS250? (ATS 2.5)
      They both appear to have similar power, though the ATS losses 2 cylinder but gains some MPGs.
      $5K seems to be very steep just to get the CUE, rft + 17" alloys and powered seats for the premium package.

    16. Member curvedinfinity's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 11th, 2004
      Location
      Highway to the danger zone
      Posts
      8,476
      Vehicles
      F14 Tomcat
      10-03-2012 12:44 PM #86
      Quote Originally Posted by too_slow View Post
      This might be an odd question, but has anyone cross-shopped this car with the IS250? (ATS 2.5)
      They both appear to have similar power, though the ATS losses 2 cylinder but gains some MPGs.
      $5K seems to be very steep just to get the CUE, rft + 17" alloys and powered seats for the premium package.
      The closest I've gotten to an IS250 is riding shotgun in Byron's IS-F presser, so take this with a grain of salt, but I'd bet you the IS is softer and spongier all around. The interior of the ATS is a big notch up from the IS, which is to be expected since its brand new.

      The ATS feels really light on its feet. Lighter than my Cruze. Lighter than the 911s I've driven. The closest car I've driven to it in recent memory in terms of "lightness" and front-end response is a Cayman S. Not to say the overall dynamics are on par because I didn't drive it hard, but it's worth saying the controls are precise and effortless.
      Contributing editor at http://becarchic.com and http://speedsportlife.com
      Personal website with contacts: http://curvedinfinity.com
      Shenandoah hot lap 1:46.92: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmYq3mBbwPg

    17. Member BLK9GEN's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 27th, 2001
      Location
      BLC, NV
      Posts
      12,259
      Vehicles
      Official Member of the Masochistic Black Car Owners Club
      10-03-2012 12:45 PM #87
      OT:

      It amazes me how fast dependability/reliability of new cars is improving, especially given their ever-increasing complexity/feature content. Chrysler's rating in 2012 is slightly better than Toyota's rating from 2005, yet most people only see them at the bottom and think "what a piece of crap". Just something to chew on.




      2005 JD Power Dependability Ranking of 2002 automobiles

      Problems per 100 Vehicles
      Lexus 139
      Porsche 149
      Lincoln 151
      Buick 163
      Cadillac 175
      Infiniti 178
      Toyota 194
      Mercury 195
      Honda 201
      Acura 203
      BMW 225
      Ford 231
      Chevrolet 232
      Chrysler 235
      Industry Average 237
      Saturn 240
      Oldsmobile 242
      GMC 245
      Pontiac 245
      Mazda 252
      Hyundai 260
      Subaru 260
      Volvo 266
      Jaguar 268
      Dodge 273
      Nissan 275
      Mitsubishi 278
      Mercedes-Benz 283
      Saab 286
      Jeep 289
      Suzuki 292
      Audi 312
      Daewoo 318
      Isuzu 331
      Volkswagen 335
      MINI 383
      Land Rover 395
      Kia 397
      19-- Willys Jeep * 1989 Cadillac STS * 1991 Ford Escort GT * 1997 Honda Civic EX * 1997 BMW 528i * 1998 Honda CR-V EX * 1999 Acura 3.2 TL * 2000 VW Golf GLS 1.8T * 2001 Land Rover Range Rover 4.6 SE * 2002 VW Passat GLS 1.8T * 2002 Honda Civic EX * 2006 Lexus GS430 * 2006 Honda Pilot EX-L * 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander XLS * 2009 Hyundai Genesis 3.8 * 2010 Kia Forte Koup SX * 2011 Hyundai Sonata SE * 2013 Honda Accord Sport * 2014 Kia Soul

    18. Member
      Join Date
      May 15th, 2007
      Location
      Wilmington, DE
      Posts
      12,865
      Vehicles
      2012 Jeep Wrangler
      10-03-2012 12:45 PM #88
      Quote Originally Posted by too_slow View Post
      This might be an odd question, but has anyone cross-shopped this car with the IS250? (ATS 2.5)
      They both appear to have similar power, though the ATS losses 2 cylinder but gains some MPGs.
      $5K seems to be very steep just to get the CUE, rft + 17" alloys and powered seats for the premium package.
      The ATS 2.5 that I drove also had leather wrapped everything.

    19. Member
      Join Date
      May 10th, 2006
      Location
      Vancouver/Melbourne
      Posts
      1,241
      Vehicles
      2011 Tiguan Highline, 2012 Mazda CX5 2.0i, 2008 Audi S3 3Dr Manual
      10-03-2012 12:50 PM #89
      Thanks whitejeep and curved!
      My mom is looking to replace her 10 year old Legacy GT wagon. We're hoping to get her a small premium car. I think she would prefer the softer ride on the Lexus, but I don't think the ATS is widely available in Canada yet (it's not even on the Canadian website) so I have absolutely nothing to base it on.

      I just happen to remember that the IS is extremely cramped inside. I'm led to believe that a MK4 Jetta is more roomy on the inside.

      It would be cool if they can offer magnetic ride + HIDs as standalone options on the base 2.5. 3.6V6 is a little overkill for her. LOL

    20. Member Mike!'s Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 17th, 2002
      Location
      Ontario & Ohio
      Posts
      12,827
      Vehicles
      2010 Mazda6 GT-I4
      10-03-2012 12:52 PM #90
      I'm surprised by all these glowing reviews on the 2.5. I didn't expect a 200hp na 4-banger to be so impressive.

      As for the IS250, the IS line as a whole is due for replacement next year. It was a small, cramped car when it came out (2006 as a 2007 model, IIRC), with bad ergonomics for tall people like me. I know the ATS isn't a particularly roomy car either, but if the E90 was the benchmark, it should be roomier than the IS at least.

      Per Edmunds:

      ATS
      EPA interior volume: 101.1 cu.f
      Width: 71.1 in.
      Height: 55.9 in.
      Length: 182.8 in.
      Front track: 59.5 in.
      Rear track: 60.9 in.
      Wheel base: 109.3 in.
      Cargo capacity, all seats in place: 10.2 cu.ft.
      Maximum cargo capacity: 10.2 cu.ft.

      Front head room: 38.6 in.
      Front hip room: 53.0 in.
      Front leg room: 42.5 in.
      Front shoulder room: 55.2 in.

      Rear hip Room: 52.3 in.
      Rear head room: 36.8 in.
      Rear leg room: 33.5 in.
      Rear shoulder room: 53.9 in.

      IS
      EPA interior volume: 98.7 cu.ft.
      Width: 70.9 in.
      Height: 55.7 in.
      Length: 180.3 in.
      Ground clearance: 5.7 in.
      Front track: 60.4 in.
      Rear track: 60.4 in.
      Wheel base: 107.5 in.
      Cargo capacity, all seats in place: 13.0 cu.ft.
      Maximum cargo capacity: 13.0 cu.ft.

      Front head room: 37.2 in.
      Front hip room: 54.1 in.
      Front leg room: 43.9 in.
      Front shoulder room: 54.4 in.

      Rear hip Room: 53.7 in.
      Rear head room: 36.7 in.
      Rear leg room: 30.6 in.
      Rear shoulder room: 52.7 in.

      The measurements are somewhat ambiguous as to whether the ATS has a room advantage. Can anyone 6' or taller who's sat in an ATS chime in?

    21. Member curvedinfinity's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 11th, 2004
      Location
      Highway to the danger zone
      Posts
      8,476
      Vehicles
      F14 Tomcat
      10-03-2012 12:56 PM #91
      Quote Originally Posted by too_slow View Post
      Thanks whitejeep and curved!
      My mom is looking to replace her 10 year old Legacy GT wagon. We're hoping to get her a small premium car. I think she would prefer the softer ride on the Lexus, but I don't think the ATS is widely available in Canada yet (it's not even on the Canadian website) so I have absolutely nothing to base it on.

      I just happen to remember that the IS is extremely cramped inside. I'm led to believe that a MK4 Jetta is more roomy on the inside.

      It would be cool if they can offer magnetic ride + HIDs as standalone options on the base 2.5. 3.6V6 is a little overkill for her. LOL
      Going completely off memory, my guess is there is about 1" more width, 2" more headroom, and 1" more rear knee room in the ATS than the IS. I agree the IS was cramped. The rear seats of the ATS were doable for me (6'4"), though my knees were touching the seats. No problem with head room. The IS's rear had my knees bending outwards, and my back hunched to fit.
      Contributing editor at http://becarchic.com and http://speedsportlife.com
      Personal website with contacts: http://curvedinfinity.com
      Shenandoah hot lap 1:46.92: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmYq3mBbwPg

    22. Member curvedinfinity's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 11th, 2004
      Location
      Highway to the danger zone
      Posts
      8,476
      Vehicles
      F14 Tomcat
      10-03-2012 01:17 PM #92
      Looking at the configurator, who am I kidding, the 2.0T is just a bit more money with the MT.

      The 2.5 was just fine though IMO. Kind of makes me wonder what if the 2.5 came in at a lower price point.

      Perhaps the next Camaro will be poverty-spec enough to replace my Cruze. The ATS 2.5 with a Cruze's level of features -- a modern day Nova -- I'd totally be all over that.
      Contributing editor at http://becarchic.com and http://speedsportlife.com
      Personal website with contacts: http://curvedinfinity.com
      Shenandoah hot lap 1:46.92: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmYq3mBbwPg

    23. Member
      Join Date
      Jun 10th, 2000
      Location
      Motown
      Posts
      19,021
      Vehicles
      1957 Testa Rossa
      10-03-2012 02:18 PM #93
      Quote Originally Posted by Mike! View Post
      The measurements are somewhat ambiguous as to whether the ATS has a room advantage. Can anyone 6' or taller who's sat in an ATS chime in?
      No offense, but a COMPACT car should be... well... compact. And that first gen Lexus IS was PERFECT size for me.

      Today's compact is well beyond what compacts were a decade ago so IMHO... I don't want ANY of them to grow any more. Obviously one's opinion of comfort/fitment in a cabin is subjective to a degree and while it might seem tight to you... it is more than adequate for my 5'7" 142lb frame. And there's more than enough in the rear for my girls.

      I highly doubt a 6' footer would have issues in the front since they even make cars like the Spark have plenty of room these days for you folks on the other side of the spectrum. But the reality has always been that if you want more space... you buy the next size up. Otherwise... there would be no such thing as vehicle size classes.

      Today's 7 Series and S Class and A8 are so damn HUGE, because they are being pushed from the bottom end. When a car like that starts pushing over 2 tons... you have to wonder what is going on.

    24. Member
      Join Date
      Jun 10th, 2000
      Location
      Motown
      Posts
      19,021
      Vehicles
      1957 Testa Rossa
      10-03-2012 02:22 PM #94
      Quote Originally Posted by whitejeep1989 View Post
      The ATS 2.5 that I drove also had leather wrapped everything.
      The platform folks were asking us if we could wrap the transmission in leather and we were...

    25. Member Lujess's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 17th, 2011
      Location
      New England, USA European Refugee
      Posts
      448
      Vehicles
      '13 Golf R 4dr CSG
      10-03-2012 02:30 PM #95
      Quote Originally Posted by NoXenons View Post
      BMW owners have usually tested all 3 and say they wanted a car that was involving and a real drivers car.
      From what I see on the road, most BMW drivers bought their car based on status, cachet, etc. and wouldn't know what to do with a real drivers car if it came up and bit them in the a$$...

      Regarding the Buick - don't like the look and especially don't like the size. When did something big enough to eclipse the sun become mid-size?
      ______________________________

      2013 4 Door R - CSG

    26. Member
      Join Date
      May 10th, 2006
      Location
      Vancouver/Melbourne
      Posts
      1,241
      Vehicles
      2011 Tiguan Highline, 2012 Mazda CX5 2.0i, 2008 Audi S3 3Dr Manual
      10-03-2012 02:37 PM #96
      People lease poverty spec 3 series and Mini Coopers here because they are cheaper to lease than a Civic / Accord V6. Not to mention, the 3 year scheduled maintenance (they should just call it 3 free oil changes during the 3 year lease term..) is included with a new lease. Most people do not know that their 323i is RWD either (Saintor, did you know that?)

    27. Member Mike!'s Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 17th, 2002
      Location
      Ontario & Ohio
      Posts
      12,827
      Vehicles
      2010 Mazda6 GT-I4
      10-03-2012 02:54 PM #97
      Quote Originally Posted by uncleho View Post
      No offense, but a COMPACT car should be... well... compact. And that first gen Lexus IS was PERFECT size for me.

      Today's compact is well beyond what compacts were a decade ago so IMHO... I don't want ANY of them to grow any more. Obviously one's opinion of comfort/fitment in a cabin is subjective to a degree and while it might seem tight to you... it is more than adequate for my 5'7" 142lb frame. And there's more than enough in the rear for my girls.

      I highly doubt a 6' footer would have issues in the front since they even make cars like the Spark have plenty of room these days for you folks on the other side of the spectrum. But the reality has always been that if you want more space... you buy the next size up. Otherwise... there would be no such thing as vehicle size classes.

      Today's 7 Series and S Class and A8 are so damn HUGE, because they are being pushed from the bottom end. When a car like that starts pushing over 2 tons... you have to wonder what is going on.
      There's a difference between size and packaging. I'm 6'0, 32" inseam. A 144" long MINI has excellent room for me and no issues getting in or out. A 176" long IS300 had reasonable room for me up front, and no issues getting in or out. A 180" long IS250 has poor room for me up front, and I have to contort my legs in strange ways to get in or out. I actually managed to hurt my knee getting out of the first one I sat in at the NAIAS in 2007, and I really wanted to like that car.

      I don't want the next size class up. I want interior ergonomics that are designed to accommodate me. The current IS just doesn't work for me and many tall people.

    28. Member
      Join Date
      May 15th, 2007
      Location
      Wilmington, DE
      Posts
      12,865
      Vehicles
      2012 Jeep Wrangler
      10-03-2012 03:45 PM #98
      Quote Originally Posted by curvedinfinity View Post
      Looking at the configurator, who am I kidding, the 2.0T is just a bit more money with the MT.

      The 2.5 was just fine though IMO. Kind of makes me wonder what if the 2.5 came in at a lower price point.

      Perhaps the next Camaro will be poverty-spec enough to replace my Cruze. The ATS 2.5 with a Cruze's level of features -- a modern day Nova -- I'd totally be all over that.
      I think the Chevy Code 130 concept is the car you are looking for. It's about the size of a BMW 1-Series, and based on a shortened version of the ATS Alpha platform. RWD, lightweight, and powered by a range of turbo 4 cylinders.

    29. Member rynodyno312's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 20th, 2012
      Location
      Orange County, CA
      Posts
      3,774
      Vehicles
      2013 Civic SI, 2011 EX35
      10-03-2012 04:06 PM #99
      Quote Originally Posted by whitejeep1989 View Post
      I think the Chevy Code 130 concept is the car you are looking for. It's about the size of a BMW 1-Series, and based on a shortened version of the ATS Alpha platform. RWD, lightweight, and powered by a range of turbo 4 cylinders.
      I highly doubt that will see production, or that anything like it will make production. The next camaro will be on the same Alpha platform, and I don't see Chevy selling 2 RWD coupes that would probably overlap in price based on trim levels.

      It is a very cool concept, though, and it would be neat if they actually did produce it.

    30. Member
      Join Date
      May 15th, 2007
      Location
      Wilmington, DE
      Posts
      12,865
      Vehicles
      2012 Jeep Wrangler
      10-03-2012 04:20 PM #100
      Quote Originally Posted by uncleho View Post
      The platform folks were asking us if we could wrap the transmission in leather and we were...
      Driving this leather lined car made me miss Pontiac. I am not really a luxury car kind of person. I prefer an honest and simple car without a lot of pretense. The ATS is a great car, but I'd like this platform without the leather, infotainment, and even the relatively few bits of chrome. This car would have been the replacement for the G6. Pity we will never see such a capable car but at Pontiac prices.

    Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •