Definitely the IS300
#36
#38
Owned an 03 B6 A4 Avant 1.8tq for a while and it was a decent car but bored me to ****ing tears. Had a nice interior but it didn't hold up well at all, peeling soft touch plastic all over the place just like my VW. Only driven an IS briefly but it gets my vote without a doubt.
PSN:Jae304
#39
How can you afford a 2004 A4 1.8Tq and not a newer 9-3Is the resale that bad for B6s? WORSE than the forgotten small sedan from a defunct niche carmaker?
Also... can you afford an early A3 2.0T? A lot more fun than the B6/B7 to drive, with better mpg. Reliability can be spotty just like the B6.
Last edited by S4cabriofox; 09-30-2012 at 02:02 AM.
#40
Have known two people that have owned a is300. They both no longer do.
Instrument panel and shift knob are
But all I can say is it has good looks, but its an average car with below average fuel economy.
Make up for that bad fuel economy and try to get the super duper rare is300 wagon..
so atleast you wont feel bad wasting gas since your driving something so rare![]()
#41
#42
I'm suspecting that if you drive with a light foot fuel economy won't be too bad (24-26mpg). I don't like the looks of the wagon and prefer the sedan, which is still quite rare anyway.
Maybe fuel economy is so bad because the power and torque on the engine happens at lower RPMs.
#43
#44
#45
Across all my fill ups my maximum has been 27.2 mpg and my lowest has been 23.5 mpg. I have no doubt that the manual transmission will regularly post better numbers than the automatics, but I've hardly been 'behaving' with mine to see what I can really get out of it.
Highway driving at ~70mph, the engine is turning 3000rpm - no need to change down to overtake, and it's not drony or uncomfortable, but it's not nearly as efficient as it could be.
The IS is a great option if you want something smaller that comes alive when you're in a spirited mood, but is comfortable and refined when you're not. Those complaining of low power must not have had enough time to grow used to how to use what power is available; I have yet to find it lacking and would argue it's far better balanced in the power/tq area than some give it credit for. There's still enough car there to get you into serious trouble, but not so much that you can't exploit 80-90% of it in a reasonably confident fashion.
Last edited by VierSpeed; 09-30-2012 at 02:38 PM.
█ ♣ █....|....├┼┤....|....Get off the Internet and back in the garage - Air and water do mix
2002 Acura RSX » 2001 Impreza 2.5RS » 1996 BMW 328is M-Sport » 2000 Impreza 2.5RSTi » 1999 Mustang GT » 2002 Lexus IS300
#46
Given your list of priorities, why these two cars? Why not something that will check your high priority boxes better but still be more fun to drive than a regular family sedan, like a Maxima or a 1st gen TSX?
#47
#48
id get the is, my friend in high school had a 3.0 b6 a4 and the maintenance was a nightmare.
plus, you know...
#49
#50
Late Model 2006 Infiniti G35 with a 6 speed.
Do it. Shop and you can probably find one cheaper:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2006-...#ht_500wt_1151
![]()
#51
I don't necessarily agree... All Wheel Drive, and a Turbo with a lot of cheap tuning potential sets it aside from a regular Front Wheel Drive sedan. I'm not saying it's extremely exciting, but I wouldn't call it regular. If someone sees you pull up in an Audi, they'll be a lot more impressed than if you pull up in a Maxima. Same goes for the Acura, but to a lesser extent.
#52
Last edited by NoXenons; 09-30-2012 at 11:36 PM.
#53
I ran into the same thing when I cross-shopped these same cars; insurance on the IS300 was going to be INSANE. I have no idea why but you should at least get a quote before you buy anything. The raging debates about maintenance costs are going to be moot if the Lexus costs an extra $1000/yr just to keep on the road.
#54
Yep, '01. I forgot that I replaced the headlights a couple years before I sold it. There was a TSB about condensation on early '01s that I missed, and mine developed it after 90k miles or something. They were ~$400 or thereabouts (buy Toyota parts as opposed to Lexus parts). As far as yellowing lenses are concerned, my originals never did, but the car was garage-kept and I waxed the lenses.
I sold it because my brother moved out of the country and gave me his '07 Outback Sport. I already had the IS and a Boxster, and the IS had the most miles and was going to need shocks relatively soon... stupid decision. It was also the best, by far, out of those three cars.
#55
#56
Hey! That's my car!
Anyways, yes, the silver/grey B6s all had the bumper match difference. Sort of a drawback to those colors, but the white/black/blue/reds didn't have as noticeable an effect.
As for which car to buy, well, I wrote this up earlier this year regarding my experiences with my B6 ... good car, recently let it go at 150k mile, but it's a solid daily for someone who lives in an area with a winter snowfall.
Originally Posted by seadoo2006
#57
I would have bought another IS300 if they didn't screw up the looks (IMO) with the IS250/IS350. I loved and miss mine.
That I6 was so quiet that you'd forget the car was running at idle.
Build quality was excellent, the only problems I ever had was rust from a bad repair and a squirrel that managed to gnaw on some electric cables.
I got 24-25mpg regularly.
The trunk was small though and the seats don't drop in the sedan.
**** JUST GOT CHAEL
#58
Lol!
I vote IS. Used cars are a gamble anyway- and Audis aren't the most durable vehicles. I have no qualms with the 1.8t engine, but everything around it seems to need constant maintenance or repair.
For a drive to work, low-hassle beater, the lighter, RWD, Lexus IS300 sounds more fun, more reliable, lower risk- a better value.
#59
IS300 if you can find one unmolested