Username or Email Address
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up

    VWVortex


    The Car Lounge
    Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
    Results 1 to 25 of 50

    Thread: Inside Line Full Test: 2013 Cadillac ATS 2.0T

    1. Senior Member Mazda 3s's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 12th, 2003
      Location
      Garner, NC
      Posts
      21,477
      Vehicles
      2013 VW Jetta Sportwagen TDI, 2013 Hyundai Elantra Limited
      10-01-2012 02:31 AM #1
      What Works (pros):
      Capable, predictable chassis; rewarding to drive hard; well-finished interior.

      What Needs Work (cons):
      Questionable fuel economy; uninspiring engine sounds; CUE needs knobs.

      Bottom Line:
      Proof that a great sport sedan is more than just a great chassis.


      There's little point in building a sport sedan to compete against the BMW 3 Series if the car isn't capable of measuring up to the German car's handling standards. The Cadillac has the hardware to do so, as it features a MacPherson strut front suspension and a five-link rear suspension. GM's magnetorheological dampers are also part of the package when the car is fitted with the FE3 suspension package like this test car, and there are two damping modes: Sport and Tour.

      With our test car, we found the Tour damping setting to be adequate in nearly every situation, even hard driving on imperfect roads. Sport mode is tuned for surfaces so smooth that they must exist only in the dreams of enthusiasts (or perhaps freshly paved racetracks). You'll be punished with ride harshness when you select Sport mode on most roads, and we found that the Tour setting provides adequate body control without the awfulness. The ATS's best slalom speed of 69.1 mph — better than the speed set by the 328i — was achieved in Tour, which also delivered better stability during rapid transitions.
      http://www.insideline.com/cadillac/a...full-test.html
      "Of course that's just my opinion; I could be wrong."

      Quote Originally Posted by The Igneous Faction
      Have you ever popped the hood on a powerstroke E350?
      Quote Originally Posted by WhistlerYOW
      No, I got good grades in school

    2. 10-01-2012 02:46 AM #2
      According to Edmunds this was a full test of the ATS, but it sounded more like a comparison. I hate when manufacturers do this especially when the car they are comparing it to is not there and they are just pulling information from their database. If you're going to do a full test on a car do it and tell us how it does on its own right then and there. If you are going to compare cars make sure both are there at the same time, otherwise there are too many variables like driver, weather, altitude, roads, tracks, etc... to be able to make a fair and honest comparison.

    3. 10-01-2012 03:22 AM #3
      the voice commands on the cue system make knobs unneeded for the most part. looks like a good car and a seriously strong entry from anything american. should be interesting to see how it drives.

    4. Member czykvw's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 10th, 2006
      Location
      oc, ca
      Posts
      2,341
      10-01-2012 04:33 AM #4
      Love everything but the headlights..

    5. Member overst33r's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 18th, 2006
      Location
      Tampa, FL
      Posts
      2,409
      Vehicles
      S2000 v3
      10-01-2012 09:50 AM #5
      23mpg all highway? That's terrible.


      135
      ╠╬╬╗
      246 R

    6. Member curvedinfinity's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 11th, 2004
      Location
      Highway to the danger zone
      Posts
      8,709
      Vehicles
      F14 Tomcat
      10-01-2012 10:15 AM #6
      I'm pretty sure I'd be happy with an ATS.

    7. 10-01-2012 10:25 AM #7
      Quote Originally Posted by mariok2006 View Post
      23mpg all highway? That's terrible.
      Agreed, but I still want it!

    8. Member Dr. Woo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 28th, 2003
      Location
      Hampton, VA
      Posts
      3,992
      Vehicles
      '03 S2K '12 Focus
      10-01-2012 11:08 AM #8
      Quote Originally Posted by AudiVwMeister View Post
      the voice commands on the cue system make knobs unneeded for the most part. looks like a good car and a seriously strong entry from anything american. should be interesting to see how it drives.
      People complain about the busy-ness of the 2012 Focus' dash, but I hardly ever use the buttons when I can flick a switch on the steering wheel and say "Call Charlie at work" or "Play artist Kasabian."
      ├┼┤2003 S2000 | 2012 Focus SE Sport (2011-2014) | 2009 G8 GT (2011-2011) | 2008 R32 (2007-2011) | 2006 GTI (2006-2007) | 2001 A4 (2002-2006)
      SAVETHERING

    9. Member TangoRed's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 7th, 2005
      Location
      Cincinnati, OH
      Posts
      6,131
      Vehicles
      2010 BMW 528i
      10-01-2012 11:21 AM #9
      Quote Originally Posted by AudiVwMeister View Post
      the voice commands on the cue system make knobs unneeded for the most part. looks like a good car and a seriously strong entry from anything american. should be interesting to see how it drives.
      I still don't think this is an excuse for a non-intuitive interface.The MyFord Touch people say the same thing. Some of us don't like using voice commands, especially if there's other people in the car having a conversation.
      Quote Originally Posted by Doug Butabi View Post
      And on the tenth day of the two thousand fifteenth year, TCL finds out about rich people.

    10. Member Calcvictim's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 16th, 2011
      Location
      most likely at work
      Posts
      867
      Vehicles
      2006 Miata
      10-01-2012 11:27 AM #10
      Quote Originally Posted by mariok2006 View Post
      23mpg all highway? That's terrible.
      I honestly have a very hard time believing that figure, my Maxima(2002) which has a much bigger engine, older technology and a 4 speed auto gets 30mpg all highway....how would this car get 23?

    11. Member MCTB's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 29th, 2005
      Location
      The Northern of Virginia
      Posts
      10,365
      Vehicles
      '12 Focus SE, '15 Outback Limited
      10-01-2012 11:30 AM #11
      Quote Originally Posted by TangoRed View Post
      I still don't think this is an excuse for a non-intuitive interface.The MyFord Touch people say the same thing. Some of us don't like using voice commands, especially if there's other people in the car having a conversation.
      Having the Sync package in my Focus, I agree. Even though there is voice command, it never works 100% of the time. You need knobs and such for any system like this because it will never work perfectly for everybody. I feel bad for the people with the MyTouch system. It really is crap.


      I like this car though. Looking like it could be a good move from Cadillac. My question though is what the buyers will think. Could this be the next Cimarron?
      Last edited by MCTB; 10-01-2012 at 11:44 AM.
      Looking for a car event on the East Coast? Check here

      I have an idea, we will try it my way first...and then we will finish.

      MCFC

    12. Geriatric Member Turbio!'s Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 21st, 2005
      Location
      San Antonio, TX
      Posts
      41,509
      Vehicles
      '13 Subaru Outback
      10-01-2012 11:35 AM #12
      Quote Originally Posted by mariok2006 View Post
      23mpg all highway? That's terrible.
      I'm really, really skeptical that it returns that kind of fuel economy. Really.
      IPRO Meat-Director and High Minister of Terror-Grilling

      Quote Originally Posted by Marshmallow Man View Post
      The Terror Grill: Part restaurant, part amusement attraction, part gladiator arena, all profit.
      ARE YOU NOT SATIATED?!?!?!

    13. Senior Member JustinCSVT's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 3rd, 2004
      Location
      Atlanta, GA
      Posts
      20,724
      Vehicles
      2013 Mustang Boss 302
      10-01-2012 11:44 AM #13
      Quote Originally Posted by Turbio! View Post
      I'm really, really skeptical that it returns that kind of fuel economy. Really.
      THey must have been doing 100+mph on all of their highway drives.

    14. Geriatric Member AKADriver's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 20th, 2001
      Location
      Unreal VA
      Posts
      41,416
      Vehicles
      Mazda2
      10-01-2012 11:49 AM #14
      This engine is just another incarnation of the LNF/LDK, isn't it?

      Edmunds observed 19.3mpg in the Buick Regal GS which has basically identical engine specs (but weighs 300lb more). They saw 25.0 in the 328i.
      Splinter - Team Post-Killing Ninja
      I don't practice llanteria

    15. Member PlatinumGLS's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 2nd, 2003
      Location
      Shelby Township, MI
      Posts
      15,705
      Vehicles
      7.4, 5.7 & 5.3
      10-01-2012 12:16 PM #15
      Within a year of having the Regal 2.0T, we saw our average fuel economy increase by about 3 MPG with the same type of driving. Wonder if other owners of GM 2.0T vehicles have noticed the same...

    16. Senior Member Air and water do mix's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 5th, 2004
      Location
      Southern Indiana
      Posts
      25,330
      Vehicles
      '66 Beetle (X2) '08 Fit
      10-01-2012 12:24 PM #16
      Quote Originally Posted by mariok2006 View Post
      23mpg all highway? That's terrible.
      Hammer time.

      Seriously. You know they had to be pounding that thing.
      Quote Originally Posted by Boyz in da Park
      Proletariat, Bourgeoise - Everybody smellin' my potpourri...

    17. Geriatric Member Turbio!'s Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 21st, 2005
      Location
      San Antonio, TX
      Posts
      41,509
      Vehicles
      '13 Subaru Outback
      10-01-2012 12:33 PM #17
      Quote Originally Posted by JustinCSVT View Post
      THey must have been doing 100+mph on all of their highway drives.
      Yep. But "We flogged the bitch like a rented mule and it only returned 23mpg omgwtflol" doesn't really make for good copy.
      IPRO Meat-Director and High Minister of Terror-Grilling

      Quote Originally Posted by Marshmallow Man View Post
      The Terror Grill: Part restaurant, part amusement attraction, part gladiator arena, all profit.
      ARE YOU NOT SATIATED?!?!?!

    18. Member c615586's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 7th, 2009
      Location
      Upper Arlington, OH
      Posts
      425
      Vehicles
      2007 Audi RS4, 2008 BMW Z4M, 2010 Audi Q5 S-line
      10-01-2012 01:26 PM #18


      Seems like there's plenty of redundant buttons on the steering wheel.

      Besides navigation stuff, the only thing I change multiple times in typical driving is the volume/radio station, which is on the right hand side of the wheel and cruise control when I'm on the highway, which is on the left. Maybe I'll adjust the climate control when I first get in, but usually that's a set and forget sort of situation.

      If the cue system has good enough voice recognition, you probably don't need to physically interact with the touch screen or center stack all that much.
      Last edited by c615586; 10-01-2012 at 01:33 PM.

    19. Member
      Join Date
      May 15th, 2007
      Location
      Wilmington, DE
      Posts
      13,797
      Vehicles
      2012 Jeep Wrangler
      10-01-2012 01:36 PM #19
      In The Wall Street Journal, Dan Neil reviewed the ATS 3.6. He gave it a largely glowing review, but at the end bitched about how loud the 3.6 is and its lack of refined sound. He said the sound was so awful that it was a "black hole" that basically ruins the entire car. I've been in and around CTSes with this engine, and have never been bothered by it's sound. One just drove past me at lunch and sounded fine. Anyone here ever been bothered by the sound of it, or is this Ole' Dan making a GM-hating mountain out of a mole hill?

      From WSJ:
      http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/f...-close-113661/

      So the ATS is a little more venturesome in design than the BMW 3-series and, surprisingly, a little more fun to helm. Does that make it a better car? Well, no.

      The ATS's major flaw—and it's practically a black hole that devours the rest of the car—is the 3.6-liter's low-speed, low-rpm powertrain noise. Wow. That sounds terrible! The injectors rattle like a sewing machine that's lost a cog. As soon as you pick up the throttle and the revs rise above around four grand, the induction, valve-train and exhaust notes come together in a rising, melodic chirr, and at full throttle, shuffling up through the gears, the powertrain sounds amazing (0-60 mph in 5.4 seconds). But in a parking lot, it sounds like my old Chevette. Ai.

      So, not perfect, but again, compelling, daring and, here and there, outrageous. I like those words better than the musty old "Standard of the World" anyway. Cadillac is not the standard anymore. It's the challenger. And the ATS is, well, challenging.
      Last edited by whitejeep1989; 10-01-2012 at 01:42 PM.

    20. 10-01-2012 01:40 PM #20
      Nice car, but it won't be the benchmark of the segment. Not the best transmission, not the best engine, not the best economy and by far not the best price.

    21. Member
      Join Date
      May 15th, 2007
      Location
      Wilmington, DE
      Posts
      13,797
      Vehicles
      2012 Jeep Wrangler
      10-01-2012 01:45 PM #21
      Quote Originally Posted by koko12 View Post
      Nice car, but it won't be the benchmark of the segment. Not the best transmission, not the best engine, not the best economy and by far not the best price.
      Most reviewers have placed the ATS as being slightly better than or on par with the 3-Series. That's pretty darned close for Caddy's first real attempt! They certainly have done better than Lexus, Infiniti, Mercedes, Acura, or Audi have done with several generations of development. In this case, being a disputed number 2 is far better than not even being on medal podium.

    22. Senior Member FlashRedGLS1.8T's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 17th, 2001
      Location
      Ohio
      Posts
      21,957
      10-01-2012 01:47 PM #22
      Quote Originally Posted by AKADriver View Post
      They saw 25.0 in the 328i.


      But it only has 240hp.

    23. Member compy222's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 7th, 2005
      Location
      Pothole, MI
      Posts
      15,056
      Vehicles
      2003 Miata SE, 2003 Honda S2000, 2007 Honda Fit Sport
      10-01-2012 02:03 PM #23
      Quote Originally Posted by Turbio! View Post
      I'm really, really skeptical that it returns that kind of fuel economy. Really.
      see below.

      Quote Originally Posted by JustinCSVT View Post
      THey must have been doing 100+mph on all of their highway drives.
      Quote Originally Posted by capsaicin View Post
      AP1 S2000? I can not in good conscience talk you out of that. May your slip angle be great and your bed not be the couch!

    24. Geriatric Member AKADriver's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 20th, 2001
      Location
      Unreal VA
      Posts
      41,416
      Vehicles
      Mazda2
      10-01-2012 03:26 PM #24
      Quote Originally Posted by FlashRedGLS1.8T View Post


      But it only has 240hp.
      240 BMWpower, which is like 270 by anyone else's numbers.
      Splinter - Team Post-Killing Ninja
      I don't practice llanteria

    25. 10-01-2012 03:44 PM #25
      Most review have done exactly what Inside Line is doing which is test the car alone then compare it to cars they have tested on other instances which is to say it's not really a comparison at all. There hasn't been any back to back comparison with any of those cars you mentioned. What's more they are all aging designs with new, improved models just around the corner.

    Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •