VWVortex.com - MT: 2012-2013 Family sedan showdown
Username or Email Address
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up

    VWVortex


    The Car Lounge
    Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
    Results 101 to 125 of 156

    Thread: MT: 2012-2013 Family sedan showdown

    1. Member clutchrider's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 10th, 2010
      Location
      Connecticut
      Posts
      5,040
      Vehicles
      2012 GLI
      10-02-2012 12:14 PM #101
      Quote Originally Posted by 2.0_Mazda View Post
      MT says 35.4 for the Cruze rear leg room
      Yeah I screwed that one up, was looking at a different car. It's been a crazy morning, got some random scam call from someone claiming to be from fidelity wanting me to fax them my wire information to complete a transfer.

    2. Senior Member Sporin's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 17th, 1999
      Location
      Vermont, USA
      Posts
      26,063
      Vehicles
      '10 Prius & '05 4Runner
      10-02-2012 12:24 PM #102
      Quote Originally Posted by Aw614 View Post
      I think a lot of camry buyers are repeat buyers, a friend of mine has like 4 in his household all different generations
      Yeah, I've owned a number of Hondas (multiple Accords and Civics) and always was very happy with them. Add in a great local dealer and some it's unlikely I'd bother to look much further.

    3. Senior Member Mazda 3s's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 12th, 2003
      Location
      Garner, NC
      Posts
      21,902
      Vehicles
      2013 VW Jetta Sportwagen TDI, 2013 Hyundai Elantra Limited
      10-02-2012 12:46 PM #103
      Quote Originally Posted by Aw614 View Post
      I think a lot of camry buyers are repeat buyers, a friend of mine has like 4 in his household all different generations
      Sounds like my in-laws. They'ved owned nothing but Toyotas for the past two decades:

      '89 Corolla Wagon
      '96 Camry LE
      '01 Camry LE
      '05 Camry LE
      '10 Camry LE

      My MiL always gets the newest one, and my FiL takes her old one; so she's now driving the '10 and he's dring her old '05.
      "Of course that's just my opinion; I could be wrong."

      Quote Originally Posted by The Igneous Faction
      Have you ever popped the hood on a powerstroke E350?
      Quote Originally Posted by WhistlerYOW
      No, I got good grades in school

    4. Member GTRaavv's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 4th, 2009
      Posts
      6,887
      Vehicles
      2013 Range Rover Evoque
      10-02-2012 12:53 PM #104
      Quote Originally Posted by Turbio! View Post
      I find it appalling just how much GM ****ed up the Malibu and its intro. I usually defend GM and praise it when it does well, but the Malibu is a dud. Introducing the Eco early was dumb, making it this small was dumb, trying to maintain both it and the Impala was dumb...they just completely ****ed it this this time around. It doesn't even look that great - in person, the tails look big and cheap and the front end is too tall.
      Wait wut? Keeping the Impala was dumb?!?! The Malibu/Impala combo sells more than any other midsize/fullsize combo several months out of the year. Even subtracting fleet sales and the Impala sells better than most "fullsize" sedans.

    5. Member
      Join Date
      May 15th, 2007
      Location
      Wilmington, DE
      Posts
      14,475
      Vehicles
      2012 Jeep Wrangler
      10-02-2012 12:57 PM #105
      Quote Originally Posted by jwaters943 View Post
      All this bitching about rear leg room is a bit overblown. I'm 6'1" and fit in the back of my Sonata. Sure, there isn't ample space, but I fit without any real issues and it only has 34.6" of rear leg room.
      So true. Honestly, smaller kids are going to riding in the backseat most of the time, other than the occasional jaunts with coworkers out to lunch. If your kids are too big for the back of a Malibu, the extra two inches of legroom in the Passat probably won't matter much. A full sized sedan or SUV might be a better choice for hauling around 6ft+ kids.

      It's funny how most other threads here complain about cars getting bigger with every generation, yet when GM takes the Malibu off of the growth hormone race, it gets smacked in the face.

    6. Geriatric Member Turbio!'s Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 21st, 2005
      Location
      Colorado Springs, CO
      Posts
      42,569
      Vehicles
      '13 Subaru Outback
      10-02-2012 01:05 PM #106
      Quote Originally Posted by GTRaavv View Post
      Wait wut? Keeping the Impala was dumb?!?! The Malibu/Impala combo sells more than any other midsize/fullsize combo several months out of the year. Even subtracting fleet sales and the Impala sells better than most "fullsize" sedans.
      One vehicle, straddling the difference between the Malibu and Impala's sizes (say, like the Passat), would do a better job of hitting the circa-2012 midsize sedan sweet spot than both of them do together. I wouldn't have killed the Impala, though. The Impala should have been a RWD halo pimpmobile, and the Malibu should have taken over the FWD basic sedan role that it currently shares.

      I think GM ****ed up by trying to differentiate the Malibu that much from the Impala sizewise, and I think they did that to try to sell it in global markets.
      IPRO Meat-Director and High Minister of Terror-Grilling

      Quote Originally Posted by Marshmallow Man View Post
      The Terror Grill: Part restaurant, part amusement attraction, part gladiator arena, all profit.
      ARE YOU NOT SATIATED?!?!?!

    7. Swallow Doretti
      Guest
      10-02-2012 01:25 PM #107
      Quote Originally Posted by whitejeep1989 View Post
      It's funny how most other threads here complain about cars getting bigger with every generation, yet when GM takes the Malibu off of the growth hormone race, it gets smacked in the face.
      Well, the Malibu isn't exactly smaller than the car it replaces--it's roughly the same footprint. The bigger problem is weight--the new 'Bu is a full 200 lbs heavier than the next-heaviest Accord, and roughly 350 lbs more than some of the class featherweights like the Altima. All that extra weight hurts fuel economy and handling, and it's probably one of GM's biggest issues across model ranges right now (a fully-loaded Cruze is roughly the same weight as an Altima).

    8. Member vdub10golf's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 22nd, 2010
      Location
      Denver, CO
      Posts
      1,485
      Vehicles
      '15 GTI Autobahn
      10-02-2012 01:26 PM #108
      My vote would've been for the Fusion. The Passat is not bad either but it's just too bland.

    9. Senior Member Mazda 3s's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 12th, 2003
      Location
      Garner, NC
      Posts
      21,902
      Vehicles
      2013 VW Jetta Sportwagen TDI, 2013 Hyundai Elantra Limited
      10-02-2012 01:42 PM #109
      Quote Originally Posted by whitejeep1989 View Post
      It's funny how most other threads here complain about cars getting bigger with every generation, yet when GM takes the Malibu off of the growth hormone race, it gets smacked in the face.
      Errr, the new Malibu is only a half an inch shorter than the old one, but took a 4" cut to the wheelbase impacting interior room. So it's not like the new one is somehow a much smaller vehicle on the outside.

      That being said, my supposedly has 34.6" of rear legroom, but the back seat is still cavernous (I'm 5'11):

      "Of course that's just my opinion; I could be wrong."

      Quote Originally Posted by The Igneous Faction
      Have you ever popped the hood on a powerstroke E350?
      Quote Originally Posted by WhistlerYOW
      No, I got good grades in school

    10. 10-02-2012 01:55 PM #110
      Quote Originally Posted by InfinitiG View Post
      I have to agree, especially after reading the article. Despite not liking the CVT, they also praised and really liked the Altima's ride and handling. It was the quickest and got the best MPGs. They loved the interior and said it had the best mix of gadgets/technology and user-friendliness (hi Ford).t.
      CVT is great with the V6.....really very similar to a normal auto.

    11. Member Ross1013's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 25th, 2012
      Location
      NoVA
      Posts
      11,428
      Vehicles
      2009 Si sedan, 2012 Crosstour 4WD
      10-02-2012 02:03 PM #111
      Quote Originally Posted by whitejeep1989 View Post
      It's funny how most other threads here complain about cars getting bigger with every generation, yet when GM takes the Malibu off of the growth hormone race, it gets smacked in the face.
      That's because companies like Honda can make their cars smaller AND lighter, while simultaneously increasing interior room.

    12. Member GTRaavv's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 4th, 2009
      Posts
      6,887
      Vehicles
      2013 Range Rover Evoque
      10-02-2012 02:09 PM #112
      Quote Originally Posted by Turbio! View Post
      One vehicle, straddling the difference between the Malibu and Impala's sizes (say, like the Passat), would do a better job of hitting the circa-2012 midsize sedan sweet spot than both of them do together. I wouldn't have killed the Impala, though. The Impala should have been a RWD halo pimpmobile, and the Malibu should have taken over the FWD basic sedan role that it currently shares.
      But plenty of other brands have a FWD fullsize flagship sedan to sit on top of their midsize sedan. Ford, Toyota, Nissan, Hyundai, Kia - they all follow this same pattern. Only Chrysler has a RWD halo pimpmobile, which doesn't sell in nearly the same ballpark as the Impala. And Chevy is getting a RWD halo pimpmobile as well - 2014 SS.

      I think GM ****ed up by trying to differentiate the Malibu that much from the Impala sizewise, and I think they did that to try to sell it in global markets.
      I agree the Malibu should be on the LWB Epsilon platform rather than SWB without a doubt. But you say "****ed up" like they had a choice. Unfortunately GM had to make the Opel-developed Epsilon platform work for 2 sedans. It wasn't like they had a huge pile of cash on hand to develop a new platform and could do so in the time given. And unfortunately, the Epsilon 2 platform is not only heavy as hell, but the SWB version is too small for American paper comparison tests. They kinda of made the best out of a bad situation, and at least were able to add some length to the Impala to address the LaCrosse trunk size issues.

      However, GM might end up lucking out in this situation and not have to take a wash until a redesign in 2018. While straddling classes has long been a GM weakness, the midsize sedan class is starting to play second fiddle to the compact sedan class in the US and maybe a shakeup could be in store. By all accounts so far the 2014 Impala looks to be a real solid effort. Having a flashier Impala take over retail sales from higher optioned Malibus might work this time around, especially since the Impala will be equipped with a 4 cyclinder. Shift Impala fleet sales to the Malibu, where rear seat size won't be such a "deal breaker" and the 2 sedans could net a very healthy amount of sales.

    13. Member
      Join Date
      May 10th, 2010
      Location
      North Jersey
      Posts
      14,133
      Vehicles
      2016 Tiguan SE 4Motion
      10-02-2012 02:28 PM #113
      Quote Originally Posted by Ross1013 View Post
      That's because companies like Honda can make their cars smaller AND lighter, while simultaneously increasing interior room.
      Except, in 2008, the new accord didn't get smaller on the outside to increase interior room.... the accord went huge
      Modding... it's a disease that can only be cured by buying a Toyota

    14. Member Ross1013's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 25th, 2012
      Location
      NoVA
      Posts
      11,428
      Vehicles
      2009 Si sedan, 2012 Crosstour 4WD
      10-02-2012 03:07 PM #114
      Quote Originally Posted by BsickPassat View Post
      Except, in 2008, the new accord didn't get smaller on the outside to increase interior room.... the accord went huge
      That was 2008. The 2013 car is shorter, lighter, and has more interior room than the 2008-12 car.

      What also happened was that in 2008 the Accord Coupe and sedan diverged. The 7th-gen Accord coupe has a larger trunk and more passenger volume than the 8th-gen. The coupe stood pat while the sedan grew, in order to better diversify.

    15. Member
      Join Date
      May 10th, 2010
      Location
      North Jersey
      Posts
      14,133
      Vehicles
      2016 Tiguan SE 4Motion
      10-02-2012 03:37 PM #115
      Quote Originally Posted by Ross1013 View Post
      That was 2008. The 2013 car is shorter, lighter, and has more interior room than the 2008-12 car.

      What also happened was that in 2008 the Accord Coupe and sedan diverged. The 7th-gen Accord coupe has a larger trunk and more passenger volume than the 8th-gen. The coupe stood pat while the sedan grew, in order to better diversify.
      the 2013, compared to 2012, gets:
      more trunk space
      less front head room
      less front hip room
      more front shoulder room
      less rear head room
      more rear hip room
      more rear leg room

      Not exactly supporting the claim you made.

      The smaller exterior dimensioned Camry is a little tighter up front, but provides a little larger space in the back....

      Technically, the smaller Camry, when it was "redesigned" kept virtually the same exterior dimensions while increasing space inside, mostly to the rear passenger compartment.

      So... honda has some packaging work to do.
      Modding... it's a disease that can only be cured by buying a Toyota

    16. Member Ross1013's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 25th, 2012
      Location
      NoVA
      Posts
      11,428
      Vehicles
      2009 Si sedan, 2012 Crosstour 4WD
      10-02-2012 03:40 PM #116
      Quote Originally Posted by BsickPassat View Post
      the 2013, compared to 2012, gets:
      more trunk space
      less front head room
      less front hip room
      more front shoulder room
      less rear head room
      more rear hip room
      more rear leg room

      Not exactly supporting the claim you made.
      Not exactly refuting it either.

      The new Accord is smaller exterior-wise than the 2008-12, correct?

    17. Member gti5dr06's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 28th, 2006
      Posts
      2,177
      Vehicles
      2014 Cappuccino shawty, 2016 White Panda
      10-02-2012 04:12 PM #117
      Quote Originally Posted by Ross1013 View Post
      Not exactly refuting it either.

      The new Accord is smaller exterior-wise than the 2008-12, correct?
      i have an 08 and the biggest change apart from the visual (appears much smaller) and is in actuality on paper, is the trunk space, and rear leg room. I suppose it helps that the looks much better too. For the areas that it got smaller, I didn't notice those as at all compared to the console compartment which is just tiny now. Where did the hell did all the space go to?
      Quote Originally Posted by konigwheels View Post
      Wow, it amazes me that we have children in here that can't read a couple paragraphs. No wonder America's doing so well in education! Can't take the time to read, but sure can find the time to post. Self indulgence at it's finest.

      TL;DR should be banned and changed to ID;CR or I'm dumb, can't read.

    18. Banned WhistlerYOW's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 14th, 2004
      Posts
      10,165
      10-02-2012 08:32 PM #118
      Quote Originally Posted by eweu View Post
      And here is a pic of the Passat's rear seat



      You could drive a tank right through there. It's enormous. That's a huge selling point right there.
      They must be using a Polish supplier.

    19. 10-02-2012 09:22 PM #119
      How in the world is the Altima short on interior space? I have witnessed my 6'2" father adjust the drivers seat to his position and then sit behind it more than comfortably; there is ample space in the interior of the Altima. The only thing the Altima is short on is memory seating...

    20. Banned Saintor's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 27th, 2003
      Posts
      9,572
      10-02-2012 09:23 PM #120
      Quote Originally Posted by sforsancho View Post

      PS Making up nicknames like that make you seem very, very biased.
      On what planet have you been living. I *AM* very, very biased.

      Fact IMO is that the Passat won many comparos with a strong non-written argument (among others), the onctuous sonority of its I5 (typically hated here) that sounds like a sweet 6 cyl.

    21. Member thunderbird1100's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 12th, 2006
      Location
      Atlanta
      Posts
      2,091
      Vehicles
      2014 Honda Accord Sport
      10-03-2012 01:20 AM #121
      Quote Originally Posted by BostonB6 View Post
      No, That's not true. The whole Malibu size thing is way overblown IMHO. Here are the #'s for Malibu/Cruze/Accord for comparison:

      Rear Hip Room 54.3/52.4/54.7
      Rear Head Room 37.5/37.9/37.5
      Rear Leg Room 36.8/35.4/38.5
      Rear Shoulder Room 57.1/53.9/56.5
      Interestingly enough I recently had a 2012 Malibu LT rental up in Oregon. The backseat was uninhabitable for myself (6'2) and my father (6'4). Outside of the fact it felt like you were sitting on a school bus bench seat with comfort (like sitting on cheap leather covered plywood), it was the headroom that was the major issue. I see from 2012 to 2013 the legroom actually decreased nearly an inch from 37.6" to 36.8" (dumb move, probably a legroom issue now too for taller adults). I also noticed though the headroom increased, but only 3 tenths of an inch. Both me and especially my father had to adjust our heads to the side just to sit upright in the backseat. Not so sure a 3 tenths of an inch increase will totally remedy that. Maybe it's how/where they measure exactly but when I got in the new Accord (same headroom height as new Malibu) nor my father or I had any issue with backseat headroom (or obviously legroom with that big backseat).

    22. 10-03-2012 01:59 AM #122
      meanwhile, Passat came last in CD comparo.

    23. Member NoXenons's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 6th, 2012
      Posts
      4,490
      Vehicles
      Various POSes in good mechanical condition
      10-03-2012 02:29 AM #123
      Quote Originally Posted by above8k View Post
      meanwhile, Passat came last in CD comparo.
      C&D is smoking the good stuff.

      Looking at articles on their website, you can find a ZL1 vs M6 comparo, XTS and Bentley, Scion vs. Porsche Cayman S, and a Rubicon with a G550.

    24. 10-03-2012 02:33 AM #124
      Quote Originally Posted by NoXenons View Post
      C&D is smoking the good stuff.

      Looking at articles on their website, you can find an XTS was compared to a Bentley, a Scion vs. Porsche Cayman S, and a Rubicon with a G550.
      yah man...those xts/bentley, frs/cayman etc comparos are more legit and will def help average buyers than this stupid midsize comparos.

    25. Member NoXenons's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 6th, 2012
      Posts
      4,490
      Vehicles
      Various POSes in good mechanical condition
      10-03-2012 02:53 AM #125
      Quote Originally Posted by above8k View Post
      yah man...those xts/bentley, frs/cayman etc comparos are more legit and will def help average buyers than this stupid midsize comparos.
      It doesn't get any more ridiculous. They determined the winner of the G550/Rubicon test from the slalom speed!

    For advertising information click HERE

    Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •