Username or Email Address
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up

    VWVortex


    The Car Lounge
    Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 234567 LastLast
    Results 126 to 150 of 156

    Thread: MT: 2012-2013 Family sedan showdown

    1. Banned WhistlerYOW's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 14th, 2004
      Posts
      10,165
      10-03-2012 10:25 AM #126
      I love how TCL is always whining about how big and fat American market cars are, crying for more European size offerings, then when gm actually downsize a model everyone whines about it. Then VW makes their cars fat and more American/less European and everyone loves it.
      Last edited by WhistlerYOW; 10-03-2012 at 10:28 AM.

    2. Member gti5dr06's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 28th, 2006
      Posts
      1,945
      Vehicles
      2014 Cappuccino shawty, 2008 silver family thing
      10-03-2012 10:45 AM #127
      Quote Originally Posted by Shomegrown View Post
      its the newest one on newsstands...so probably won't be online for a bit
      Quote Originally Posted by konigwheels View Post
      Wow, it amazes me that we have children in here that can't read a couple paragraphs. No wonder America's doing so well in education! Can't take the time to read, but sure can find the time to post. Self indulgence at it's finest.

      TL;DR should be banned and changed to ID;CR or I'm dumb, can't read.

    3. Member GTRaavv's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 4th, 2009
      Posts
      6,832
      Vehicles
      2013 Range Rover Evoque
      10-03-2012 01:38 PM #128
      Quote Originally Posted by Turbio! View Post
      Sure, but most of those brands don't have a 'tweener Buick sitting above them, right where the Avalon, Azera, Taurus, and so forth are priced. If the Impala could start around $30-32k like the LaCrosse does, that'd be perfect, with lots of room for a LWB Malibu underneath it price- and equipment-wise. But Impala needs to undercut LaCrosse, while still offering something more than the 'Bu.
      But currently the Impala starts off at almost the same price as the Taurus (not factoring in huge rebates). And there is no reason to think that the 2014 Impala won't receive a price bump to Taurus levels. Has the Taurus hurt the Fusion at all? I'd also argue that pricing these mainstream "flagship" sedans higher like the Asian brands has not necessarily led to a lot of success in terms of sales (ex: Avalon, new Azera maybe).

      I also don't think LaCrosse pricing is going to hinder how Chevy prices the Impala with options too much. While the LaCrosse currently starts at $31,000, it keeps moving up the price ladder quite a bit since release. I'd imagine that the refresh for 2014 will see another $1,000 price increase and the redesign an even larger one. They also seem to target different markets rather well, at least a lot better than GM used to do with its rebadges.

      I don't really mean to imply they had no choice, though it's just a snowball of bad choices made through the years. I do agree that the Impala looks pretty great and gives Chevrolet a little better answer to high-spec midsizers and other fullsizers. I just think their redundancy is really hurting them, and if they're committed to Buick, they can't cripple Chevrolet models to try to jam them all together in a price/size continuum. They either need to embrace a bit of redundancy, or they need to axe some models.
      Snowball of bad choices is nice to say the least! And I think redundancy has plagued them in the past to no ends. But I don't think the issues with the Malibu stem from any redundancy. They stem from not having 2 platforms sized in spec with other U.S. midsize and fullsize sedan platforms and ones that don't weigh a ton available at the time. I'd assume that somewhere right now GM is developing an Epsilon 3 platform that will be lighter and allow for greater adaptability in terms of length, giving Chevy the option to have a larger Malibu and Impala in the future.

      However, I don't think this issue will matter too much at this time because of the transition GM is trying to make with the Impala from fleet queen to retail darling. This requires a large shift of the 10,000+ fleet sales a month the Impala racks in to the Malibu. And I think the Malibu is more than capable of handling fleet sales shifted down from the Impala as well as maintaining its retail sales. This allows the Impala to appeal to high-spec buyers in the segment who probably care more about resale value that can be diminished by high percentages of fleet. Should be interesting to see how the premium-spec Fusions retain value if Ford keeps up its fleet dumping practices.

    4. Swallow Doretti
      Guest
      10-03-2012 02:02 PM #129
      Quote Originally Posted by gti5dr06 View Post
      its the newest one on newsstands...so probably won't be online for a bit
      What was the finishing order?

    5. Member gti5dr06's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 28th, 2006
      Posts
      1,945
      Vehicles
      2014 Cappuccino shawty, 2008 silver family thing
      10-03-2012 02:18 PM #130
      Quote Originally Posted by Swallow Doretti View Post
      What was the finishing order?
      i'm quoting it from another forum, but it was:

      1)Accord
      2)Fusion
      3)Altima
      Quote Originally Posted by konigwheels View Post
      Wow, it amazes me that we have children in here that can't read a couple paragraphs. No wonder America's doing so well in education! Can't take the time to read, but sure can find the time to post. Self indulgence at it's finest.

      TL;DR should be banned and changed to ID;CR or I'm dumb, can't read.

    6. Member IsraelGT's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 25th, 2001
      Posts
      6,144
      Vehicles
      FX50S, Sienna AWD ltd.
      10-03-2012 02:57 PM #131
      Quote Originally Posted by gti5dr06 View Post
      i'm quoting it from another forum, but it was:

      1)Accord
      2)Fusion
      3)Altima
      I don't see a Passat?

    7. Member gti5dr06's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 28th, 2006
      Posts
      1,945
      Vehicles
      2014 Cappuccino shawty, 2008 silver family thing
      10-03-2012 03:03 PM #132
      Quote Originally Posted by IsraelGT View Post
      I don't see a Passat?
      I'm assuming there's more than four since they mentioned it was last.
      Quote Originally Posted by konigwheels View Post
      Wow, it amazes me that we have children in here that can't read a couple paragraphs. No wonder America's doing so well in education! Can't take the time to read, but sure can find the time to post. Self indulgence at it's finest.

      TL;DR should be banned and changed to ID;CR or I'm dumb, can't read.

    8. Senior Member Mazda 3s's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 12th, 2003
      Location
      Garner, NC
      Posts
      21,516
      Vehicles
      2013 VW Jetta Sportwagen TDI, 2013 Hyundai Elantra Limited
      10-03-2012 03:13 PM #133
      Quote Originally Posted by WhistlerYOW View Post
      I love how TCL is always whining about how big and fat American market cars are, crying for more European size offerings, then when gm actually downsize a model everyone whines about it. Then VW makes their cars fat and more American/less European and everyone loves it.
      A .5" reduction in length is downsizing? That's pretty much parity IMHO. Now if were were talking 4", like they did with the wheelbase, I'd agree.
      "Of course that's just my opinion; I could be wrong."

      Quote Originally Posted by The Igneous Faction
      Have you ever popped the hood on a powerstroke E350?
      Quote Originally Posted by WhistlerYOW
      No, I got good grades in school

    9. 10-03-2012 03:16 PM #134
      Quote Originally Posted by gti5dr06 View Post
      i'm quoting it from another forum, but it was:

      1)Accord
      2)Fusion
      3)Altima
      well i got the first two right. man, how quickly the top fall. i don't know what they hated so much about the Passat this time around. actually, i think the non-eco Malibu probably did very well in the handling portion, and maybe the Camry SE grew on them.

    10. Forum Sponsor Andy@Ross-Tech.com's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 5th, 2002
      Location
      2015 GTI SE 6MT
      Posts
      15,140
      10-03-2012 03:29 PM #135
      Quote Originally Posted by gti5dr06 View Post
      its the newest one on newsstands...so probably won't be online for a bit
      Article paraphrased here:

      http://www.hondasacuras.com/2012/10/...size-cars.html

    11. 10-03-2012 03:32 PM #136
      actually, with a little research, the Accord EX seemed to win because of its heavy advantage in powertrain over the Fusion. they both had the same score for vehicle evaluation 82 /100 points and chassis score 54/60 points. but the Accord got 52/55 points for powertrain vs 45/55 from the Fusion, and the Accord surprisingly got 23/25 points for fun to drive compared to 21/25 points from the Fusion contradicting the Motor Trend comparison which stated that the same Accord EX was no fun to drive at all. however, they did use the automatic version of the Fusion which is probably much more boring than the manual. so it appears that the Fusion wasn't as knocked over its ergonomics and interior styling as i thought it would be. or maybe the Accord lost points in probably being the most expensive vehicle in the test, or something.

    12. Member Shomegrown's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 26th, 2002
      Location
      Detroit
      Posts
      18,887
      Vehicles
      Current: Audi S4, Q5 TDI quattro, Porsche Boxster S, Ford F-150 FX4 4x4
      10-03-2012 03:39 PM #137
      Quote Originally Posted by Andy@Ross-Tech.com View Post
      I can't blame them. I'm pretty sure I'd take the Fusion over a 2.5 Passat too.

      (TDI is a different story)

    13. Banned
      Join Date
      Nov 27th, 2006
      Posts
      66
      10-03-2012 04:00 PM #138
      Quote Originally Posted by Andy@Ross-Tech.com View Post
      I'm looking forward to a TDI Passat comparison to the hybrid or new DI Accord.

    14. 10-03-2012 06:14 PM #139
      Looking at the charts rather than reading the text shows these cars to be remarkably close, so a few observations:
      Based on observed MPG, the Malibu's 21.3 really is off; the Passat's "good, but not outstanding" 25.5 is only .3 off the Accord's "fine" 25.8 and .8 off the Altima's leading 26.3.
      The Passat's "massive trunk" is smaller than the Malibu and Fusion.
      The Passat, for all the bally-hoo about its interior size, comes up first only in rear legroom, and that by .2 over the Camry. If you're a tall driver, you'll want the Altima.
      They're all pretty close 0-30 and 0-40, the Passat lags (probably noticeably) 0-60 and 45-65.
      Based on the numbers, there's no clear winner.
      Interior and exterior styling preferences are ultimately personal, so I doubt that anyone choosing based on that will be disappointed.
      I suspect that the driving experience is the clearest variable. If you're not an enthusiast and/or have a brand preference, it probably won't make a difference; and while the Malibu and Camry seem to come up a bit short, I wonder whether the on-the-road difference between the others is that significant. Personally, I've driven a prior gen Camry, ridden in my brother-in-laws Eco-Malibu-sort of unimpressed, especially compared to his previous gen Malibu; and taken a Passat 2.5 for an unfortunately short test drive-satisfied enough to give it another shot; test drove an Optima-impressive; and have no experience with recent Accords or Altimas.
      I know I sound non-committal, but this test gives me no reason to believe that whichever car one picks it won't disappoint, nor will nitpicky hairsplitting change anyone's mind.
      All in all, I guess that's a testament to the manufacturers' strides in a very competitive segment, or an indictment of their universal blandness-I'll go with the former.

    15. Member Yo Teach's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 24th, 2010
      Location
      Maumee, OH
      Posts
      3,494
      10-03-2012 07:09 PM #140
      Quote Originally Posted by NoXenons View Post
      C&D is smoking the good stuff.

      Looking at articles on their website, you can find a ZL1 vs M6 comparo, XTS and Bentley, Scion vs. Porsche Cayman S, and a Rubicon with a G550.
      Quote Originally Posted by NoXenons View Post
      It doesn't get any more ridiculous. They determined the winner of the G550/Rubicon test from the slalom speed!
      Car and Driver's tongue was placed firmly in their cheek when they came up with those comparisons, but they still had a point - What is the gap in performance, comfort, quality, etc. between luxury and non-luxury brand vehicles? Is the price jump for a BMW over a Chevy worth it?

      Quote Originally Posted by gti5dr06 View Post
      I'm assuming there's more than four since they mentioned it was last.
      It was just the four cars; Accord, Fusion, Altima, Passat, respectively.
      2007 Mazda 3 s Grand Touring

    16. 10-03-2012 08:24 PM #141
      Book another C/D 10Best win for the Accord. It's already wrapped up.

    17. Swallow Doretti
      Guest
      10-03-2012 08:34 PM #142
      Quote Originally Posted by joe97 View Post
      Book another C/D 10Best win for the Accord. It's already wrapped up.
      My only comment about the article is that several of the journos with whom I've spoken about the Accord say that the new steering system really reduces the fun-to-drive factor.

      The new Fusion really does look great, but I remain concerned about how Ford handles the whole integration of the stereo and A/C--the center stack in the M/T test looks utterly button-rific.

    18. Member Ross1013's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 25th, 2012
      Location
      NoVA
      Posts
      9,596
      Vehicles
      2009 Si sedan, 2012 Crosstour 4WD
      10-03-2012 09:01 PM #143
      Quote Originally Posted by Swallow Doretti View Post
      My only comment about the article is that several of the journos with whom I've spoken about the Accord say that the new steering system really reduces the fun-to-drive factor.

      The new Fusion really does look great, but I remain concerned about how Ford handles the whole integration of the stereo and A/C--the center stack in the M/T test looks utterly button-rific.
      When you hear gripes like that, do you assume that the steering actually sucks, or that you're talking to people who haven't acclimated to EPS yet (or just dislike it)?

    19. Banned
      Join Date
      Nov 27th, 2006
      Posts
      66
      10-04-2012 01:24 PM #144
      Quote Originally Posted by Andy@Ross-Tech.com View Post
      Altima is quick and efficient.

    20. Member rynodyno312's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 20th, 2012
      Location
      Orange County, CA
      Posts
      3,898
      Vehicles
      2013 Civic SI, 2011 EX35
      10-04-2012 02:25 PM #145
      Quote Originally Posted by Ross1013 View Post
      When you hear gripes like that, do you assume that the steering actually sucks, or that you're talking to people who haven't acclimated to EPS yet (or just dislike it)?
      A good EPS system shouldn't need the driver to be "acclimated." My GTI has EPS and it has amazing steering feel with excellent feedback--it loads up in the corers just as well as a good hydraulic system and doesn't feel disconnected at all. I had to look it up to find out it was electrically-assisted. I like it much better than the hydraulic variable-assist steering in my GF's Infiniti.

    21. Member Ross1013's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 25th, 2012
      Location
      NoVA
      Posts
      9,596
      Vehicles
      2009 Si sedan, 2012 Crosstour 4WD
      10-04-2012 02:36 PM #146
      Quote Originally Posted by rynodyno312 View Post
      A good EPS system shouldn't need the driver to be "acclimated."
      Any new control system requires some getting used to.
      Last edited by Ross1013; 10-04-2012 at 03:11 PM.

    22. 10-04-2012 02:38 PM #147
      This a classically styled, sagely engineered four-door that focuses on bona-fide family sedan requirements while delivering a notably superior driving experience

      I knew MT was full of horse manure when they said classically styled

    23. Member rynodyno312's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 20th, 2012
      Location
      Orange County, CA
      Posts
      3,898
      Vehicles
      2013 Civic SI, 2011 EX35
      10-04-2012 02:46 PM #148
      Quote Originally Posted by Ross1013 View Post
      Uh...you sure?

      EPS can be twitchy and it takes a while to re-adjust IMO. In most EPS cars, the sharpness and the length of your inputs need to decrease compared to what you need to use on a hydraulic car.

      And if it's a more performance-oriented system like what Honda use on their cars, it's going to feel even more twitchy and reactive.
      No, Ross, I actually have no idea how my own car's steering feels.

      I'm sure EPS can be twitchy and can take awhile to adjust to. I'm just saying it doesn't have to be that way, and the car I drive every day is proof of that. I haven't driven a newer honda with EPS and can't compare it to that specific system, but the EPS I do have experience with feels just like a good hydraulic system.

    24. Member Ross1013's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 25th, 2012
      Location
      NoVA
      Posts
      9,596
      Vehicles
      2009 Si sedan, 2012 Crosstour 4WD
      10-04-2012 03:41 PM #149
      Quote Originally Posted by rynodyno312 View Post
      I'm sure EPS can be twitchy and can take awhile to adjust to. I'm just saying it doesn't have to be that way, and the car I drive every day is proof of that. I haven't driven a newer honda with EPS and can't compare it to that specific system, but the EPS I do have experience with feels just like a good hydraulic system.
      What I am saying is, it all depends on what you are coming from, and what you are comparing it to.

    25. 10-10-2012 02:48 AM #150
      Quote Originally Posted by above8k View Post
      They would have been placed behind Camry anyway.
      Not the Optima.

      Both the new Camry and Altima got a 3-1/2 star rating from MT while the Optima received a 4-star rating.


      Quote Originally Posted by whitejeep1989 View Post
      So, in order of Dumb to Righteous Choices for Mid-Sized Sedans (According to TCL):

      Dumbest:Malibu
      Galant
      Avenger
      200
      Camry
      Accord
      Altima
      Regal
      Legacy
      Optima
      Sonata
      Fusion (but preferably with Euro "Mondeo" badging)
      The upcoming Mazda6 that isn't even for sale yet anywhere in the world
      Passat
      Most Righteous: Kizashi
      Always Optima > Sonata.

      It seems that the new Accord is the best all-around "family sedan" - much like what the Camry was during the early 1990s.

      For the best driver, it'll probably come down btwn the Fusion and the 6, but there is one Euro review which found the steering in the Mondeo to be better than in the 6.
      Last edited by CP1; 10-10-2012 at 02:50 AM.
      Why you wouldn’t (buy an Optima SX):

      Because you have your eyes on the Frigidaire Limited Edition Camry that you saw last weekend at the neighborhood Autoplex
      .
      - LeftLaneNews

    Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 234567 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •