VWVortex


Links back to The Car Lounge (opens in same window)
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 35 of 126

Thread: Should the Opel Adam be offered in the U.S. as a Buick?

  1. Senior Member Wimbledon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 25th, 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    20,249
    Vehicles
    2006 Audi A8 L
    10-02-2012 09:29 PM #1
    http://blogs.motortrend.com/could-up...ick-24641.html



    Given that Opel and Buick are now connected at the hip, could the Adam become a Buick? Buick already is driving down the average age of its buyers with current models and that should continue next year with the launch Encore crossover. After the engine/transmission upgrades, the Adam car could be the fashion statement Buick needs, but Opel will build the Adam only in Germany. Production would have to move to a more cost-effective assembly plant to make a Buick version profitable.













  2. Member Iroczgirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 17th, 2007
    Location
    Bend, OR
    Posts
    15,017
    Vehicles
    '55 Ford 351C, '80 Rabbit AAZ
    10-02-2012 09:33 PM #2
    Could be a Fiat 500 competitor. But then again, how many Fiats are sold in the US every month? I don't think it would be worth it for GM.

  3. Member mike02467's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 17th, 2010
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    2,394
    Vehicles
    2011 Civic SI
    10-02-2012 09:36 PM #3
    America has enough useless tiny 2 door hatches, ala smart fortwo and fiat 500. Those cars suck and don't sell, GM would stupid to bring the Adam to America.

  4. 10-02-2012 09:46 PM #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Wimbledon View Post
    Is that an adult Big Wheel? Wish I still had mine.

  5. Member phil123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 13th, 2009
    Location
    92808
    Posts
    5,507
    10-02-2012 09:53 PM #5
    No.

    It would be one of those forgotten cars that the car lounge talks about in 8 years if they were to do this.

    "Remember the Buick Adam"
    "Oh ya, the fiat 500 looking thing with grandpa buick logo. No one bought one of those"
    2011 Golf TDI DSG | 2001 Cabrio VR-T | 1995 GTI VR6
    A2Resource |

    FS: Porsche Wintercults | MK3.5 Mirrors

  6. Member nickthaskater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 17th, 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    11,367
    Vehicles
    An imaginary one
    10-02-2012 09:54 PM #6
    Wow, I actually really, really like that. It's super cute/funky

    Would look at if it ever came to North America and wasn't raped by Buickification.

  7. Geriatric Member VDub2625's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 3rd, 2003
    Location
    Fall River, MA
    Posts
    44,051
    Vehicles
    90 Jetta GLI 16v, 99.5 Cabrio Highline
    10-02-2012 09:56 PM #7
    I don't think it'd fit with the Buick image. Though interestingly, a theoretical small Buick and the "fashion class" (500, Mini etc) do occupy the same price range...
    A2Resource
    .......

  8. Senior Member VarianceVQ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 26th, 2005
    Location
    Fancy, Connecticut
    Posts
    20,116
    Vehicles
    1996 Nissan Pathfinder LE 4x4
    10-02-2012 09:58 PM #8
    No.

    The Verano and Encore are already at the outer limit of how small a Buick can be without being ridiculous. Not to mention a Buick Grille on that is going to look asstacular.
    Thoughts expressed are those of the poster and not those of some long dead guy who I choose to speak for me.

  9. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 26th, 2009
    Posts
    3,805
    Vehicles
    Raisin toast on 22s
    10-02-2012 09:58 PM #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Iroczgirl View Post
    Could be a Fiat 500 competitor. But then again, how many Fiats are sold in the US every month? I don't think it would be worth it for GM.
    Fiat moved over 4,000 cars last month -- this is a steadily growing number, too, as the number of dealerships increase. At their current growth rate they'll be outselling Volvo sometime next year and well within reach of Mini -- with one car.

  10. Member vrsexxy_GTI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 14th, 2004
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    7,320
    10-02-2012 09:59 PM #10
    Yes.

    Even if it doesn't sell well, it will bring more interest to the brand.

  11. Member nickthaskater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 17th, 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    11,367
    Vehicles
    An imaginary one
    10-02-2012 10:13 PM #11
    Quote Originally Posted by VarianceVQ View Post
    No.

    The Verano and Encore are already at the outer limit of how small a Buick can be without being ridiculous. Not to mention a Buick Grille on that is going to look asstacular.
    What determines the limit on the size of a Buick?

  12. Senior Member VarianceVQ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 26th, 2005
    Location
    Fancy, Connecticut
    Posts
    20,116
    Vehicles
    1996 Nissan Pathfinder LE 4x4
    10-02-2012 10:30 PM #12
    Quote Originally Posted by nickthaskater View Post
    What determines the limit on the size of a Buick?
    How unbefitting it looks. See Aston Martin Cygnet.
    Thoughts expressed are those of the poster and not those of some long dead guy who I choose to speak for me.

  13. Member Live-Wire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 9th, 2005
    Location
    Guelph Ontario
    Posts
    10,280
    Vehicles
    2008 BMW 335i
    10-02-2012 10:42 PM #13
    Quote Originally Posted by mike02467 View Post
    America has enough useless tiny 2 door hatches, ala smart fortwo and fiat 500. Those cars suck and don't sell, GM would stupid to bring the Adam to America.
    There comes a point where cars get too small, slow, not any more efficient, and useless at begin a daily driver car to work in North America. This is the size car. They have their niche, sure... but they aren't extremely popular. What makes me laugh is how GM will pull out of making something like a competitive minivan (which while sales are down, they still sell quite a lot) when they used to sell many Ventures (before they made it snub nosed)... but they consider cars where they might make $8 profit per car on 10,000 units a year seriously. Take the Regal for example... it isn't selling very well, it's expensive to make, yet they offer something like 3 distinct trim lines for it and two separate front fascia's... and it's already getting a facelift .

    GM, you already have the Sonic... people spending $13k on a new car don't want to pony up $4k extra for a Buick when you can pony up that money and get a Cruze. Here's a thought... bring the extremely useful Cruze wagon over. You'd sell more of them then the Adam (sounds like a name Jeremy Clarkson would coin for a car) and make more money on each sale.

  14. 10-02-2012 10:42 PM #14
    Blatant A1 copy is blatant.

    Also, no.
    Speed:Sport:Life
    Current | 06 Cayman S | 99 CR-V LX 4WD
    Past | 11 Mustang GT | 06 Cayman S | 83 300SD | 00 Civic Si | 91 Galant VR4 | 00 Civic Si |

  15. Senior Member Lwize's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 4th, 2000
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    22,067
    Vehicles
    09 Rabbit S 5MT
    10-02-2012 10:51 PM #15
    Add plastic cladding and bring it as a GMC.
    There are no old Porsches - just new owners.

  16. Member BLK9GEN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 27th, 2001
    Location
    BLC, NV
    Posts
    12,082
    Vehicles
    Official Member of the Masochistic Black Car Owners Club
    10-02-2012 10:51 PM #16
    Quote Originally Posted by tampaSi View Post
    Blatant A1 copy is blatant.


    That didn't take long.
    19-- Willys Jeep * 1989 Cadillac STS * 1991 Ford Escort GT * 1995 Dodge Neon Sport * 1997 Honda Civic EX * 1997 BMW 528i * 1998 Honda CR-V EX * 1999 Acura 3.2 TL * 2000 VW Golf GLS 1.8T * 2001 Land Rover Range Rover 4.6 SE * 2002 VW Passat GLS 1.8T * 2002 Honda Civic EX * 2006 Lexus GS430 * 2006 Honda Pilot EX-L * 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander XLS * 2009 Hyundai Genesis 3.8 * 2010 Kia Forte Koup SX * 2011 Hyundai Sonata SE * 2013 Honda Accord Sport

  17. Senior Member cougar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 24th, 1999
    Posts
    23,753
    10-02-2012 10:52 PM #17
    Styling is way too... odd... for a Buick.
    Unpaid shill

    Quote Originally Posted by Rutledge View Post
    Well, then, I'm here to "ruin" the vortex for you. I'm sorry you hate fun.

  18. Member l88m22vette's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 1st, 2006
    Location
    Chicagoland, IL
    Posts
    12,322
    Vehicles
    2003 TTq coupe, 2001 Forester L
    10-02-2012 10:56 PM #18
    Call it the Skylark, position it against the Mini/500/Beetle, certainly get noticed, I'd look at this before any of those if shopping that market
    Audi TT mk1 FAQ Clutch and other **** next week

    Quote Originally Posted by TTC2k5 View Post
    There's a special place in hell for those that put a mk2 style grill on the mk1.

  19. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 25th, 2012
    Location
    Shytcago, IL - hell hole of all hell holes
    Posts
    1,679
    Vehicles
    74 Subaru DL, 78 280Z,94 Sentra SER, 86 CRX Si, 86 Suzuki 700 Intruder (still own) 07 Fit (still own
    10-02-2012 10:57 PM #19
    Quote Originally Posted by cougar View Post
    Styling is way too... odd... for a Buick.
    I'd like to see Buick compete against Fiat though

    I'd rather hug a tree than a terrorist

  20. Member nickthaskater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 17th, 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    11,367
    Vehicles
    An imaginary one
    10-02-2012 11:00 PM #20
    Quote Originally Posted by VarianceVQ View Post
    How unbefitting it looks. See Aston Martin Cygnet.
    What is it supposed to look like? We aren't talking Buicks of the '70s any longer; small is in. Do you think the ATS is too small for a Cadillac? The Spark too small for Chevrolet? The Ka too small for Ford, et. al?

  21. Senior Member VarianceVQ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 26th, 2005
    Location
    Fancy, Connecticut
    Posts
    20,116
    Vehicles
    1996 Nissan Pathfinder LE 4x4
    10-02-2012 11:24 PM #21
    Quote Originally Posted by nickthaskater View Post
    What is it supposed to look like? We aren't talking Buicks of the '70s any longer; small is in. Do you think the ATS is too small for a Cadillac? The Spark too small for Chevrolet? The Ka too small for Ford, et. al?
    The ATS isn't a subcompact hatchback. Chevrolet and Ford aren't upscale brands and selling subcompacts isn't out of the norm for them.

    I'm not saying all Buicks have to be land yachts but going this small doesn't fit the brand. Why would Buick even need this?
    Thoughts expressed are those of the poster and not those of some long dead guy who I choose to speak for me.

  22. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 1st, 2011
    Location
    The Volt Bar
    Posts
    569
    Vehicles
    Chevrolet Malibu 2.0T, Cadillac ATS 3.6
    10-02-2012 11:30 PM #22
    Quote Originally Posted by VarianceVQ View Post
    The ATS isn't a subcompact hatchback. Chevrolet and Ford aren't upscale brands and selling subcompacts isn't out of the norm for them.

    I'm not saying all Buicks have to be land yachts but going this small doesn't fit the brand. Why would Buick even need this?
    *I am not confirming/denying/implying that this car is in GMNA's product plans.*

    I strongly disagree. There is a reason why the Germans are tripping over themselves to fill this niche.

  23. Member MidnightSpecial's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 11th, 2007
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    5,541
    10-02-2012 11:40 PM #23
    I think it would make a better Chevrolet and I can see the design translating. I know they have the Spark, but it's more economy based. I would only have the Spark available in poverty trim and sell the Adam with the cool stuff.

    Call it the Chevrolet H.E. (Harley Earl).
    Algunos padres son poetas, todos los hijos son poesías. ♥

  24. Member nickthaskater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 17th, 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    11,367
    Vehicles
    An imaginary one
    10-02-2012 11:48 PM #24
    Quote Originally Posted by VarianceVQ View Post
    The ATS isn't a subcompact hatchback. Chevrolet and Ford aren't upscale brands and selling subcompacts isn't out of the norm for them.

    I'm not saying all Buicks have to be land yachts but going this small doesn't fit the brand. Why would Buick even need this?
    The ATS may as well be a subcompact hatchback given Cadillac's traditional history.

    Mercedes has the A Class and Smart, Audi has the A1, BMW has the i3, Aston has the Cygnet and so forth.

    Why would Buick need this? Because the market for these cars is growing, and rather than being reactive, Buick/GM should be proactive.

  25. Senior Member Fritz27's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 8th, 2003
    Location
    Gulf Coast, FL
    Posts
    24,205
    Vehicles
    2013 Nike Killshot, 2012 Sperry Top-Sider or 2011 Rainbow Flip-Flops
    10-03-2012 12:38 AM #25
    I think it's a pretty cool looking car. Heck, why not do what Chrysler does with Fiat and just put them in a cool corner of the Buick dealership and don't let Buddy Garrity (God, I hope someone gets this reference) types with terrible 1994-era suits try to sell them?

    Don't even bother badging it as anything other than the Adam or something that kinda/sorta fits with the Buick naming convention.
    PSN: PhilipGTI
    Official Miami Dolphins Thread: Come share in the misery!
    Quote Originally Posted by fatlace View Post
    Get lost santa

  26. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 26th, 2009
    Posts
    3,805
    Vehicles
    Raisin toast on 22s
    10-03-2012 01:01 AM #26
    Quote Originally Posted by MidnightSpecial View Post
    I think it would make a better Chevrolet and I can see the design translating. I know they have the Spark, but it's more economy based. I would only have the Spark available in poverty trim and sell the Adam with the cool stuff.
    They probably couldn't sell the Germany-built Adam in the United States at a price that would make sense. Pretty sure it's impossible for any manufacturer to get a European-built car sold in the US for under $17,000 these days.

    And besides, the Spark is doing extremely well so far (they've sold 4,000 in two months despite only being in some big-city markets, and dealers can't keep any in stock) but it's the $13,000 price point that's doing it, not the size of the car. Jack the price of the Spark up enough (or introduce an Americanized Adam) and people will say "whatever", and start looking at Sonics or 500s instead.

  27. Member Woodski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 14th, 2010
    Location
    Southington, CT
    Posts
    1,804
    Vehicles
    '93 940, '95 SL1
    10-03-2012 01:23 AM #27
    Absolutely.

    It's already got a fake vinyl lookin roof thing going on too

  28. Member mavric_ac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 13th, 2007
    Location
    Canukistan
    Posts
    11,292
    10-03-2012 02:11 AM #28
    looks better than the fiat
    stay in drugs, eat school, and don't do vegetables
    permanent vacation

  29. Member simon_C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 4th, 2006
    Location
    SFBAY
    Posts
    4,662
    Vehicles
    1983 Rabbit GTI
    10-03-2012 05:40 AM #29
    Why dont they just bring it here as a f**king opel? Bout time they revived the opel brand here....
    How does a rotary work? This one's easy: the magic triangle spins in the peanut and then apex seals come out.

  30. 10-03-2012 07:19 AM #30
    Quote Originally Posted by VDub2625 View Post
    I don't think it'd fit with the Buick image. Though interestingly, a theoretical small Buick and the "fashion class" (500, Mini etc) do occupy the same price range...
    This. Neither the interior or exterior fit "Buick". But it is a nice car.
    Quote Originally Posted by Fritz27 View Post
    You're a self-serving Japanese car-hating asshat.
    I drive two Japanese cars.

  31. 10-03-2012 08:02 AM #31
    GM already has the Spark which this would compete directly against.

  32. Member Burnin8r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 7th, 2003
    Location
    NY NJ PA
    Posts
    2,915
    Vehicles
    2012 FIAT 500 Sport
    10-03-2012 08:36 AM #32
    Quote Originally Posted by mike02467 View Post
    America has enough useless tiny 2 door hatches, ala smart fortwo and fiat 500. Those cars suck and don't sell, GM would stupid to bring the Adam to America.
    sales are up over 130% vs last year for FIAT, it wasn't an overnight success but America is warming up to small, stylish cars. The Abarth literally sold out in 6 weeks. Not everyone wants to drive a boat, especially people who commute or have to park in an urban areas. That being said, the Adam looks great, just not as a Buick.

  33. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 25th, 2012
    Location
    Shytcago, IL - hell hole of all hell holes
    Posts
    1,679
    Vehicles
    74 Subaru DL, 78 280Z,94 Sentra SER, 86 CRX Si, 86 Suzuki 700 Intruder (still own) 07 Fit (still own
    10-03-2012 08:41 AM #33
    Quote Originally Posted by simon_C View Post
    Why dont they just bring it here as a f**king opel? Bout time they revived the opel brand here....
    I believe the bean counters think they're better off rebadging Opels and other overseas models instead of going through the huge expense of setting up another division.
    I'd rather hug a tree than a terrorist

  34. Member 200HP4dr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 21st, 2001
    Location
    NE. OH
    Posts
    7,522
    10-03-2012 08:43 AM #34
    I agree with the Skylark nomenclature.

    Or, they could bring it over as the Buick Opel.

    It worked in the 70's, right? ummm....

    Chris
    | 2012 Nissan Leaf | 1995 Jeep Wrangler | 1999 Olds 88
    | 2007 Toyota Prius | 1999 Plymouth Voyager | 1993 Toyota Previa AWD

  35. 10-03-2012 08:45 AM #35
    No this would not be a good fit for Buick. I question what GM is doing with the brand bringing the Trax here as the Encore and this would make even less sense. Is GM trying to kill Buick?

    What does make sens is to replace the Chevy Spark with this car.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts