Username or Email Address
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up

    VWVortex


    The Car Lounge
    Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
    Results 51 to 75 of 289

    Thread: ILX sales are below Acura projections

    1. Member BLK9GEN's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 27th, 2001
      Location
      Reno, NV
      Posts
      12,707
      10-05-2012 11:02 AM #51
      Quote Originally Posted by 6cylVWguy View Post
      It's like the Cimarron of the honda lineup.
      Except, you know, that the Civic on which this is based isn't a total and utter POS like the Cimarron was. Given Honda's track record I'd say it is a pretty safe bet that 20 years from now many of these will still be on the road.

      Which is not to say that Honda didn't botch the launch of this car. They should have waited until the new hybrid/earth dreams engines came on line to launch this. The current engines are lackluster for anything wearing a "luxury" badge.

    2. Member Professor Gascan's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 11th, 2002
      Location
      Canada
      Posts
      10,507
      10-05-2012 11:03 AM #52
      Quote Originally Posted by Hajduk View Post
      Meanwhile in Canada....... the ILX is selling better than its predecessor, the CSX.

      I guess we just really like fancy Civics.
      That's damning with faint praise. The CSX was a sales dog compared to the EL. I have yet to see an ILX on the road here, and Acura around here used to have excellent market penetration.
      Rubbing alcohol is for external injuries. Drinking alcohol is for internal injuries. It's a science. - Nick Miller

    3. 10-05-2012 11:06 AM #53
      Car buyers in this segment are often car leasers, such as myself. I leased a base 2011 328i a year ago. Out the door price was $31k for a car with real leather and a 230hp inline six. Why would I want a $30k ILX instead??

      Today you can lease a G25 for the same price as the ILX. Is there any question which is more car?

    4. Senior Member 6cylVWguy's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 14th, 2000
      Location
      PA
      Posts
      23,593
      Blog Entries
      4
      Vehicles
      '11 M3 ZCP; '94 SLC
      10-05-2012 11:09 AM #54
      Quote Originally Posted by jwaters943 View Post
      Except, you know, that the Civic on which this is based isn't a total and utter POS like the Cimarron was.
      I didn't say it was a POS. But both situations are an example of blatant corporate laziness. A lot of companies can be accused of the same exact things.

    5. Member RacingManiac's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 18th, 2011
      Location
      SE Mi and Toronto
      Posts
      6,281
      Vehicles
      Current: 2016 NBM PP Golf GTI 6MT Was: 2010 DB GTI DSG 2 Door
      10-05-2012 11:14 AM #55
      Quote Originally Posted by Hajduk View Post
      Meanwhile in Canada....... the ILX is selling better than its predecessor, the CSX.

      I guess we just really like fancy Civics.
      In Canada there is an established market for the car, its basically just the next EL/CSX. Where as in US it is a new product....

      Whats the price difference going from CSX to this anyway?

    6. Geriatric Member Turbio!'s Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 21st, 2005
      Location
      San Antonio, TX
      Posts
      41,605
      Vehicles
      '13 Subaru Outback
      10-05-2012 11:36 AM #56
      Quote Originally Posted by 6cylVWguy View Post
      What you're expecting and the actual reality is completely different. The took the cheap road and performed some very minor changes. It likely cost Honda very little money to bring the ILX to market. What you're suggesting would require an extensive re-engineering of the car. It's not like they would use the old RDX motor because they certainly had what, almost a decade to use it in something else and never did. Adding AWD would also cost some significant coin.

      I would put money on the fact that cost efficiency was, by far, the primary driving force for how the ILX came out. While conceptually, I like your idea, I don't think Honda felt they could make a case to spend so much on making such an idea reality. You're familiar with the term "quick and dirty" right? That's how Honda approached the ILX, IMO. It's like the Cimarron of the honda lineup.
      Oh yeah, I'm naturally assuming there that this is some kind of bizarro-world Honda that's as entrepeneurial and engineering-driven as it was in around 1995, and that this hypothetico-Honda actually gives a **** about aggressively growing Acura and making awesome cars, not that it's the same old complacent, "the bare minimum is good enough" Honda we know today. But hey, maybe that old Honda is coming back out again, the new Accord and CR-V aren't execrable and seem to be serious attempts at being competitive rather than the default choice.

      And yeah, I agree entirely. It's a cheap, quick "hey, we need something smaller, I guess people want fuel economy these days" hack job, indifferently shat out in the mistaken impression that Acura buyers are as committed as Honda buyers.
      Last edited by Turbio!; 10-05-2012 at 11:40 AM.
      IPRO Meat-Director and High Minister of Terror-Grilling

      Quote Originally Posted by Marshmallow Man View Post
      The Terror Grill: Part restaurant, part amusement attraction, part gladiator arena, all profit.
      ARE YOU NOT SATIATED?!?!?!

    7. 10-05-2012 11:49 AM #57
      Quote Originally Posted by Moodyblues View Post
      Car buyers in this segment are often car leasers, such as myself. I leased a base 2011 328i a year ago. Out the door price was $31k for a car with real leather and a 230hp inline six. Why would I want a $30k ILX instead??

      Today you can lease a G25 for the same price as the ILX. Is there any question which is more car?
      G25 is dead.

    8. Senior Member 6cylVWguy's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 14th, 2000
      Location
      PA
      Posts
      23,593
      Blog Entries
      4
      Vehicles
      '11 M3 ZCP; '94 SLC
      10-05-2012 11:54 AM #58
      Quote Originally Posted by Turbio! View Post
      Oh yeah, I'm naturally assuming there that this is some kind of bizarro-world Honda that's as entrepeneurial and engineering-driven as it was in around 1995, and that this hypothetico-Honda actually gives a **** about aggressively growing Acura and making awesome cars, not that it's the same old complacent, "the bare minimum is good enough"
      I think the underlying problem is that Honda has whittled down avialable platforms and motors to improve efficiency across the brands, but at the detriment of variety. And now, they have a problem because there isn't a lot of room to differentiate their various cars--both within and between the Honda and Acura brands.

      I have to say that I prefer VWs approach to this sort of thing. They have whittled down the platforms as well, but the platforms also seem to be far more flexible and allow for the creation of the cars that from an engineering perspective are related, but from the seat of the pants, have a pretty different look and feel. Not to mention, VW has access to quite a few different engine and transmission combinations (based, seemingly, on the need to develop such different powertrains for the various markets VW has a presence in), so every project wouldn't seem to require an extensive re-engineering process.

      To Honda's detriment in this situation, it's also a much smaller company than VW, so there's also that to consider. I'm not as big of a fan of the CRV as you are, but I have to say that I'm not nearly as offended by the new accord, at least based on the pictures I've seen, than I was of the previous gen car. Unfortunately, Honda needs to invest some money in several different engine and transmission lineups and I think they're just too damn conservative. I like your idea about awd for the ILX, but that would require far more forward thinking than I feel Honda has put forth in their current products.

      But hey, maybe Honda is putting ALL of their engineering skill into developing the NSX.

    9. Senior Member Iroczgirl's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 17th, 2007
      Location
      Bend, OR
      Posts
      24,571
      Vehicles
      Some American, British, German, and a bunch of Japanese.
      10-05-2012 11:59 AM #59
      Quote Originally Posted by 1985Jetta View Post
      Haven't seen a single one here.
      Same here.
      Lots of VW stuff|Rare Scirocco parts!
      The family: '55 Ford 351C, '70 TR6 262Olds, '80 Rabbit AAZ, '84 C30 350, '88 Scirocco 9A, '97 Hardbody KA24E, '01 TJ 150AMC.
      Quote Originally Posted by Crimping Is Easy View Post
      You're always better off with a Citroën.™

    10. 10-05-2012 12:18 PM #60
      Didn't even know about the ILX. Haven't even seen a commercial for it
      @WhiteOnRice32

    11. Member
      Join Date
      May 10th, 2006
      Location
      Vancouver/Melbourne
      Posts
      1,257
      Vehicles
      2011 Tiguan Highline, 2012 Mazda CX5 2.0i, 2008 Audi S3 3Dr Manual
      10-05-2012 12:27 PM #61
      The ILX 2.4 replaces the CSX Type-S, the latter has a sport exhaust + NAV, both of which are no longer found on the ILX. The ILX also costs $1,000 more.

    12. Member choochoo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 12th, 2008
      Location
      OC, CA
      Posts
      6,840
      Vehicles
      nothing to see here
      10-05-2012 12:57 PM #62
      Quote Originally Posted by Turbio! View Post
      Sure there is - the Verano, A3, 1-series, and Ct200h, as well as the upcoming A-class MB derivatives, A3 sedan, and rumored small Hyundai Genesis-branded sedan. Honestly, I'd throw the GLI into that mix too, along with the the Focus Titanium and ST trim levels.

      It also competes on price and features with larger cars, but it's definitely got competition its own size and spec.
      Of the ones you list, the A3 and Ct200h are only available as hatch/wagons and the Ct200h is hybrid only. So, I wouldn't say they were direct competitors.
      the others are either vaporware or haven't reached our shores yet.
      I agree that the Verano is definitely a competitor. But, honestly, I didn't even think of it. Like most west coast folk in this target demographic, Buick isn't even on our radars. Also, it doesn't help that the Verano, IMHO, is even more generic looking than the ILX


      Consumer reports sums it up well in its Verano review, "Just like with the Acura ILX, you have to want to pay a premium to get a smaller car." People would rather buy a bigger car with the same amount of features without the premium badge.

      I think you're right about the GLI. Plus the Jetta has a TDI option to compete with the ILX hybrid interms of fuel economy.

      Quote Originally Posted by above8k View Post
      I think sales will jump if they give 2.4L an auto option and navigation.
      price would bring it even more into TSX territory.

      Quote Originally Posted by BMP_3918 View Post
      Didn't even know about the ILX. Haven't even seen a commercial for it
      Acura was running these a few months ago.


      not really compelling, if you ask me. When I first saw them on TV, I thought they were going to sell alcohol.

      Actually, I'd add the Suzuki Kazashi to it's list of competitors too.
      But sadly for Suzuki, the kazashi is REALLY off most people's radar.


    13. Banned Tiny4cyl's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 5th, 2011
      Posts
      1,494
      Vehicles
      '15 WRX Limited HK 6MT, '14 370Z Sport 6MT SRM, '99 Camry CE 4AT
      10-05-2012 01:06 PM #63
      Quote Originally Posted by sucking chest wound View Post


      Car developed for the mythical focus-group derived "middle-aged, solid earner but somewhat frugal, Just-for-Men-using guy who aspires to a wine tasting trip to Napa sometime before his 70th birthday".

      This has always been Acura's problem, in spite of the fact that they occasionally find buyers outside this mould no matter how hard they try to thwart them. 1994-1999 was an exception where there was a glimmer of hope they'd break through to sanity, but it obviously never materialized.

      Hence, the frustrating slow rot of the brand. Fundamentally decent engineering, but no cognisance at all for any buyer outside the Just-for-Men guy.

      Acura was fine in 2005.

      RSX/S sport coupes
      TSX sport sedan (much better engine back then, true DOHC VTEC)
      RDX turbo cuteute with thoughts of that motor making it into other cars (exciting)
      NSX sold for its last year
      TL was the most beautiful mid-sized entry-luxury sedan like evar.
      RL was looking solid, boasting 300hp from a V6 long before competitors caught up with similar displacement engines
      MDX was doing well

    14. Member
      Join Date
      Jul 1st, 2011
      Location
      The Volt Bar
      Posts
      1,376
      Vehicles
      2016 Chevrolet Volt, 2016 Cadillac CTS
      10-05-2012 01:07 PM #64
      Quote Originally Posted by choochoo View Post
      I agree that the Verano is definitely a competitor. But, honestly, I didn't even think of it. Like most west coast folk in this target demographic, Buick isn't even on our radars. Also, it doesn't help that the Verano, IMHO, is even more generic looking than the ILX


      Consumer reports sums it up well in its Verano review, "Just like with the Acura ILX, you have to want to pay a premium to get a smaller car." People would rather buy a bigger car with the same amount of features without the premium badge.
      What 'target demographic' are you referring to? Because the early returns on our surveys--you know the ones from the buyers who helping the Verano outsell the ILX 4 to 1 on average-say that the Verano is attracting a very different buyer, age wise. That CR statement is completely spot on--in 2007.

    15. Member vrsexxy_GTI's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 14th, 2004
      Location
      Wild rose country
      Posts
      7,601
      10-05-2012 01:16 PM #65
      Quote Originally Posted by Avus View Post
      In Canada, base ILX = $27790 CAD (with a 2.0L I4 150hp engine, 5sp auto...)

      A base Buick Verano = $22595 CAD (with a 2.4L I4 180hp engine, 6sp auto...)

      A base Passat = $23975 CAD (with a 2.5L I4 170hp engine, 6sp auto...)
      Acura is dreaming with these prices, my friend just returned his tl type-s lease and they offered him a tsx with 10k on it for 600/month 4 year lease, he later visited audi and got a brand new A4 quattro with l.e.d package for 580 and 0 down. Tough choice..

    16. Member
      Join Date
      Aug 13th, 2008
      Location
      Minneapolis
      Posts
      1,435
      Vehicles
      1995 M3, 2012 GLI
      10-05-2012 01:27 PM #66
      Turbio has it right here. They need a sophisticated, adult small sedan with a competitive feature set at a good price. I could maybe see making a case for this gussied-up Civic at $25K. But $30K? As someone else mentioned, there are entry level BMWs, Infinitis and Audis available to those buyers. To say that this car isn't in the same league is not a subjective characterization, it's a fact: A car based on a Civic platform is not the equivalent of BMW anything. It can't be.

      Really, I just think they should take all the content of the ILX and put it in the Civic while not charging more. They're so close together in the market (loaded Civic versus base ILX) and as has been pointed out, the ILX was developed on the cheap. Why didn't Honda just make this Civic this good? How does this car justify it's faux-luxury badge? Also, personally, I find wannabe-luxury badges to be pretty embarrassing. If you want your car to impress people, then just get a damn BMW/MB/Audi already.

    17. Member choochoo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 12th, 2008
      Location
      OC, CA
      Posts
      6,840
      Vehicles
      nothing to see here
      10-05-2012 01:48 PM #67
      Quote Originally Posted by Minority5 View Post
      What 'target demographic' are you referring to? Because the early returns on our surveys--you know the ones from the buyers who helping the Verano outsell the ILX 4 to 1 on average-say that the Verano is attracting a very different buyer, age wise. That CR statement is completely spot on--in 2007.
      I was commenting on west coast Gen Yers? I don't think I know anyone around my age, would even consider a buick. Which people are you polling, Verano owners? I wonder how many Verano owners are gen Y and live on the west coast. I'm really curious.

      I think the CR comment is very valid for the compact entry level luxury market. Like I said earlier, people would rather buy a bigger car with the same amount of features without the premium badge.
      Especially in a soft economy.

    18. Member P-Body's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 17th, 2007
      Location
      Toronto
      Posts
      5,497
      Vehicles
      15 RC350
      10-05-2012 02:04 PM #68
      Quote Originally Posted by Hajduk View Post
      Meanwhile in Canada....... the ILX is selling better than its predecessor, the CSX.

      I guess we just really like fancy Civics.
      The pricing gets kooky after the base models though. I don't see how you walk into an Acura dealer for an ILX, and don't leave with a TSX, which seems more substantial in just about every way.

      They do look great in person though.
      Quote Originally Posted by teklord69 View Post
      Scenario: Uphill on two lane hwy. You need to pass and overtake a slower vehicle. That 151 torque won't let you. You will hit an oncoming car the opposite side if you do.

    19. Member P-Body's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 17th, 2007
      Location
      Toronto
      Posts
      5,497
      Vehicles
      15 RC350
      10-05-2012 02:05 PM #69
      Quote Originally Posted by vrsexxy_GTI View Post
      Acura is dreaming with these prices, my friend just returned his tl type-s lease and they offered him a tsx with 10k on it for 600/month 4 year lease, he later visited audi and got a brand new A4 quattro with l.e.d package for 580 and 0 down. Tough choice..
      That choice at that pricing is like picking the 500 pound woman over the 600 pound woman. Either way, you're gonna get sat on and hurt.
      Quote Originally Posted by teklord69 View Post
      Scenario: Uphill on two lane hwy. You need to pass and overtake a slower vehicle. That 151 torque won't let you. You will hit an oncoming car the opposite side if you do.

    20. Member TetsuoShima's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 30th, 2008
      Location
      Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
      Posts
      7,273
      Vehicles
      1994 Honda Prelude V-TAK
      10-05-2012 02:08 PM #70
      Quote Originally Posted by Turbio! View Post
      Thing I don't get is why they're trying to pull defeat from the jaws of victory when there's a fat, perfect market segment just waiting there for somebody to exploit it. Build a $25-30k compact sport sedan with a sharp design and a turbo four developing around 230-240 hp and SH-AWD as an option, make it look okay, call it the Integra, and sell a goddamn million of them to 35-55 year old professionals who are tempted by the WRX, Focus ST, MS3, and so forth but want something a little more grown up that doesn't rape their wallet like the Tier 1s do. As it stands the GTI and GLI have that market essentially to themselves. Undercut the upcoming A3 sedan by a few grand or so, and they've got it made.
      Logic + Common Sense + Aesthetically pleasing design =/= Honda/Acura

    21. Member clutchrider's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 10th, 2010
      Location
      Connecticut
      Posts
      4,899
      Vehicles
      2012 GLI
      10-05-2012 02:09 PM #71
      For the money of an ILX you could easily slide into a loaded GLI or get a nice lease on a VW CC.

      I am not pushing my own car, but there is nothing that really makes the ILX stand out. It looks meh, it performs meh, and is marketed towards the entry level businessman. Sorry but I know of nobody in that market who would want this car.

      I've seen one in the flesh. One. It looked nice, nicer than the pictures show. But it wasn't anything special.

    22. Member P-Body's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 17th, 2007
      Location
      Toronto
      Posts
      5,497
      Vehicles
      15 RC350
      10-05-2012 02:11 PM #72
      Quote Originally Posted by clutchrider View Post
      For the money of an ILX you could easily slide into a loaded GLI or get a nice lease on a VW CC.

      I am not pushing my own car, but there is nothing that really makes the ILX stand out. It looks meh, it performs meh, and is marketed towards the entry level businessman. Sorry but I know of nobody in that market who would want this car.

      I've seen one in the flesh. One. It looked nice, nicer than the pictures show. But it wasn't anything special.
      I'd say you pretty much described the CC and the GLI as well.
      Quote Originally Posted by teklord69 View Post
      Scenario: Uphill on two lane hwy. You need to pass and overtake a slower vehicle. That 151 torque won't let you. You will hit an oncoming car the opposite side if you do.

    23. Member
      Join Date
      Jul 1st, 2011
      Location
      The Volt Bar
      Posts
      1,376
      Vehicles
      2016 Chevrolet Volt, 2016 Cadillac CTS
      10-05-2012 02:14 PM #73
      Quote Originally Posted by choochoo View Post
      I was commenting on west coast Gen Yers? I don't think I know anyone around my age, would even consider a buick. Which people are you polling, Verano owners? I wonder how many Verano owners are gen Y and live on the west coast. I'm really curious.

      I think the CR comment is very valid for the compact entry level luxury market. Like I said earlier, people would rather buy a bigger car with the same amount of features without the premium badge.
      Especially in a soft economy.
      Well there is a big, big world out there beyond the West Coast. 30 years ago, BMW's were what you drove if you couldn't afford a Mercedes and Saab was in the wheelhouse of those same buyers. Things change, and will continue to do so if a company makes the investment. And CR's view is outdated. Why is the 'Verano segment' and the smaller premium market in general growing? Buyers needs are changing, along with there spending habits.

    24. Member choochoo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 12th, 2008
      Location
      OC, CA
      Posts
      6,840
      Vehicles
      nothing to see here
      10-05-2012 02:36 PM #74
      Quote Originally Posted by Minority5 View Post
      Well there is a big, big world out there beyond the West Coast. 30 years ago, BMW's were what you drove if you couldn't afford a Mercedes and Saab was in the wheelhouse of those same buyers. Things change, and will continue to do so if a company makes the investment. And CR's view is outdated. Why is the 'Verano segment' and the smaller premium market in general growing? Buyers needs are changing, along with there spending habits.
      I understand that, my comments are based on my observations. I'd rather not talk about the rest of the country where I have little or no experience with. Like I said, I wonder what percentage of Verano owners are on the west coast and gen y?

    25. Member
      Join Date
      Sep 8th, 2007
      Location
      Calgary, AB
      Posts
      644
      Vehicles
      2013 335i x-drive
      10-05-2012 02:40 PM #75
      Quote Originally Posted by P-Body View Post
      I'd say you pretty much described the CC and the GLI as well.
      Agreed.

      People just like to whip on Acura on these boards.

      Sure, go buy your beyond base level Audi/BMW/Merc whatever at 30k, it won't have nearly the same options or equipment on it as the ILX will, lets be honest here.....

      The ILX looks worlds better than the Verano.

      For the price I do agree the engines could have a little more oomph to them... Why not the I4 from the Accord?

    Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •