VWVortex.com - ILX sales are below Acura projections
Username or Email Address
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up

    VWVortex


    The Car Lounge
    Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
    Results 76 to 100 of 289

    Thread: ILX sales are below Acura projections

    1. Member choochoo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 12th, 2008
      Location
      OC, CA
      Posts
      6,854
      Vehicles
      nothing to see here
      10-05-2012 02:36 PM #76
      Quote Originally Posted by Minority5 View Post
      Well there is a big, big world out there beyond the West Coast. 30 years ago, BMW's were what you drove if you couldn't afford a Mercedes and Saab was in the wheelhouse of those same buyers. Things change, and will continue to do so if a company makes the investment. And CR's view is outdated. Why is the 'Verano segment' and the smaller premium market in general growing? Buyers needs are changing, along with there spending habits.
      I understand that, my comments are based on my observations. I'd rather not talk about the rest of the country where I have little or no experience with. Like I said, I wonder what percentage of Verano owners are on the west coast and gen y?

    2. Member
      Join Date
      Sep 8th, 2007
      Location
      Calgary, AB
      Posts
      662
      Vehicles
      2015 X5 35i
      10-05-2012 02:40 PM #77
      Quote Originally Posted by P-Body View Post
      I'd say you pretty much described the CC and the GLI as well.
      Agreed.

      People just like to whip on Acura on these boards.

      Sure, go buy your beyond base level Audi/BMW/Merc whatever at 30k, it won't have nearly the same options or equipment on it as the ILX will, lets be honest here.....

      The ILX looks worlds better than the Verano.

      For the price I do agree the engines could have a little more oomph to them... Why not the I4 from the Accord?

    3. Member
      Join Date
      Aug 13th, 2008
      Location
      Minneapolis
      Posts
      1,572
      Vehicles
      1995 M3, 2012 GLI
      10-05-2012 03:20 PM #78
      Quote Originally Posted by P-Body View Post
      I'd say you pretty much described the CC and the GLI as well.
      Except the GLI is cheaper and has 50 more bhp.

      And the CC is a larger, more substantial car that many people feel is quite stylish.

      What does the ILX have on either of these cars? What 'killer app' does it have that distinguishes it in the marketplace?

    4. Member randy's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 18th, 1999
      Location
      The Orange Curtain- CA
      Posts
      4,551
      10-05-2012 03:28 PM #79
      The marketing behind this car is horrid. Here's the full page ad in C&D for the ILX:





      So, if your dad didn't have you, you think he'd be driving an ILX? And who are they targeting with that ad..... you, or your dad so he can reclaim his youth?

      I went to the local dealer and saw a ILX in the showroom this week. $33K. You gotta be kidding me.
      Last edited by randy; 10-05-2012 at 03:44 PM.
      Randy
      2012 Audi Q5 | 2002 Passat 1.8T manual

    5. Senior Member 6cylVWguy's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 14th, 2000
      Location
      PA
      Posts
      24,177
      Blog Entries
      4
      Vehicles
      '11 M3 ZCP; '94 SLC
      10-05-2012 03:39 PM #80
      Quote Originally Posted by clutchrider View Post
      For the money of an ILX you could easily slide into a loaded GLI or get a nice lease on a VW CC.

      I am not pushing my own car, but there is nothing that really makes the ILX stand out. It looks meh, it performs meh, and is marketed towards the entry level businessman. Sorry but I know of nobody in that market who would want this car.

      I've seen one in the flesh. One. It looked nice, nicer than the pictures show. But it wasn't anything special.
      When it comes to actually spending my own money, in reality, I'm 100% with you on this. I would pick the GLI over pretty much any other sedan under $35k. Which isn't to say that I think the GLI is the objective best car out there, but I think it represents a better value. At least at moderate levels of equipment, which is how I buy my cars anyway.

    6. Member NoXenons's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 6th, 2012
      Posts
      4,682
      Vehicles
      Various POSes in good mechanical condition
      10-05-2012 03:50 PM #81
      Quote Originally Posted by 6cylVWguy View Post
      When it comes to actually spending my own money, in reality, I'm 100% with you on this. I would pick the GLI over pretty much any other sedan under $35k. Which isn't to say that I think the GLI is the objective best car out there, but I think it represents a better value. At least at moderate levels of equipment, which is how I buy my cars anyway.
      You would take a GLI over an A4 Quattro or Evo X?

    7. Member choochoo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 12th, 2008
      Location
      OC, CA
      Posts
      6,854
      Vehicles
      nothing to see here
      10-05-2012 03:53 PM #82
      Quote Originally Posted by randy View Post
      So, if your dad didn't have you, you think he'd be driving an ILX? And who are they targeting with that ad..... you, or your dad so he can reclaim his youth?
      marketing 101 fail

    8. Member P-Body's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 17th, 2007
      Location
      Toronto
      Posts
      5,557
      Vehicles
      15 RC350
      10-05-2012 03:55 PM #83
      Quote Originally Posted by Charlie84 View Post
      Except the GLI is cheaper and has 50 more bhp.

      And the CC is a larger, more substantial car that many people feel is quite stylish.

      What does the ILX have on either of these cars? What 'killer app' does it have that distinguishes it in the marketplace?
      By that rationale, a GLI is a horrible buy considering I can get a WRX for about the same amount.

      And I'll match your CC with just about any upper echelon mid-size sedan with more options from a non-luxury brand.

      It's a silly argument. And one that is parroted over and over. Your two examples don't bring anything new to the table either, but you're using them as examples. In fact, the Jetta regressed technically versus previous generations.

      The ILX is a premium compact car. Nothing more or less.
      Quote Originally Posted by teklord69 View Post
      Scenario: Uphill on two lane hwy. You need to pass and overtake a slower vehicle. That 151 torque won't let you. You will hit an oncoming car the opposite side if you do.

    9. 10-05-2012 04:06 PM #84
      Acura needs to get serious liek Infiniti does offer more hp than the competition to get in the game.
      This isnt 1986 anymore

    10. Member
      Join Date
      Aug 13th, 2008
      Location
      Minneapolis
      Posts
      1,572
      Vehicles
      1995 M3, 2012 GLI
      10-05-2012 04:13 PM #85
      Quote Originally Posted by P-Body View Post
      By that rationale, a GLI is a horrible buy considering I can get a WRX for about the same amount.

      And I'll match your CC with just about any upper echelon mid-size sedan with more options from a non-luxury brand.

      It's a silly argument. And one that is parroted over and over. Your two examples don't bring anything new to the table either, but you're using them as examples. In fact, the Jetta regressed technically versus previous generations.

      The ILX is a premium compact car. Nothing more or less.
      I'm not trying to hawk the GLI or the CC. Someone else brought up that particular comparison. My point is that they each have something compelling about them...a reason to prefer X instead of Y. The ILX does not.

      I just purchased a GLI as my daily driver. I got it for a ridiculously good price (less than the cost of a loaded Civic). I wouldn't call it a great car, but it's good solid transportation that can be a little fun now and then and isn't aesthetically embarrassing (as I find the WRX to be). In the GLI:WRX Venn diagram, they have some in common but not really that much overlap...different features, layout, design, and different buyers. If you Venn diagram'd the GLI and the ILX, I think you'd find that there is much more overlap but the ILX's circle is considerably smaller despite being more expensive.

      Again, my point is not about the GLI or the CC or the WRX. I'm focusing on the ILX and it's lack of any unique appeal. In the crowded market of $25K sedans, how does the ILX stand out? I guess some might argue in it's favor that you're getting a "luxury" badge for $25K. Well, I can't help those people if all they're after is the badge...and not even a very good one at that.

    11. Member Avus's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 20th, 2000
      Location
      Toronto
      Posts
      10,410
      Vehicles
      2008 Hyundai Accent, 2007 S2000
      10-05-2012 04:15 PM #86
      Quote Originally Posted by Hajduk View Post
      Meanwhile in Canada....... the ILX is selling better than its predecessor, the CSX.

      I guess we just really like fancy Civics.
      Don't think so... even in GTA north (Markham, Richmond hill) where lots of Asia ladies (EL and CSX were always loved by Asian ladies ), I don't see the new ILX much. I am guessing lots of Acura customers (specially Asian) had moved "up" to Audi/BMW/Mercedes.

      I only saw an ILX on 401 once... Honestly, nowadays Honda and Acura selling most of their cars with big discounts... like the old GM.
      Windows Vista (32bit only)/7/8/10 "God Mode"
      - Create new folder on desktop
      - rename folder to the following:
      GodMode.{ED7BA470-8E54-465E-825C-99712043E01C}

    12. Member
      Join Date
      Aug 13th, 2008
      Location
      Minneapolis
      Posts
      1,572
      Vehicles
      1995 M3, 2012 GLI
      10-05-2012 04:18 PM #87
      Quote Originally Posted by Impeccable View Post
      Acura needs to get serious liek Infiniti does offer more hp than the competition to get in the game.
      This isnt 1986 anymore
      Really! Infiniti knew that it needed a shot in the arm and to do that, they needed a game-changer. Solution? Build a 3-series knock-off, but make it bigger, more powerful, and cheaper. It's a simple formula, but it did exactly what it was supposed to. Now, Infiniti is in much better shape than it was when it was just re-badging Maximas.

    13. Member NoXenons's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 6th, 2012
      Posts
      4,682
      Vehicles
      Various POSes in good mechanical condition
      10-05-2012 04:25 PM #88
      Quote Originally Posted by Impeccable View Post
      Acura needs to get serious liek Infiniti does offer more hp than the competition to get in the game.
      This isnt 1986 anymore
      Maybe if they want to impress kids on TCL who might buy their cars used in 5 years. Otherwise Infiniti is the example not to follow. Acura has outsold Infiniti every month this year. They are doing fire leases on G37's and the one rebadged FWD Nissan they sell has been a huge success.



      http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/02/s...malcy-edition/

    14. Member thebanker's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 11th, 2005
      Location
      Aliso Viejo, CA
      Posts
      1,842
      Vehicles
      2013 Subaru WRX, 2010 Nissan Sentra aka THE M3 DESTROYER
      10-05-2012 04:34 PM #89
      Seen three ILX's on the road. All driven by middle aged women.

      I live in Southern CA... the "just for men" guys don't want to drive cars like this. They're buying trucks, mustangs, or RWD...
      - mikey

      "It's not a real build until there's Plasti Dip involved."

    15. Member P-Body's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 17th, 2007
      Location
      Toronto
      Posts
      5,557
      Vehicles
      15 RC350
      10-05-2012 04:38 PM #90
      Quote Originally Posted by Charlie84 View Post
      I'm not trying to hawk the GLI or the CC. Someone else brought up that particular comparison. My point is that they each have something compelling about them...a reason to prefer X instead of Y. The ILX does not.

      I just purchased a GLI as my daily driver. I got it for a ridiculously good price (less than the cost of a loaded Civic). I wouldn't call it a great car, but it's good solid transportation that can be a little fun now and then and isn't aesthetically embarrassing (as I find the WRX to be). In the GLI:WRX Venn diagram, they have some in common but not really that much overlap...different features, layout, design, and different buyers. If you Venn diagram'd the GLI and the ILX, I think you'd find that there is much more overlap but the ILX's circle is considerably smaller despite being more expensive.

      Again, my point is not about the GLI or the CC or the WRX. I'm focusing on the ILX and it's lack of any unique appeal. In the crowded market of $25K sedans, how does the ILX stand out? I guess some might argue in it's favor that you're getting a "luxury" badge for $25K. Well, I can't help those people if all they're after is the badge...and not even a very good one at that.
      And my point is that everything you described your GLI as, I can do the same for the ILX. It stands out in a sea of good 25k sedans about as well as anything else, including your Jetta.

      And the Subie is squarely in the same group as the Jetta. Turbocharged compact sedans from regular brands. The Acura plays with the Verano, A3, CT and whatever the small Volvo is.
      Quote Originally Posted by teklord69 View Post
      Scenario: Uphill on two lane hwy. You need to pass and overtake a slower vehicle. That 151 torque won't let you. You will hit an oncoming car the opposite side if you do.

    16. Member clutchrider's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 10th, 2010
      Location
      Connecticut
      Posts
      5,040
      Vehicles
      2012 GLI
      10-05-2012 04:39 PM #91
      I wasn't looking to tout the GLI/CC either. I was just using them as examples. The CC for it's price point offers something that you cannot get "brand new" in the market from many other manufacturers. At least not without stepping into Mercedes price ranges.

      In the sea of sedans in the ILX price range, what makes it stand out from the group? Is the GLI the best of the best, not at all. But it is the "performance" (used lightly) version of the Jetta lineup and thus has a niche same as the Si and WRX in the same price point. Value for the money plays a role in this segment. The ILX just doesn't have anything to make it noticeable.

      Acura should be spending more time fixing their current models than releasing more garbage (MDX aside). It just adds to the opinion that they don't care anymore.

    17. Member MRVW00's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 30th, 2000
      Location
      Everywhere you want to be.
      Posts
      9,722
      Vehicles
      B5 2.8Q, Buell XB9S
      10-05-2012 04:48 PM #92
      That brochure reminds me of this....

      RIP Cosmic TDI

    18. Member BostonB6's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 16th, 2005
      Location
      Boston, MA
      Posts
      9,699
      Vehicles
      2016 Audi A4/ 2015.5 Volvo XC-60/2005 BMW Z4
      10-05-2012 04:50 PM #93
      Quote Originally Posted by P-Body View Post
      In fact, the Jetta regressed technically versus previous generations.
      Maybe for the non-GLI Jetta, but the GLI has the IRS & all the soft touch interior trim of the euro-Jettas.

    19. Member thebanker's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 11th, 2005
      Location
      Aliso Viejo, CA
      Posts
      1,842
      Vehicles
      2013 Subaru WRX, 2010 Nissan Sentra aka THE M3 DESTROYER
      10-05-2012 05:14 PM #94
      Quote Originally Posted by P-Body View Post
      And my point is that everything you described your GLI as, I can do the same for the ILX. It stands out in a sea of good 25k sedans about as well as anything else, including your Jetta.
      Um isnt the ILX, at best, a 2.4L N/A with 200 hp / 170 tq? At about 2978 lbs... it's similar but probably a bit slower than the GLI.

      Also it's derpy looking.
      - mikey

      "It's not a real build until there's Plasti Dip involved."

    20. Member bmann's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 7th, 2001
      Location
      Lafayette, CO
      Posts
      3,472
      Vehicles
      2005 Toyota MR2 Spyder, 2009 Subaru WRX, 2003 Subaru Baja
      10-05-2012 05:46 PM #95
      You'd think TCLers never heard of a manufacturer making a premium car based on a non-premium car.
      Do not be persecuted by the pompous fedora, balanced by the equilibrium, fortified by the
      government's inability to eradicate, or foreshadow—taken from the Hebrew word: foreskin

    21. Senior Member Hostile's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 18th, 2001
      Location
      Near Rabbit5GTI
      Posts
      33,666
      Vehicles
      '15 STI & '16 R
      10-05-2012 05:52 PM #96
      Acura sells a 4-door sedan with 201hp and a manual for less than $30k and TCL still bitches and moans...

    22. Member thebanker's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 11th, 2005
      Location
      Aliso Viejo, CA
      Posts
      1,842
      Vehicles
      2013 Subaru WRX, 2010 Nissan Sentra aka THE M3 DESTROYER
      10-05-2012 05:56 PM #97
      Quote Originally Posted by Hostile View Post
      Acura sells a 4-door sedan with 201hp and a manual for less than $30k and TCL still bitches and moans...
      Because it's

      a) weird looking
      b) 170 tq for ~2970 lbs
      c) not un-weird looking
      - mikey

      "It's not a real build until there's Plasti Dip involved."

    23. 10-05-2012 05:59 PM #98
      Quote Originally Posted by above8k View Post
      people saying ILX is like another Civic.
      I forgive you, but I can understand why you are confused. You probably didn't know about the generations before the ILX to truly grasp what the ILX is.

      The EL, CSX, and ILX are just a tarted up Civic targeted for people older than 25.

      Acura EL

      (Civic Based)



      Acura CSX

      (Civic Based)


      Acura ILX

      (Civic Based)
      Last edited by DedRok; 10-05-2012 at 06:07 PM.
      To be a Rok, and not to roll

    24. Member choochoo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 12th, 2008
      Location
      OC, CA
      Posts
      6,854
      Vehicles
      nothing to see here
      10-05-2012 06:07 PM #99
      ^^^nope
      ILX has a completely different sheet metal all the way around and different interior.

    25. 10-05-2012 06:08 PM #100
      Quote Originally Posted by Prail11 View Post
      Agreed.

      People just like to whip on Acura on these boards.

      Sure, go buy your beyond base level Audi/BMW/Merc whatever at 30k, it won't have nearly the same options or equipment on it as the ILX will, lets be honest here.....

      The ILX looks worlds better than the Verano.

      For the price I do agree the engines could have a little more oomph to them... Why not the I4 from the Accord?
      While subjectively, it may look better than the Verano ( I don't care for either the ILX or the Verano), the ILX is priced close enough to the Buick Regal that it becomes a legitimate choice.


      I think the Accord is the number 1 reason not to get an ILX. The newly redesigned Accord starts at a lower base price, with a more powerful engine: 185-189 hp 2.4 I4 vs 150 hp 2.0 I4.
      If you move up to the more powerful 2.4 I4 in the ILX (201 hp starting @ $29K+) you get close to the Accord EX L V6 which has 278 hp starting @ $30K+.

    For advertising information click HERE

    Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •