Going in on Monday to check out the FR-S a bit more in depth. I think the 86's steering is a result of the low rolling resistance tires especially in this company.
#1
______________________________________
![]()
![]()
#2
Going in on Monday to check out the FR-S a bit more in depth. I think the 86's steering is a result of the low rolling resistance tires especially in this company.
#3
I have to imagine a 944 S/S2 is in the same league, if not better, than any of these cars.
DD: 2012 GLI
Gone but not forgotten: 2010 Golf 2.5
Summer fun: 1995 M3
Former E36 318i driver and self-appointed Chairman of the Momentum Preservation Society.
#4
#5
The S2 is too powerfull to be in his group, and while the S fits the power requirement, it is too fat to be included......87-88 944 S weighs 1,300KG
Great article though. The E30 M3 and Integra Type-R are wonderful cars to drive. Have not had a chance to take an FR-S or BRZ for a spin yet.
Last edited by a2a4raddo; 10-13-2012 at 01:38 PM.
#6
The more I look at them/hear about them, the more the Toyobaru twins remind me of the 924S. Supremely talented chassis, pretty ok engine. A little bit of finessing and BAM, darn near perfect.
That would be a good comparison. E30 M3, 924S, B13 Sentra SE-R and BRZ.
1998 VW Golf Mk.III 5dr/1960 Porsche 356B T5
/1980 Honda CM400E
"I drive an '81 Jetta with a Scirocco engine, Rabbit front fenders and multi-colored doors. There's a spiderweb fracture in the driver's side windshield, and a dented bumper sticker that says 'praised are the lowered'"
#7
GT86's interior looks super super riced out. Hate it.
Originally Posted by Zhine
#8
The GT86's aura starts to fade.
2007 E90 AW 323i Step | Lowered 1.25"/1" | BMW Performance Exhaust | PBX | Debadged | Scangauge II | Style 162 18" & 161 17" wheels & rear 15mm spacers
#9
I can confirm that the author of this comparo is in his early 40's.Originally Posted by Evo
#10
#11
#15
He said "talented chassis, ok engine."
The ITR had a talented chassis an amazing engine.
Sorry, unsuccessful troll is unsuccessful.
And you say I'M the one that derails threads? Whatever happened to that "what exhaust to get on my 1.8T Jetta" thread? I called you out, you didn't reply. What's the matter, realize that I was right and that you're a bigger dickhead than I am?
Last edited by C4 A6; 10-13-2012 at 06:32 PM.
#16
#17
I wonder if all these famed French hot hatches live up to the hype. Sucks that we don't get them in the U.S. I'd really like to thrash one.
DD: 2012 GLI
Gone but not forgotten: 2010 Golf 2.5
Summer fun: 1995 M3
Former E36 318i driver and self-appointed Chairman of the Momentum Preservation Society.
#18
Nice article. Personally I think the GT86 can handle a lot more power and that's why it seem kind of dull when compare to cars like the others in this test.
#19
Why? Because Evo said it was one star short of 2 of the most iconic sport coupes of all time and the modern benchmark of hot hatches which you can't get in North America? Yeah, that's a really poor showing.
I'd still give one of my testicles for an FR-S. It's an amazing little car.
#21
I'll take the Clio!
"As anyone who has ever tinkered with an old BMW engine or looked out on to the wing of a jet can attest, pure response to engineering requirements can sometimes deliver just as much pleasure as a more intentionally aesthetic design process."
#23
1998 VW Golf Mk.III 5dr/1960 Porsche 356B T5
/1980 Honda CM400E
"I drive an '81 Jetta with a Scirocco engine, Rabbit front fenders and multi-colored doors. There's a spiderweb fracture in the driver's side windshield, and a dented bumper sticker that says 'praised are the lowered'"
#24
C4 gotta defend that type-rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
C4 gonna buy up all the type-rrrrrrrrrsssss
#25
I own an E30 M3 and I approve this article.
Religious wars aside, better cars abide, whatever your stance, I like this comparison.
--Measure with mike, mark with chalk, cut with axe, pound to fit, paint to match
#26
#27
The same case could be made of all cars with great chassis. For some reason manufacturers just don't give them more power (case in point: Miata.)
But you have to think, would these cars really have such great handling characteristics if they had a bigger (and heavier) engine or a turbo (adds weight, throttle response not as good)?
What manufacturers SHOULD do would be to max out the NA motors that come with these cars and push the 120hp/L boundary. But if they did that, then longevity goes way down.
#28
#30
All those cars look appealing to me...except for the Toyota; strangely enough.
#31
#32
It's amazing how the ITR fared so well after all these years against a newer RWD GT86 and was rated higher than the GT86. Now imagine if Honda came out with a RWD ITR.![]()
#33
I just had a BRZ for a couple of days and didn't really think it needed more power either (ok, maybe 25hp bump if at all), it was a hell of a lot of fun wringing it out. As a matter of fact, I thought the car way more fun to drive than the Lexus LFA (engine noise aside) I drove the week before.
And I am jaded from driving 500+hp exotics, I think they are somewhat boring since you can't use the performance on the street (ask the cop who pulled me over in the LFA) and they are boring on the track too since they are so over competent that a mere mortal driver can't even approach the limits of them.
BRZ is a great balance for real world performance, if you think it needs big power, you need to find better roads to drive or stick to pony cars
It seems like most of the complaints against the Toyota in the article came down to the tires, which has been a gripe in a lot of the reviews
Last edited by MoPho; 10-14-2012 at 04:35 AM.
#34
#35
Yeah, I'm down with Clio from this review, as well. It's just cool![]()
![]()