George@Fourtitude
Fourtitude Staff
Offline
Member Since
4-9-2004
13123 posts
Hershey PA
2010 S4 (on order), 1984 4000 quattro x 2 , PREVIOUS CARS - 1991 200 Turbo quattro, 2002 A4 Avant 1
|
Driven: 2009 Audi RS 6 Avant | « » 2:03 AM 8-6-2008 | |
|
With every European car manufacturer it seems, there will always be a selection of models not available on the left side of the Atlantic – the greener grass on the other side of a row of pickets. For Audi, there is no more in-your-face example of this European forbidden fruit than the latest and greatest RS 6 Avant. And even though a more American mainstream-friendly sedan is known to be on the way, there’s been no mention of any potential sale of the car in the States. That said, the car hasn’t exactly been ruled out yet either and, combined with our own taste fruit we’re told we can’t eat, we headed to Germany’s Eurospeedway Lausitz to get sample the car. Full Story
-G 10 S4 | 84 4000 S quattro FOURTITUDE on TWITTER FOURTITUDE on FACEBOOK FOURTITUDE on MYSPACE
|
S8Ns
Member
Offline
Member Since
8-6-2008
5 posts
houston tx
2001 S8, 2003 TT 225, 2003 Golf TDI
|
Re: Driven: 2009 Audi RS 6 Avant (George@Fourtitude) » | « » 8:45 AM 8-6-2008 | |
|
I agree that an Avant would be more popular in the US. The RS6 is an Audi enthusiast's car. And Audi enthusiasts (like me) love their Avants. The advent of another sedan would be following the old motive of "trying to recruit" new enthusiasts / buyers. And this is a niche performer, not a recruiter. Besides~ wagons are becoming more popular in the US overall.
|
audiant
Member

Offline
Member Since
2-12-2006
2751 posts
woodside ny
2007 A3 2.0T 6MT S-Line Open Sky
|
» | « » 9:50 AM 8-6-2008 | |
|
drool
A3 2.0T 6MT Ibis White,S-Line,Cold Weather Package,OpenskyNeuspeed sport springs,koni fsd,Awe catback,Atp downpipe,Neuspeed p-flo&Carbon fiber engine cover,S-line blkout grill,Votex sideskirts,LED tails,6000k HID,S3 shiftknob&brake handle,TT alum light switch,TT alum pedals,S-line flat bottom steering wheel,forge dv,AWE Boost Gauge,ECS Spacers& Dogbone Mnt
|
George@Fourtitude
Fourtitude Staff
Offline
Member Since
4-9-2004
13123 posts
Hershey PA
2010 S4 (on order), 1984 4000 quattro x 2 , PREVIOUS CARS - 1991 200 Turbo quattro, 2002 A4 Avant 1
|
Re: Driven: 2009 Audi RS 6 Avant (S8Ns) » | « » 10:42 AM 8-6-2008 | |
|
| Quote, originally posted by S8Ns » | | I agree that an Avant would be more popular in the US. The RS6 is an Audi enthusiast's car. And Audi enthusiasts (like me) love their Avants. The advent of another sedan would be following the old motive of "trying to recruit" new enthusiasts / buyers. And this is a niche performer, not a recruiter. Besides~ wagons are becoming more popular in the US overall. |
Good points. Welcome to Fourtitude BTW.
-G 10 S4 | 84 4000 S quattro FOURTITUDE on TWITTER FOURTITUDE on FACEBOOK FOURTITUDE on MYSPACE
|
iwantanaudi
Member
Offline
Member Since
6-8-2006
379 posts
OC CA
|
Re: Driven: 2009 Audi RS 6 Avant (George@Fourtitude) » | « » 1:26 PM 8-6-2008 | |
|
George, Other than the extra power, was there a large difference between the RS6 and your S6? You mentioned that the steering was similar, but what about handling? Thanks And yes the Avant is much better looking than the sedan, but Americans, in general still see it as a station wagon. As much as I would love to have the RS6 come in Avant form to the US, I think it would be a mistake for Audi to do it.
|
George@Fourtitude
Fourtitude Staff
Offline
Member Since
4-9-2004
13123 posts
Hershey PA
2010 S4 (on order), 1984 4000 quattro x 2 , PREVIOUS CARS - 1991 200 Turbo quattro, 2002 A4 Avant 1
|
Re: Driven: 2009 Audi RS 6 Avant (iwantanaudi) » | « » 2:10 PM 8-6-2008 | |
|
The adjustable suspension - basically the suspension portion of the same technology found in the Audi Drive Select system we've seen in B8 cars, is considerably better and more variable than the S6's steel sprung, non-adjustable setup. I love the S6 and it handles like a car its size has no right handling, but the RS6's comfort mode was more comfortable and sport mode more sporting. There was basically more range.
-G 10 S4 | 84 4000 S quattro FOURTITUDE on TWITTER FOURTITUDE on FACEBOOK FOURTITUDE on MYSPACE
|
.:R2theT
Member

Offline
Member Since
9-6-2005
677 posts
MPLS MN
VR6
|
Re: Driven: 2009 Audi RS 6 Avant (S8Ns) » | « » 8:40 PM 8-6-2008 | |
|
| Quote, originally posted by S8Ns » | | I agree that an Avant would be more popular in the US. The RS6 is an Audi enthusiast's car. And Audi enthusiasts (like me) love their Avants. The advent of another sedan would be following the old motive of "trying to recruit" new enthusiasts / buyers. And this is a niche performer, not a recruiter. Besides~ wagons are becoming more popular in the US overall. |
Uh, maybe? Didn't Audi only sell like 300 S4 Avants last year? I just have to believe, unfortunately, that the days of Audi bringing over the power-wagons may be long gone.
I LOVE to drive!-------------------------------- 2006 Audi A3 3.2Q -------------------------------- Drive! --------------------------------
|
S8Ns
Member
Offline
Member Since
8-6-2008
5 posts
houston tx
2001 S8, 2003 TT 225, 2003 Golf TDI
|
Re: Driven: 2009 Audi RS 6 Avant (.:R2theT) » | « » 3:30 PM 8-13-2008 | |
|
I don't know how many S4 Avants were sold last year. Is 300 accurate? What would be even more accurate & descriptive is the percentage increase YTY, sold. You can make much wiser predictions using % / T as opposed to one year's factor. I'm basing my assumptions (and that's all they are) on my ambiguous observation of seeing more wagons on the market and on American roads. As I said: The RS6 (Avant or Sedan) is an enthusiast's car", not a mass prod. Thus, catering to mass prod., in my opinion (for what it isn't worth), would be a mistake. Instead~ cater to the folks who will actually purchase an RS6. I for one did not buy one in 03 because it wasn't an Avant. (Instead I bought a TT 225) I also had a chance to buy one 3 months ago, cherry & heavily discounted from market, but did not. Why? Because it's not what I want. And I know many others who have the same discerning attitude, who are actually in a position to move on it. I've owned an S4 Avant, S8 & TT 225... all Audi pinnacles in my opinion. I chose the 225 over the more powerful 3.2 simply because it's more fun than the DSG and the engineering is more interesting. Similarly~ if the RS6 / S6 avant doesn't make it across the pond... I'm out. I'll buy the new forced induc. S4 Avant. The market will be tough this year. All of the $30K millionaires are losing their credit & leverage, so they will be stuck with their H2s & C230s. Yet another good reason to target the BUYING enthusiasts. Audi since 99 & still pushing on all four's.
|
JIIP
Member

Offline
Member Since
4-20-2006
4602 posts
Hoodinville washington
LB7Z Sport Luxury Coupe
|
Re: Driven: 2009 Audi RS 6 Avant (S8Ns) » | « » 9:29 PM 8-20-2008 | |
|
they made the mistake of not bringing S cars over in the past. lets just hope they dont do it again. But if anything i would rather see the avant over here than the sedan.
| Quote, originally posted by JustinS1219 » | ILL!
|
BPC--Dubs>> ...| Quote, originally posted by vdubmike2 » | ive been perfectly happy with hid's in my NA headlights, why spend $500 for e-codes...If all your looking for is improved light output e-codes are a waste of money.
 |
|
wolfsburgfanatic
Member

Offline
Member Since
5-27-2002
2000 posts
Frederick MD
2009 VW GTI
|
Re: Driven: 2009 Audi RS 6 Avant (George@Fourtitude) » | « » 9:45 PM 8-20-2008 | |
|
awesome car, but I'd still rather have this:
| Quote, originally posted by W. Sobchak » | | Man, you think it'd do okay with the Gas situation and all. People seem to care less and less about cars every year. I can't wait til 2025 and car shopping will be as exciting as toaster shopping. (No offense to anyone that gets psyched about toaster shopping.) | (O:o)==w==(o:O)
|
jsm1024a
Member
Offline
Member Since
10-30-2006
377 posts
forest hill md
99.5 Golf 2.0
|
Re: Driven: 2009 Audi RS 6 Avant » | « » 11:04 PM 8-20-2008 | |
|
| Quote » | | much less a twin-turbocharged 5.0-liter V10 fitted with two turbochargers. |
diesel idle 2.0 power
|
George@Fourtitude
Fourtitude Staff
Offline
Member Since
4-9-2004
13123 posts
Hershey PA
2010 S4 (on order), 1984 4000 quattro x 2 , PREVIOUS CARS - 1991 200 Turbo quattro, 2002 A4 Avant 1
|
Re: Driven: 2009 Audi RS 6 Avant (jsm1024a) » | « » 11:43 PM 8-20-2008 | |
|
Did I mention it has a pair of turbos? Fixed. Thanks.
-G 10 S4 | 84 4000 S quattro FOURTITUDE on TWITTER FOURTITUDE on FACEBOOK FOURTITUDE on MYSPACE
|
justinperkins
Member

Offline
Member Since
5-11-2006
7595 posts
Austin
B6 S4 Avant & C5 A6 Avant Q
|
» | « » 1:26 AM 8-21-2008 | |
|
Amazing car, but gosh, a traditional auto instead of DSG? Is that really true? Slightly unrelated, but I really think Audi is making a mistake not differentiating the DSG trans from the older autos in their naming conventions (tiptronic). Not to mention is damn near impossible to tell the difference when looking at a brochure or website.edit: my bad, I was just looking at the spec sheet and the DSG version is called "S-tronic" not tiptronic. Tiptronic just refers to the manual mode of the transmission.
Modified by justinperkins at 10:34 PM 8-20-2008
-justinRegister your US-spec R32
|
jsm1024a
Member
Offline
Member Since
10-30-2006
377 posts
forest hill md
99.5 Golf 2.0
|
Re: Driven: 2009 Audi RS 6 Avant (George@Fourtitude) » | « » 10:28 AM 8-21-2008 | |
|
| Quote, originally posted by George@Fourtitude » | Did I mention it has a pair of turbos? Fixed. Thanks. |
no problemo
diesel idle 2.0 power
|
George@Fourtitude
Fourtitude Staff
Offline
Member Since
4-9-2004
13123 posts
Hershey PA
2010 S4 (on order), 1984 4000 quattro x 2 , PREVIOUS CARS - 1991 200 Turbo quattro, 2002 A4 Avant 1
|
Re: (justinperkins) » | « » 2:37 PM 8-21-2008 | |
|
| Quote, originally posted by justinperkins » | | Amazing car, but gosh, a traditional auto instead of DSG? Is that really true? Slightly unrelated, but I really think Audi is making a mistake not differentiating the DSG trans from the older autos in their naming conventions (tiptronic). Not to mention is damn near impossible to tell the difference when looking at a brochure or website. edit: my bad, I was just looking at the spec sheet and the DSG version is called "S-tronic" not tiptronic. Tiptronic just refers to the manual mode of the transmission. Modified by justinperkins at 10:34 PM 8-20-2008
|
Nothing else in the partsbin currently can handle the torque FWIW. In Audi speak: Tiptronic - torque converter automatic with manual shift controller on center console and optional paddles. Multitronic - chain-driven CVT (fwd longitudinal applications only) with manual shift controller on center console and optional paddles to shift between 7 pre-set ratios. Stronic - 6-speed dual clutch DSG sequential for transverse, 7-speed DSG for longitudinal Rtronic - 6-speed single clutch sequential for mid-mounted engine in R8... also used in Lamborghini Gallardo.
-G 10 S4 | 84 4000 S quattro FOURTITUDE on TWITTER FOURTITUDE on FACEBOOK FOURTITUDE on MYSPACE
|
justinperkins
Member

Offline
Member Since
5-11-2006
7595 posts
Austin
B6 S4 Avant & C5 A6 Avant Q
|
Re: (George@Fourtitude) » | « » 11:34 PM 8-21-2008 | |
|
Thanks for the clarification on terminology  | Quote, originally posted by George@Fourtitude » | | Nothing else in the partsbin currently can handle the torque |
What about the Veyron? Guess that trans is a little out of the RS6 price range ... at least for the time being 
Modified by justinperkins at 8:35 PM 8-21-2008
-justinRegister your US-spec R32
|
George@Fourtitude
Fourtitude Staff
Offline
Member Since
4-9-2004
13123 posts
Hershey PA
2010 S4 (on order), 1984 4000 quattro x 2 , PREVIOUS CARS - 1991 200 Turbo quattro, 2002 A4 Avant 1
|
Re: (justinperkins) » | « » 11:39 PM 8-21-2008 | |
|
Veyron is mid-engined and uses a dual clutch DSG-style transmission sourced from Ricardo that's unrelated to any of the ones listed above. There's no front-longitudinal application that I know of.
-G 10 S4 | 84 4000 S quattro FOURTITUDE on TWITTER FOURTITUDE on FACEBOOK FOURTITUDE on MYSPACE
|