Quote, originally posted by Big Morgan »

Huh? Do you mean you know you're high so you pay better attention to the road, or do you mean it actually helps you focus better? As in, you have a big test this morning so you chief a fat blunt so you can focus.

I will not buy from BFI

Yeah, talk about Confusion...

I can just picture the Corrado flipping over and piling into a heard of sheep.

"Corrado can lift rear wheel when pressing on, but roadholding fine"

Flip

Tumble

Sheep

Sheep death

Oh $h!~

01001111 01101100 01100100 00100000 01000001 01101100 01100100 01101111 01100110 01110010 01100101 00100000 01001101 01110101 01110011 01101001 01100011 00101110 00100000

corrado always looks wild...from MEIN_VW's old post...

Quote, originally posted by andlf »

corrado always looks wild...from MEIN_VW's old post...

That's not wild its Roadholding Fine.

01001111 01101100 01100100 00100000 01000001 01101100 01100100 01101111 01100110 01110010 01100101 00100000 01001101 01110101 01110011 01101001 01100011 00101110 00100000

HAHAHA

....ZING

Even if the Audi was 20V equipped, it is still terribly light on torque and suffers from a chassis that is designed for terminal understeer. Plus I've never found the Coupe to be an attractive car.

Trying to keep a stock G60 on the road is an exercise in frustration, and while VW did a brilliant job of tuning what is a very simple chassis setup it doesn't overcome the lackluster engine and infuriating build quality.

The 944 is still one of the most well-balanced RWD cars built. I think its interesting that their test car wore 195/65/15 tyres rather than the US-spec 215/60/15 size; I have to wonder if the squirrely understeer/oversteer transition wouldn't have been mitigated a bit by a wider tire? I've never heard of a 944 being criticized for that before.

Of the three, it's the car I'd own--especially in 2.7L form. With an ECU remap, high-flow cat, and throttle cam the car is really transformed.

Still miss that car

i've owned both! although my 1984 944 was only 2.5 liters, imho i prefer the corrado in all aspects.

Yeh, or the bizarre love triangle between these three.

I regret not having purchased any of these

you can always fix that!

they had GAME then!

lol, i was just shooting puns with the name of New Order songs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Order

Modified by andlf at 2:28 PM 10-31-2008

Quote, originally posted by WakeHead »

136hp performance car.

Um. Porsche built an upmarket engine for their 356 lineup called the Super 90. Guess why they called it that... Go ahead, guess. Yes, because it had 30 hp more than their standard 60 hp engine.

Believe it or not, cars can be an absolute blast with less than 100 hp. Hell, the most fun cars I've had have had less than 100 hp. Including my VR6 GTi and my Jetta 16v (although the Jetta is awfully fun!)

Quote, originally posted by patrikman »

A restoration to me is some sort of exorcism/brainwash for a car. /rant.

i love all the funny phrases:

"Together they constitute a personal goosepimple factor . . ."

"The right-hooker will be powered by the notably less exciting 138bhp 16V GTi unit."

". . .VW reopend the grave and pulled out a set of strings that are as inharmonious as a warped record and as vague as a horoscope cast by a fair-ground fortune-teller."

"The Audi . . . has twice as much spring travel which is for fine *****-footed drives."

good stuff.

Modified by G0to60 at 9:03 PM 10-31-2008

Quote, originally posted by -Khaos- »

Seriously, cows "emit" alot of gases compared to cars, yet I don't think any of these smog-test supporters have switched to a vegan diet or made any attempt to place a catalytic converter up a cows rectum.

Seems more like Temptation to me...