VWVortex.com - Staggered tire diameter affecting xDrive AWD?
Username or Email Address
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up

    VWVortex


    The Car Lounge
    Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
    Results 1 to 25 of 50

    Thread: Staggered tire diameter affecting xDrive AWD?

    1. Member
      Join Date
      Jun 25th, 2006
      Location
      NoVA
      Posts
      9,546
      Vehicles
      Entry-level luxury
      01-07-2010 11:00 AM #1
      I know the recommended tire sizes for 18x8 & 18x10 would be like 225/40 and 255-265/35.
      Would running a 245/35 rear cause problems with the xDrive transfer case or diff? There would be a 0.3" difference in tire diameter and 11 revs/mile compared to the 225/40 front (-1.352%).
      RSI, LLC | Fender Rolling | Suspension | Engine | Other Stuff

    2. Remove Advertisements

      Advertisements
       

    3. Member Shomegrown's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 26th, 2002
      Location
      Detroit
      Posts
      19,727
      Vehicles
      Current: Audi S4, B9 Allroad, Porsche Boxster S, Ford F-150 FX4 4x4
      01-07-2010 11:01 AM #2
      So you want more understeer in a car that will already be understeer prone?

    4. Member lojasmo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 23rd, 2002
      Location
      SE MN
      Posts
      4,471
      Vehicles
      2006 Vue, 2012 Chevy Cruze LT2, 2004 Allroad
      01-07-2010 11:07 AM #3
      Don't do it.

    5. Member Grinch337's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 31st, 2002
      Location
      Northeast
      Posts
      1,683
      Vehicles
      E30 track car, E39 540i/6 M Sport, 99 Mountaineer
      01-07-2010 11:11 AM #4
      Quote, originally posted by Shomegrown »
      So you want more understeer in a car that will already be understeer prone?

      Wouldn't narrower tires in the rear help to neutralize the handling characteristics of the car, all else being equal? The front tires are still going to break away at the same point, while now the rear would break away earlier than stock due to a narrower contact patch, right?
      OP: I would think not due to the sophisticated computers controlling the AWD system, but truthfully I dont know. You should probably consult either a tech at your dealer, or maybe try one of the dedicated BMW boards that has knowledgeable people about your AWD system. PM me for another suggestion as well as to how to find out the information.
      "That which you manifest is before you"

    6. Member Shomegrown's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 26th, 2002
      Location
      Detroit
      Posts
      19,727
      Vehicles
      Current: Audi S4, B9 Allroad, Porsche Boxster S, Ford F-150 FX4 4x4
      01-07-2010 11:31 AM #5
      Quote, originally posted by Grinch337 »
      Wouldn't narrower tires in the rear help to neutralize the handling characteristics of the car, all else being equal? The front tires are still going to break away at the same point, while now the rear would break away earlier than stock due to a narrower contact patch, right?
      OP: I would think not due to the sophisticated computers controlling the AWD system, but truthfully I dont know. You should probably consult either a tech at your dealer, or maybe try one of the dedicated BMW boards that has knowledgeable people about your AWD system. PM me for another suggestion as well as to how to find out the information.

      You're correct. [IMG]http://*****************.com/smile/emthup.gif[/IMG]
      I didn't know the car came with staggered tires. I thought he was talking about going from same sized tires to a staggered setup.

    7. Member strictlyA2's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 27th, 2002
      Location
      VA
      Posts
      2,241
      Vehicles
      1990 4Runner 1986 Quantum Syncro x2 1991 318is 32v
      01-07-2010 11:32 AM #6
      You can get staggered fitment wheels on new x-drive BMW's.
      Quote Originally Posted by themagellan View Post
      ac blowing out them snow flurries' duh.

    8. 01-07-2010 11:35 AM #7
      Do it. Jersey FTW.
      No Longer : -=Camry Driver=- -=Camry Driver=- -=Camry Driver=- -=Camry Driver=- -=Camry Driver=- -=Camry Driver=- -=Camry Driver=- -=Camry Driver=- -=Camry Driver=- -=Camry Driver=-

    9. Member VR6 NRG's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 23rd, 1999
      Location
      Anthem, AZ
      Posts
      12,147
      Vehicles
      2015 Audi S3 on air / 1996 VR6 Cabrio on air
      01-07-2010 11:57 AM #8
      just dont try to lower the car, the whole half-shaft going through the middle of the oil pan thing puts a kabosh on any kind of sport suspension. Thats engineering for ya
      quattro FTW
      2015 Audi S3 2.0T quattro - Air Lift / fifteen52/ PARTS SCORE / B&B / BFI / GIAC
      1996 Cabrio build thread https://forums.vwvortex.com/showthrea...6-build-thread
      I Sell Audi's in AZ

    10. 01-07-2010 12:18 PM #9
      Quote, originally posted by VR6 NRG »
      just dont try to lower the car, the whole half-shaft going through the middle of the oil pan thing puts a kabosh on any kind of sport suspension. Thats engineering for ya
      quattro FTW

      If you are buying an AWD BMW, you don't care about sportyness.

    11. Member
      Join Date
      Nov 19th, 2006
      Location
      Arden, NC
      Posts
      3,925
      Vehicles
      2009 BMW 328it
      01-07-2010 12:19 PM #10
      you should be extra hella flush and put a 225/40 on the your 18x11s

    12. Member
      Join Date
      Jun 25th, 2006
      Location
      NoVA
      Posts
      9,546
      Vehicles
      Entry-level luxury
      01-07-2010 12:33 PM #11
      I'm not concerned with handling and performance. It's a 328xi.
      I'm already lowered on KW coilovers, as well as the other 1000 people on e90post.com, so this statement is garbage.
      Quote, originally posted by VR6 NRG »
      just dont try to lower the car, the whole half-shaft going through the middle of the oil pan thing puts a kabosh on any kind of sport suspension. Thats engineering for ya
      quattro FTW

      Quote, originally posted by msrothwell »
      you should be extra hella flush and put a 225/40 on the your 18x11s

      No. I'm asking about 245s on a 18x10" wheel.
      Quote, originally posted by strictlyA2 »
      You can get staggered fitment wheels on new x-drive BMW's.

      Yes, but my OEM tires are 225/45/17 and 255/40/17 which is a negligible difference in rolling diameter.
      I understand TCL doesn't like stretch, but I'm looking for actual, intelligent answers.


      Modified by Derek Zoolander at 11:35 AM 1-7-2010
      RSI, LLC | Fender Rolling | Suspension | Engine | Other Stuff

    13. Member
      Join Date
      Nov 19th, 2006
      Location
      Arden, NC
      Posts
      3,925
      Vehicles
      2009 BMW 328it
      01-07-2010 01:29 PM #12
      yea, I think that the 335xi with the sport package comes with 18x8.5 with 255/35R18 rear and 18x8 with 225/40R18, so I think thats what I'd go for. Last thing you want to do is have your AWD system blow up and then have your warranty voided because you ran the wrong tire size.

    14. 01-07-2010 01:33 PM #13
      You'd be better off balancing the handling with air pressure, than by fooling around with tire widths, imo.
      Put more pressure in the rear tires and they'll break free sooner than the fronts.
      I learned this trick when I used to auto-x my integra. I would jack all the tire pressures up, but the backs especially. It really enhanced the lift-throttle oversteer I could accomplish.

    15. Member
      Join Date
      Jun 25th, 2006
      Location
      NoVA
      Posts
      9,546
      Vehicles
      Entry-level luxury
      01-07-2010 01:42 PM #14
      Quote, originally posted by msrothwell »
      yea, I think that the 335xi with the sport package comes with 18x8.5 with 255/35R18 rear and 18x8 with 225/40R18, so I think thats what I'd go for. Last thing you want to do is have your AWD system blow up and then have your warranty voided because you ran the wrong tire size.

      But I want to run a 245 for fender clearance. I'm not asking for tire size suggestions. I know what I should run. I'm asking about the consequences of variation between front/rear rolling diameters.
      RSI, LLC | Fender Rolling | Suspension | Engine | Other Stuff

    16. Member
      Join Date
      Nov 19th, 2006
      Location
      Arden, NC
      Posts
      3,925
      Vehicles
      2009 BMW 328it
      01-07-2010 02:51 PM #15
      Quote, originally posted by Derek Zoolander »
      But I want to run a 245 for fender clearance. I'm not asking for tire size suggestions. I know what I should run. I'm asking about the consequences of variation between front/rear rolling diameters.

      Hate to say this then, I think you bought the wrong size/offset wheels if you can't fit the OEM size tire in the fender.

    17. 01-07-2010 02:58 PM #16
      Quote, originally posted by Derek Zoolander »
      But I want to run a 245 for fender clearance. I'm not asking for tire size suggestions. I know what I should run. I'm asking about the consequences of variation between front/rear rolling diameters.

      Pull your fenders.
      What you want us to say is your car will be fine, but no one has the experience to be sure, so bottom line you run the risk of damaging your drive line.

    18. Member
      Join Date
      Jun 25th, 2006
      Location
      NoVA
      Posts
      9,546
      Vehicles
      Entry-level luxury
      01-07-2010 03:15 PM #17
      Quote, originally posted by msrothwell »
      Hate to say this then, I think you bought the wrong size/offset wheels if you can't fit the OEM size tire in the fender.

      Wow. I didn't buy the wheels. There is no right or wrong offset, just recommended. My stock rear tires are 255s. I can fit anything up to 285s. Does that mean I bought the wrong wheels?
      Don't you realize that people run aftermarket wheel/tire setups larger than stock?
      E90 rear fenders are super thick. Pulling would require extra bodywork.


      Modified by Derek Zoolander at 2:20 PM 1-7-2010
      RSI, LLC | Fender Rolling | Suspension | Engine | Other Stuff

    19. Member
      Join Date
      May 27th, 2008
      Location
      Malvern, PA
      Posts
      7,856
      Vehicles
      '19 5500, '15 1500, '98 5.3L TJ, '01 DT466 4700LP
      01-07-2010 03:16 PM #18
      Quote, originally posted by Derek Zoolander »
      I'm asking about the consequences of variation between front/rear rolling diameters.

      It sounds like you understand that your transfer case will be working constantly to overcome that "-1.352%" from your first post.
      I doubt it would explode the first day. I also doubt it would last as long as one riding in a car with balanced corners. There's so many other variables, a definite answer really isn't possible.

    20. Member strictlyA2's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 27th, 2002
      Location
      VA
      Posts
      2,241
      Vehicles
      1990 4Runner 1986 Quantum Syncro x2 1991 318is 32v
      01-07-2010 06:10 PM #19
      Quote, originally posted by Derek Zoolander »
      I understand TCL doesn't like stretch, but I'm looking for actual, intelligent answers.

      Generally speaking, staggering wheels on an awd drive vehicle isn't recommended, from my experience (Volvo's especially) we would sell a set of four tires if there was a variance in tread depth alone. BMW's come from the factory with very specific tires, not just specific sizes but literally specific tires. If you are staggering a set of tires that BMW does not normally fit (even as a factory option) you are pretty much on your own if you are wondering what will roll equally front to back etc.
      The Car Lounge is the last place I would seek advice for something like this, its a silly place unless you want to be insulted, applauded, berated, praised, personally attacked and left with a feeling of regret after only a few thread replies. If I were a woman I would equate the feeling of posting technical questions in TCL the same way I would feel entering/ exiting an abortion clinic.
      Give the Tire Rack a call, they are quite helpful when it comes to stuff like this.
      Quote Originally Posted by themagellan View Post
      ac blowing out them snow flurries' duh.

    21. Member
      Join Date
      Jun 25th, 2006
      Location
      NoVA
      Posts
      9,546
      Vehicles
      Entry-level luxury
      01-07-2010 06:17 PM #20
      I've got a thread over on e90post. I was just curious because there are some knowledgeable people here.
      RSI, LLC | Fender Rolling | Suspension | Engine | Other Stuff

    22. Banned justanotherusername's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 26th, 2007
      Location
      Palm Beach, FL
      Posts
      26,016
      Vehicles
      '08 135i, '00 4runner, '85 Huntsman (Toyota) RV
      01-07-2010 06:29 PM #21
      By doing this, the ECU is going to sense the differences in rolling diameters as wheel slip. That part is a given.
      The question is, is it enough slip for it to try and do something about it? If this passes the thresholds where the xDrive system is going to try and shift power from one end to the other, it's going to cause damage for sure.
      If it's not past that threshold, it's going to lower the amount of real world slip it takes to reach the threshold, and it could possibly cause damage, especially when it happens on dry roads.
      Personally I wouldn't attempt to run tires with different rolling diameters on an AWD car under any circumstances. The systems needs everything spinning at the same speed to work properly.

    23. 01-07-2010 06:30 PM #22
      Quote, originally posted by Derek Zoolander »
      knowledgeable people here.


    24. Member Murderface's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 12th, 2006
      Location
      PA
      Posts
      5,275
      Vehicles
      2001 Porsche Boxster S
      01-07-2010 07:10 PM #23
      Quote, originally posted by Derek Zoolander »
      I've got a thread over on e90post. I was just curious because there are some knowledgeable people here.

      Here's what I think...I know AWD has to have some amount of rolling diameter difference tolerance built in to account for tire wear, so you ought to be able to get away with a little difference. You said the difference in rolling diameter would be .3" which = 9.6/32". Most tires come with 7/32 - 9/32" tread depth. Therefore what you're doing would be roughly equal to running identical tires all around but with two brand new tires and two tires with a bit less than half tread. Hard to say whether that'd be liable to damage something or not.
      BMW should tell you if you ask them. Someone in the TT forum emailed Haldex asking about quattro's tolerance for the same thing and they responded that it's around 4%...which is something like 3/4" if I remember right.
      I wouldn't risk breaking expensive things like AWD systems just to have my car slamd on its nutz, but I guess some Mk4 habits don't leave even after you sell the car and replace it do they?


      Modified by Murderface at 6:11 PM 1-7-2010

    25. 01-07-2010 08:16 PM #24
      Don't have to take my thought seriously since I'm a complete AWD noob, but here it is:
      Having skinnier tires than stock at the rear will induce more oversteer since there's less contact patch, causing the rear tires to break away sooner than stock. Setting yourself in a situation of hard fast cornering, the ECU will sense the slippage and will adjusts the power applied on the wheels of whichever axle it is designed to adjust. To neutralize the car, the ECU would have to make action of understeer.
      If the power is adjustable at the rear wheels, the ECU would lower the power at the rear; if it's adjustable at the front, it would increase that; and if both, then somehow it'll have to find balance but that's too complicated of a system. Rear adjustable power would be safer and more practical since the car will slown down, it is easier to "breathe" off power than to apply more, and it is less stressful on the drivetrain. This is completely the opposite if it was front adjustable, but it's more fun since we're going at higher speed!
      Figure out how your system works and what your tolerances like others have mentioned. Whatever I said is completely theory and somewhat pulled out my ass...

    26. Member 2000JettaGLXVR6's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 17th, 2002
      Posts
      11,516
      Vehicles
      2016 A6 2.0T Quattro
      01-07-2010 08:17 PM #25

    Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •